create your own

States At War With USA Government Obama Attacks Freedom

69
rate or flag this page

By born to be free


Delusion of Grandeur

Abraham Obama
Abraham Obama

Obama wants to destroy The Bill of Rights. Shut up Limbaugh, shut up Christians. Terrorists, let's be friends.

Don't you think it's strange that this current man setting in the White House so openly attacks the citizens of America in an effort to destroy freedom, yet on the other hand befriends known terrorist nations.

These actions are impeachable. Why? These are acts of treason. It does not matter how much this man sugar-coats what he is doing with sweet words, the bitter truth still remains, this mans mission is to destroy the soverignty and power of America.

It is May 31, 2009

Obama promises the Palestinians Jerusalem

During the Presidential Campaign Obama led Israel to believe that he was in support of Israel, now only a few months post election the President of the United States has made it clear that he intends to turn on Israel. This man would do well to read Genesis 12:1-3

"Those Who Bless Israel Will Be Blessed
and Those Who Curse Israel Will Be Cursed"

If the American people do not move for the impeachment of this President, if they side with this evil, the people will be cursed as well as this man.

One tactic used by the socialists in America is to try and convince Americans that we are not going down a path of socialism. These people are not simply blind to the fact that we are being pushed by Obama down the road of socialism; these people are simply trying to get true Ameircan citizens to back off until they have taken over the country.

You can read Hubs all over the place that preach the deceptive lie saying America is not falling in to socialism, friends, that is simply a lie! Obama is a sworn socialist who hates what America stands for. He was raised and trained all his adult life by a hate mongering Preacher who is nothing but a Preacher of hatred against White America and the Nation of America.

Most Americans have not heard about what is going on between the Federal Government and The individual States of the United States. The States are beginning to claim their sovereignty from the Federal Government as contained in the ninth and tenth amendments to the Constitution of The United States.

Several States have already submitted Resolutions to the House of Representatives, and several other States are drafting Resolutions as we speak. The States are claiming that the Federal Government has overstepped their Constitutional bounds.

Many of the Resolutions are directed toward Barack Obama. The Resolutions clearly point out the issues that they feel the Government has, or are preparing to violate. Among the issues mentioned are;

  • The Government can not limit freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, if it does they are altogether void, and of no force.
  • The Federal Government can not order martial law
  • An American can not be imprisoned and held without trial
  • The infringements on the right to keep and bear arms by the Government is a violation of the Constitution, and void.

Pay close attention to the wording from New Hampshire, toward the end of the declaration; in no uncertain terms, they warn the Federal Government that if they cross the Constitutional line in violating the freedoms of the people, the result will be the the transfer of power to the States. Then they talk about the collective States forming a new Government.

I have included several of the States Declarations below. I have had some people say that this is nothing new, that the States do this whenever the Federal Government inacts legislation that the States can't afford to pay for, these people are wrong. What they fail to see is that these declarations spell out the crimes as I have mentioned above.

How long do you think that an arrogant pushy President will put up with his subjects acting this way? This President has already used his position of power as a threat by warning the Republicans about listening to the Radio.

This President and his band are working on legislation at this moment to try to stop the freedom of speech on radio. There are more areas of the Constitution that this White House has violated.

Please, also be aware that our Governments Military has already been put on alert to handle us Americans should we protest against the Government. All Law Enforcement has also been contacted with the same orders should this happen. See this link; War College warns military must prepare for unrest; IMF warns of economic riots

Since the writing of this Hub, now several Governors are refusing to take the stimulus money from the Federal Government because of all the strings attatched to the stimulus money.

So now we have not on several Legislators telling the Government in Washington D.C. to back off, we now have several Governors of the States telling Washington to keep their money.

UPDATE:

House panel rejects state sovereignty resolution

LITTLE ROCK — The House of Representatives Wednesday, voted against a resolution asserting Arkansas claim to sovereignty under the 10th Amendment over all powers not specifically granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution.

The vote was 8-10, and fell along party lines, eight Republican members voting “yes” and 10 Democratic members voting “no.”

