Top Ten Prehistoric Plants and Animals Found Alive in the Wild
78
What is a Lazarus Taxon?
Cryptozoology can be a very lonely pursuit.
To say that cryptozoologists (people who research undiscovered animals) get no respect is a grotesque understatement.
Animals like Bigfoot, Ogo Pogo, the Loch Ness Monster, and the Michigan Dogman, are considered by mainstream biologists to be legends, not real animals, and cryptozoology is considered to be pseudoscience, not a real science.
Cryptozoology is so reviled by some that it has spawned its own crew of passionate anti-cryptozoologists called Debunkers. If cryptozoologists sometimes do seem a bit flakey and irrational, Debunkers often sink to something like professional trolling and can be just as unreasonable.
A crankier, more self-righteous bunch of sourpusses is hard to find, and you really do have to wonder after awhile if the guy on the corner searching for Bigfoot is truly that big of a danger to society, or if something else is going on, something that has to do with known primates: namely, us.
Can't we all just get along? I mean, seriously: Lighten up you guys!
(A recent article I wrote about the Debunker/True Believer War instantly brought that very fight right into my front room--a result I found to be both funny and annoying.)
Sometimes cryptozoologists deserve at least some of the derision heaped upon them by skeptics and debunkers. The guy on the Quixotic quest that defies all reason can be combative and irritating too, and many cryptid researchers are less than scrupulous about their methodology and theories, yet quite aggressive in the defense of them.
Others, however, are gainfully employed within mainstream science and academia and are sincere, professional people who have become convinced that a specific cryptid (the animals cryptozoologists study) is the real deal. Many are careful and capable amateurs who make real contributions to real science by working out in the field on their own dime.
The fact that species formerly thought to be extinct actually do reappear is well-documented and has its very own name: Lazarus taxa.
Lazarus taxa (named after the fellow Jesus raised from the dead) are animals that disappeared completely from the fossil record, only to reappear millions of years later.
The hope of discovering a new Lazarus taxon is exactly the kind of thing that keeps cryptozoologists going in spite of all the abuse.
Ancient animals and plants vanish and then reappear with surprising frequency. The reason this happens is thought to be due to the effect of very low numbers on the work of paleontology. If animals or plants continue to exist but are fairly rare, we might not find fossils of them no matter how hard we look. The organisms are still be around, undetected for millennia, happily munching on this or that with only a few friends to keep them company.
The fossils disappear. The creatures don't.
Many cryptozoologists believe that certain cryptids are extinct species that have found a way to survive in very small numbers.
Lake Monsters are a cryptid category especially likely to be attributed to an actual reappearing species. The species most often mentioned is the Plesiosaur, a prehistoric aquatic animal with a long neck and fins that lived during the Cretaceous period and which disappeared from the fossil record about 65 million years ago.
Could a 65 million year old creature really have survived undetected in landlocked glacial lakes?
The Plesiosaur was a carnivorous animal and a large one, so it doesn't seem very likely that it would be able to find sufficient food in an inland lake. (Lake Champlain, the home of the 'Champ' lake monster is one notable exception).
But, stranger things have happened. Here are ten of them:
Ten Lazarus Taxa
- The Coelacanth. This large prehistoric fish was thought to have gone extinct 80 million years ago until a live specimen was found in 1938.
- Monoplacophora Mollusks. These innocuous shellfish from the prehistoric Devonian period (circa 380 million years ago) were found happily alive (well, however happy a mollusk can get) in deep waters off Costa Rica in 1952.
- The Pygmy Tarsier. This odd, gremlin-like animal was thought to have gone extinct 80 years ago, so technically the pygmy tarsier isn't a prehistoric animal, but it did make a big splash recently when a Texas A & M researcher found three of them alive and well in Indonesia.
- The Laotian Rock Rat. Another innocuous animal thought to be extinct for 11 million years. The Laotian rock rat waas rediscovered in 1996.
- The Lazarussuchus. I kind of like this name, and I like the whole idea of this animal. The Lazarussuchus is a very small crocodile common during late Triassic period. It was assumed to have gone extinct about 170 million years ago. So far two living varieties have been discovered, the first in 1982. A lazarussuchus is very small (a few inches long), which seems to me a good size for a crocodile to be.
- Gracilidris. This species of 20 million year old ant, thought to be extinct and nearly forgotten by ungrateful contemporary ants, was discovered alive in Brazil by a team of scientists in 2006.
- The Dawn Redwood. A small cluster of this extinct prehistoric redwood plant was discovered in 1944 in China by Zhan Wang. Dawn redwoods are gorgeous reminders of what the world looked like when dinosaurs roamed freely.
