Life Insurance--What Good Is It, Really?

Life Insurance??

In today’s mail came a solicitation for a life insurance policy. This is nothing particularly new or startling--it is, in fact, a rather commonplace occurrence; all part of the junk mail phenomenon in which various businesses manage to buy lists of names and addresses to pester as many people as possible with assorted sales pitches.

The older you get, the more often you will get solicitations to purchase life insurance. If it were not for the waste of resources in these mass mailings, I’d find it comical. What is the point, after all? This time, I decided to really look through the material before sending it to the shredder.

Typical of most sales pitches, the mailing was full of hyperbole and promises with little substance. I've put the images of two of the pages here for everyone to see, but I did black out the name of the company, to avoid any problems with copyright issues or other legalities that might be involved.

Contradictions

The first thing you notice is that the information is somewhat contradictory, telling you that your policy can never be cancelled “due to age or health.” Oh? If they must specify two conditions under which the benefits won’t go down, I must ask, what is the omitted information? What are the bases upon which benefits can be reduced? Outside of the obvious condition of non-payment of the “premiums” (a.k.a. bills), I can think of no reason, except that they've left a deliberate loophole.

Coverage is available “to age 100,” yet you may not apply past the age of 85. Very interesting. Why not? Should that not be up to the individual?

Double Standards are Not Dead

The next thing I noticed was differing rates for men and women. It costs more for men. In the 21st century, we still have the old double-standards.

This time, it is in favor of women instead of against, but it’s a double standard all the same.

Foolish Selling Points

One of the main “advantages” these mailed mouthpieces like to emphasize is the ability to use the paid-in equity in the policy as a savings account against which you can borrow for emergencies or other needs…”even for household repairs,” it says in this particular mailer.

That’s all well and good, however, while this may be an “interest-free loan” of sorts, if you don’t pay back those “emergency” withdrawals, (they don’t mention this in the sales pitch), your eventual benefits paid out will be shorted by the amount you borrowed.

Wouldn't it just make more sense to put those monies into a savings account yourself, and gain even what paltry interest is currently being offered? Instead, you are paying out money on a “life insurance” policy that does not pay any interest. Indeed, your money is invested and pays interest to the insurance company; at a much higher rate, I assure you, than any bank is offering to private individuals.

Insuring Your Life?

Are you really insuring your life, as the title of the policy implies? If that were the case, it could be argued that you never expect to die, and the policy would pay off only in the event that you did.

Funny thing about life--you don’t get out of it alive. I haven’t met any immortals, have you?

Since insurance is essentially a gambling game--with the policy holder betting against themselves that at some point they will need the purchased coverage, and the insurer betting that they will not need to pay out, life insurance surely seems to be a foolish gamble on both sides. Everyone loses, for you cannot insure against the inevitable.

Oh, and here’s an interesting twist: they won’t pay for death by suicide until the person has had the coverage for two years. So, if you plan to buy life insurance, then off yourself, you’ll have to plan well in advance.

(My personal feelings on suicide are that it is a selfish, cowardly act, showing extreme disrespect for the feelings of family and friends left wondering, “Why?” It is a permanent solution to a (usually) temporary problem, but that’s neither here nor there.)

If the policy is supposed to pay when you die, then the cause should not matter, nor should the timing. It’s a loophole.

Misnomer

Shouldn't this form of insurance be called a “death expenses savings account?” For that is what it truly is. They like to offer all sorts of scary figures about the high cost of funerals, and how little is paid by Social Security’s “death benefit.” That much is true--the Social Security system does only pay a little over $200, which is far short of the usual funeral costs.

On the other side of the argument, however, is the fact that funerary arrangements in this country are a huge, overpriced business. While the mortuary business does provide a needed service, they are not above the application of subtle guilt trips in trying to ‘up-sell’ grieving families into more expensive products and services.

This, I find shameful, and is the direct cause of the great expense mentioned in the insurance industry’s sales pitches. Families need to stand firm and not opt for excessive, expensive and unneeded accoutrements. Keep it simple. The funeral, you must remember, is not for the dead--they aren't there; they don’t care. Funerals are to impress the still-living, and this is no place to play the one-upmanship game. The comfort factor should come from whatever version of memorial service people choose, and not from fancy caskets that will never be seen again.

When my mother died, she had expressed a desire to be cremated. Painful though it was, I went along with her wishes. And when the funeral director asked what casket I wanted, I said, “None. It would have offended my Mom’s sense of Yankee frugality to buy an expensive casket just to burn up.” I chose, (emotionally hard as it was for me), a plain cardboard box, so honoring both her wishes and her memory by respecting what were her sensibilities in life.

