Breaking the Mould
Many of us are familiar with the phrase “A Paradigm Shift” that gets spouted almost to the point of effeteness in popular parlance. It is used to denote a major altering of the way that we see, understand or perceive things. Many people assume its a phrase that comes out of popular psychology and business success literature. Truth be told it is thanks to master Kuhn that we have that phrase in popular usage as well as the accompanying perceptual leap that the phrase implies.
The word paradigm originally comes to us from the Greek word “deiknunei” which means to show or teach. So in essence the best way to understand a paradigm is to consider it as a ‘world view construct‘ that has been handed to you by the people that you learn from, be it teachers, parents, peers or role models. As one gets older we are able to create our own constructs as well, but in most instances our constructs or paradigms are just extensions of the ones we had before.
The thrust of Kuhn’s argument was that scientific research and thought, and by extension ‘scientific models’ are defined by
“paradigms,” or conceptual world-views. What happens is that scientists tend to accept these prevailing constructs as they are made up of classic experiments, formal theories and trusted methods and then by refining the assumptions that the paradigm is made up from they attempt to extend its scope.
The problem with this though, is that it doesn’t usually lead to any astounding breakthroughs because the very paradigm itself is determining the types of tools and methodologies that are being used and therefore ultimately the resultant outcomes . A simple way of looking at it is ‘ If I only measure oxygen in a square box I will come to the conclusion that oxygen is square, then I will spend the rest of my time figuring out how square it actually is’. My paradigm is therefore determining the outcome of my research. My data is confined by the limitations of the sphere of my perception.