create your own

Vaccines and Autism-What is not being told to you

69
rate or flag this page

By J D Murrah

The Pertussis (whooping cough) Vaccine

There are many vaccines that the medical establishment recommends. The following information concerns the Pertussis vaccine, which is one of those recommended. It is not meant as medical advice. Every consumer needs to investigate the matter for themselves and draw their own conclusions. The Pertussis vaccine is known to cause irritation of the brain and neurological system. There is also the potential danger of Thermisol, a mercury derivative often used as a preservative in vaccines.


Clinical examples of pertussis (whooping cough)

Pertussis Information Video


Brief History of the Pertussis vaccine

Vaccine development was in high gear in the 1920’s and 1930’s. Whooping Cough, which had been declining in numbers was a identified as a significant health problem. Many in the medical community saw it as a public health issue that needed to be addressed through mass vaccinations. What was not known was at what age the vaccinations should begin and how much to give the children.

Early researcher, Louis Saur was a proponent of mass vaccination. In his research which he published in 1941, he observed that only 27 percent of the population of 89 babies he administered his vaccine to had developed the antibodies needed for protection when vaccinated earlier than three months. Based on this he recommended that the vaccination begin no earlier than seven months.

Saur’s findings led to a great debate. Many physicians considered whooping cough so dangerous that vaccination needed to begin earlier believing that partial protection was better than none at all. The problem was eventually settled by recommending that the initial shot be administered at two months, followed up with booster shots given at four months, six months, eighteen months, and between the ages of four and six years.

Europe pursued a different course and chose to begin vaccinations after six months of age in order to allow improved antibody response.

The United States never performed their own clinical trials in the States concerning the safety of the pertussis vaccine regarding it being safe and effective. Instead, the US policy was based on research conducted by the British Medical Research Council. The Council conducted trials on the safety of the vaccine on a population of 50,000. The council determined the vaccine was safe for children. The majority of the children were 14 months of age and older. The United States based its policy on those findings and concluded the vaccine was safe for babies two months old. What is not addressed is the significant difference in body weight between a two month old and a fourteen month old.

First, the linkage between vaccines and death was signaled in 1933 by a researcher named Thorvald Madsen in Copenhagen. He observed that two babies died immediately after receiving the vaccination shot.

In the United States, physicians during the 1930’s observed some children experienced fevers, convulsions and collapse. The physicians noted these reactions, yet believed that the greater good served by the vaccine for whooping cough was insignificant compared to these reactions in segments of the population.

In the 1940’s researchers Werne and Garrow documented the death of identical twins within 24 hours after receiving their second recommended shot in 1946. Researcher Matthew Brody a year later described two cases of brain hemorrhaging leading to death after the shot.

In 1948, Randolph Byers and Frederick Molls of the Harvard Medical School conducted a small study of 15 children who reacted violently after receiving the vaccination. The children had been healthy prior to the shots and within 72 there were severe symptoms. The medical community was displeased by the article when it was published. Prior to that time, the literature had considered the vaccine relatively safe from side effects.

In 1955, Niels Low with the Department of Neurology at the University of Illinois observed that the EEG of some infants changed after being given the pertussis vaccine. His report said’ “mild, but possibly significant , cerebral reactions occur in addition to the reported very severe neurological changes”. As research continued, the number of reaction cases increased. The possible reactions were called, “notifications” . The number of these notifications was 30,000-90,000 by the late 1950’s.


Possible Adverse reactions and contraindications

Note: These are reactions some people have reported after the vaccine was administered. In these cases, the child had not previous history of such disorders, which appeared within 72 hours of the vaccine. Although some researchers claim the number is one in 1,750 children, some research suggests this number may be one in 333 children. Many of these reactions are of the type that parents report shortly after administration of the vaccine. Longer term reactions are not often reported or included.

The CDC form given to parents for pertussis vaccination states, “Sudden unexplained infant deaths have occurred rarely after vaccination, but it is not known whether this has been caused by the vaccine.” The inclusion of such a warning indicates that there are some risks. The number of reactions varies due largely to a lack of a clear definition of what ‘vaccine damage” is.

Possible adverse reactions include:

  1. Skin reaction
  2. Fever
  3. Vomiting and Diarrhea
  4. Cough, runny nose and ear infection
  5. High pitched screaming and persistent crying
  6. Collapse or shock-like episode
  7. Excess sleepiness
  8. Seizure disorders (including convulsions and epilepsy)
  9. Infantile spasms
  10. Loss of muscle control
  11. Blood disorders (thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia)
  12. Diabetes and hypoglycemia
  13. Learning disabilities and hyperactivity

One area of vaccine information that rarely makes it to the public is that not everyone is a good candidate for vaccination. Some of the contraindications of pertussis immunization include:

1. Personal or familial history which contains convulsions or neurological problems

2. A family member who reacted to the vaccine

3. History of cerebral irritation.

4. History of severe allergic reactions

5. Chronic illness or recent severe illness

As with any decision concerning your health, consider the information available. Discuss the issue with your doctor, study the issues for yourself. When it is your child, you need to weigh the information carefully.

