Conservatives Vote to Keep Jobs Overseas!!! (Well, 4 Republicans Didn't) [156*8]
PRESIDENT OBAMA'S #1 JOB CREATION INTIATIVE WAS THE "BRING JOBS HOME" ACT, WHICH THE CONSERVATIVES JUST KILLED
MITT ROMNEY HAS SOMETHING TO CROW ABOUT
ONCE AGAIN, CONSERVATIVES CLEARLY SHOW AMERICANS their flag-waving rhetoric is simply empty words and bears no resemblance to their actions! What conservatives succeed in doing in denying the Cloture vote is to continue the filibuster on the "Bring Jobs Home" Act. This Act did two simple things, 1) it gave a 20% tax break (imagine, a Democrat reducing taxes) to companies in the cost of moving Operations from overseas back to America and 2) eliminated the deductibility of moving expenses for moving Operations overseas. That was it, period. Isn't that what Americans, especially conservative Americans have been screaming for? Well, conservative Americans, President Obama tried to deliver for you! But, your political leaders, in their laser-like, destroy-America-in-the-process effort to unseat Obama in order to keep Senator McConnell's Dec 2010 promise, managed, by four votes to keep the filibuster going and Kill the "Bring Jobs Home" Act dead in its tracks.
Of course Senator McConnell was upset Senator Reid wasn't going allow him to add an amendment to the bill to repeal Obamacare, "it wasn't germane", Reid said. What was also notable about this cloture vote is that not only did the Conservatives hoist their hypocritical flag high, they lost their iron-clad control over their ranks! Four Senators mutinied and became Republicans for a brief instant, Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Susan Collins (R-ME), Scott Brown (R-MA), and surprisingly, Dean Heller (R-NV), I wish that were a sign of things to come, but I doubt it since all four supported the continued hiding of large donors behind the cloak of anonymity; another HUGE example of conservative hypocrisy and slap-Americans-in-the-face antics (sort of reminds you of Muhammad Ali; dance like a butterfly, sting like a bee, doesn't it).
Fast Forward A Couple of Years
THIS ISSUE IS STILL WITH US AS THE REPUBLICANS get ready to take of the reins of power in the Senate Jan 2014. The question is, "will they try to do anything in the next two years under their own terms?".
The reason for the question is that this is a major "jobs bill" that can help the economy. The reason it didn't go anywhere the first time is Majority Leader Reid wasn't allowing any amendments, such as ones to defund Obamacare, so McConnell got out his filibuster club and used it. Now, they could reintroduce it, attach what use to be poison pill amendments to it and let Senator Reid pull out his filibuster club.
But, if that even happens, can the Republicans claim Democratic hypocrisy like the Republicans were guilty of years ago? I don't know that they can because there was no really good reason, other than McConnell's sole legislative objective of destroying Obama, for the Republicans to have not voted for it; remember four did.
In Reid's case, he is between a rock and a hard place and must decide which of two bad options to go with. On the one hand, he can allow the passage of a really popular bill that obviously would help the country yet destroy the Democrats signature legislation that lets all Americans have access to health insurance. Or, on the other, take the heat for vetoing a good jobs bill like his counterpart did, and just take the heat for it.
AND YOUR OPINION IS???
Setting my obviously biased rhetoric aside, do you agree with the Conservatives Vote to kill the "Bring Jobs Home" Act?See results without voting
DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY #1
Do you consider yourself more closely aleigned with theSee results without voting
DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY #2
Are youSee results without voting
More by this Author
- 3Which High Profile Republicans are Voting for Hillary Clinton in Order to Save America? (updated 9/30/16)
Unlike any election before it, the stampede of high profile personalities from the opposing Party who not only won't vote for their Party's nominee, but actually will vote for the opponent.
Drug testing recipients of welfare payments has always been controversial; most States that have tried drug-testing direct testing have been unsucessful. Florida's governor, Rick Scott, is putting his hat in the ring...
When I say "Freeloading", that is of course, sarcasm: only a small percentage of those drawing welfare are actually freeloading although Conservatives would have you believe it is 100%.