This vote down by the Democrats could very easily lead to a new Civil War, the Republican States vs. the Democratic States. There is little option left when the Government is ran by a majority of Democrats who no longer respect the Constitution of The United States.

The United States has become nothing more than the evil Government our Forefathers revolted against. The Democratic Party has created a society of no morals, a society which is controlled by the Central Government.

I remember back when these Democrats were running for office, I remember how they all tried to play the religion card. It was so sickening to hear these immoral Democrats trying to convince the population that they too believed in God.

Actions speak louder than lips full of lies.

Puppet Obama


Similarities Between Barack Obama And Abraham Lincoln

Is Barack Obama Abraham Lincolns Evil Twin? Could the President be suffering from "Delusions of Grandeur?" Sure makes you wonder......

  • Both Abraham Lincoln and Obama moved to Illinois, and became high ranking political leaders in the state.
  • Both Abraham Lincoln and Obama men were elected President at relatively young ages. Abraham Lincoln 51, Obama 47.
  • They were both raised by someone other than their mother. Abraham Lincoln by his stepmother. Obama spent most of his youth with his grandmother.
  • Abraham Lincoln and Obama named political rivals to their cabinet after winning the Presidential election. Abraham Lincoln placed three. Obama placed two.
  • Obama was sworn into office with the Bible President Lincoln used for the presidential oath.
  • Abraham Lincoln signed into law, the Homestead Act. Obama mentioned the Homestead Act several times during his Presidential campaign.
  • Obama takes the same 137-mile train ride from Philadelphia to Washington to copy Lincoln's train ride in 1861.
  • Obama has china replicas of the plates Abraham Lincoln ate off of used at the Inaugural Luncheon.
  • Both were presidents during a time of great turmoil in the United States. Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War and Obama with economic problems, and now the threat of most States pulling out of the Union.

  • Barack Obama was born exactly 100 years after Abraham Lincoln became the President of the United States(1861/1961).
  • Barack Obama was inaugurated as President exactly 200 years after Abraham Lincoln's birth (1809/2009).
  • Obama and Abraham Lincoln were lawyers in Illinois.
  • Obama and Abraham Lincoln were both US Senators for the State of Illinois.


New Hampshire HCR 6 – AS INTRODUCED 2009 Session

HCR 6 – AS INTRODUCED

2009 SESSION

09-0274

09/01

HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 6

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

SPONSORS: Rep. Itse, Rock 9; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Sen. Denley, Dist 3

COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs

ANALYSIS

This house concurrent resolution affirms States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

09-0274

09/01

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 1, Article 7 declares that the people of this State have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent State; and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to the United States of America in congress assembled; and

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 2, Article 1 declares that the people inhabiting the territory formerly called the province of New Hampshire, do hereby solemnly and mutually agree with each other, to form themselves into a free, sovereign and independent body-politic, or State, by the name of The State of New Hampshire; and

Whereas the State of New Hampshire when ratifying the Constitution for the United States of America recommended as a change, “First That it be Explicitly declared that all Powers not expressly & particularly Delegated by the aforesaid are reserved to the several States to be, by them Exercised;” and

Whereas the other States that included recommendations, to wit Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Virginia, included an identical or similar recommended change; and

Whereas these recommended changes were incorporated as the ninth amendment, the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people, and the tenth amendment, the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people, to the Constitution for the United States of America; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:

That the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a General Government for special purposes, -- delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force; that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress; and

That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory; and

That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitution, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people;” and that no power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated, rather than the use be destroyed. And thus also they guarded against all abridgment by the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselves the right of protecting the same. And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press:” thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch, that whatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others, and that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion, are withheld from the cognizance of federal tribunals. That, therefore, all acts of Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are altogether void, and of no force; and

That the construction applied by the General Government (as is evidenced by sundry of their proceedings) to those parts of the Constitution of the United States which delegate to Congress a power “to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States,” and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested by the Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof,” goes to the destruction of all limits prescribed to their power by the Constitution: that words meant by the instrument to be subsidiary only to the execution of limited powers, ought not to be so construed as themselves to give unlimited powers, nor a part to be so taken as to destroy the whole residue of that instrument: that the proceedings of the General Government under color of these articles, will be a fit and necessary subject of revisal and correction; and