Head of CDC on CNN addressing the Autism-Vaccine Link

Vaccine Autism cover up regarding thimerisol

More on Vaccine-Autism Link: Government Admission

Mercury in vaccines and autism by Dr. Boyd Haley

Military cover up of vaccine reactions-(Removed by You Tube-Surprise?)

An October 2009 Report on Vaccines and Autism Rates

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

patty_inglish@yahoo.com  says:
18 months ago

I had the Pertussis vaccine, but it wore off - As an adult, I have had whooping cough twice!

I remember a lot of vomiting after childhood vaccinations as well.

Thanks for the Hub!

Patty Inglish, MS profile image

Patty Inglish, MS  says:
18 months ago

I had the Pertussis vaccine, but it wore off - As an adult, I have had whooping cough twice!

I remember a lot of vomiting after childhood vaccinations as well.

Thanks for the Hub!

(erase my first comment - sign in did not sign in. lol)

J D Murrah profile image

J D Murrah  says:
18 months ago

The Pertusis, like all vaccines poses some difficult choices. What is becoming clear is that some people show severe reactions to it. Knowing the contraindications is key to making the choice for what is right for your child and yourself is key. The vaccine does not always produce the antibodies in sufficient numbers to provide immunity for life.

Thanks for stopping by.

Patty Inglish, MS profile image

Patty Inglish, MS  says:
18 months ago

Yes, once we thought vaccinations to be the "cure alls", but we were wrong.

J D Murrah profile image

J D Murrah  says:
18 months ago

People forget that medicine is STILL an inexact science that does not have all the answers. This is very apparent with psychiatric medications. At one time Thorazine was seen as a wonder drug, and now few people have even heard of it. Electroshock and insulin shock therapies were all the rage at one time and are now seen as harsh. Doctors once said cigarettes were helpful, and now...

donnaleemason profile image

donnaleemason  says:
18 months ago

Personally I think the FDA is paid off. I think they do a lot of damage. Look at the many so called safe meds that have to be taken off the market after they have been approved by them and many people have suffered as a result of taking them.

I am 100% sure that my two son's Autism was caused by their vaccinations.

I was told by the physician that I had no choice in the matter. Later I found out that I did and as a result have chosen not to vaccinate.

Parents need to know that they do have a choice and even delaying the immunisations until the child's immune system is better able to cope with them could mean the difference between a healthy child and one that is impaired.

J D Murrah profile image

J D Murrah  says:
18 months ago

Donnaleemason,

I think you are on to something. There are many questionable actions they engage in. I agree that parents need to know they have a choice. There are some in the medical establishment that keep the public in the dark on such matters. The immunization episode in Meryland a while back is a prime example.

In Texas, we had the HPV vaccine episode. Truly that was a dangerous vaccine that was unecessary and the government was attempting to force it on the people as a whole.

I have seen what can happen first hand. Since my experience we have had to deal with a few militant physicians. We stood our ground and everything turned out well. The physicians often resorted to threatening comments until they saw that we were not backing down and we knew what we were talking about.

I hope that through the Hub and other places, parents wake up to the fact that they do have a choice and that they need to be informed.

Stacey  says:
8 months ago

My son was vaccinated at 2 months old and reacted 2 days after his injection. High pitched scream, crying for 10 hours...yet the nurses & doctors refused to believe me, since he was reacting 2 days later. They told me if he was reacting, he'd react the day of, or the day after...not 2 days later.

We refused any more immunizations until he was older. Now, at age 5, we took him back, but refused the MMR & DTP. I decided to give him the polio, Hepatitis B and Chicken pox...and again, he's reacting to them. Wheezing, hoarsness and dizziness.

NEVER AGAIN!

Vaccinations are not good for everyone. For example, Peanuts are healthy...filled with lots of protein...and good fats...HOWEVER, not everyone can eat peanuts...some people are ALLERGIC to them. The same thing goes for vaccinations...they are not meant for all people.

J D Murrah profile image

J D Murrah  says:
8 months ago

Stacey,

Your story is more common than I would like. In my own family, we saw dramatic reactions with our son. At first we thought it was coincidence. When the pattern occurred again with our second son, we woke up to what was going on.

Vaccinations are not the safe injections that they are portrayed to be. Although the medical establishment continues advocating them, they are not problem free. I was reminded of this with the recent story about how Merck devised a list of doctors to be 'neutralized' who were critical of their products. http://digg.com/u11jxo

FMDiMeglio profile image

FMDiMeglio  says:
7 months ago

The NUMEROUS vaccines are biologically active, and yet they are unnatural and foreign to the body. So when the body THEN reacts as if it is infected with disease (via immune responses/antibodies), is it not diseased/ill/damaged/infected to some extent? All of these NUMEROUS and altered/unnatural immune responses/vaccinations will eventually compromise our immune function. The answer is common sense and simple, and there is no way around this. Frank Martin DiMeglio (author)

J D Murrah profile image

J D Murrah  says:
7 months ago

Frank DiMeglio,

You are correct in your statement. Our bodies react in some way to all the substance injected into it. Vaccines are dangerous for several reasons. 1) the substances included in the vaccines (with greater danger with the 'live' vaccines). 2) the amount of the substances in the vaccines. Since children are the targets of the largest number of vaccines, the amount of chemical is extreme for thier young bodies.

