create your own

Who would make a better president

66
rate or flag this page

By vrajavala



Hillary has astrologically mixed results

I have written about this before and compared the astrological profiles of both candidates in terms of who would win the presidency from an astrological perspective. You see, the planets are really the final determination for events. Even if a person is more talented than another will not always give us the final answer.

I hate to compare this election to American Idol, but just let me give an example of a contestant, Michael Johns, who was recently eliminated. Now, if we look at is astrological profile, we see that Michael's natal Moon is in Gemini. The benefic planet Jupiter is now in Capricorn, or his 8th house, or the house of loss. Obviously, he was/is a talented performer and many predicted his winning.

Another example, election 2000, Al Gore won the Presidency, but the national election was held on a day when the planet Mercury was retrograde. this even happens about 4 times every year and any knowledgeable astrologer will tell you that it spells chaos for elections. Remember the "dimpled chad"? Now, we had another Mercury retrograde earlier this year, namely from January 28th until February 19th. During this time the "renegade" states held their early primaries and were "penalized" by the DNC by losing their delegate voting privileges. It is a widely held American value that all have the right to have their vote counted.

It was during this time that Senator Obama was enjoying his "free ride" with the press. now, every aspect of his life is being examined, from his association with communists to Louis Farrakhan, to William Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn, to the "Reverend" Jeremiah Wright. He is no longer being seen as the Democratic candidate who can withstand the upcoming Republican challenge. He is a compromised candidate. Democrats want a candidate who can beat the so-called warmonger McCain.

Other astrologers have pointed out that there has never been a President with a Pisces Moon (Hillary), but there has never been a female President. She also has Mars in Leo, a trait that many former presidents have, but Senator Obama does not. Now there is some controversy about the birth times of both candidates: 8 AM or 8 PM for Hillary and 106 AM or 106 PM for Senator Obama, so it becomes treacherous to predict. In the case of Hillary, either value will predict a win (Jupiter will be in either her 10th or 11th house). In the case of Senator Obama, the afternoon birth time becomes a case for his eventual loss.Update: he now says his birth time is 7:24 PM

Now, Hillary is in a sun period and her natal sun is in the 8th house of death and secret Enemies.

Also this gives an Aquarian Ascendant with Jupiter and Saturn in the 12th position to the ascendant. Since he is in in a Jupiter period now, this may be seen as an indication of his eventual loss. This also puts Mercury conjunct Sun in the 6th house and accounts for his identity as an author. This birth time puts the Moon in Gemini and accounts for some of the well known Gemini mannerisms that he displays, like coking his head to one side. However, with Jupiter now in Capricorn, his 8th house of death, I would predict an eventual loss.

I believe, that his rise to prominence has to do with his being in his major Jupiter period (1996-2012), but debilitated. This birth time also puts jupiter in the 12th position to his aquarian ascendant, another house of loss. Also, his wife Michelle is an Aquarian both solar and lunar. There are also various traits ascribed to a person according to the exact degree of his/her natal Moon. At that birth time, Senator Obama's moon would be at 10 degrees 18 minutes of Taurus (sidereal). I believe that Senator obama's abandonment at an early age is just this and he has and would be susceptible to influence by other dominant males. Not a good quality for a commander-in-chief.


  • It's The Brzezinski Factor, Duh!

    Everyone is in a state of alarm, now that inside sources at the Obama administration have reported that our Golfer-Snorkeler-in-Chief knew about the "Crotch Bomber 3 days before he took off for his sunny... - 31 hours ago

  • Maureen Dowd Slams Obama

    Whoah..it wasn't Limbaugh, Cheney, Beck. No, Maureen Dowd, summed it all up: "Heck of a job, Barry." Sammy, YidWithALid, put it a little more bluntly. the only thing people need a government for is security,... - 4 days ago

  • Just Like Clockwork

    Yeah, it sure is "clockwork' ,Ms. Napolitano. You've got a tight ship there. Too bad, it's more of a clock used by Al-Quaeda to schedule their friendly reminders to the "Infidels." Ms. Napolitano is from the... - 7 days ago

No Amazon results found

Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

blangrehr profile image

blangrehr  says:
2 years ago

That was cute, like a Disney cartoon. At first it even sounded like an interesting and different unbiased evaluation our three presidential candidates. Of course it didn’t take long to realize that it was just another uniformed Hillary propaganda piece. Written by a lady to lazy or disinterested to make-up her mind; information gained through the liberal media and believe only if it agrees with her per-conceived feminists agenda.

