Was The United States Founded As A Christian Nation?

60
rate or flag this page

By David Bowman



Many believe that the United States is a country founded on the Christian belief system; but, is this true? To answer this question definitively the Treaty of Tripoli is an often invoked piece of historical documentation that many believe unequivocally states that the United states is not a Christian nation. Authored by diplomat Joel Barlow and signed by president John Adams, the Treaty Of Tripoli states the following:

"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries." [emphasis added]

In an article about the Treaty of Tripoli the online encyclopedia Wikipedia describes the response to the treaty among senate members based on the official record:

Official records show that after President John Adams sent the treaty to the Senate for ratification in May 1797, the entire treaty was read aloud on the Senate floor, and copies were printed for every Senator. A committee considered the treaty and recommended ratification, 23 of the 32 sitting Senators were present for the June 7 vote which unanimously approved the ratification recommendation.

It doesn't seem as though the president or the senators involved objected in any way to the wording of the treaty. It's unlikely that the president and legislative members of the government would have chosen to unanimously ratify a treaty that specifically states that the United States is not founded on Christianity if it were not true.


Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson

The wall of separation between church and state

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. - Thomas Jefferson[excerpt from a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, 1802]

The founding fathers were first and foremost secularists who envisioned a country where the laws are not dictated by the authority of the church or where the church is under the authority of the state. One need not look any further than the first amendment in the constitution to see that it looks on religion, of any kind, with indifference. The first amendment has this to say about religion:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."[emphasis added]

If the United States was founded with the intention of establishing it as a Christian theocracy why would the constitution establish a clause prohibiting a religious test as a requirement for anyone seeking public office? Below is an excerpt from article six section three of the constitution that contains the religious test prohibition:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.[emphasis added]

Although, the Declaration of Independence does make reference to natures god, creator, and divine providence in some parts, these references reflect more of a deistic view of god. The Declaration of Independence makes no mention of Christianity, Jesus, or the Bible and this should be no surprise since the declaration was, after all, written by Thomas Jefferson, a deist. Some of the most notable figures who founded this nation were also deists among whom were: George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, and James Monroe.

Supporters of the idea that the founders intended the United States to be a Christian nation sometimes make reference to the "In God We Trust" printed on American currency or the "Under God" in the pledge of allegiance to make their case. The "In God We Trust" on American currency was added in the fifties by president Eisenhower in an effort to rally Americans against "godless communism" during the Cold War. The "Under God" in the pledge of allegiance was also added during this period for the same reason.

Notice that all mentions of god in the constitution, on currency or in pledges, never place god in any specific religious context. It is clear from all of the historical evidence and the express indifference to religion in the constitution that the founding fathers did not intend to establish the United States as a Christian theocracy.

Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

Paraglider profile image

Paraglider  says:
8 months ago

David - interesting details re Eisenhower & in God we trust. I didn't know that previously. The rest was pretty familiar but it does nothing but good to keep reminding people of the deliberate separation of church & state.

pgrundy profile image

pgrundy  says:
8 months ago

Thank you for this excellent and to the point article. You wouldn't believe how many people here at HP passionately believe that the U.S. was founded as a Christian nation, despite abundant evidence that the founding fathers took pains to make sure it wasn't any such thing. I imagine you'll be hearing from some of them shortly...

It's really maddening.

David Bowman profile image

David Bowman  says:
8 months ago

Paraglider - glad to know that I helped someone learn something new.

pgrundy - You're quite welcome. It is an important topic which is why I felt compelled to write about it.

Thank you both for taking the time to read my article.

Tricia Lee profile image

Tricia Lee  says:
7 months ago

David-excellent hub and history lesson. I love learning facts on this subject (Church/State). It helps me stand my ground when talking to christians. Thank you

David Bowman profile image

David Bowman  says:
7 months ago

Tricia Lee - Glad you liked it. I think the constitution speaks for itself on this issue. Thanks for reading my hub.

Bibowen profile image

Bibowen  says:
5 months ago

To answer the question to your title, "yes" it was. I have a hub that addresses the Treaty of Tripoli. As for the "wall of separation," it is not a part of the original intent of the Constitution. As for the lack of mentioning "Jesus," or "Christianity,' "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence." The name of "God" is not mentioned in the book of Esther in the Bible, but no one would argue that Esther is a "secular" text. A text that does not make an explicit mention of God is not by default "secular" or "godless." As for Article VI's prohibition on religious tests and the Establishment Clause, both can be understood in light of state religious establishments that existed at the time of the founding. They have nothing to do with wanting to "keep religion out." They had to do with rivalries among Christian sects, and not rivalries between believers and unbelievers.

