Dateline: Purgatory - Darlie Routier Book

Darlie has been almost 20 years in prison and still has held to her innocence of the crime she was convicted of.
Darlie has been almost 20 years in prison and still has held to her innocence of the crime she was convicted of. | Source

Kathy Cruz Investigation

A new look at an old mystery.

Dateline: Purgatory is a fairly recent book out by Kathy Cruz. I was very anxious to read it knowing it would lead me through all the trial and days of the trial and conviction of Darlie Routier.

I have read through the court documents so much and I have read 1001 views of others. I find that quite a few of us (myself being one) who had no doubts that Darlie did this looked at it differently once we found out there was more than one scene at the silly string grave party that showed two sides of this mother. We only saw what the prosecution wanted us to see. (Much like the biased press of today.)

Kathy tells us how Dana, Darlie's younger sister has had a lifetime now of guilt being the one to bring the silly string and possibly causing the prosecution to have a ploy to convince not only the jury this made Darlie guilty but perhaps the general public.

It does seem clear in this reading that the jury will only see what the prosecution wants them to see. It is undeniable that the defense put little if any effort in this trial and objected to very little.

So it is very easy to see how a jury could be persuaded. So very much they do not see of what they should have and on one important issue they are even lied to.

Yet this does not call for a new trial? Let's see what you think from the information in this book.


Dateline Purgatory is full of food for thought for how this trial went.
Dateline Purgatory is full of food for thought for how this trial went. | Source

So Many Things Missed!

Such a sad excuse for a lawyer!

Several friends saw the sores in Darlie’s mouth and fed her ice to help the pain she is having even being half out of it. She was also heavily medicated the day of the silly string and suffering from dry mouth and was why she was acting loopy and smacking gum someone had given her for dry mouth her friends claim.

Could Darlie have been knocked out with ether or xylene it is questioned. Since these both were easy to obtain in 1996 for auto parts but also for building computer hard drives. This would answer so much of Darlie's actions and her sore mouth. This would have wiped out memory of the happenings and possibly struggle with someone trying to kill her and certainly answer all the confusion she had.

Neither of the Routier’s cars are in the driveway this night and the sports car is broken down. They were preparing to leave for vacation and did someone perhaps not seeing any cars think they were already gone?

They claimed no dust was wiped from the window that someone was supposed to have come through and the dirt was not disturbed. Darlie’s best friend’s husband (Kenneth Waits) said he checked this out after her sentencing and there was no dirt beneath the window to be disturbed and not only that but the big window was only about six inches off the ground which meant anyone could step right through it not having to disturb dust. He said they lied about all of that that was listed in her arrest affidavit. (Why did the defense not check any of this out?)

ugh the murders of her two sons instead of suggesting she may have been unconscious during that time which greatly affected the jury’s thinking. Did no one on the defense team question her muddled memory and what could possibly cause it if not the sliced throat?

Was there ever any suspect besides Darlie?
Was there ever any suspect besides Darlie? | Source

Tired of being Daisy Duke

Darlie asked Darin for a divorce just hours before the attacks on her and her sons. She said she did not feel like being Daisy Duke for him anymore dressing sexy in front of her sons was starting to bother her conscience and they were fighting about it often. So this was not the first time she threatened to divorce him; other times he threatened to hurt himself in front of their sons if she left him; but this time he just went upstairs and went to bed.

Working free for belief in Darlie's innocence

Stephen Cooper became Darlie’s court appointed lawyer in 1997 after her conviction no doubt because she had no more funds for a lawyer but this lawyer has gone on representing her at no charge because he believes in her innocence as so many have.

Several witnesses told the police they had seen a black car just before these murders. That they appeared to be watching the Routier house! Why would they lie? (The book will also tell you about a white truck that Darlie reported seeing that day and the connection it could have to two criminal thugs who claimed to have done some stabbing that night!)

Terry Laber and Bart Epstein, blood splatter experts, were prepared to testify that Darlie had not staged a crime scene but were never called to testify by Darlie’s Lawyer Mulder! They had already been paid except for travel expense to come testify. Mulder did not think they had anything to add to the case so he did not call them. With practically nothing for the defense why would he make this choice?