It was a creation of self congratulations, rumors and just plain false information. But it was beautifully written, I enjoyed it; thanks.

vrajavala profile image

vrajavala  says:
2 years ago

Well for your information blanghehr. i'm hardly lazy. i have a doctoral degree, and it wasn't an online or papermill. I earned it over 4 years at Boston University. I have also served in the Armed forces. I also supported and actviel campaigned for Senator Mel King in his mayoral run for the mayor of boston. So I'm not a racist. i have been an astrologer for 20 years and have many clients who swear by me. Unfortunately you don't know your own christian heritage of the three magi who found Jesus. They were astrologers. So, Mr Christian, before you start name-calling try to be respectful and do some research yourself.

blangrehr profile image

blangrehr  says:
2 years ago

You are right, I am sorry! “Lazy and disinterested” was rude, but I did not call you a racist. I’m sorry, not based on my belief is Christ, but because at times I’m an idiot. I’m working on that daily and I do see slow progress.

Again, you are right, I was out of line; please accept my apology.

vrajavala profile image

vrajavala  says:
2 years ago

I understand that there are a lot of controversial things going on right now and I actually follow all the politics as well and i really can't blame you for getting on the bandwagon with Barack. However, due to ill-thought out connections with jeremiah Wright, Frank Marshall Davis, who was his childhood mentor and a communist, william ayers and Bernadette Dohrn, i don't think he will politically be able to withstand what the Republicans will throw at him. Plus i have added just a few more comments at the end of the post about Sen obama's tendency to fall in line with dominant males due to his childhood paternal abandonment.

blangrehr profile image

blangrehr  says:
2 years ago

I am certainly not an Obama supporter, the truth is that I have not made up my mind on whom to vote for president. It’s an important choice, one that I prefer to evaluate as long as I possibly can, to be as sure as I can about my final decision. I am a Christian, and being so, I refuse to label the personal life of any candidate. For example, I firmly believe it to be impossible for Senator McCain to be a War-monger. The man spent too many years going through unspeakable horror (and remain loyal, by all accounts, to this country) to love war. Both Senator Obama and Senator Clinton have publically stated their opposition to this label for Senator McCain.

To be perfectly honest, I wish Bill Clinton was a possible choice. But alas, we have whom we have. It’s a very important, difficult decision. I truly want to remain objective and open so I can process the different information. I also remain steadfast in my belief that while I may not agree politically with these three people, I can honor their individual work and dedication to this country. Be it very miss-guided and detrimental at times.

vrajavala profile image

vrajavala  says:
2 years ago

Well,we're only lowly mortals. The planets,which are the instruments of God have already predetermined the winner.

blangrehr profile image

blangrehr  says:
2 years ago

So, do you accept my apology? It will seriously adversely affect my sleep if you say no.

vrajavala profile image

vrajavala  says:
2 years ago

oh sure. I hardly have time to keep grudges what with my 3 grandchildren keeping me busy. have a nice evening with your family

Drivers Education profile image

Drivers Education  says:
2 years ago

Astrologically YOU"RE more fit to be President. Give me a break. Sen Hillary Clinton has lied about Nafta, Sniper Fire, Columbia Free Trade, the bozo who's been running her campaign - she's clearly unable to budget since her campaign is nearly defunct with at least 10 races to go. I'm no Sen Obama fan either but you have got to be kidding me. Do you really anticipate that the general public is ready for (a) another President to be tried and found ready to impeach (b) another sex scandal in the White House (c) Politics as usual? Hillary Clinton has far more BAGGAGE than either Sen Obama or Sen McCain and SHE's CERTAIN to bring all the 'cronies' back to the White House (and who knows what she'll leave with this time). I think this is a PERFECT election for a write in candidate. Undecided Voter in MA

vrajavala profile image

vrajavala  says:
2 years ago

Thanks, dear, but I'm not running. This is an imperfect world at best. Senator Obama is definitely too compromised a candidate to go up against McCain.. Now McCain can't win astrologically. the forces are not favoring him his Moon is in Capricorn at about 27 degrees and Jupiter is moving into Capricorn but is still negative to his Moon position. A negative position. Plus he is too old. The planets rule. We have three candidates and one will win. That is Senator Hillary Clinton. You mentioned that she will bring all the cronies back. That's good. The last time the Clintons were in the white House, they left the American Public with about a 3 trillion dollar surplus. And she is hardly going to be impeached for a sex scandal. She's a prude. I hope all your kids get drivers licenses. I grew up in mass and went to school there. BA UMass and doctorate BU. Oh by the way, did you know that that Sen McCain dumped his first wife for Cindy, the Anheuser Busch heiress? His 1st wife had waited for him for 5 yrs while he was a POW. No baggage? He's OCD with a hot temper? No baggage? Obama with all his Hate America friends? No baggage? Seems to me Hillary is about the most innocent candidate. What the heck did she do? Stick by her man?

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working