Writers Need to Eat
85Accused of extravegance!
Several months ago I purchased a paperback book in a local retail shop. I did not pay full price; the book was on special offer. When I arrived home with the volume my mother-in-law was horrified at this fresh evidence of my boundless extravagance.
She began by asking why I had bought a book. I said that I was about to go on a long train journey and wanted something to read. She replied that I could have borrowed something from the library. If I was trying to avoid the bother of returning a book on time, I could have bought a book from a charity shop for only one or two pounds.
Then mother-in-law decided that as I had already wasted my money, I should mitigate my offence by ensuring that as many people as possible read the book. After my husband, offspring, siblings and friends had finished with the volume, I could give it to a charity shop.
The book that I had so thoughtlessly purchased was an autobiography. As I read it, I came to see the author as quite a decent fellow, and began to wonder whether he didn’t deserve better treatment.
Of course a writer who has had a book published has (in most cases) been paid. Usually the publisher will have made an advance payment to the writer and agreed to pay a percentage of the sales once a set number of copies have been sold. Surely this is extremely generous compared to what might be paid for (for example) a shirt. Making a shirt is hard work and requires skill – but if I make a shirt I can only sell it once.
The difference is that I could buy a pattern to make a shirt. I would not have to start by coming up with an original idea. I could set up a workshop and employ several people to make shirts, whereas every piece of writing must be unique if it is to have any value.
But I wonder if the current popular view is that writing is in itself of no value, as there is so much available for no cost to the reader.
But the fact remains that writers need to eat.
Food keeps writers alive
If something is free has it got any value?
As it happens, the author of the book that started my thought process is now deceased. Possibly he wished for the money earned by his writing to be a legacy for his children and grandchildren, but it will cause the writer no harm to have his book given away.
It appears that society now has an expectation that entertainment, or at least books, newspapers and music should all be available at no cost.
In London the last daily newspaper for the city, the Evening Standard, is now given to commuters at no charge. The idea is that the newspaper can be funded entirely from advertising.
Similarly, most of us who write for websites receive no direct payment for our writing. We write because we enjoy it, or in the expectation of receiving some income from advertising.
I do not believe that there was ever a golden age for writers; it has always been difficult to actually make a living from writing. But it had become more difficult because of the culture of free access to information and entertainment.
I also wonder whether some writers corrupt the quality of their efforts in an attempt to increase their earning from advertising. For example, do Internet writers make an effort to include potentially lucrative keywords at the expense of clarity or aesthetically pleasing writing?
The book in question
Just in case you are wondering about the book that I purchased, it was ‘Miracles of Life’ by J.G. Ballard. This is a summary of what I thought of it:
When JG Ballard learned that his cancer was terminal he determined to write his autobiography. His situation gives the narrative a sense of urgency, but Ballard’s genius as a storyteller makes every word count. Of course it helps that his early life in Shanghai was exotic compared to most lives today; his teenage years were rendered dramatic by invasion and internment. He tells his story with great enthusiasm, recounting it more as adventure than a dangerous and frightening time.
After the war he was repatriated to England, a country he that he knew through AA Milne, ‘Just William’ and repeated stories. He gives a vivid description of his disappointment at finding post was England derelict, dark and half-ruined.
JG Ballard attended The Leys School, Cambridge, and made more than one attempt at finding a career. He eventually made a very happy marriage, and embarked on his successful career as a science fiction writer.
Tragically his wife died suddenly when their 3 children were very young. He chose to raise the children by himself, and writes that the years with his young children were the best of his life.
The chapter about his experience as a single parent was my favourite part of the book: it was so refreshing to read an account by someone who took positive pleasure from time with children.
The whole book was entertaining and interesting; I never felt the urge to skip paragraphs or pages (or even chapters) as I have often done when reading autobiographies. Even though I do not usually read science fiction, I now want to read more by JG Ballard.
If this very brief review makes you interested in reading the book, I hope that you will actually buy a copy!