What makes the danger more insidious is that all this damage is done in the name of "public health".

FMDiMeglio profile image

FMDiMeglio  says:
7 months ago

Also consider: The vaccines (viruses and bacteria) are altered and unnatural; AND the disease/infection process is fundamentally different as well (via injection). This is all very significant, in keeping with everything else that can be/has been said.Understanding that autism meets the definition of a disintegration and contraction of being and experience is very helpful in understanding, preventing, and treating this disorder. The increasing numbers of vaccines and the rising rates of disorders involving mind/emotion/body are of very serious concern.

The NUMEROUS vaccines are biologically active, and yet they are unnatural and foreign to the body. So when the body THEN reacts as if it is infected with disease (via immune responses/antibodies), is it not diseased/ill/damaged/infected to some extent? Also consider, all of these NUMEROUS and altered/unnatural immune responses/vaccinations will eventually compromise our immune function. Life is fragile, as it is delicately and precisely regulated and balanced. Artificially reconfigured/replaced sensory experience (including pollution, toxins, processed foods, television, vaccines, etc., etc.) is making us increasingly unconscious and reactive in various and unpredictable ways. We are becoming more inanimate. Frank Martin DiMeglio

J D Murrah profile image

J D Murrah  says:
7 months ago

Frank,

People often forget that injecting foreign substances directly into the body is a danger. Such an invasive proceedure upsets that natural balance of things. It also bypasses natural defenses the body has. When the vaccines are made of material that has been 'tweaked' in a labratory the potential danger is even worse.

Thank you for contributing to the dialogue on vaccines.

FMDiMeglio profile image

FMDiMeglio  says:
6 months ago

Hi JD, also note the following please. It is most important to this discussion.The reconfiguration, replacement, and loss of sensory experience (and feeling) includes toxins, vaccines, lack of exercise, processed foods, television, etc., etc. This is making us increasingly unconscious and reactive in various and unpredictable ways; and this involves sensory processing disorders as well.

Autism is a disintegration, contraction, and detachment of being and experience (including consciousness). This also meets the definition/description of anxiety, depression, cancer, obesity, sleep disorders, and the experience of television. The NUMEROUS vaccines are biologically active, and yet they are unnatural and foreign to the body. So when the body THEN reacts as if it is infected with disease (via immune responses/antibodies), is it not diseased/ill/damaged/infected to some extent? Moreover, all of these NUMEROUS and altered/unnatural immune responses/vaccinations will eventually compromise our immune function, and worse. We are becoming more inanimate. The natural and integrated extensiveness of being and experience go hand in hand, as the disintegration, contraction, and detachment of being and experience go hand in hand as well.

J D Murrah profile image

J D Murrah  says:
6 months ago

FMDemeglio,

Thank you for your valuable addition to the hub. Any chemical we take directly into our bodies has some potential for danger. In the case of vaccinations, the danger is high. Since the chemicals involved with vaccines impact the nervous system they are particularly onerous. I have another hub where I deal with the dangers of MSG. I tried to keep this hub focused on the vaccine and autism link.

Kim Garcia  says:
3 months ago

Extremely informative and quite disturbing. I wonder what side effects people will experience with the Swine Flu vaccination? Thanks for enlightening us!

Peace! ~K

J D Murrah profile image

J D Murrah  says:
3 months ago

Kim,

Thank you for stopping by. From reading your profile, you are aware of many health issues. The Swine Flu is one that concerns me. My concerns are several.

1. They have not tested the vaccine enough to know the correct dosage. Part of the early programs is using kids as guinea pigs to find out the correct dosage.

2. In order to stretch the number of useful vaccines, they have added attenuators (substances that enhance the effects of the vaccine). One of those is attenuators is squalene. Squalene has been implicated in links with Epstein-Barr type symptoms http://autism-prevention.blogspot.com/2009/08/this There is also evidence that it is the substance that may have triggered many gulf-war symptoms. The situation will also be worsened since statins (lipitor, etc.) inhibit the effectiveness of squalene. In other words, it interferes with it.

3. There is also some concern about cancer cells being mixed into the vaccine. http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Drug/

Since I am still sorting through the research, I do not have all the firm answers to my concerns that I would like. What I do know is that the vaccine is dangerous. The potential dangers at present outweigh the benefit of the vaccines as they are presently composed. I imagine I will do a hub on the topic in the future.

Best Regards

Kim Garcia  says:
3 months ago

Thank you so much JD for your prompt and informative answers. This is what I was afraid of. I suffered with the Epstein-Barr Virus for 12 years, do not care to go down that road again!! I'm well on my way to full recovery, praise God, but this Swine Flu has many people terrified. And many are reluctant to get vaccinated as am I for sure. Thank you again for these links, I will check them out!! Peace n' Blessings! ~ K

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites


A Shot in the Dark A Shot in the Dark
Price: $6.45
List Price: $14.95

Latest News on Children's Vaccines

working