create your own

The Nobel Peace Prize

74
rate or flag this page

By stephhicks68


Obama Wins the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize (image from Alessio85 on Flickr)
Obama Wins the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize (image from Alessio85 on Flickr)

Amazing news in America with the announcement that President Obama has been awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples." The high honor was not expected by the young leader, and is considered by many to be a surprise decision, perhaps based more on expectations than achievements. Yet, the decision to award the Peace Prize to Obama was unanimous among the 5-person committee.

Since 1901, the Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded 89 times, including four awards to American presidents. Obama's award is the third time a sitting president has received the honor. According to the official Nobel website, the 2009 Peace Prize competition was among the most people and organizations in history:

"205 names were submitted for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, 33 of which are organizations. The Nobel Committees in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature and the Prize Committee for Economics each usually receives 250-300 names every year, but this is the highest number of nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize ever."

Questions remain as to why the Norweigian Nobel Committee selected Obama after he has only been in office 9 months, even though they praised his outreach to Muslims and his push for nuclear disarmament. Nonetheless, Obama joins the ranks of respected Nobel Laureates including Jimmy Carter, Elie Wiesel, Desmond Tutu and Mother Teresa. The President accepted the award in a humble fashion on October 9, 2009:

"I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments but rather an affirmation of American leadership. I will accept this award as a call to action, a call for all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st century."



Fast Facts on the Nobel Peace Prize (as of 2009)

  • 119 Nobel Laureates
  • 28 Peace Prizes shared by 2 Laureates; 60 Peace Prizes awarded to a single person or organization; 1 Peace Prize shared 3 ways
  • 96 Nobel Laureates have been individuals
  • 20 organizations have been given the Nobel Peace Prize award
  • 12 women have been awarded the Prize, including the very first award in 1901 (Bertha von Suttner, who shared the award with Henry Dunant)
  • The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has achieved the award the most times (3)
  • Hitler, Stalin and Ghandi were all nominated for the Peace Prize (none were awarded)

Alfred Nobel's Legacy

The Nobel Peace Prize is over 100 years old. It originated from the Will of Dr. Alfred Nobel, a Swedish cosmopolitan and inventor, signed on November 27, 1895. In his Will, Nobel dedicated a large share of his fortune (the equivalent of about $250 million USD) to fund the Nobel Prizes. Among the 6 Nobel Prizes (also including physics, chemistry, literature, medicine and economics), the Nobel Peace Prize is dedicated to:

"the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

According to Nobel's Will, the Nobel Peace Prize is awarded by a committee of five persons to be elected by the Norwegian Parliament.  Nominations are sought by the Nobel Committees from a broad range of International organizations, parliamentary committees, former Nobel Laureates and more.

Alfred Nobel was more than a wealthy man. His legacy includes chemist, engineer, innovator, armaments manufacturer and inventor of dynamite. But Dr. Nobel was even more than that. He was fluent in a number of languages, wrote drama and poetry and held social and peace issues thought to be radical for his 19th century era.

After a premature obituary was published in 1888, condemning Nobel as the "merchant of death," he decided to leave a better legacy for himself. In his 1895 last will and testament, Dr. Nobel dedicated the majority of his vast wealth to the Nobel Prizes, which would be awarded annually among an International pool of Nobel Laureate candidates. With the exception of the Nobel Peace Prize, which is awarded in Oslo, Norway, the Nobel Prizes are handed out in Stockholm, Sweden.

Alfred Nobel: Founder of the Peace Prize
Alfred Nobel: Founder of the Peace Prize

Should Obama Have Been Awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize?

  • No - he has not demonstrated enough of a legacy with respect to International peace
  • Yes - his accomplishments certainly warrant the Nobel Peace Prize
  • Not sure
See results without voting

Why Obama?

The decision to award the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize to President Obama has many wondering why? Among the number of theories proposed include the fact that America's image has improved significantly in the months following George W. Bush's presidency thanks to Obama's International outreach efforts. Others say that the award is actually a "slap in the face" to Bush from the European establishment who often considered the former president to be arrogant with respect to his foreign policies.

Politics and policies aside, many people worldwide revere the Democratic leader as inspirational. His messages have consistently been of hope and peace, even as America continues to struggle with managing two wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan, under fears of nuclear stockpiling by Iran and North Korea. The Nobel Committee had this to say:

"Very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future."

Yet, has Obama done enough to warrant the revered Peace Prize?


What does the Nobel Peace Prize Mean?

As noted, Obama is the fourth U.S. president to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Teddy Roosevelt was awarded the prize in 1906, Woodrow Wilson in 1919 and Jimmy Carter in 2002. From that standpoint, he steps into a legacy of well-known, influential leaders. It certainly is impressive on a resume.