That a committee of conference and correspondence be appointed, which shall have as its charge to communicate the preceding resolutions to the Legislatures of the several States; to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship and union which it has manifested from that moment at which a common danger first suggested a common union: that it considers union, for specified national purposes, and particularly to those specified in their federal compact, to be friendly to the peace, happiness and prosperity of all the States: that faithful to that compact, according to the plain intent and meaning in which it was understood and acceded to by the several parties, it is sincerely anxious for its preservation: that it does also believe, that to take from the States all the powers of self-government and transfer them to a general and consolidated government, without regard to the special delegations and reservations solemnly agreed to in that compact, is not for the peace, happiness or prosperity of these States; and that therefore this State is determined, as it doubts not its co-States are, to submit to undelegated, and consequently unlimited powers in no man, or body of men on earth: that in cases of an abuse of the delegated powers, the members of the General Government, being chosen by the people, a change by the people would be the constitutional remedy; but, where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy: that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact, (casus non foederis), to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them: that nevertheless, this State, from motives of regard and respect for its co-States, has wished to communicate with them on the subject: that with them alone it is proper to communicate, they alone being parties to the compact, and solely authorized to judge in the last resort of the powers exercised under it, Congress being not a party, but merely the creature of the compact, and subject as to its assumptions of power to the final judgment of those by whom, and for whose use itself and its powers were all created and modified: that if the acts before specified should stand, these conclusions would flow from them: that it would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights: that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism -- free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence; it is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power: that our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no further, our confidence may go. In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. That this State does therefore call on its co-States for an expression of their sentiments on acts not authorized by the federal compact. And it doubts not that their sense will be so announced as to prove their attachment unaltered to limited government, whether general or particular. And that the rights and liberties of their co-States will be exposed to no dangers by remaining embarked in a common bottom with their own. That they will concur with this State in considering acts as so palpably against the Constitution as to amount to an undisguised declaration that that compact is not meant to be the measure of the powers of the General Government, but that it will proceed in the exercise over these States, of all powers whatsoever: that they will view this as seizing the rights of the States, and consolidating them in the hands of the General Government, with a power assumed to bind the States, not merely as the cases made federal, (casus foederis,) but in all cases whatsoever, by laws made, not with their consent, but by others against their consent: that this would be to surrender the form of government we have chosen, and live under one deriving its powers from its own will, and not from our authority; and that the co-States, recurring to their natural right in cases not made federal, will concur in declaring these acts void, and of no force, and will each take measures of its own for providing that neither these acts, nor any others of the General Government not plainly and intentionally authorized by the Constitution, shall be exercised within their respective territories; and

That the said committee be authorized to communicate by writing or personal conferences, at any times or places whatever, with any person or person who may be appointed by any one or more co-States to correspond or confer with them; and that they lay their proceedings before the next session of the General Court; and

That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:

I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and

That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State’s legislature.

Michigan House Concurrent Resolution No. 4.

Rep. Opsommer offered the following concurrent resolution:

            House Concurrent Resolution No. 4.

            A concurrent resolution to affirm Michigan's sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and to urge the federal government to halt its practice of imposing mandates upon the states for purposes not enumerated by the Constitution of the United States.

            Whereas, The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"; and

            Whereas, The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and

            Whereas, The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

            Whereas, Today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and

            Whereas, Many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

            Whereas, The United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

            Whereas, A number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States; now, therefore, be it

            Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That we hereby affirm Michigan's sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States. We also urge the federal government to halt its practice of imposing mandates upon the states for purposes not enumerated by the Constitution of the United States; and be it further

            Resolved, That copies of this resolution be transmitted to the Office of the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and the members of the Michigan congressional delegation.

Montana HOUSE BILL NO. 246

2009 Montana Legislature

HOUSE BILL NO. 246

INTRODUCED BY J. BONIEK, BENNETT, BUTCHER, CURTISS, RANDALL, WARBURTON

A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT EXEMPTING FROM FEDERAL REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES A FIREARM, A FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN MONTANA; PROVIDING FOR THE DUTIES OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; AND PROVIDING AN APPLICABILITY DATE."

