Why Biofuel is not better than fossil fuel

I keep wondering why all the talk about biofuel or bioenergy when it is quite obvious that there is already food scarcity in the world. And does it not occur to you all that biofuel will impact negatively on the environment as a result of commercial farming necessary for its sustenance?

Why do you think that both big business and governments are interested in this kind of alternative energy? Well, it is because it will be labor intensive and so justify the high cost at which they will eventually fix the end product for you and I to buy.

So why should anyone like to see the U.K. Govt. and European Union investing more in bioenergy now? That must be because they are not aware of the most inexpensive and environmentally friendly fuel alternative called HH0 gas, or are you one of those who think that the Water for gas fuel technology is a scam?

Well, let me tell you here that I have been driving my cars with more water than gas for a couple of years now. It has saved me a lot of money, and has surely reduced environmental pollution also.

I don't think that anyone should encourage both the Government and big business to engage in further despoiling our earth with the production of bioenergy when everyone can make more than 70% of their own energy, using more water than gas to power engines.

Best of it all is that you need just about 4 gallons of water to drive an average car for 365 days, so there is no risk of negative impact on the world’s water supply.

To learn more on how to run your engines on more water than gas visit http://waterforgas.realitiesinfo.com