The defense kept claiming that Darlie slept through the murders of her two sons instead of suggesting she may have been unconscious during that time which greatly affected the jury’s thinking. Did no one on the defense team question her muddled memory and what could possibly cause it if not the sliced throat?

Source

Convenient Afterthoughts?

Casting doubt

Mulder claimed he was only Darin’s lawyer for less than 60 seconds when he was accused of breaking a gag order he had not been cautioned about. If Darlie was the only client then to save her life why did he not mention Darlie asking him for a divorce or mention the high insurance on Darlie’s life which the jury never got to hear about? He did bring it up for the sentencing…would that not have been important to at least put one doubt in the jury's mind?

Reasonable doubt?

A partial bloody print that still has not been identified.
A partial bloody print that still has not been identified. | Source

Unidentified fingerprint

The unidentified bloody partial fingerprint that was found on a glass sofa table by crime scene investigator James Con, between the room of the attacks and the kitchen was said during trial to be of a child’s between the age of five and six. After the trial a forensic anthropologist said it was a print of an unidentified adult. Although a scan of it could very well name the owner if the print is clear enough; law enforcement has to make that request and so far they clearly have no intent of doing so.

Is Darlie Routier Guilty?

Are you convinced of Darlie's guilt or do you think she could have been railroaded?

See results without voting

1. It was not at first known how the necklace became embedded but after removal two nicks were found in the necklace. The necklace could have well been what kept a main artery from being severed.

2. Investigator who questioned Darlie in hospital did not use recordings or written notes.

3. It wasn’t until five years after Darlie’s conviction that Darin confessed to plotting a break in for insurance scam.

4. With the growing number of influential people convinced of Darlie's innocence why can no one help her?

5.The sock in the alley contained Damon’s blood and no blood trail from Darlie was found meaning if she inflicted her own wounds it had to be after she stabbed him and since he was still living when the first respondent's arrived it meant he had to have been stabbed just minutes before not allowing the timeline it would have taken for Darlie to have done it and this from courtroom testimony. So Darlie had to be ruled out as the one to do this. No one bothered.

6. Sarilda, Darlie’s mother-in-law saw a mass of black bruises under Darlie’s hospital gown on her body not in view. Was this photographed? A nurse called these defense wounds.

7. Sandy Aitken, Darin’s aunt noted the judge went to sleep 16 times during the trial and was asleep seriously when the Rowlett Police Lieutenant James Walling was testifying about handling of bloody crime scene evidence some of which he put in the car and defense attorneys concerned with inexperienced police officers putting articles in the same bag making transference a possibility changing the interpretation of blood splatter.

8. All the evidence has been kept in brown grocery bags since 1996; moved around and back and forth when it should have been vacuum sealed! (You can see them in video below.)

9. The material found in the bread knife they claimed were from the screen was also consistent with fibers in a brush they would have used over fingerprints. Charles Linch who did this testing on this had been hospitalized for alcoholism and depression just previous to this which was not known until years later.

10. Why does the information sent back to the jury by court reporter Sandra Halsey saying the utility door was locked (which it was not but the garage door was locked) make grounds for a new trial? They had to wonder why there was absolutely no damage to this door when in fact all anyone had to do was simply open and walk in.

"An earthquake achieves what the law promises but does not in practice maintain — the equality of all men."

— Ignazio Silone
Source

Silvia Chase 3 years after Darlie's conviction

Forgiveness for Precious Angels

Barbara Davis who wrote Precious Angels accusing Darlie of killing her two sons now believes Darlie was railroaded.

Davis was in the house with her 25 year old son three years after Darlie was convicted when police broke down the door and shot and killed her son and arrested her. This was from a false police report in a drug investigation and Barbara had to grieve her dead son from jail; the same as Darlie Routier had hers. She changed her mind about Darlie’s guilt and apologized to Darlie and was instantly forgiven the same as the juror who asked forgiveness for his guilty vote.