- The Wollemi Pine. This conifer was known only from fossils between 2 and 90 million years old until its rediscovery in 1994.
- The Chacoan Peccary. A peccary is a small piglike animal native to parts of South America. This particular one was only known from the fossil record until scientists discovered living specimens in 1975.
- The Mountain Pygmy Possum. This animal is Australia's only hibernating marsupial and was known exclusively from fossil records until its discovery in 1966. It is currently facing extinction once again due to global climate change.
How likely is it that cryptids are examples of reappearing animals that are simply (so far) eluding capture or verification of a life specimen?
It is completely possible that no cryptids are examples of reappearing animals. I think it is just as possible, however, that at least some of them might well be real animals that are either assumed to be long gone from planet Earth, or brand new animals that are present in small numbers in remote areas.
In the meantime, just knowing that such animals are regularly found and recognized within mainstream science is enough to keep cryptozoologists actively looking for more of them.
Now, when is Bigfoot coming to dinner? (I'll bring the salmon!)
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
Hey dohn, that would be awesome. I was surprised by how hard it was to find pictures of some of these guys. You'd think they'd be all over the net, but most of them, if they weren't at Wiki they weren't available (not without permission anyway0.
Very cool compilation! The mountain possum looks like a sugar glider! :)
You know what, Mellas Views? It does look like a sugar glider. Weird how so many of these are little animals. I'd be so impressed if they found a brontosaurus somewhere, or even a wooly mammoth. :)
Now that would be spectacular. I want to see a saber tooth found. Alive of course.
Yetti-nother great hub (sorry. . .)! I am constantly amazed by the numbers of new species of plant, animal, and insect that are discovered every year, so maybe it's not so unlikely that some which were believed to be extinct could have snuck in there among the ferns and hid out for a few thousand years, or even have re-evolved from the same source as before.
Arrrgggh! I love bad puns!
I've been having so much fun with these odd topics. I'm thinking of attending some conferences for fresh material, plus I think it would be a hoot. I'm also genuinely interested. Thanks for stopping by Teresa.
Mellas--If I find a saber tooth in my yard you are the first person I'm going to call. :)
Thanks a lot Pam. Prehistoric studies is one my favorite subjects. If you like cryptids visit the Coast to Coast AM website.
Thanks RV Daniels! I'll check that out. :)
This is great, thank you! I keep an open mind on cryptids, including the possibility that the legends turn out to be something completely different. Especially things like the plesiosaurid lake monsters -- they could be relicts or they could be convergent evolution. Porpoises. icthyosaurs and sharks all share the same general build, but are completely unrelated.
I prefer having an open mind to assuming either a) everything on the planet is known to science or b) the original versions of all legends are true as described. I applaud the researchers who do work to track down cryptids like the ones you just listed.
Hi Robert--I have those kinds of thoughts about cryptids too. One intriguing possibility that has been suggested for lake monsters is large sturgeon, which can look very exotic and do indeed come into such lakes on occasion. Thanks for stopping by. :)
I have never heard of the Michigan Dogman and I live in Michigan. Very intresting,..I looked it up on YouTube and Googled it,..Scarry. I'll think twice before camping again,..LOL Great Hub !!!!
Hi Army Infantry Mom,
I also wrote a hub about the Dogman:
http://hubpages.com/hub/The-Michigan-Dog-Man
It's really fascinating, especially the fact that it started out as a joke on the radio and turned out to be a very, very old story dating all the way back to before the white man came to this area of the U.S. So the joke ended up being on the jokesters! Creepy!
Really enjoyed reading about these strange survivors. Thank you, PGrundy
Such a good write up, really enjoyed it. Read the article in the Science Daily website - over 1000 new species found in the Mekong area, so there's still a lot of the critturs left out there to be found.
Hi Tom and Mountain Blossom! So glad you both stopped by. :)
Facinating stuff
Delightful read, certainly had never heard of a few of them. I think this world has a few more surprises for us in terms of these kind of discoveries.
Thanks Ethel and Jerilee! I wanted to be a paleontologist when I was growing up. I was one of those kids who collected fossils and loved it. :)
Fascinating hub. Thanks.
Very cool hub. I was reminded of a brief but rather amazing section in Bill Bryson's book In a Sunburned Country about a prehistoric ant discovered in Australia, lost for more than 40 years, and then rediscovered completely by accident 800 miles from the original site, when some researchers going to renew the search for the ant had mechanical problems with their truck!
