create your own

Watching Television

80
rate or flag this page

By Lisa HW



Why Do People Watch TV Instead of Doing Something More Productive?

Note: This Hub is written in response to the question, "Why do some people watch tv instead of reading a good book or growing themselves personally?" I'm sure this Hub has a somewhat defensive tone to it; but as someone who is not above watching the occasional television program, I find the presumption that people who watch television don't read or don't "grow themselves" not only incorrect, but just a little insulting. So, it is without any hostility, and yet admittedly with just a hint of defensiveness that I've put together this response to the question.


It is said that all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. For many people, watching a little television is a form of "play" (i.e., relaxation, entertainment, leisure). Watching television doesn't always mean not engaging in other, more productive, activities. In fact, those of us who are secure enough in knowing how much reading, "self-development" and "others-development" (i.e., raising children) we've done in our lives can often be quite confident in knowing how little some television viewing will detract from us, or our lives.

I, personally, have never been much of a television fan. Even so, I appreciate a good sitcom that makes me laugh, or the occasional good drama. Although, today, we have many sources of news, I still make it a point to watch at least one of the daily, local, news programs. Like so many other adults in the U.S., I'm a faithful viewer of the "talking heads" program, "Meet the Press" on Sunday mornings. Like so many other views, I make that pot of coffee and settle in to watch the program that not only is informative, but that helps me differentiate Sunday from other days in the week. (David Gregory is fine, but I still miss Tim Russert, almost a year after he passed away.)

The fact that put the morning news on during breakfast or settle in to watch the 11:00 p.m. news with a cup of tea doesn't mean I have not spent a whole lot of time, over the course of my life, reading or otherwise growing. In fact, after spending a lot of time in my youth, reading fiction; since I've been an adult I read primarily non-fiction, including many reference and text books. The fact that I watch two or three sitcoms a week doesn't mean that I don't socialize with friends, spend time exercising to my many fitness DVD's, write, think, or do any number of other things that would be considered "growing" myself, my family's well-being and closeness, and/or my life in general.

For me, when there's that evening when I just decide to stop doing all those other things I do, make that coffee or tea, and just settle in to watch the occasional hour-long drama; it is most often because I need a rest, and both want and need to just enjoy a good story.

My "life history" with television involves having watched it in the 60's, when I was still a kid and home evenings. Even then, I didn't "do nothing but watch tv". Still, I watched a lot of the shows that were on. I generally missed most television during the 1970's because I was single, working, and out most nights. Besides the usual "growing" that young people do, I used most of my other free time to read. I also missed most television in the 1980's (except for a nightly viewing of Nightline, and some morning exposure to Sesame Street and Mr. Rogers). My children were young in the 80's, and their television viewing was limited. I made time for the half-hour of Nightline each evening, as part of my "me time". In the 1990's I would watch a few programs with my kids, who were old enough to watch a couple of sitcoms most nights. It was "family time" for all us, which, in itself, can be a way of "growing" as people. It was in the early 2000's that my kids began graduating, and I found I had a little more time for myself. As a result, I developed the patterns I've describe above and stayed with them to this day. Even so, if anyone were to check out my Internet activity it would be clear that most of the television-watching I do is accompanied by a number of useful, practical, and even "growing" activities online.

The point is that not all television viewing involves someone settling in at 6:00 p.m., with a "tv tray" in front of him, and "vegging out" until bedtime.

I can't stand a lot of the junk that's on television these days. I have cable, but I can't stand a lot of what cable offers either. I didn't want my children spending a whole lot of time watching television when they were little. Still, it has its place, and watching television does not necessarily mean not "growing ourselves" or not reading. In fact, selective television-watching can help a person stay a little more informed, find those few laughs he can really use in this sometimes very sobering world, or just offer some plain, old, entertainment (which isn't such a terrible thing either). For my most recent birthday my son,knowing my approach to selective viewing, and, himself, a very selective viewer (and recent college graduate, as well as well balanced/"growing" individual) gave me the DVD set with the story of John Adams. Not all television- and DVD-watching is equal. I don't happen to believe that making the time to watch those DVD's has taken anything away from my otherwise well balanced, fairly "grown" (and still "growing") self.

While I'm ordinarily about the most selective viewer when it comes to identifying those few programs with "redeeming value" of some sort, I have a confession to make: As my stress level goes up, so does my need to find that leisure activity that will make no demands of my energy. That's not the worst of my confession. This is: Recently, I've discovered the "joys" of watching YouTube videos when I want to take a little time to relax and can't find anything I consider "watchable" on television. I'll look for either beautiful musical videos or else the funniest videos I can find, and before I know it my mood has either been lifted by music or laughter - and that, for the person dealing with the stressful days with which so many adults these days must, is, in itself, a form of "inner growth". All work and no play does make a Jack a very dull boy indeed, and watching television (or YouTube videos) is just another form of play. While my online writing is nothing more than hobby writing; and while it certainly doesn't come close to painting a picture of all the productive/"growing" activities in which I've engaged throughout my adult life; I have hundreds and hundreds of articles on line that would at least, I think, show evidence that, even as a television-watcher, that I'm not some "mindless vegetable" who hasn't engaged in productive thought, introspection, or reading.