And then there's the money... about $1.4 million to be exact. Obama has not stated what he might do with the prize money yet, other than that it will be donated to charity.

Yet, will the global community take the award seriously this time? Even the Nobel Committee members appear to admit that the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded more for what is expected from Obama in the future, rather than specific accomplishments.

The committee stated that it gave "special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons," and wished to honor him for "creat[ing] a new climate in international politics." Its chairman, Thorbjoern Jagland commented:

"Some people say, and I understand it, isn't it premature? Too early? Well, I'd say then that it could be too late to respond three years from now. It is now that we have the opportunity to respond — all of us."

This year's prize was admittedly intended to help build momentum behind the efforts to reduce nuclear arms, raising awareness about global climate change, and use of diplomacy and cooperation (all of which stand in contrast to Bush's policies).

Obama has stated that he will travel to Oslo to accept the award on December 10.


#1 Reason for Peace (image from Dave Hogg on Flickr)
#1 Reason for Peace (image from Dave Hogg on Flickr)

Debate is Not New to the Peace Prize

While the debate may continue over Obama's selection for the award, the unfortunate reality is that Dr. Nobel did not explain how the Peace Prize would be chosen. In fact, there are questions over why he even established the prize in the first place. Some experts believe that it was compensation for developing dynamite and ballistite, commonly used for destructive purposes.

Nonetheless, the Peace Prize is unique in that it is often awarded for contemporary achievements, in contrast to the scientific and literary Prizes that are issued years after the event for which they honor. Even though the Nobel Laureate is selected by committee, there can often be controversy. One person's "peace" efforts may not be universally recognized as such.

Debate is not new to the Peace Prize. In fact, when Henry Kissinger received the award, two Nobel Committee members resigned in protest. The awards given to Roosevelt and Wilson also riled some members of the public.

We may never know exactly how or why Obama was awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. The identity of the nominating individual is secret, unless that person desires to be known. What is known, however, is that the nomination was made the day after Obama was sworn in as President.

The bottom line is that a Peace Prize is laudable, yet not the only defining measure of those individuals and organizations that have worked to achieve peaceful ends, using peaceful means. There's a long list of noted omissions, and of course, another list of those whom some believe should not have received the medal.

Perhaps when it comes to Obama, we should just "agree to disagree" over whether he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.

That would be the most amicable thing to do.

Peace Out! (image from Flickrized on Flickr)
Peace Out! (image from Flickrized on Flickr)

The Nobel Peace Prize in the News

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

oakleighvermont profile image

oakleighvermont  says:
2 months ago

Another brilliant piece Stephanie, thank you! I think you have single-handedly started your own global information clearinghouse. Google watch out!

stephhicks68 profile image

stephhicks68  says:
2 months ago

Thank you Glenn! I always appreciate your support. :)

Hmrjmr1 profile image

Hmrjmr1  says:
2 months ago

Great Hub!

LdsNana-AskMormon profile image

LdsNana-AskMormon  says:
2 months ago

Very informative, Stephanie. I too, am asking many of the same questions that you have presented in this piece. This is definitely a case, where time will tell...

tDMg

Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds  says:
2 months ago

Nice job on this Hub. It's apparent that you put some work into it. No one has yet suggested what other candidate(s) are more deserving than Obama. Perhaps the Nobel committee wanted to put its stamp of approval and encourage the change in the direction of U.S. policy under Obama from that of the Bush administration. I haven't heard anyone suggest that Bush is more deserving than Obama.

In my opinion, all Americans should be proud that our president has been honored with a Nobel Peace Prize.

stephhicks68 profile image

stephhicks68  says:
2 months ago

It truly is fascinating! My husband and I were as surprised as anyone else by the news this morning, so I thought it would be interesting to investigate further. I'm sure that the controversy over this year's Nobel Peace Prize is just getting started

Wendy Mills profile image

Wendy Mills  says:
2 months ago

Certainly at the end of his term you could debate whether or not Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize or not, but considering the fact that the deadline to nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize was Feb. 1st, Obama was nominated while only in office for 10 days. I find it hard to believe he did anything to further world peace in that time to warrant a Nobel Peace Prize nomination.

What about Ronald Reagan and the Berlin Wall coming down? I can think of other presidents who had actually done something that could be considered worthy of being awarded recognizition for furthering world peace.

It really doesn't matter if you personally like Obama or not, it is apparent that the award has more to do with a political statement than anything else.

stephhicks68 profile image

stephhicks68  says:
2 months ago

Wendy, I am definitely getting this sentiment from my Democratic, as well as Republican friends.

robie2 profile image

robie2  says:
2 months ago

Wonderful meaty hub with great info on the Nobel Peace Prize. I woke up at six this morning and saw it on TV too and like you I had to write about it-- mine was just a short, personal blog post, but with your permission I'm going to link to this hub because it is so complete, informative and well written.

