There is a TON of science, studies, surveys, and data supports cause of Global Warming. I think there is an agenda behind the science Global Warming. The intention of this hub is to document the cases which the science was manipulated, altered, changed or forged, to fit into this left agenda. To prove that its not science at all that IPCC and other various groups or committees is conducting. I will document some of the scientist who have left the IPCC or spoke out against them and the Pro Global Warming debate as a whole. My intent is to persuade you into realizing that the Left and most Pro Global Warming hysteria is fueled by a liberal Left agenda for social control, and this is my evidence.

The following is how the IPCC has manipulated and alterd the science to fit it agenda.

"Consensus never proves the truth of a scientific claim, but is somehow widely believed to do so for the IPCC reports"

"An example of rampant misrepresentation of IPCC reports is the frequent assertion that ‘hundreds of IPCC scientists’ are known to support the following statement, arguably the most important of the WG I report, namely “Greenhouse gas forcing has very likely caused most of the observed global warming over the last 50 years.”

In total, only 62 scientists reviewed the chapter in which this statement appears, the critical chapter 9, “Understanding and Attributing Climate Change”. Of the comments received from the 62 reviewers of this critical chapter, almost 60% of them were rejected by IPCC editors. And of the 62 expert reviewers of this chapter, 55 had serious vested interest, leaving only seven expert reviewers who appear impartial.

Two of these seven were contacted by NRSP for the purposes of this article - Dr. Vincent Gray of New Zealand and Dr. Ross McKitrick of the University of Guelph, Canada. Concerning the “Greenhouse gas forcing …” statement above, Professor McKitrick explained “A categorical summary statement like this is not supported by the evidence in the IPCC WG I report. Evidence shown in the report suggests that other factors play a major role in climate change, and the specific effects expected from greenhouse gases have not been observed.”

Dr. Gray labeled the WG I statement as “Typical IPCC doubletalk” asserting “The text of the IPCC report shows that this is decided by a guess from persons with a conflict of interest, not from a tested model.” "

See more indepth information about whats stated above here: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/968

This next piece of evidence just destroys the crediblity of the IPCC. The scientist were actually caught FAKING the results. How much more damagin can they be to themselves?

"Climate scientists allied with the IPCC have been caught citing fake data to make the case that global warming is accelerating, a shocking example of mass public deception that could spell the beginning of the end for the acceptance of man-made climate change theories."

For the entire article see : http://current.com/items/89538911_ipcc-scientists-caught-producing-false-data-to-push-global-warming.htm

"An oligarchy is a

“form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class or clique; government by the few.”

This definition certainly fits with the IPCC, as illustrated by the closed meeting in which Gerald Meehl, Jonathan Overpeck, Susan Solomon, Thomas Stocker, and Ron Stouffer are organizing in Hawaii in March 2009. This meeting is reported at

Joint IPCC-WCRP-IGBP Workshop: New Science Directions and Activities Relevant to the IPCC AR5 [Tuesday, March 03, 2009 - Friday, March 06, 2009 at the University of Hawaii International Pacific Research Center Honolulu , Hawaii].

While the meeting is to be mostly self-funded [which means federal contracts and grants and other such sources will be used to pay for the trip], it raises the issue as to why such a remote location is chosen. Presumably the particpants should be concerned about the emission of CO2 into the atmosphere from the jet aircraft that will transport them to Hawaii."

They went to Hawaii on tax dollars. More info: http://climatesci.org/2008/07/24/climate-oligarchy/

"The IPCC would have us believe that its reports are diligently reviewed by many hundreds of scientists and that these reviewers endorse the contents of the report. An analysis of the reviewers’ comments for the scientific assessment report by Working Group I show a very different and very worrying story.”—http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org "

"Perhaps the greatest scientific deception of the IPCC is the abuse and misuse of computer climate models. They allow them to make their reports and deliberations appear credible. They allow them to bamboozle the public because computer models are a complete mystery to most people. Pierre Gallois explains, If you put tomfoolery into a computer, nothing comes out of it but tomfoolery. But this tomfoolery, having passed through a very expensive machine, is somehow ennobled and no one dares criticize it. "

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/3247 -This blue link contains volumes against the IPCC and the Global Warming debate, a crucial read.

"An analysis of the United Nations widely-touted 2007 IPCC Global Warming Summary for Policymakers by UK Lord Viscount Monckton has found 31 errors and exaggerations. New Report Finds Red-faced Errors by IPCC and Gore

" This Lord Viscount Monckton found a ton of manipulation and erros read what he has to say about the IPCC.

http://ff.org/centers/csspp/press/20070302_release.html

http://mclean.ch/climate/IPCC.htm

The sources cited contain MASS AMOUNTS of evidence against the IPCC, Check it out! :)

The above was just the IPCC here is evidence citing the "bandwagon" that the Global Warming Left is working on.

"NASA Study Shows Sun Responsible for Planet Warming " http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/nasa-study-shows-sun-responsible-for-planet-warming/

"One in seven scientist say colleagues fake data" -And around 46 per cent say that they have observed fellow scientists engage in “questionable practices”, such as presenting data selectively or changing the conclusions of a study in response to pressure from a funding source.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6425036.ece

"Freeman Dyson, one of the great physicists alive today, put it plainly enough in his autobiography:

"...all the fuss about global warming is grossly exaggerated. Here I am opposing the holy brotherhood of climate model experts and the crowd of deluded citizens who believe the numbers predicted by the computer models. ... I have studied the climate models and I know what they can do. ... They do a very poor job of describing the clouds, the dust, the chemistry and the biology of fields and farms and forests. They do not begin to describe the real world that we live in." http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/global_warming_as_pathological.html     "Climate of Fear
Global-warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence." http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220

The director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)…Was paid off by George Soros who gave him thousands of dollars to politicize the Global Warming issue Check this link out. http://www.veerite.com/2008/06/24/global-warming-kook-paid-for-by-george-soros/

Do a quick google search on James Hansen to read any of the thousands of mainstream media stories touting Hansen's claims of censorship by the Bush administration. This wouldn't be the first time credibility questions have been raised regarding Hansen and his alarmist claims  http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jake-gontesky/2007/09/26/global-warming-alarmist-james-hansen-shill-george-soros

I know this is rough but there is a ton of information out there, the real indepth info is in the blue links.