More interesting tidbits

The Routier hose was torn all to pieces and parts of furniture, walls and appliances even, were taken as evidence. In the mass of things taken from the Routier house is Darlie's Will for her boys. She states who they should go to and how their inheritance would not be given to them until they are 25 if they do not go to college and that if they should marry the money would be protected by

So many questions

Here are a few that Dateline:Purgatory brings up:

Who was the man Darin saw in the house and thought was a policeman before the first policeman showed up? (If he is telling the truth; could this be the or one of the intruders going out the front door before police arrive?)

If Darlie threw the sock in the alley as a prop to make herself look innocent then why does she never mention it? When she is questioned she never says a word about the sock. So what was the point if she did indeed put it there?

Did prosecutors use breast implants and a male stripper to get the death penalty for Darlie? (They spent repeated times putting Darlie down as a woman to the jury as if that equaled murderer. Did it to the jury?)

What other mother has killed her children with her husband just feet away in the same house? (Can you name one?)

What was the motive given for Darlie killing her sons? (What mother who no longer wants her kids are so involved in their lives (school and home) as Darlie was?

Darlie's defense lawyer, Mulder, claimed he was only Darin’s lawyer for less than 60 seconds when Darin was accused of breaking a gag order he had not been cautioned about. If Darlie was the only client then to save her life why did he not mention Darlie asking Darin for a divorce or mention the high insurance Darin had on Darlie’s life which the jury never got to hear about? (Mulder only brought it up for the sentencing once she was found guilty.)

Source

Court Transcripts Incorrect

One of many flaws in this case.

Self-inflicted? In hospital photo. Main artery barely missed in her neck. Two jurors swear they never saw these photos.
Self-inflicted? In hospital photo. Main artery barely missed in her neck. Two jurors swear they never saw these photos.
Prosecution claim Darlie inflicted these wounds on herself before or after she stabbed her sons and ran and threw a sock down the alley.
Prosecution claim Darlie inflicted these wounds on herself before or after she stabbed her sons and ran and threw a sock down the alley.

I simply cannot believe Darlie made these wounds on herself and I do not see how anyone could. What other mother that murdered or tried to murder their child did this sort of injury to themselves? I really would like to see an example. Darlie always looked like a doll and there was no testimony from anyone that she ever enjoyed injuring herself. These are deep bruises and wounds; it took a lot of effort for them to be made. They are so obviously defense wounds; how much thought and effort it took if these were done by her and I will never believe she did this.

The jury asked if the utility door was locked and the answer sent back to them by the court reporter Sandra Halsey was ‘yes it was locked’ but the true answer was Darin said the garage door was locked but not the utility door. So the jury could have and maybe did assume from this that the utility door going into the house should have shown forced entry if someone came in through the window with the torn screen and through that door. Of course it did not have damage, being unlocked, but the jury never knew this.

There was a real mess also with this court reporter who was going through marital trouble with her husband and she claimed to not have the trial transcripts that were for some reason in her garage and to keep from getting into trouble she claimed they had been erased and she didn’t have them. Then she went before a judge and according to this book admittedly lied.

The court had to have them redone and was out the $74,000 Halsey was paid plus that again. Halsey allegedly had 3300 errors in the transcripts; misspellings, typographical errors, omitted words and misidentified speakers!

Supposedly when all this was said and done (the book is not clear on who said this) it was offered to Darlie to admit her guilt and they would take death off the table and she would just have life. She knows death could be coming soon since she is older and her notoriety is wearing off and the state would feel better in doing that now.

But she said no; she refused to say she was guilty of killing her sons; as she has continued to do now for almost 20 years. She says she is ready to die if that is how it is to be and that God must have His reason for all she has been through.