Save Your Money

Part of the problem is that we, in this culture, seem to find death and preparations for death to be a nearly-taboo topic. It is only among the elderly that such discussions seem acceptable, for they know their remaining time may be short, and have learned to face the inevitable.

So, if you want to offset the costs of your own funeral at whatever date in the future, start yourself a savings account; perhaps one with a limited ability to withdraw funds before a certain time frame, and keep the interest money for yourself. Let your family know that this is the death expenses money, not to be touched for any other reason; it’s not the kids’ college fund, nor is it for household repairs, it is to self-insure against those dastardly funeral costs that come to us all.

More by this Author


Comments 10 comments

Mhatter99 profile image

Mhatter99 3 years ago from San Francisco

Food for thought.Thank you for this.


DzyMsLizzy profile image

DzyMsLizzy 3 years ago from Oakley, CA Author

Hi, Mhatter99,

Thanks--I'm glad you found the article interesting...and of course, all the ads and "related hubs" are FOR what I'm against...that's the trouble with writing contra-pieces. LOL


Nell Rose profile image

Nell Rose 3 years ago from England

I remember when my aunt died we thought she was totally covered, but it turned out to be a sort of scam, we did get the money to pay for her funeral but we still had a few thousand on top to find, it was a nightmare! if she had just saved over the years herself she would have had the money, great thoughs lizzy, nell


DzyMsLizzy profile image

DzyMsLizzy 3 years ago from Oakley, CA Author

Hi, Nell!

You are right--most insurance is a scam of sorts, if you think about it. You pay in over the years in good faith, and when you finally need to make a claim, they toss in all sorts of conditions, exclusions, restrictions, deductibles and other nonsense to try and slide out of the deal. This is especially a problem with both auto and homeowner's insurance, about which I have written two separate Hubs.

Thanks for stopping by and adding your experience; I'm pleased you liked the article.


MsDora profile image

MsDora 3 years ago from The Caribbean

You've answered some questions others are afraid to ask; and you have given wise counsel. Thanks for your insight on this topic. Voted Up.


DzyMsLizzy profile image

DzyMsLizzy 3 years ago from Oakley, CA Author

Hello, MsDora!

Thanks very much for your comment; I'm glad you found the article worthwhile. Thanks, too for the vote!


Thomas Swan profile image

Thomas Swan 3 years ago from New Zealand

Brilliant advice. I can't stand insurance companies and I think people who work for them are either too silly or too evil to be worth my time. After all, their entire business is based on taking advantage of people's fears. Not only this, but they take advantage of people who can't control themselves. Like you say, why not put the money into a savings account and actually gain some interest? The answer would be that some people are simply unable to control their money and would spend it if someone didn't take it off them. Only silly people get insurance they don't need, which fits with those trying to sell it I suppose. They can keep their whole silly business to themselves!


DzyMsLizzy profile image

DzyMsLizzy 3 years ago from Oakley, CA Author

Hello, Thomas!

Thank you very much for your praise of my article. I agree with you; some people just don't have the discipline to hold on to 'set aside' funds; others don't make enough money to have anything to set aside, in which case, the life insurance industry is essentially stealing from them and contributing to their poverty. It is all about being "sheeple," and the current climate of teaching people to live as victims!


Stephanie Henkel profile image

Stephanie Henkel 3 years ago from USA

I believe that there is a time in our lives when purchasing insurance makes perfect sense. When our children our young and our mortgages large, loss of the main breadwinner in the family could be financially devastating. Having a good insurance policy can mean a great deal to the survivors.

On the other hand, my husband and I have been retired for 10 years. When I see offers of life insurance policies come in the mail, I throw them away without opening them. Paying on an additional life insurance policy now seems like a waste of money. If one of us dies, the other would still get Social Security benefits plus whatever retirement funds are left. We do still have a small paid up whole life policy on my husband that he's had for years. I guess if I die, he'll have to figure it out because I dropped my life insurance when I stopped working!


DzyMsLizzy profile image

DzyMsLizzy 3 years ago from Oakley, CA Author

Hi Stephanie!

Yes, when my kids were young, I had a limited life policy on my (then) husband that would pay off the mortgage if he died. But, he did not die; I ended up cancelling the policy to save money after the kids were older, and in the end, we divorced--that money was lost forever. There was no withdrawal; no refund.

With my current husband, he is disabled, and our finances are so strained we're lucky to afford the mandatory auto insurance, and food on the table, let alone extra policies.

Thanks for your comment; much appreciated.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working