create your own

Ban Late Term Abortions

72
rate or flag this page

By pmm349


Ban Late Term Abortions

The procedure known as late term abortion is one of the most controversial aspects of the abortion debate, if not one of the worst medical procedures out there. Every year, thousands of unborn babies are killed after spending weeks in the womb. Some are even killed after they become viable outside of the mother’s body. Currently 44 of the world’s most populous nations have banned late term abortions from happening within their own borders. In the United States, there is no explicit federal law that is bans late term abortions, although 36 states have laws that ban late term abortion. The problem in the U.S. is that many of the laws are written in a way that would infringe on the right to an abortion, as provided by Roe vs. Wade.

The definition of a late term abortion can range from the 20th to the 27th week inside the mother. Almost all babies are viable after 27 weeks, and none are before 21 weeks, leaving a margin of error about whether the child could survive. Since abortion will not be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court anytime soon, pro life activists have attempted to put bans on all late term abortions. Democrats in Congress have killed any effort made to curtail abortions due to pressure from liberal women’s groups that feel that they should be able to have an abortion whenever they want.

The majority of American people are strongly opposed to late term abortions because it is tantamount to murder. If a baby can live outside the mother, but instead is aborted, that should be made illegal and treated as murder. The practice is barbaric and should be made criminal. Pro life organizations have been making headway on the issue, but more needs to be done. Since Roe vs. Wade is going to be upheld for the time being, there are other ways to go about reducing abortions. The Supreme Court left open the door for states to pass laws that can put restrictions on abortions, and that is the method that needs to be used. Every state should be lobbied to pass a ban on late term abortions, because this has strong public approval. Once that passes, then the opportunity will be there for other restrictions in the future. A mother had the choice to have an abortion for months, so her mind should be made up. She can have an abortion legally in the previous five months, but there is no need to wait for the baby to grow to live and then kill it. That is the most inhumane aspect about the whole thing. The only exception to the ban should be if the mother’s life is threatened, other than that it should be made illegal. A ban on late term abortions can be conducted peacefully and successfully in each state. Public opinion and facts are on the side of preserving life, instead of recklessly destroying it.



Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins  says:
5 months ago

This "procedure" is so horrifying I cannot imagine anybody is crass enough to support it publicly. These Pro-Death folks have no shame. And no conscience.

Thanks for a fine Hub pointing out the awful truth.

Madame X profile image

Madame X  says:
4 months ago

It was Josef Mengele, the "angel of death", the Auschwitz death camp doctor who first performed late-term abortions as "experiments" on the death camp inmates. James is right - it is so horrifying that anyone who would support it is not just mentally ill, but evil. Good hub pmm.

Katherine  says:
3 months ago

You do all realize that late term abortions (which account of only 1% of all abortions in the US) are only permissible when either the mothers life is at risk, or if the baby has a birth defect that is incredibly severe, such as...

Open Neural Tube Defect, which means that the spinal column of the baby has not closed properly.

In which case the baby would be born most certainly paralyzed and incontinent, during the pregnancy the baby's brain is being tugged against the opening in the base of the skull and the cranium is full of fluid. It would be completely unknown whether the baby would live at all. Countless surgeries would be required if the baby did live. None of which could repair the damage that was already done to their brain.

I suspect most of YOU would still try to fight for that baby's life, but I don't quite know if the baby would thank you or hate you for it... on second thought, the fluids of the child's brain would most likely strike it incapable of any speech or rational thought. So unfortunately it wouldn't have the option to thank or hate you...

Just as you are all trying to steal the option from women who want to make that VERY PERSONAL choice for themselves and their child.

Late Term Abortions are STRICTLY regulated. It isn't like any random woman who decides she doesn't want to go through with the pregnancy can just walk into a LTA clinic and say, I want out. But unfortunately that's what you'd all like everyone to believe to prove your point.

Do more research before you blog such nonsense.

Tackle This profile image

Tackle This  says:
3 months ago

Mr. Watkins, is right once again. I agree with his statement whole-heartedly. There is no way proponents of late term abortions could have a conscience. They are "evil" personified.

Patman66 profile image

Patman66  says:
2 months ago

Abortion is a necessary evil, late term abortion is an abomination. Kathrine, though, seems to have a point.

thetfin  says:
3 weeks ago

Katherine, how does pulling the baby's head all the way out put the mother at more risk than pulling most of the body out? Whether you kill it or not, the head will inevitably be pulled out. PBA is not neccessary.

Birth defects do not mean we lose our rights. I recall something about freedom for all... Or does that exclude those of us with birth defects? I think not.

Kayla  says:
3 weeks ago

I can't believe things like this can actually happen in the United States. If you ask me this should be considered murder not matter the situation. Babies with birth defects or mental disabilities deserve the same right to live as any other child. God did not send them to this Earth to be killed before they have a chance!This makes me absolutly sick! The only reason that they are permissable at all is because the term "health" when used in context to the mothers health is a very vague term and does not mean that her actual life is in danger at all, it is up to the doctor to decide what health means therefore late-term abortions ARE done on perfectly healthy babies and mothers with no good reason!!!

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

  • Warren disputes Obama's abortion stanceUPI76 minutes ago

    WASHINGTON, Nov. 29 (UPI) -- Pastor Rick Warren, who delivered the invocation at U.S. President Barack Obama's inauguration, says he disagrees with him on abortion.

  • In Support of Abortion, It’s Personal vs. PoliticalNew York Times20 hours ago

    WASHINGTON — In the early 1950s, a coal miner’s daughter from rural Kentucky named Louise McIntosh encountered the shadowy world of illegal abortion. A friend was pregnant, with no prospects for marriage, and Ms. McIntosh was keeper of a secret that, if spilled, could have led to family disgrace.

  • Groups fighting abortion restriction in health reform billJTA3 hours ago

    WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Several Jewish groups are fighting a controversial measure in health reform legislation that would have the effect of eliminating insurance coverage for abortion for millions of women.

working