American Politics: The "Federalist Papers" -Back In Perspective - FP# 2, Constitutional Convention; John Jay [281]

Chief Justice and NY Governor John Jay

Source

Federalist Paper #2: Why a Constitutional Convention?

JOHN JAY1 KICKED OFF THE RATIONAL FOR RATIFYING THE NEW U.S. CONSTITUTION. The initial argument is probably the easiest to make and understand ... becoming a single republic is safer, vis-a-vis Europe's designs on America, than the alternatives of having 13 separate States or two or three smaller confederacies. The reason a small number of confederacies gained traction is because their are natural divides between the Northern, Mid-Atlantic, and Southern States in terms of geography, history, beliefs, and religion.

The last time man was in a Hobbesean theoretical "state of nature" was around 10,000 BCE; before animals were domesticated and agriculture developed. After that time people began gathering into small groups and started to voluntarily or involuntarily give up some degree of their liberty they previously had in this "state of nature". This was done in order to form some sort of government which, among other reasons, had the job to protect them at some level.

It is this idea which John Locke formally expanded into refocusing of the individual as the center of the universe, as it were, and all else, including government, grew from that fundamental and, at the time, revolutionary idea. Before that, history had evolved such that the State was superior to the individual; Locke turned that idea on its head. But Locke also realized that the nature of man, in order for the whole to survive, must voluntarily transfer some of their rights to a higher authority which they created and own. It is from this that Jay began is essay with

"Nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of government, and it is equally undeniable that whenever and however it is instituted, the people must cede to it some of their natural rights in order to vest it with requisites powers."

Then he lays out the fundamental question facing Americans in 1787 ... should this government be one nation under single, federal government or 2 to 3 confederacies or 13 separate States with various forms of state governments.

Jay points out, possibly self-servicing, that until recently most everybody agreed with the concept of a central government is essential to the continuing "prosperity" of their countrymen. Now, with the submittal of the new Constitution to the People certain politicians are arguing that the better result is from some subdivision of the nation. The fact is, politicians were arguing against the new Constitution before the Constitutional Convention ever convened as well as during it; some convention members left the debate out of protest when they saw the purpose was to supplant the Articles of Confederation.

Reasons varied then, from philosophical to pragmatic to self-aggrandizement which could be obtained from disunion. Those same reasons still existed as the Federalist Papers were being written, but now the competition gets serious because there are going to be real winners and losers. Jay, Hamilton, and Madison were determined not to be on the losing end.

Jay's opening salvo was to show that 1) America is blessed with abundant natural resources and 2) that its citizens descended from the "same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in manners and customs ..." and suffered through the bloody battle to secure their liberty and freedom. After setting this stage, Jay then declares that "This country and this people seem to be made for each other ... that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, ... united to each other ... should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties." Definitely pulling on a lot of emotional strings; too bad he overstated the truth about the homogeneity of the new Americans, but then all is fair in love and the constitutional ratification wars isn't it.

Next Jay takes a swipe at the current form of government, meaning the single, powerless Congress created under the Articles of Confederation. He says "It is not to be wondered at, that a government instituted in times as inauspicious [the Revolutionary War), should on experiment be found greatly deficient and inadequate to the purpose it was intended to answer." In other words, the Continental Congress sucks.

The "snark" is not a modern day creation, by the way. Consider Jay's comment in starting of the next paragraph; "This (meaning the problems with the Articles of Confederation) intelligent people perceived and regretted these defects." And, as a result, the Constitutional Convention was convened.

Jay emphasizes the distinguished character of the delegates who attended; the attention to detail; and the lack of "having been awed by power, or influenced by any passions except love of country ...". This, of course, is to attest to how well thought out and crafted the resulting constitution was, implying its acceptability.

John Jay concludes by taking up refrain often heard today; that the "[P]eople have always thought right on this subject", that being forming and retaining a single Union. He goes so far as to say that "To preserve and perpetuate it was the great object of the people (delegates ?) in forming that convention ...". The refrain I am talking about is the use of the term "people", writ large, as if very few disagreed with the concept ... that is hardly the case. Just as it is today with the Right or the Left say "The People ..."; Jay and politicians like McConnell and Reid who invoke such claims know full well it is so much hyperbole.

Nevertheless, he presses the point by ending rather dramatically when referencing the failings of disunion by saying,

"That certainly would be the case, and I sincerely wish that it may be as clearly foreseen be every good citizen, that whenever the dissolution of the Union arrives, America will have reason to exclaim, in the words of the poet 'Farewell! A long farewell to all my greatness'."

1 John Jay wrote very few of the Federalist's Paper because of illness.

Demographic Survey #1

Politically Speaking, Do You Find Yourself Agreeing More With

  • The Political Right
  • The Political Left
  • Either the Right or the Left, Depending On the Issue.
See results without voting

Demographic Survey #2

Are You

  • Female
  • Male
  • Transgender
See results without voting

Demographic Survey #3

What is Your Age

  • Less Than 18
  • 18 - 25
  • 25 - 45
  • 45 - 65
  • Over 65
See results without voting

If You Are Serious About Politics - A Must Read

More by this Author


3 comments

Maya Shedd Temple profile image

Maya Shedd Temple 4 months ago from Spring Hill, TN

Hello, My Esoteric:

Your article here has been stolen and appears verbatim on a site called BEST CONTENT EVERY DAY at http://best-article-every-day.ga/american-politics...

Just wanted to let you know, in case you did not already.

Sincerely,

Linda Sue Grimes

Maya Shedd Temple


My Esoteric profile image

My Esoteric 4 months ago from Keystone Heights, FL Author

I appreciate that Maya, and even more, thank you for reading my hub. I had a more recent hub banned because they got hold of it before the Hub computers approved up and ended up declared a duplicate; that has since been resolved.

I can understand the violation of copyright law, but at least give some attribution to the author.


Maya Shedd Temple profile image

Maya Shedd Temple 4 months ago from Spring Hill, TN

Yes, that same "duplicate content" thing happened to me three times! I'm hoping HubPages is now aware of what that site does.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working