The Investigators

Video

Sources:

Dateline: Purgatory

YouTube videos

© 2015 Jackie Lynnley

More by this Author


Comments 345 comments

profile image

kezzy1996 20 hours ago

I may come across as harsh, but it is beyond me how anyone can defend what Darin did. Just because he wasn't charged for the crime doesn't make him innocent

TIME LINE OF ACCOUNTS

2:30 AM DARLIE IS IN THE KITCHEN SHE DIALS 911

2:30:15 DARLIE IS WALKING TOWARDS BOYS, TELLS DARIN TO HURRY

ACCORDING TO DARINS STATEMENT HE CLAIMS THAT HE CAME DOWN STAIRS BEFORE DARLIE DIALED 911, BUT THE 911 CALL PROVES DARIN DIDNT APPEAR IN THAT HALLWAY UNTIL AFTER DARLIE LEFT THE HALLWAY TO GO INTO THE KITCHEN TO GET THE PHONE. THIS GAVE DARIN THE CHANCE TO APPEAR IN THE HALLWAY. THIS ALSO PROVES DARLIE COULD NOT HAVE SEEN DARIN COME OUT OF HIS ROOM OR DOWN THE STAIRS.

DARLIES STATEMENT SHE SAYS SHE GOES TO DAMON FIRST, THEN SHE GOES OVER TO DEVON. THE 911 CALL PROVES THIS WAS TRUE.

2:30:39 DARLIE GOES OVER TO WHERE DEVON AND DARIN SCREAMS OUT DEVONS DEAD

SO WE KNOW DEVON WAS ALREADY DEAD WHEN DARIN GETS TO HIM. DARIN ADMITS THIS AND DARLIE CONFIRMS IT ON THE 911 CALL.

THE BLOOD PATTERN MAP ALSO CONFIRMS DARLIE DID GO OVER TO DEVON AFTER SHE HAD BEEN STABBED. THERE IS A BLOOD PUDDLE BESIDE THE SPOT WHERE DEVON WAY LAYING.

WHAT THE EVIDENCE DOESNT DO IS BACK UP DARINS ACCOUNTS OF WHAT HE CLAIMED HAPPENED.

DARIN SAID HE WAS IN HIS ROOM WHEN HE HEARD HE GLASS BREAK IN THE KITCHEN. THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSSIBLE FOR DARIN TO HAVE HEARD THAT GLASS BREAK IF HE WAS IN HIS ROOM. FIRST OF ALL THE DOG WOULD HAVE BEEN BARKING FRANTICALLY, HE WOULDNT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO HEAR THE GLASS BREAK OVER DARLIES DOG BARKING.

DARIN ALSO CLAIMED THAT DARLIE WAS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIRS SCREAMING WHEN HE CAME OUT OF HIS ROOM. THIS IS ALSO NOT TRUE. IF THIS WERE TRUE THEN THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A PUDDLE OF DARLIES BLOOD AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIRS AND THERE ISNT.

DARIN HAS 7 YEARS OF CPR TRAINING. HE KNEW DEVON WAS ALREADY DEAD WHEN HE GOT TO HIM. HE KNEW IT WAS TOO LATE FOR DEVON. A PERSON COULD UNDERSTAND HIM STAYING WITH DEVON FOR MAYBE 1 OR EVEN 2 MINUTES. DARIN STAYED WITH DEVON AND DELIBRATELY DENIED DAMON ANY ASSISTANCE FOR OVER 3 MINUTES.

3:30:20 DARIN DIDNT LEAVE DEVONS SIDE UNTIL AFTER HE HEARD THE FIRST OFFICER PULL UP TO THE HOUSE. DARIN CLAIMED IN HIS POLICE STATEMENT HE WENT UPSTAIRS TO PUT HIS PANTS ON JUST AS POLICE AND MEDICS WERE COMING THROUGH THE DOOR. THIS IS NOT TRUE ACCORDING TO THE 911 CALL. DARIN DID GO UP STAIRS JUST BEFORE THE POLICE ARRIVED BUT IT WASNT TO PUT HIS PANTS ON, AND THE POLICE AND MEDICS WERE NOT COMING THROUGH THE FRONT DOOR.

