The Hitcher (A Dynamic Duo Dual Review)
56Watch the trailer
The original on DVD
|
The Hitcher
Price: $2.35
List Price: $5.98 |
This weekend, Njoke and Jason headed down to Jack London Square in Oakland for a late afternoon matinee. The last horror movie we saw, The Descent, was a bit disappointing. This movie, a remake of the 80s horror movie, The Hitcher, was the only major wide release for the weekend, which made our job of selection a bit easier.
A few disconcerting signs:
- Despite it being the weekend's only major release, the theater was empty. Granted, it was 5pm, so a bit early.
- Two of the other moviegoers were young mothers. How do we know they were mothers? Because they brought their young children. To a horror movie.
At any rate, let's discuss this one.
*Spoiler alert!* Plotlines and/or endings revealed below.
Have you seen this movie? We'd love to read your comments below!
Njoke responds:
Yes, but the moral of the story is "Don't let Jason choose the movie". One would think I would have learned my lesson after several iterations of Charlie's Angels and a generous offering of Strangers with Candy everytime I come over but apparently I haven't. I dont think this movie taught me anything other than Sophia Bush can't act but has killer legs. (By the way was I the only one who noticed how swiflty she progressed from a cute bunny slipper wearing coed to a shotgun weilding avenger...I mean, where does a college freshman learn how to shoot like that! no recoil even!) It also confirmed all of our suspicions that police brutality is becoming increasingly color blind and last but not least that if you leave your boyfriend to his own devices while you go to the bathroom he will do something terminally stupid in your absence. I'm saying!
Jason: I offer but never force!
Strangely enough, Njoke does find herself laughing beside herself whenever I pop ol' Jerri Blank into the DVD player...
I have to give a thumbs up on the morals you learned from the movie, Njoke...damn, such a cynic! ;-)
Jason: Was this a morality tale?
I can't help it...as I sat there shivering in my seat, my inner cynic kept on shaking me back to reality. Was this movie trying to temper the criticism that all gory thrillers get with a message that parents would approve of? I kept on thinking, "Don't pick up strangers", "Trust the police", "Fasten your seatbelt"...even "Don't sleep in the nude." (You know which scene I'm talking about, right?)
Are these meant to be subconscious messages to young, carefree viewers, or are they the product of a screenwriter's paranoid imagination? What say you?
Njoke responds: put some clothes on!
Jason says: Short attention spans
The panties & bra shots were all for the PG-13 crowd. But yeah, after the first time someone tried to knife me in my own car, I would probably not be able to sleep that night. Sophia's character was shaken for about 10 minutes, 15 tops, and then she was sleeping like a baby later. And how many butchered families would she have to see before she pulls the whole Hollywood diva thing (with pouting and scoffing) at the police station? Those were the kinds of things that reminded me in the middle of the movie that I was watching another poorly-done horror movie. Why couldn't she sustain visible fear until the end? But we can't only blame her. There was some piss-poor script writing, too. Would a character on the run from a relentlessly bloodthirsty killer be thinking about sex while hiding for her life in a hotel room?
Jason: Actor quality
Some horror flicks really ruin the fearful escapism they're supposed to induce when an actor or actress reminds you this is a Hollywood flick filmed in a backlot studio somewhere in Southern California. I have to say that I was not impressed with Sophia Bush's acting chops. Granted, her name is designed to bring over a sizeable audience through name recognition alone, and not showcase the broad range of dramatic talents she possesses. There was another horror flick, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, almost ruined by Eric Balfour (fortunately, he was offed pretty early).
Another thing that Sophia Bush brings are: breasts. Well, you know what I mean. There are plenty of gratuitous body shots, obviously appealing to a certain demographic that has an enormous overlap with fans of horror flicks...middle-aged lesbians. No, I'm kidding. But does everything that's supposed to appeal to teenage boys have to include scantily-clad girls running around. Is this something I'm going to have to put up with as a horror-film enthusiast?