Thanks for addressing this important topic.

David Bowman profile image

David Bowman  says:
5 months ago

There are obviously different schools of thought on this issue or else this would not be an issue. I have no interest in challenging your statement; I will leave it up to the reader to come to his or her own conclusion on this subject. Thanks for the comment and for adding some balance to this important topic.

dare4321  says:
4 months ago

While Thomas Jefferson was President, he allowed church services to be held in the capitol building and even the Supreme Court. He also used money from the treasury to fund chrisian missionaries to the native americans. Also in the Supreme Court you will find pictures of the Ten Commandments and many more references to the Bible. Obviously it wasn't their intent to remove religion from the government but to remove the government from telling the people how they should worship.

David Bowman profile image

David Bowman  says:
4 months ago

I'm not sure about Jefferson funding missionaries to proselytize to Native Americans; that could very well be. I have no doubt that Thomas Jefferson probably saw something good about Christianity. Perhaps he saw Christianity as a good moral philosophy, something to "tame" the natives so to speak. However, I know he himself did not believe in the Christian faith and even harshly criticized it as baseless. He is quoted as saying "I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition (Christianity) one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology."

It is true that you will find many references to Christianity even in government establishments. Christianity has had a heavy influence in American society and powerful lobbying power within the government. However, showing preference to a particular religion or any government sanctioned activities that support religion is unconstitutional.

I don't think it was the wish of the founding fathers to usher in a Christian theocracy. If that had been the case, we would see that clearly spelled out in the constitution.

dare4321  says:
4 months ago

I absolutely agree that their intentions were not to make a Christian "utopia" where the government endorsed it in the sense that everyone should be a christian or that you should at least be one to be in government. However judging from their their words and actions I don't see how anyone can say that the Bible has not been the main basis for the founding of this country, from the church services held in government buildings to the President being sworn in on the Bible. I believe their intentions were only to keep the government from mandating religion not from keeping religion from having any influence in the government. I think its apparent that they had no problem with religion having an influence in the government.

David Bowman profile image

David Bowman  says:
4 months ago

dare4321 - From time to time there have been religious presidents and members of the government who have attempted, and many succeeded, in creating a symbiotic relationship between religion and government. I just think that trying to bring religion into politics is unconstitutional for the reasons I stated in the article.

Just to let you know, the president is not required to be sworn in on the Bible and is not required to utter the words "so help me god." It is not part of the official oath of office.

Thanks for reading and commenting.

dare4321  says:
4 months ago

yep no problem, I love a good debate. I appreciate it.

Things Considered profile image

Things Considered  says:
3 months ago

Great hub. Bookmarking it, and I'm sure I'll be linking to you often.

I knew way too much about the founding of our country and the men who were key in it before I ever seriously encountered christianity. This issue gave me my first clue that christians might not always be trustworthy, or accurate, or reasonable. Their emphatic lies on this issue alone prompted me to look much closer at everything else about christianity, and that -of course- could only lead a reasonable person in one direction. Away.

Keep talking.

David Bowman profile image

David Bowman  says:
3 months ago

Things Considered - Christians have long claimed this country as their own and have taken great pains to quote the founders out of context to support that notion. However, digging deeper one finds evidence much to the contrary. Most people aren't aware of most of the things I mentioned in the article. If they were, Christians wouldn't have a leg to stand on.

Thanks for reading and commenting.

someonewhoknows profile image

someonewhoknows  says:
6 weeks ago

In response to Bibowen's comment from above.

It's clear from your comment that you don't understand the true meaning of "Dieism" -a belief in God . This is not the same as "Thieism " - a belief in a particular religion .Religion - a system of formalized rites and practices.

Your comment that the Etablishment clause has nothing to do with keeping religion out of government affairs is not quite true.The intention of that clause was to prevent "any" Religion from claiming that the government was endorsing it and to prevent the government from endorsing any particular religion.

David Bowman profile image

David Bowman  says:
6 weeks ago

Thanks for your input someonewhoknows.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working