THEN DARIN SAYS HE RUNS OUT THE FRONT DOOR AND HE RUNS OVER TO KAREN. WE KNOW THIS WAS ANOTHER LIE DARIN TOLD BECAUSE OF SEVERAL WITNESSES TESTIMONY. OFFICER WADDELL, AND MR. GORSUCH BOTH GAVE THE SAME STORY. THEY SAID DARIN RAN OUT OF THE HOUSE AND RAN RIGHT INTO OFFICER WADDELL, THEY THEN SAID THEY TURNED AROUND AND WENT BACK INTO THE HOUSE. THE 911 CALL ALSO BACKS UP WADDELLS ACCOUNTS.

DARIN CLAIMS HE RAN OVER TO KARENS TO GET HELP. THIS IS ALSO A LIE AND IS BACKED UP BY KAREN NEILS TESTIMONY. DARIN DIDNT GO OVER TO HER HOUSE UNTIL AFTER THE MEDICS AND POLICE HAD ENTERED THE HOME. MEDICS AND POLICE ALL SAID DARIN WAS IN THE HOME WHEN THEY ENTERED THE HOUSE. DARIN HAD NO REASON TO GO OVER AND PUT ON THAT ACT LIKE HE WAS DESPERATE TO GET HELP FOR HIS BOYS. DARIN NEVER HELPED OR EVEN TOUCHED EITHER DYING VICTIM. HE INTENTIONALLY USED HIS SON DEAD BODY AS AN EXCUSE NOT TO HELP DARLIE AND DAMON.

I CAN SEE SOMEONE GIVING DARIN THE BENIFIT OF THE DOUBT IF THERE WAS A FEW INCONSISTANCIES BUT THAT IS NOT THE CASE.

DARIN KNEW DEVON HAD BEEN DEAD FOR OVER 4 MINUTES WHEN HE WALKED BACK INTO THAT HOUSE WITH WADDELL. THERE IS NO EXCUSE DARIN CAN USE TO EVEN TRY TO EXPLAIN WHY WHEN WADDELL ASKED HIM TO HELP DAMON HE DELIBRATELY WENT BACK TO HIS DEAD SON AND DENIED DAMON ANY ASSISTANCE. THIS WAS COLD AND CALCULATED AND DELIBRATE. HOW CAN ANYONE POSSIBLY IGNORE WHAT DARIN HAD DONE.

WADDELL HAD NO IDEA THAT DARIN HAD DELIBRATELY DENIED AND AVOIDED HELPING DARLIE OR DAMON FOR THREE MINUTES BEFORE HE ARRIVED. IF ANYONE HAD EVEN INVESTIGATED DARIN IN THE SLIGHTEST THEY WOULD HAVE KNOWN EXACTLY WHAT DARIN HAD DONE.

STARTING WITH HIS PREMEDITATION OF THIS CRIME. TO HUGE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY ON DARLIE AND THE ONES ON HIS BOYS, TO THE SETTING UP OF THE SUSPICIOUS BLACK CAR WITH HIS EMPLOYEE, TO THE PLANNED ROBBERY TO COLLECT INSURANCE, TO THE PAST FRAUD INSURANCE CLAIM HE ALREADY GOT PAID OUT ON, TO THE FAILING BUSINESS THAT HE ENDED UP CLOSING DOWN, TO THE CHEATING ON DARLIE GIVING HER AN INCURABLE STD, TO HIS USE OF COCAINE AND OTHER DRUGS, TO HIS HUGE OVER DUE BILLS AND BROKE BANK ACCOUNT.

THERE IS NO WAY THE JURY COULD HAVE CONVICTED DARLIE KNOWING ALL THESE THINGS. THEY WOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT DARLIE COULD NOT HAVE GIVEN DARIN THAT ALIBI. EVERY SINGLE LIE DARIN HAS TOLD FROM THE START HAS BEEN TO SET DARLIE UP AND TO TRY AND MAKE HIMSELF LOOK INNOCENT.

