create your own

Bad Bad! Neighbour!

70
rate or flag this page

By whirlingdervish


Vicarious Punishment

Perhaps I should clarify in response to a couple of comments, first, this is an amalgam of apartments, not all one, second, the true issue is one of responsibility. If the tenant isn't responsibile for their own behaviour, the landlord isn't responsible for repairs and the government isn't responsible for keeping housing affordable and available then who is responsible?

Alberta's Landlord Tenant act says a whole lot of things that aren't worth repeating because it would seem that no-one can be bothered to enforce them. I'm aware that with five health inspectors (probably an understatement) in a city of over a million there's not a lot that can be done, but when does the landlord become responsible? With thousands of people looking for homes, it shouldn't be that difficult to rent to people who care enough to follow the rules. --That would be where the personal commentary ends--

At what point does the landlord have to begin repairing drafty windows, ceilings that are developing mold from the leak two floors up from six months ago, or holes under the sink that let in the smoke every time the guy downstairs lights up his bong? In this era where everyone has a terminal case of CYA -if you can't figure that one out, think about it for a second- It isn't not possible to move into an apartment without signing a lease, unless it's to the landlord's advantage to not sign one.

Why, then, are some people seemingly exempt from the law? And the terms of their lease? A woman two floors down bragged for eight months that she was paying her rent two weeks late every month and "There's nothing they can do about it" There are property owners in this city who are known for the drug and prostitute activity in their buildings, water comes up from sewer pipes on some property and through rooftops and down stairwells in others,

Resident managers burn out three paychecks and a few dozen cases of beer into the job, so while tenants are knocking eachothers teeth in because they're sick of being kept up all night by parties or getting stoned by osmosis, they sit blissfully in their penthouse suites as the buildings they are responsible for roller-coaster up and down through various stages of disrepair. By way of clarification, the resident manager works for a month or two, gets the repairs done that the last one let go, then starts sitting on his or her butt, except for the day or two before the owner comes into town.

When you're being kept up all night, and can't study for finals because the guy downstairs doesn't turn it down until you pound on his door so hard he thinks it's going to fall in, when mold grows on the bathroom ceiling because requests for repairs go ignored, When your health is endangered because you are walking through clouds of marijuana, crack and hash smoke, but you're not *quite* living in a slum, and the vacancy rate is less than one percent and the rental rates are way more than you can afford on a single disability income. It would seem that your options are rather limited.

So again, and consider that this is a rhetorical question. Who is responsible?



Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

teeray profile image

teeray  says:
2 years ago

Isn't everyone supposed to be responsible? From the landlords to tenants to (drumroll...this is a biggie) - THE GOVERNMENT POLICY MAKERS and ANYONE on a gov't board who is AWARE that these problems exist?

Oh wait...excuse me - I had a lapse for a moment...I forgot - you are telling about REALITY...my head went into 'theory' and the 'hypothetical'...which, in our city is a joke, really, right?

I have also read the landlord/tenant ummmmm piece of literature that you mentioned. It is a JOKE that nobody understands. It is so vague that even if 'authorities' had the time to DO SOMETHING about the issues, I don't believe they can figure that particular document OUT! BTW there is an assumption in Alberta that the document in question actually PROTECTS LANDLORDS but if you read it, it DOES NOT...it does not protect anyone...so I think that TENANTS who have valid problems with their landlords - should start to use the 'non-protection' characteristics of that document...instead of listening to 'official-wannabe' people who keep saying "Awe, there's really not much we can do for you - the landlord/tenant act, as we all know, kind of sides on the side of the landlord."

Nope - that's not true....that is just the 'common dominant belief' that is circulating...

Perhaps a place to start is with tossing that document around a bit?

teeray profile image

teeray  says:
2 years ago

Not to mention that the document is ARCHAIC...it is so old and unreal for the needs of ANY people, both landlords AND tenants in the year 2007...do I sound cranky?

Great hub - voice this opinion MORE! Perhaps people will start to problem solve if they hear this stuff more - instead of hiding from the problem that 'APPEARS' too big to tackle.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working