We Aren't Leaving Iraq
68President Obama Extends Pull-Out Time to 19 Months
The New York Times revealed today that President Obama has extended the amount of time it will take for US forces to pull out to 19 months, originally his campaign promise guaranteed 16 months.
Obama has said that this current timeframe will continue unless "things get hot" on the ground in Iraq, implying that more time may be required to get the majority of US forces out of Iraq.
Sources at the State Department declared that "tens of thousands" of soldiers will stay in Iraq to safeguard Iraq and US interests in the area.
So we aren't getting out of Iraq, huh?
I completely called this one. I said we would never leave Iraq, just like Germany, Japan and South Korea. I just didn't seem like the United States to completely pull out of an area that it has expierenced conflict in. It seems that tens of thousands of troops will be stationed in western Iraq incase they are required to quell violence within, or outside the country.
It sounds kind of tyranical that we will stay there, but it does make sense. The sense is solidified after key figures within the Iraqi Government have requested to keep a US presense in Iraq. Ofcourse, these statement were private and eventually leaked to the US media. Iraqi Government officials deny this, and say the US must leave. Many spectators believe this is because the US presense in Iraq is unpopular, and a Iraqi government official seeking election would be a dead man if found to be supporting the US.
It all makes sense now.
IED In Iraq
Great Reads On The War In Iraq!
|
What Was Asked of Us: An Oral History of the Iraq War by the Soldiers Who Fought It
Price: $4.75
List Price: $14.99 |
|
|
Longitudes and Attitudes: The World in the Age of Terrorism
Price: $1.99
List Price: $14.95 |
|
|
Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2003 to 2005
Price: $7.00
List Price: $16.00 |
|
|
The Occupation of Iraq: Winning the War, Losing the Peace
Price: $10.00
List Price: $20.00 |
Life is Becoming Easier, Though Power Plays Still a Threat
The United States and Iraqi forces seem to have done a decent job in quelling some of the violence in Iraq. Military casualties are down, as are civilian casualties. IEDs, small-arms attacks and suicide bombing are still occuring within the Baghdad Metropolitan area and Mosul. Mortar and rocket attacks on US bases and Iraqi police stations are down, but still occur.
Morale is slightly higher now than a year ago in Iraq, although Morale is sagging in the north near Mosul. Power Vacuums are beginning to be sealed as border control is becoming better with Iran (where most arms seem to come in from), and elections are beginning to hold more value--thus increasing their popularity with the people.
Shia and Sunni tensions are still extremely high, yet Kurdish deaths are down and are largely unaffected by the ethnic and religious tensions raging across the country. US and Iraqi forces have proven to be no match for centuries old religious tension.
Mass Terminations Within Iraq Government
The New York Times also revealed today that up to 62,000 firings have occured due to public servants failing loyalty tests in Iraq. Whether these "tests" are arbitrary garbage, writen exams, literacy tests or merely feuds with certain peoples (kurds, shia, etc.), is unknown.
The "Big Red 1" Looks For Munitions
Resources on Iraq
- Iraq Index
Tracking variables of reconstruction & security in post-Saddam Iraq. - U.S.-Iraq War resources - Memorial Library - University of Wisconsin-Madison
- The Human Cost of the War in Iraq
- U.S. Intelligence and Iraq WMD
- The War on Terrorism: Post-Saddam Iraq
The War on Terrorism: Post-Saddam Iraq - War with Iraq Sources
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
We never should've been there. But we are and it defies common sense that we're having such a hard time getting out. How 'bout a reverse invasion? Just pick a day (like we did for the INvasion in '03) and just *leave*. 'Bye... See ya... Next stop: Fort Riley USA.
Isn't it strange that wars have always been because of "your" method" of religion is different from "my" way?
Who decided that the US would be the policeman of our world? Was that the Bush something-or-other Doctrine?
I'm not PRO War, but I think we have to stay until things stabilize a bit more. We can't take out existing government and leave warring factions fighting to fill the void. The country would probably end up with a leader more vile than Sadam.











C. C. Riter says:
10 months ago
Not surprising to me at all.