Jason: I guess they had no choice
It's pretty much impossible to not know the basic premise of this movie before heading into the theater: the hitchhiker is a killer. So I guess it makes sense that they're not going to try to pull the wool over the audience's eyes. It's more like, "How long before these trusting teenagers wake up?" (I loved it when the boyfriend offers to give the guy a ride in the beginning, and people in the audience muttered "Stupid!")
But there were few tension-raising moments like that. For the rest of the movie, he killed first and asked questions later. Only the two main characters had any luck at avoiding his killing. I don't think the movie answers the story of "why" at all, which makes all that rushing to the end utterly pointless.
Njoke: Don't play with your food!
Jason: Maybe the movie was better than you thought
That's what a great horror movie does...it keeps you guessing throughout the whole movie. It's supposed to lead you down dozens of dead-ends and then shock you with an ending while you're still mired in other possibilities. I think our brain is wired to want to find a solution, to make sense, of something as soon as we're confronted with an illogical problem (someone spontaneously killing left and right is one of those irrational things that we always have trouble wrapping our head around). I think we want a solution too, because horror flicks are scary and we want relief from the anxiety as soon as possible (just like a part of you can't wait for an amusement park ride to be over as soon as you get on it).
I recognized the sherriff from Minority Report. Of course, the geek that I am, I googled and found it was the same guy: Neal McDonough. Yes, he's a little creepy-looking. I think that was the point.
Njoke: Unnecessary characters
Can you tell me what was the point of the sherriff in this movie? Well, other than adding some creepiness factor. I know I wasn't the only one that thought he looked like one of the children from Village of the Damned now all grown up. Now there was a decent horror movie...but I digress. In my mind, even the most poorly-written movies have to make have a smidgen of logic and I kept hatching several nefarious plots all througout this movie.
Plot #1: Hitcher uses the left behind cell phone to call up Grace's gal pals and take his reign of terror to their Spring Break spot in New Mexico (that by the way would have been a great movie!)
Plot #2Jim is really the son of the hitcher. They have been tag teaming this freeway for months and Grace is their next victim of terror. This would also explain why the hitcher has never used any of the many opportuities he had to kill them and why Grace cant tell the diff between Jim and Hitch in bed.
Plot #3: The waitress in the restaurant is in cahoots with the hitcher. Why else would she be act so suspicous and have them arrested. I mean I know I would freak if someone walked into my office covered in blood but I wouldn't assume that they were guilty. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Plot #4: Creepy sherriff is in cahoots with the hitcher and he gives him a key to escape while en route to the Albuquerque Prison.
Clearly I spent more time sitting in the theater thinking about plot lines than the director did during the entire production.
Maybe all the good scenarios ended up on the floor of the editing room.
Must-make-sense-of-this-bad-movie!
Jason: Hear, hear
Njoke: Horror movie don't
Look, I am not heartless. I don't have kids but I imagine a parent might go stir crazy some weekends while those little buggers bounce from wall to wall in a Cocoa Puffs-induced high. I also imagine that every once in a while you want to watch a show that is not animated or that does not come with its own action figure. I know good baby-sitters are hard to come by and some of them have stopped returning your calls. But for the love of god, you must accept that movies like The Descent and The Hitcher have ADULT themes. I don't want to have to cringe while your child stares wide-eyed at scenes of a young man getting torn limb from limb!
I don't want to imagine all the damage that is being inflicted to this young mind that is being exposed to motivation-free carnage and absorbing the subliminal message that killing is okay and, oh yeah, the police are your enemy (well maybe that one...it depends). I especially don't want your child to grow up to be a sick and twisted serial killer like the Hitcher and then tries to kill my future kids on the way to their future spring break. So please just don't do it. Over and out!
Jason: ....
What can I say? Don't watch a horror flick with me unless you want to be prodded, squeezed and pinched. I can't help it! If it's any consolation (and I doubt it is), I don't remember any of it at all. I was very much engrossed in the movie...except for the times that Sophia Bush talked.
Finally, I did put the original in my Netflix queue, and am interested in comparing it to the remake. Somehow, I think the first will have this second one beat, for two reasons:
- The first spawned not only a sequel (The Hitcher 2) but this remake 20 years later
- Remakes usually suck.
Njoke: Relax, it's just a movie
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub