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:

NEW SECTION. Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 7] may be cited as the "Montana Firearms Freedom Act".

NEW SECTION. Section 2. Legislative declarations of authority. The legislature declares that the authority for [sections 1 through 7] is the following:

(1) The 10th amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the states and their people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the constitution and reserves to the state and people of Montana certain powers as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those powers is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the constitution and reserves to the people of Montana certain rights as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(3) The regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the 9th and 10th amendments to the United States constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition.

(4) The second amendment to the United States constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, and the guaranty of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(5) Article II, section 12, of the Montana constitution clearly secures to Montana citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual Montana citizens to keep and bear arms. This constitutional protection is unchanged from the 1889 Montana constitution, which was approved by congress and the people of Montana, and the right exists as it was understood at the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

NEW SECTION. Section 3. Definitions. As used in [sections 1 through 7], the following definitions apply:

(1) "Borders of Montana" means the boundaries of Montana described in Article I, section 1, of the 1889 Montana constitution.

(2) "Firearms accessories" means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.

(3) "Generic and insignificant parts" includes but is not limited to springs, screws, nuts, and pins.

(4) "Manufactured" means that a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition has been created from basic materials for functional usefulness, including but not limited to forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.


NEW SECTION. Section 4. Prohibitions. A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Montana and that remains within the borders of Montana is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in Montana from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state. Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Montana and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Montana does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Montana from those materials. Firearms accessories that are imported into Montana from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Montana.

NEW SECTION. Section 5. Exceptions. [Section 4] does not apply to:

(1) a firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;

(2) a firearm that has a bore diameter greater than 1 1/2 inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;

(3) ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or

(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.

NEW SECTION. Section 6. Marketing of firearms. A firearm manufactured or sold in Montana under [sections 1 through 7] must have the words "Made in Montana" clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.

NEW SECTION. Section 7. Duties of the attorney general. (1) A Montana citizen whom the government of the United States attempts to prosecute, under the congressional power to regulate interstate commerce, for violation of a federal law concerning the manufacture, sale, transfer, or possession of a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured and retained within Montana must be defended in full by the Montana attorney general.

(2) Upon written notification to the Montana attorney general by a Montana citizen of intent to manufacture a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition to which [sections 1 through 7] apply, the attorney general shall seek a declaratory judgment from the federal district court for the district of Montana that [sections 1 through 7] are consistent with the United States constitution.

NEW SECTION. Section 8. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 7] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 30, and the provisions of Title 30 apply to [sections 1 through 7].

NEW SECTION. Section 9. Applicability. [This act] applies to firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition that are manufactured, as defined in [section 3], and retained in Montana after October 1, 2009.

- END -

Arizona HCR 2024

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Forty-ninth Legislature

First Regular Session

2009

HCR 2024

Introduced by

Representatives Burges, Ash, Biggs, Boone, Gowan, Mason, Montenegro, Pancrazi, Seel, Williams: Barto, Campbell CL, Court, Crandall, Crump, Driggs, Fleming, Goodale, Hendrix, Kavanagh, Lesko, McComish, McGuire, Miranda B, Murphy, Nichols, Pratt, Quelland, Stevens, Tobin, Weiers JP, Senator Harper

A concurrent RESOLUTION

claiming sovereignty under the tenth amendment to the constitution of the united states over certain powers, serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates and providing that certain federal legislation be prohibited or repealed.

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"; and

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and

Whereas, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

Whereas, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and

Whereas, many federal laws are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp; and

Whereas, Article IV, section 4, United States Constitution, says in part, "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government", and the Ninth Amendment states that "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"; and

Whereas, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

Whereas, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States.

Therefore

Be it resolved by the House of Representatives of the State of Arizona, the Senate concurring, that:

1. That the State of Arizona hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.

2. That this Resolution serves as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.

3. That all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed.

4. That the Secretary of State of the State of Arizona transmit copies of this resolution to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate of each state's legislature and each Member of Congress from the State of Arizona.

Washington Claiming state sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment.

H-1028.1 _____________________________________________
HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL 4009
_____________________________________________
State of Washington 61st Legislature 2009 Regular Session
By Representatives Shea, Klippert, Condotta, Kretz, Anderson, McCune,
and Kristiansen
Read first time 01/30/09. Referred to Committee on State Government &
Tribal Affairs.


1 TO THE HONORABLE BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND
2 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF
3 REPRESENTATIVES, AND TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
4 UNITED STATES, IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED, AND TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE
5 SENATE AND SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF EACH STATE'S
6 LEGISLATURE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
7 We, your Memorialists, the Senate and House of Representatives of
8 the State of Washington, in legislative session assembled, respectfully
9 represent and petition as follows:
10 WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
11 States specifically provides that, "The powers not delegated to the
12 United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,
13 are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."; and
14 WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal
15 power as being those powers specifically granted to it by the
16 Constitution of the United States and no more; and
17 WHEREAS, Federalism is the constitutional division of powers
18 between the national and state governments and is widely regarded as
19 one of America's most valuable contributions to political science; and
p. 1 HJM 4009
1 WHEREAS, James Madison, "the father of the Constitution," said,
2 "The powers delegated to the federal government are few and defined.
3 Those which are to remain in the state governments are numerous and
4 indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external
5 objects, [such] as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. The
6 powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects
7 which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties,
8 and properties of the people."; and
9 WHEREAS, Thomas Jefferson emphasized that the states are not
10 "subordinate" to the national government, but rather the two are
11 "coordinate departments of one simple and integral whole. The one is
12 the domestic, the other the foreign branch of the same government.";
13 and
14 WHEREAS, Alexander Hamilton expressed his hope that "the people
15 will always take care to preserve the constitutional equilibrium
16 between the general and the state governments." He believed that "this
17 balance between the national and state governments forms a double
18 security to the people. If one [government] encroaches on their
19 rights, they will find a powerful protection in the other. Indeed,
20 they will both be prevented from overpassing their constitutional
21 limits by [the] certain rivalship which will ever subsist between
22 them."; and
23 WHEREAS, The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means
24 that the federal government was created by the states specifically to
25 be limited in its powers relative to those of the various states; and
26 WHEREAS, Today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as
27 agents of the federal government; and
28 WHEREAS, Many federal mandates are directly in violation of the
29 Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
30 WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v.
31 United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply
32 commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and
33 WHEREAS, A number of proposals from previous administrations and
34 some now being considered by the present administration and from
35 Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States;
36 NOW, THEREFORE, Your Memorialists respectfully resolve:
37 (1) That the State of Washington hereby claims sovereignty under
HJM 4009 p. 2
1 the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all
2 powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government
3 by the Constitution of the United States; and
4 (2) That this serve as a Notice and Demand to the federal
5 government to maintain the balance of powers where the Constitution of
6 the United States established it and to cease and desist, effective
7 immediately, any and all mandates that are beyond the scope of its
8 constitutionally delegated powers.
9 BE IT RESOLVED, That copies of this Memorial be immediately
10 transmitted to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United
11 States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the
12 House of Representatives, the President of the Senate and the Speaker
13 of the House of Representatives of each state's legislature of the
14 United States of America, and each member of Congress from the State of
15 Washington.
--- END ---
p. 3 HJM 4009

The Second American Revolt. Viewed over 2 million times.

Don't Panic - States are "reminding" Congress of limits

No Liberal Supermajority - Obama Says Constitution Garbage - Atlas Shrugged

House of Representatives Support Destruction of U.S. Constitution.

  • Gaza barrier a 'sovereign right': Egyptian state-owned dailyZawya1 second ago

    CAIRO, Dec 17, 2009 (AFP) - A state-owned Cairo daily confirmed on Thursday that Egypt is building an underground barrier with Gaza and said it was a "sovereign right" that would increase pressure on the enclave's Hamas rulers.

  • U.S. Calls for Supporting Georgiaâs Territorial IntegrityCivil Georgia1 second ago

    Ian Kelly, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of State said on December 16, that recognition of breakaway Abkhazia and South Ossetia by Nauru did absolutely nothing and he called on all countries to support Georgia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty.

  • Native Hawaiian bill moves ahead without revision that upset stateHonolulu Advertiser1 second ago

    WASHINGTON — A Native Hawaiian federal recognition bill moved forward in the House yesterday without the proposed changes that have drawn opposition from Gov. Linda Lingle. The bill, which creates a process for Hawaiians to form their own government similar to American Indians and Alaska Natives, was approved by the House Natural Resources Committee and now goes to the full House.

  • Police state Canada 2010 and the Olympic crackdownOnline Journal2 hours ago

    In advance of the 2010 Winter Olympics, critics of the Games have been subjected to surveillance, harassment, along with other intimidation tactics. Voicing opposition to the Olympics appears to be all that is needed for one to be labeled as a security threat.

  • Clinton: US would help raise billions on climateBoston Herald1 second ago

    COPENHAGEN - U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to put new life into flagging U.N. climate talks Thursday by announcing the U.S. would join others in raising...

  • Clinton: US would help raise billions on climateSeattle Times1 second ago

    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to put new life into flagging U.N. climate talks Thursday by announcing the U.S. would join others in raising $100 billion a year by 2020 to help poorer nations cope with global warming.

  • As hope fades at climate talks, Clinton says US would help raise billions for climate victimsMinneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune1 second ago

    COPENHAGEN - As hopes faded for a strong climate deal, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to put new life into flagging U.N. talks Thursday by announcing the U.S. would join others in raising $100 billion a year by 2020 to help poorer nations cope with global warming.

  • Posted: 17-12-2009 , 13:22 GMTAl Bawaba1 second ago

    A state-owned daily confirmed on Thursday for the first time that Egypt is building an underground barrier with Gaza Strip and said it was a "sovereign right".

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

Proud Mom profile image

Proud Mom  says:
10 months ago

Very interesting information.

I hope you are feeling better.

I was not able to digest everything in one read, so I will be back!!

born to be free profile image

born to be free  says:
10 months ago

Hello Proud Mom, thanks for stopping by. I know there's a lot of information already, but this is just the tip of the iceberg. I will be adding more information showing how the Federal Government has, and is planning to control the States and destroy our liberty.

eovery profile image

eovery  says:
10 months ago

btbf,

I am keeping an eye out for this. This news is scary, I am starting to find information like this popping up in other parts of the internet. We will have to see what this leads to.

Thanks for the info.

born to be free profile image

born to be free  says:
10 months ago

eovery,

Have you heard the latest on the Bailout? GOP Governors consider turning down stimulus money, due to Governments strings attatched to the money. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090219/ap_on_bi_ge/bu

Vladimir Uhri profile image

Vladimir Uhri  says:
7 months ago

Thank you for excellent information.

born to be free profile image

born to be free  says:
7 months ago

You're welcome Vladimir.

The truth is that America is now ran by small groups with loud financial voices. Because these little groups get the most attention, most Americans are under the impression that these worthless Americans out number the Patriots, this is an out right lie! All these groups have on their side is money and political power, well, I suppose that's all one needs when the greater number of Americans set on their behinds and do nothing to remove these frauds and corrupt political leaders. I still love my country and I will continue to do so until the last drop of blood drops from the wounds caused my own countrymen.

bgamall profile image

bgamall  says:
5 months ago

My natural father was Jewish and without a two state solution Israel will not have peace. It is not like she dominated in the last war. She has a lot to offer the middle east, but only if she makes peace. I am for the world giving reparations to the Palestinians because the world allowed the existence of Israel, not just the Israelis. Without world sanction it would have been difficult for Israel to survive.

So, I am for the existence of Israel, but also for a two state solution which must come to give Israel peace.

born to be free profile image

born to be free  says:
5 months ago

Hello bgamall,

I do not believe that Israel will ever have peace under any circumstances until God has destroyed her enemies. Coming from the Bible's point of view, there will come a time when the view you point out will be enforced by men, but three and a half years into this agreement they will again show that it was never really about a separate state, the issue has always been a hatred for Israel and a desire to wipe her from the face of the earth. In the beginning God gave the Land to Israel and only He can legally take it.

theconserv profile image

theconserv  says:
5 months ago

The American people, if i should say the American people, will never stand up for anything anymore its like they have lost there backbone. Thank you for this article. Obama will never be impeached, have you forgotten why he was elected. I could go on all day about this, and i will with my hub haha.

born to be free profile image

born to be free  says:
5 months ago

theconserve, hello

Can't argue with you at all about there being no backbone. I believe you are also right about Obama never being impeached, God placed this man in office to punish a heathen nation that had once served Him.

elb22 profile image

elb22  says:
4 months ago

Are you a Jew BTBF? It doesn't sound like it. It sounds like you are defending Israel because part of the biblical story took place there. What has Israel actually done with us or for us to merit our undying support regardless of the collateral damage? They stole that land from the Palestinians under cover of night because they had no land of their own. They proceeded to "allow" Palestinians to live in a sliver of land they used to occupy all together. Israel = Jewish, Palestine = Muslim. USA + Israel = every Muslim country in the area hating both of us. Maybe you are so adamant because of the oil? What if we got our oil somewhere else or didn't need it anymore? Your issues about Israel would probably diminish. Why aren't you shouting for us to support Afghanistan? They at least helped us defeat our nemesis Russia to end the cold war and what did we give them? No rebuilding, no new government, nothing because they don't have any natural resources we need. The sad thing is that you support the idea even if it destroys our country and you probably don't have any ties to the place. I have relatives who live there that feel the same way I do. I agree with you about most of your article except where it veers to the extreme right and gets all righteous and religious.

born to be free profile image

born to be free  says:
4 months ago

elb22, hello

What you can not see is that the connection between the United States and Israel is their common belief in the one true God. It has nothing to do with oil. It is this one true God that gave the land to Israel. Those who fight against Israel fight a losing battle.

I understand fully how the enemies of the United States and Israel placed leaders in our learning institutions in America in an effort to darken the minds of Americans in an effort to destroy support for Israel, and it has worked. We now have one of these deceived and naive college graduates setting in the White House.

These college professors started a campaign of twisted and distorted knowledge and have twisted and perverted the young minds of America. We have finally reached a point in America where the majority hate Christianity, the majority hate Israel, and the majority believe lies.

America is turning her back on God and Israel, the fruit of this can be seen across America, our nation is dying spiritually, morally, and the only hope for America is to return to the God of our Fathers', which also happens to be the God of Israel.

I can already hear it coming, so I will clearly state for the record, the God of Israel is not the same God that their neighbors serve.

Again I say, "Those Who Bless Israel Will Be Blessed

and Those Who Curse Israel Will Be Cursed"

BJC profile image

BJC  says:
4 months ago

You are one informed man. Everything you wrote is on target. God is still on the throne and He is......

Thanks for keeping people informed.

BJC

born to be free profile image

born to be free  says:
4 months ago

BJC, thanks for your comment. As we near the final showdown, I feel so blessed to be able to be used in some small way to help the family wake up. Those among us who are honest will confess that we had fallen asleep in the Church. We sat right beside the world and enjoyed all the blessings, and just like Israel had done so many times, we forgot God. And we all know where the car the world is driving is headed, right for the ditch. I have to love them though, I was one of them before the light of the glorious gospel opened my eyes.

Robert

Place Kick profile image

Place Kick  says:
4 weeks ago

Here we are near the end of one year of Barack Obama and his socialist agenda and heath care being shoved down our throats. We all need to start fighting back as hard as we can by phoning everyone in congress and emailing anybody we know. The worst is yet to come.

born to be free profile image

born to be free  says:
4 weeks ago

Hello Place Kick,

I agree, the worst is yet to come, but we must all remember also that 90% of what is really going on we never hear about until after the fact, so I really think we are much further down the road of socialism than we could ever imagine. I also believe that the time to talk was 20 years ago, I think we are at the point of giving them all a size 12 boot and throwing them out.

Submit a Comment

You Must Sign In To Comment

To comment on this Hub, you must sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages account.

working