THE LAST EVIL DIG THAT DARIN TOOK AT HIS BOYS WAS WHEN HE TOOK IT APON HIMSELF TO BURY THOSE BOYS WITH SWORDS AND PLAY THAT GANGSTER SONG. DARLIE MAY HAVE BEEN CELEBRATING THE BIRTHDAY OF DEVON, BUT DARIN WAS SECRETLY LAUGHING AT THE ENTIRE WORLD WHEN THOSE BOYS WERE LAID TO REST WITH THE VERY WEAPON THAT TOOK THEIR LIVES. SHAME ON THE LEGAL SYSTEM, AND DARLIE LAWYER, AND MOSTLY GREG DAVIS. HE KNEW AND STILL KNOWS OF DARINS GUILT AND TO SAVE FACE HE STAYED SILENT WHEN HE KNEW HE SHOULD HAVE ARRESTED AND CHARGED DARIN.

The prosecution knew and still knows that Darins jeans have blood evidence on them that proves he was right there with both boys when they were stabbed. Darin might be able to explain away Devons blood but there is no way in hell for him to explain how Damons blood spatter ended up on his jeans. Darin never went anywhere near Damon. He denied that boy any assistance at all. This also explains why there was the boys blood on Darins runners in the garage and also on his sock that was found in that back alley.

Darlie kees knows all these facts and has known for years. She has chosen to protect her son in law and allowed her daughter to remain on death row waiting to be murdered by the state.


profile image

kezzy1996 25 hours ago

Heather Blaze: Darlie kee has not helped Darlie because she knows the spotlight would be put on Darin. You obviously haven't watched Darins interviews where he talks in detail of Devons death and that so called cpr he did on him. He is grinning when he is talking to the two investigators. His creepy sickening eyes are darting back and forth with excitement at the shocked reaction from those investigators. You show me one video of any other innocent parent that goes on not one but several interviews just to talk about their heroics in trying to save their child.

For crying out loud open your eyes. Darin knew when he went upstairs just before the police Devon was dead. Darin knew Devon was dead when he first got to him. When him and Waddell came back in Waddell told Darin to go over to Damon to help him. Darin didn't. He walked right past that living boy and took Devons dead body and used it to do a fake cpr on him. Darin knew Devon died 4 minutes earlier. He has 7 years cpr experience. He knew Damon needed help to survive and he stepped right over that boy to go over to Devon to pretend to be trying to save him. Darin has lied and changed many of his stories but he cant change what witnesses saw.

And don't say Darlie didn't do anything for son. What the hell is wrong with you. Damon lived for 6 minutes. Darin never touched that boy only Darlie did. She must have done something right to keep him alive for that long.

I have no idea why you would defend what Darin did to his children. Watch that video of going into detail of the cpr . He tramples over the very spot where Devon died and he fakes sitting down and acts out what he did on june 6th. If that doesn't convince you of how sick that creep is. Then watch the video of him talking to the investigators. He is grinning, no doubt about it. Focus on Darin for once. Go through his accounts of what he says happens when he gets down stairs. None of it adds up, not even his statement claiming Darlie saw him come out of his room. 


profile image

kezzy1996 39 hours ago

Jackie: yea, your right I have to try and reach out to others. What I don't understand here is there is a father who murdered his children and robbed his son of ever being a part of his mothers life is still free. This isn't even about solving a case anymore. I know you care about this case and those boys. This is way beyond Darlie being guilty or not.

This is about Darin killing his kids. There is enough evidence to prove he killed his family I would like for you to work with us to try and get someone to listen to us.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 40 hours ago from The Beautiful South Author

I guess all you can do Kezy is try to finally reach the right person who may listen. Have you sent emails or letters out to certain ones about all this?


profile image

kezy1996 2 days ago

Jackie: I don't know if you are aware of this but Basia showed up at he Routier home right after the boys were stabbed. She was aware of Darins plans for the home robbery but when she called the detective over to tell him about he black car she never mentioned the robbery Darin had been planning.

Not only that Basia also knew the person who had been stalking the Routier home for those days leading up to the robbery. She said she was to scared to tell the police who that person was. Now that is more than strange. If she wasn't involved in the crime then why would she be scared to tell the truth about that black car. She said the person in the black car was a friend of her daughters. She also said she told them to go by the Routier neighborhood to get ideas for landscaping. If she were innocent and that black car had nothing to hide then why would she not come forward and tell the truth, and why wouldn't that person driving that black car come forward.