Miracles of Life by J.G.Ballard
|
|
Miracles of Life: Shanghai to Shepperton: An Autobiography
Price: $15.61
|
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
I love this thought-filled and thought-provoking hub! Thanks for that, 2Patricias ;-)
You've certainly proven the case that something for FREE has value. And, I suspect there are some writers, who sometimes corrupt the quality of their writing in order to earn their food.
Interestingly, as a passionate, yet sometimes penniless, reader and writer I have often opted for the book over the food... and never saw it as an extravagance at all!
Hello Gerg and Mary,Thank you for your comments.
Pat's house is full to overflowing with books. Tricia buys books, keeps some, but seems to transfer the majority to Pat's house.
Neither of us believes that buying books is extravegant. Glad to find we are not alone.
Much to chew on here! I have to say that even at my most penny strapped of moments, I have always been a book-buyer. I suppose that as long as there is a variety of people, there will be a variety of purchasing options, and hopefully there will be enough to keep an author with at least something edible in their ice box, at some point.
Hi Frieda,
Yes, I do hope there will continue to be people who buy new books.
Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment.
How funny from your first sentence I thought how wonderful that you got the book at a special offer. What a wonderfully written hub on different perspectives.
Hello T.Mom, Nice to hear from you! Yes, it always interests me when 2 people look at the same issue (or object) and see 2 different ideas. Makes life interesting.
Lots of good food for thought here-- a veritable banquet in fact. I think there will always be a place for the printed page, but that place is changing and evolving as it should and must.... much the way the place of radio changed as Television became popular in the 1950's and '60's.
The book sounds wonderful and your mother-in-law is obviously not much of a reader. Nothing will ever replace curling up with a good book and turning page after page until the end.
Hello Robie,
I'd forgotten about how radio changed. When I was a kid there were more 'story' programmes. Also, there was a prediction that television would mean the end of cinemas,but they still seem to be around.
But you are right - nothing beats curling up with a good book!
Thanks for your comment.
Hi 2patricias - I suppose there will always be the booklovers who buy and the book tolerators who can't understand why. And, in all probability, the twain will never find a meeting ground :)
Very thought-provoking hub - I will try and get hold of the book and read it!
Hi Shalini,
I guess life would be boring if we were all the same.
I really did enjoy the book and hope that you will too.
Hello, 2patricias! This is much apropos to a very current discussion regarding writers rights, there is quite a movement out there not about free books but second hand books. The era of internet has brought the possibility to buy the same book a number of times, and there are already plenty of authors that complain about the practice, as they only get paid royalties once, when the book is a new purchase. I've found quite a few sites where authors ask readers to please buy first-hand books, as by purchasing a second hand copy what is achieved is that these authors are stripped of their means to earn a penny, and in the longer run that means they can't write for a living.
The fact that something is for free doesn't mean at all that it's not valuable, but it may mean that whoever produced it can't continue producing equally valuable stuff. I sometimes try to equate a 200 page book with 200 hours hired from a lawyer or an investment trader... what's the difference? It's all hard work for a penny, so why should a lawyer or a banker not be begrudged their dues but a writer can?
Well, you can see I have strong feelings about this :-) Thanks much for the thought-provoking article!
Hello Elena,
Thanks for bringing the second hand book arguement into the discussion. In England some of the charity shops have turned into second hand book shops and I had wondered if this was really a good thing in the long run.
Your suggestion that 'whoever produced it can't continue producing quality stuff' may be true for a lot of writiers.
So good to hear from you!

















Gerg says:
2 weeks ago
It's funny how different one person's perspective is from another. There is an intrinsic value in owning a piece of written work that online articles, blogs, Kindles, etc. will never capture.
I have an abundant library, and my favorites are those older, fading volumes that are yellowed, dusty and worn. I'm not too worried about the purchase of books becoming obsolete.
Bon Apetit!