There's an online account of the story here: http://www.tinglealley.com/?p=163
i love to watch MonsterQuest on the History channel. ive only know them once to find what they were looking for. and that was the greenland shark.
very cool--I think Loch Ness is real, or pretty neat at least. i would not however want to run into that pygmy tarsier thing in the woods, though....
Hi kerryg--Thank you for posting that link. That was incredibly cool. What a great life that would be, to work in the field like that! Great stuff. :)
Ecoash--I love Monsterquest too. They almost never find anything, and yet I'm still a sucker for those kinds of shows.
Hi Janetta--The one I think is most likely to be real is Sasquatch. But so far, no live animal produced. It always seemed to me that there is more than enough wild northern territory to support such an animal, and if it is intelligent it could elude us without problem. Thanks for visiting. :)
Great article. I had no idea about any of these species, except for one. The Wollemi Pine was found about 2 hours drive away from where I live, in the Blue Mountains. (It's named after the national park where the copse of trees is located). Recently, the authorities have started selling the Wollemi Pine trees in an effort to ensure the species stays alive. It's a good idea. Hopefully it'll work. :-)
http://www.wollemipine.com/index.php is where you can find out more.
Hi Hovalis--Cool website, thanks for the link! I wrote this (using different words) for another site in response to a discussion that was going on about what idiots cryptozoologists are. I thought, gee. That's a bit harsh. And I knew about the coelacanth, so I went looking for other examples and was surprised to find many. Thanks for stopping by. :)
LOL, the pygmy tarsier DOES look like a gremlin! :) Cool hub!
This was a lot of fun to read. I knew about most of the animals, but not about the Dawn Redwood.
Speaking of cryptozoologists, I had become quite excited over the CNN-covered Bigfoot discovery a few months back and was quite disappointed it turned out to be a hoax. The unscrupulous ones have kind of ruined the field's reputation.
Hi Arthur--That CNN bit disappointed me too. It was so mean-spirited, and I think it said way more about the hoaxers than about cryptozoology. I love all things weird and fantastic and have my reason, good ones I think, but they are rather more boring (the reasons) than just telling stories about it all and writing hubs like this. Thanks for your comment!
Pam, I love this stuff and listen to a radio show every Friday night (George Norry or something, Coast to Coast) where all kinds of people call in with some pretty wild stories. If you are looking for weird, that's the place.
I have a Dawn redwood in my back yard, fell in love with the fossilness of it - a beautiful tree and wound up writing a hub on the dawn redwoods.
I hope I don't find a pygmy tarsier in my dawn redwood. Those things are creepy.
Hi Dolores--I will check that out! I just started writing for Examiner.com on paranormal stuff, but HP people are so much friendlier. It's kind of weird over there. The money is good, but lots of crabby commentary and weirdness. I guess that's the internet in general these days. :)
Thanks for stopping by. I'm going to check out your Dawn Redwood hub, and yes, those pygmy tarsiers are WEIRD--the look like living Furbies.
A wonderful hub, Pam. Informative, entertaining, and, as always, on the mark. I was, however, disappointed not to find myself listed in your Top Ten Prehistoric Plants and Animals Found Alive in the Wild.
Q.
The Rhino has the appearance of a pre-historic animal too. Great article PG...
Quillographer--LOL! If you get to be on the list, so do I! Thanks for stopping by and for making me laugh. :)
Nancy--Rhinos do look like prehistoric creatures don't they? Thanks for commenting.
cooooooooooooool
and extra ordinary
I love this hub! I'm a freak lol when it comes to crazy animals and love to hear about them finding animals that they had previously thought extinct. God is amazing :)
Thanks Brian! :)
hey brian dude pgrundy dont believes in GOD.
Hi,
Lazarussuchus is not a crocodile. It is a choristodere (or champsosaur). These were fossil relatives of lizards and snakes. Furthermore, the picture you have linked is of Shinisaurus, the Chinese crocodile lizard. It is called so because of the way its scales resemble a crocodile, but not for any other reason. I always found it funny that we have two species of alligator lizard (Elgaria) in our native land, but neither greatly resembles an alligator any more so than any other lizard.
An otherwise interesting page, however, and I appreciate the image, I did not know Wiki had such nice images...
Cheers,
Nick
Hi, I decided to write a hub about my above comment-
http://hubpages.com/hub/Lazarussuchus-is-not-alive
You can see real pictures of Lazarussuchus and other fossil reptiles there!
i cant draw this
































dohn121 says:
4 months ago
A very entertaining hub, Pgrundy, I especially like the Laotian Rock Rat, as he hails from my country of birth! I'm going to see if I can find a pic for you. Thank you for sharing.