After Darin closed his business and she realized she was not getting her share of the partnership in Darins business she turned on Darlie and testified against her in court. Yet she kept all those lies and secrets about Darin away from the police and lawyers. Not only that Darin had been bragging to her about how much money he was going to be making on movie and book deals.

When Darin and Darlie's sister showed up at the Routier home laughing and joking throwing away all the gifts people left for the babies, Darin was counting the dollars on how much he was going to be making from the death of his boys.

Darlie Kee has not made herself available to try and learn or search any evidence to try and prove her daughters innocence. She has always known what has really been going on while her daughter has been sitting on death row.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 days ago

Jackie: No matter what they say about Darlies guilt, it does not change the fact that Darin used Devons dead body to deceive Darlie and to deceive officer Waddell. Darin can not explain that evidence away. Why the hell wasn't he charged for that at the very least?


profile image

kezzy1996 2 days ago

Jackie: Your right about nothing being done. I have tried calling Cooper many times. He either doesn't answer his phone or he isn't interested in new evidence. I don't know what Darlies mother has been spending all that collection money on, but it sure as hell hasn't been to help her daughter


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 2 days ago from The Beautiful South Author

Maybe they will never kill Darlie, maybe there is reasonable doubt in someone's mind but it sure looks like little is being done to ever get her another trial and Darin seems pretty sure of that.


profile image

kezy1996 3 days ago

The biggest clue in solving the Devon and Damon Routier murders is the evidence that was hidden from the jury regarding Darin Routiers involvement.

The jury was led to believe that Darin was not and could not have been the killer. Through searching the evidence in this case it is fact that Darlie did not, and could not have seen Darlie come out of his room, let alone run down those stairs.

I have never heard the words come directly from Darlies mouth that she saw Darin come out of his room.

It isnt just a possibility that Darin could have did this crime, but it is very probable.

Darin said he came out of his room, ran down the stairs screaming and pushed past Darlie and ran right over to Devon.

This did not happen and this is why.

First of all Darlie was never standing at the foot of those stairs, and if she had been then there would have been a puddle of her blood somewhere near the stairs or the landing. There is no evidence to collaberate Darins story.

Darin said he came down the stairs and after he got to the bottom of the stairs he yelled at Darlie to call 911 as he was running over to Devon. So this means Darin would have had to take only a few steps to run over to Devon as soon as he got to the bottom of the stairs. This also means Darin would have already been with Devon and doing cpr on him when Darlie came back from the kitchen to get the phone.

If you listen to the 911 call it is fact that Darlie is saying to Darin 15 seconds into that call to hurry. This proves that Darlie was not in view of Darin when he appeared on the scene. He waited until she went to the kitchen out of site so he could appear. That is why she caught Darin on his way over to Devon, and not after he was with Devon. To further confirm this. Darlie said she stopped at Damon first and then went over to Devon. At 39 seconds into the call she screams out Devon is dead. Darin continued to stay with Devons dead body for over 3 minutes. Darin himself admitted Devon was already dead when he first got to him.

I would like to know why Darin never touched Damon. He never went anywhere near that boy at all ever. When he left Devons side he ran right past Damon and went upstairs. He said he went up there to put his pants on, but we know that was a lie.

Darins accounts of June 6th.

2:30 am Darlie goes to the kitchen and dials 911.

2:30:15 Darlie is in the hallway heading back to the boys. On the 911 call Darlie is heard saying to Darin hurry. This proves that Darin did not come out of his room and run down those stairs before Darlie dialed 911.

2:30:20 Darlie is in the hallway standing with Damon, while Darin is with Devon

2:30:39 Darlie goes over to where Devon and Darin are. She screams out on the 911 call that Devon is dead. This was confirmed many times by Darin himself. Darin said Devon was already dead when he first got to him.

2:33:20 For three minutes Darin stays with Devon. Darin said he didnt know Darlie was hurt, and he didnt help Damon because he had no pulse, even though Darlie is heard on the 911 call talking to Damon. Darin does not stop at Damons body or Darlie, he runs right past both victims and runs upstairs just as Waddell pulled up to the front of the house. We know this because Darin said this in his statement, and we also heard the dog bark for the first time. So this dog had been locked in the bedroom upstairs with the baby.

