create your own

Arguments Against The Public Option: Yahoo!

73
rate or flag this page

By fishskinfreak2008


 The title of a recently released Yahoo! article is "After all the fusspublic health plan COVERS FEW"It seems like public option opponents are trying to start something again.

So what are their arguments? We always have to look at what people are saying and decide if what they're saying is reasonable or not to either prove or disprove the notion in the title. The first 2 sentences are: "What's all the fuss about? After all the noise over Democrats' push for a government insurance plan to compete with private carriers, the numbers are finally in: two percent" of AmericansNow here's a serious questionWhich of the following scenarios are true (or could all three of the following scenarios be true)Either: the legislation was poorly written, REPUBLICANS ARE RIGHT (i.e. Obama and the Democrats really don't care about insuring everyonehowever far-fetched that possibility seems) or the private insurance industry cannot stand the fact that they may well now have competition from a government-subsidized plan (i.e. the public sector) and are now making some noise, trying to launch a smear campaign (this is entirely possible).

Here are the two critical issues: "The underwhelming statistic is raising questions about whether the government plan WILL BE THE IRON-FISTED COMPETITOR THAT DRIVES PRIVATE INSURERS OUT OF BUSINESS (this is insaneor a niche operator that becomes a haven for patients with HEALTH INSURANCE HORROR STORIES". The most common (and most likely only) "health insurance horror story" that we should be hearing about these days should be coming from people who either don't have a job and are looking for work or people who have recently been laid off (therefore losing their health insurance) and are again looking for work (obviously because of the horrendous economy).

According to Drew Altman, president of the supposedly non-partisan Kaiser Family Foundation, "The public option is a significant issueBUT ITS PLACE IN THE DEBATE IS COMPLETELY OUT OF PROPORTION TO ITS ACTUAL IMPORTANCE TO CONSUMERS". Surely, Mr. Altman is joking. "It has sucked all the oxygen out of the room and diverted attention from bread-and-butter consumer issuessuch as AFFORDABLE COVERAGE and comprehensive benefits". Is Altman out of his mind? He talks about "affordable coverage"? Well, right nowgood quality health insurance is unaffordable for many people and their families because of THE SKY-HIGH PREMIUMS THAT MANY INSURANCE COMPANIES CHARGE BECAUSE OF THE ABSENCE OF COMPETITION FROM ANOTHER SOURCE (i.e. the government)Surely, the Kaiser Family Foundation is not "non-partisan".

According to economist Karen Davis, president of the Commonwealth Fund, "The concern was that the public option WOULD DESTABILIZE THE BULK OF PRIVATE INSURANCE, but in fact, what Congress has done is very targetedIT'S NOT GOING TO BE TAKING AWAY THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY'S CORE BUSINESS". This is trueAfter the health care reform proposal is passed and signed into law, people will have to buy insurance (which is necessary because we don't know when a catastrophe will occur; as they say 'Prepare for the unexpected'; 'The unexpected is to be expected')BUT NOT NECESSARILY GOVERNMENT INSURANCEAgain, we've said this many times: PEOPLE WHO ARE EMPLOYED AND ARE HAPPY WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PROVIDED BY THEIR EMPLOYER OR UNEMPLOYED WIVES COVERED BY THEIR HUSBAND'S HEALTH CARE CAN KEEP THEIR CURRENT POLICYNotice "It's not going to take away the insurance industry's core business", which, of courseis one of the private insurance industry's favorite complaints/gripeswhether this is legitimate or not. Obama the politician should be happy that an industry expert is on his side (it's now even more ironic that Donald Tsang is a politician by profession).

Finally, according to Antonio M Perez, chief executive of Eastman Kodak, speaking to the Business Roundtable, "THAT COST IS GOING TO COME BACK TO YOUone way or another...and it's coming back in the way of TAXES and LIABILITIES". This is yet another Republican-like argument. "We just don't believe that there are miracles out there".


Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

Ralph Deeds  says:
2 months ago

Obama health care strategy paying off:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/health/policy/02

breakfastpop profile image

breakfastpop  says:
2 months ago

The fear is two-fold. When the government runs anything it screws up. Secondly,most people want to keep the insurance they have and they do not want any interference in the relationship between their doctor and themselves. Oh, one more thing, costs will most certainly rise and now is the worst possible time to tamper any further with our ailing economy.

fishskinfreak2008 profile image

fishskinfreak2008  says:
2 months ago

So breakfastpop, you're a Republican.

breakfastpop profile image

breakfastpop  says:
2 months ago

Dear fishskinfreak,

I am neither a Democrat or a Republican. I am me.

fishskinfreak2008 profile image

fishskinfreak2008  says:
2 months ago

"When the government runs anything it screws up" sure SOUNDS LIKE a GOP statement. Republicans are always saying 'Leave everything alone'.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working