What If? : Questions in Subjunctive History
73
What if?
All of us (or at least, the most of us) have encountered this question (or theory) sometimes in our lives. Oh yes, we all understand that living in the past has no use, that you cannot drive ahead by looking into the rear view mirror. Yet the fact remains, at one stage or the other in our lives, we tend to ask ourselves: what if? What would have happened if I had taken up that job instead of this one, wouldn’t I be happier? What would have happened if I had reached the station in time, and caught the correct train….? Big or small, we ask this question often. At least I do, but then I am also a daydreamer ;). I had never known that this theory had even a name, and that it had been studied extensively!
The most dramatic impact of this theory has been in the field of history. There is a whole branch of history that is dedicated to these questions, and it is called the ‘Subjunctive History’. The term subjunctive history has been put into the common language by the play (and later movie): The History Boys. Subjunctive history is also variously known as Alternative History or Counterfactual History. It deals with the eternal question “What If” in terms of history. What if some historical events had happened the other way? It seems that we always play with this question, yet the possibilities are sometimes chilling!
Subjunctive history is a hot favorite with fiction writers and movie script writers, and for fairly obvious reasons. They get a free run to play with events, to mix the real with the imagined, and produce interesting stories as a result. In fact, there are a lot of many other novels which deal with the theme of subjunctive history. One common feature of these novels is that almost all of them are based on the Second World War, or more specifically, on the hypothetical victory of Nazi Germany in that war.
|
SS-GB: Nazi-Occupied Britain 1941
Price: $39.90
List Price: $10.95 |
One such novel is SS-GB, written by Len Deighton. The story is set in the year 1941, in London, when the United Kingdom has been conquered and occupied by Nazi Germany. It tells the story of a detective, who is torn between loyalty to his country and his sense of duty and professionalism as a police officer. An investigation into a seemingly isolated murder leads to the highest echelons of the Nazi government.
|
|
1945
Price: $39.50
List Price: $6.99 |
Another similar novel is 1945, which has been co-authored by Newt Gingrich (US politician and the 58th speaker of the US Congress) and William R. Forstchen. In this novel, the US enters the Second World War only to defeat Japan. It withdraws after that, letting Nazi Germany defeat and occupy the Soviet Union. A cold war develops between the two victors, which later turns into a real war. Germany attacks the US and there is heavy fighting, with the US suffering great losses. The book ends with Rommel attacking the UK (!), and Churchill asking for US help. There was supposed to be a sequel to 1945, titled “Fortress Europa”, but it never came out.
Here I will put down a few favourite historical questions that are a part of the subjunctive history. Of course, these are now reduced to hypothetical questions, and can have no impact whatsoever on current history. Yet, it can be real fun to read, think and imagine! Can you imagine Adolf Hitler negotiating with John F Kennedy? That might have happened if Germany had won the Second World War! So well, here goes:
1) It is often said that the seeds of the Second World War had been sown in the First World War itself. If the world had collectively learned its lessons after the First War, then there wouldn’t have been a Second one, and world history would be a different one. What if the humanity had learnt its lesson from the First World War?
2) This is again going to be related to Hitler. There was an attempt in 1944 by some German Army officers, led by Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg (played by Tom Cruise in Valkyrie) to kill Hitler. What if Adolf Hitler was indeed killed in the bombing?
3) A favourite of the conspiracy theorists is the John F Kennedy assassination. What if those bullets had missed the President?
In fact, there can be many more of these “What If” situations in history. Feel free to share them here!
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your comments. "What if" is a very interesting question, both on a historical and a personal level. Like I said, being a daydreamer, I often play with it! Maybe that is why I was drawn to subjunctive history!
G"day Sidd, I have never heard of subjunctive history, but like you I have played the what if game!. It is really a game , right ? You cannot change history, right? LOL.
Sidd this is a nice informative Hub. That Valkyrie movie looks interesting. It's just being released in Australia.
G'day, mate!
Yes Ag, you are right that history cannot be changed. Yet no harm in playing the what if game! I guess you and I are not the only ones indulging in this game!
Valkyrie seems to be a very nice movie. I have not seen it yet, but I have read the original incident of Col Stauffenberg. At the end, I was left wondering: What if...?
Hi, Sidd, heres one to get everyone rolling. What if McGain had won the US Presidency?
Yes Ag, that is an interesting one. Maybe someone will write a hub on it! Or has it already been written?
SIdd- One of the eternal "What if" question I have is about India being undivided would the world have been different. Would undivided India have been better off or is it better off with out Pakistan/Bangladesh. Thumbs up for a very thought provoking hub.
Hi CW,
Good to hear from you after so long!
Actually, it is a very interesting point that you have raised. Did you know that MA Jinnah was suffering from tuberculosis at the time of partition, and the doctors had given him only a few months to live? He actually died in September, 1948. The original date for freedom of India was set in June 1948, later preponed to August, 1947. IF ONLY, Mountabatten and Nehru had known of his illness, they would have extended the process of transfer of power, and we would have a very different sub-continent now!
So you mean we would have undivided India but do you think we would have been better off then or we are better off now. I know I am asking dangerous questions and you can refuse to answer this question if it is inconvenient for you.
A lot of alternative history is also based on the Confederate States winning the American Civil War, I think.
Excellent!
If more people would ask "what if" we might have a breakout of personal responsibility.
CW,
Yes, it is very difficult question, maybe even dangerous! But my humble opinion is that the combined entity would have been BETTER OFF. Reasons:
1) No wars.
2) No terrorism.
3) A lot of strategic depth against China.
Hi LondonGirl,
Thanks for your comments. You are right that a lot of alternative history is based on the American Civil War, especially the Battle of Gettysburg.
Hi Joer4x4
Thanks for stopping by and commenting.
This was a fun read, Sidd. I've been one of those people who have played too many what ifs in the past, which can lead to a lot of needless frustration - there are no shoulda/coulda/wouldas, right? ;-) But put into the right context, as an examination into history, you can begin to see that much good has happened, and that if we broaden our perspective, we can make positive decisions in the future, knowing that what we say and do matters.
Hi Gerg,
Great to have you here! You are right that brooding over the past may lead to endless frustrations. On the other hand, learning from past, as in history, is also absolutely essential. Subjunctive history is a great tool in that context, as it helps to understand what troubles we would have saved ourselves, had we learnt our lessons correctly.
more hitler what ifs:
hitler's mom seriously considered having an abortion, but was talked out of it by her doctor . . . what if?
hitler was assigned by the official German government, the weimar republic, to spy on nazi meetings. he liked what he saw at the meetings and became their leader. what if they had sent someone else? what if hitler had had a different mission?
Hi, i am doing a project on the subject of history what-ifs. And i was just wondering if someone could go into more detail over what would have happaned if Muhammad Ali Jinnah had died and India had not been divided.
















Cris A says:
10 months ago
Hi Sidd,
This is very interesting as the "what ifs" you discussed here may alse be applied to one's personal history. But the difference being that in our personal history, we fairly have an idea of the consequences had we done something differenly. But as far as history goes, it boggles the mind to even start to think about "what ifs" for the simple reason that a lot of people with different ways of thinking are involved. But that's just me me of course! LOL Thanks for sharing this :D