Personally, I am delighted that President Obama got the award. Here's what I had to say about it:

http://politicalpackrat.blogspot.com/2009/10/barac

stephhicks68 profile image

stephhicks68  says:
2 months ago

Please, link away! It is so interesting to read about the process, those involved and the standards for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds  says:
2 months ago

Here's a great comment:

Jacob Heilbrunn: It would be hard to think of a more electrifying and deserved recipient of this year's Nobel Peace prize than President Obama. Obama is the fourth American president to win the Nobel prize. His predecessors are Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Jimmy Carter. Obviously, the award is based on the hope that Obama will achieve real progress in advancing diplomacy rather than confrontation around the globe. To some degree, he already has. Click here to read more.

Here's the link http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jacob-heilbrunn/pres

MikeNV profile image

MikeNV  says:
2 months ago

4th hub so far, but your coverage is much better. I believe there is an agenda behind this one but it will take time to play out. I actually feel kind of Bad for O'bama... he has enough on his plate. Talk about being put in the hot seat.

izettl profile image

izettl  says:
2 months ago

I'm puzzled- I thought it was a joke. I'm a little disappointed in the decision because Obama has many plans for the future but the prize should be based on real accomplishments. So he was better than Bush with foreign outreach- that could have been anybody. It just seems silly- we barely know the guy (Obabma) really.

stephhicks68 profile image

stephhicks68  says:
2 months ago

Thanks for the comments - I am not surprised that other people have written about the Nobel Peace Prize today. Of course, it will be a hot topic in weeks to come. My aim was to set forth the parameters for the decision, the history, etc., without taking a position on the committee's decision. That is what the comment section is for, and of course, the blogosphere.

eonsaway profile image

eonsaway  says:
2 months ago

Excellent hub and comments. I agree with Ralph D. It seems they are trying to set a better mood in place of how we all treat each other as far as discrimination, etc.

stephhicks68 profile image

stephhicks68  says:
2 months ago

Thanks so much eonsaway (love your username too, btw). I heard an interesting piece on NPR (national public radio) tonight about how its the first time the Nobel Peace Prize award was made based on an anticipated future - the tone that the President has set.

Nemingha profile image

Nemingha  says:
2 months ago

I'm from Australia so I don't usually comment on hubs about American politics although I do, of course, read a good many. The Nobel Peace Prize is, however, an international award, so I feel my comment is legitimate.

When George Bush literally 'forced' other nations to send troops to Afghanistan to support American soldiers, it left a very foul taste in the mouths of many people all over the globe. I don't remember an American Presidential campaign that has been so eagerly reported, read and commented upon as this last one.

It seems that the international community has high hopes and expectations of Obama and, whether Americans like his policies or not, he should be given the opportunity to fulfill them. World peace is certainly something we should all be striving for.

stephhicks68 profile image

stephhicks68  says:
2 months ago

I appreciate your thoughts! Its important for us to remember that the Peace Prize is an international honor. The impact of each individual nation's actions on the globe should be considered.

Kebennett1 profile image

Kebennett1  says:
2 months ago

Excellent Hub, very thorough! A Nobel Peace Prize for what MIGHT be done; I am just not sure that Mr. Nobel would have agreed with that! It is good to have hope, but hope is not always fulfilled!

Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds  says:
2 months ago

Here's Mitch Albom's column in the Sunday paper and my comment on it.

http://www.freep.com/article/20091011/COL01/910110

Re: If Obama can get one, you can, too

posted at 10/11/2009 7:25 AM EDT on freep.com

Mitch, I'm one of your fans, but you missed the boat on this one. Your analysis is simplistic this time especially your focus on the fact that Barack Obama was selected for the prize only shortly after he took office. Clearly, the panel who selected him didn't base its decision on what he did in the brief period after he took office. As you observed, he campaigned for a year and made it clear that he intended to take the country in a significantly different direction from that of George Bush. He succeeded in convincing the American people of the wisdom of reversing Bush's approach to dealing with international issues such as cooperation to deal with terroism, nuclear disarmament, Palestine, climate change, economic policies and so forth. Now, despite mindless GOP opposition, he is following through on the program he outlined in his campaign. All Americans can now be justly proud that the president that we elected received the Nobel Peace Prize.

Sally's Trove profile image

Sally's Trove  says:
2 months ago

While reading your excellent Hub, I couldn't help but make the association between October 9, 1940, John Lennon's birthday, and October 9, 2009: "Give Peace a Chance".

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working