When people are secure and mature, there is no need to fear that watching television will turn them into a mindless couch potato. As with everything else in life, television watching, too, is a matter of moderation, balance, and being selective.

Ralph Waldo Emerson said, "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." One may think it is inconsistent of me to generally not be a big fan of television and yet to both admit to watching it and also defend it. I like to think Emerson's words apply in this case. Besides, I also like to think that I'm far from being a "dull boy".


Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

shamelabboush profile image

shamelabboush  says:
8 months ago

I can't stand some of the junk shows on the television now either! I read at least 2 hours a day, and if time permits, I increase reading hours. But still TV is somehow useful. I personally watch news every morning before going to work. I watch some comedies and I love documentaries. The issue here is to balance between TV and Book bcz too much of everything is dangerous. Thanks dear Lisa for this hub.

Lisa HW profile image

Lisa HW  says:
8 months ago

shamelabboush, thank you. I agree about too much of anything. In fact, I think all the junk on tv actually kind of makes it "self-limiting" when it comes to anyone watching too much of it. :) Still, I do find those times when a particularly funny sitcom is just the kind of thing I need some days.

Minilady profile image

Minilady  says:
8 months ago

Nice hub. I am basically a reader but watch TV as well. There are some good programmes on even if there is a lot of rubbish too!

My grand dad always said "you should be the master of the book don't let the book be your master", becasue I used to forget everything when I began reading!

Like you said balance is the key.

Iphigenia profile image

Iphigenia  says:
8 months ago

I read more than watch - but I like to select good documentaries and love some sitcoms. I enjoy watching films on TV (usually a DVD) but have never and will never get into soap operas - they may be good, but I know so many people who 'just can't' miss and episode and even tape 2 weeks' worth when on holiday .... horses for courses I guess.

TV has a value - sometimes 'moving wallpaper' can be soothing ! Nothing beats holding, reading and getting lost in a book for me.

Lisa HW profile image

Lisa HW  says:
8 months ago

Minilady, it looks like you approach it as I do.  I've always been a "reading freak" too. When I was a kid my mother was actually worried about how much I was reading for a while. I just loved it. :)

Iphigenia, you're so right about "wallpaper" (I've been known to turn the sound way down, just to have some movement in a too-quiet room.)  My "rule" has always (with the exception of when the children were tiny) been "no tv on when it's daylight out".   Like you, I'm not the soap opera type (Although, when my premie baby was born in November years ago, I did mostly stay in the house with him that Winter.  I actually did start putting on soap operas, and I did kind of get into them a little.  Then Spring came, the baby was bigger - and it was out of the house for the two of us, thankfully.   :)  )

Feline Prophet profile image

Feline Prophet  says:
8 months ago

I definitely read more than I watch TV but it's a personal choice...got nothing to do with opting for more edifying activity! And when I watch television I sometimes choose the daftest things on offer...each to his own. Why be judgemental about it?

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins  says:
8 months ago

The best television watching for me is a show such as "Fraiser" that not only provides belly laughs (good for the soul) but also intelligent content; and documentaries (so one can learn about the world we inhabit). Like drinking, I think TV is best not done alone.

TV is insidious, however. It promotes a certain worldview to the unsuspecting. I see a concentration of certain themes such as: the great, normal gay guy way out of proportion to their actual numbers in real life; the black sage dispensing advice to the hopeless white folks; the happy promiscuous single people compared to the miserable married people; the ignorant, bigoted Christians; the incessant portrayal of fathers as the bumbling idiots.

It was vastly different in the 1960s when fathers were wise and families were a safe haven from the world.

Some say TV has no effect on people with its constant sax and violins. Makes me wonder why billions of dollars are invested in commercials if this is true.

Reading a book one uses much more of their own imaginative, creative brain than when watching TV—a largely passive activity.

And the talking heads on "news" shows usually don't know what they are talking about. Experts indeed.

Lisa HW profile image

Lisa HW  says:
8 months ago

James A. Watkins, I agree with just about everything you said - especially about documentaries and, above all, Frasier.   :)    Frasier was (I think, as do a lot of people I know) one of the best television shows ever.

I know the talking heads don't always know what they're talking about, but I enjoy watching anyway.   :) They sure beat "Wife Swap" and "Lose the Most Weight" (or whatever that show is). :)  

shibashake profile image

shibashake  says:
8 months ago

Television, books, cinema, art, comics, and computer games are simply different mediums of expression. They all can be used to express a variety of content including Shakespeare, romance stories, soap opera, reality stories, tragedy, science, news, porn, or whatever else. In my mind, no one medium is somehow nobler than another. Different people however will have different preferences as to which medium they enjoy more.

As for the "quality" of content, that is also in the eye of the beholder.

ParadigmShift... profile image

ParadigmShift...  says:
8 months ago

Well, those are all good and much appreciated answers to my question! Thank you Lisa HW for your response and insight. I personally don't like to watch too much Tv. I make it a reward for reading. I finish a book, I can watch a movie or some Tv. It's an incentive.

I do believe there are times when we need mindless entertainment (stress can make the mind tired), but personally, if it doesn't move me forward in life, I really can't afford to be investing my time into it.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working