2:33:30 Darin emerges from his bedroom upstairs and runs down the stairs and right out the front door. He runs into Waddell in the middle of the yard. Both Waddell and Darin go right back into the house.

2:33:45 Darin and Waddell are in the house. They first see Damon on the floor trying to move. He is trying to crawl and looking around the room. Waddell said he looked over at Devon and knew Devon was dead. Waddell told Darin to go over to Damon and help him, Waddell is heard on the 911 call trying to help Darlie.

Darin claims he didnt come into the house with Waddell. Darin has claimed that he went over to karens, but the 911 call proves this was not true. Darin also said he was not the person who ran out the front door when Waddell first arrived, but an eye witness saw Darin running in front of his home when Waddell arrived. Darin claimed that Waddell had allowed the intruder to run from the home. We also know this was not true.

The big question here is why didnt Darin go over to help Damon. Waddell knew Devon was already dead, and he didnt understand why Darin immediately ran over to Devon and not Damon. What Waddell didnt know was Darin had already been with Devon for over three minutes before he arrived. Darin knew absolutely Devon was gone, and he knew it was crucial that Damon get some assistance.

Darin had been doing cpr on Devon in front of Darlie before Waddell arrived, it made no sense to me why Darin would have put on that show in front of Waddell unless it was to try and cover up. Darin had intentionally denied help to Darlie and Damon that was obvious.

There is no doubt that the jury would not have been able to convict Darlie if they had been shown all the evidence against Darin.

They didn't see the jeans Darin had on that had blood spatter on it that could have only gotten there if he had been the one who stabbed the boys. Darin never went anywhere near Damon so this proves he had to have been near him during the stabbings.


profile image

kezy1996 6 days ago

You mentioned that Darlie's attorney and the prosecution never looked at Darin, but that's not true. The prosecution absolutely looked at Darin. In fact, I saw an interview with Greg Davis that happened about a year-and-a-half ago and he specifically said that the investigators and the prosecution, himself included, were convinced that Darin knows more than he's saying. They just didn't have the evidence to prove it. Greg Davis said that directly himself. So the prosecution absolutely believed that Darin was either involved or complicit in helping Darlie cover up this crime.

YES YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT DAVIS KNOWING DARIN WAS GUILTY, WHAT I AM SAYING IS DARIN WAS SPARED PROSECUTION BECAUSE HE MADE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE DA'S OFFICE. THAT IS THE ONLY EXPLANATION FOR THEM ALLOWING DARIN TO WALK FREE. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN THE KARLA HOMOLKA CASE IN CANADA. THEY MADE A DEAL WITH HER BEFOR THEY FOUND THE TAPES WHERE SHE PARTICIPATED IN THE RAPE AND MURDER OF ALL THOSE GIRLS INCLUDING HER OWN SISTER. THEY HAVE TO OF MADE A DEAL WITH DARIN, THAT IS THE ONLY EXPLANATION FOR HIM BEING FREE TODAY.

I WA S REFERRING TO DARLIES LAWYER MULDER. DARIN AND DARLIE HIRED HIM ONLY BECAUSE HE AGREED TO NOT IMPLICATE DARIN IN THE CRIME. READ THROUGH THE TRANSCRIPTS. ANY AND ALL TIMES THAT DARINS ACTIVITIES OR WHEREABOUTS CAME UP THEY ALL CHANGED THE SUBJUECT. THEY CAN SAY WHAT EVER THEY WANT BUT THE FACTS PROVE DARLIE DIDNT AND COULDNT HAVE SEEN DARIN COME OUT OF HIS ROOM. THAT ONE EXPLANATION AND THAT ALONE WAS THE ONLY EXCUSE THEY HAD NOT TO GO AFTER DARIN.

I HAVE ASKED OVER AND OVER THROUGH THE YEARS. SHOW ME ONE BIT OF PROOF WHERE DARLIE ACTUALLY SAYS SHE SAW HIM COME OUT OF HIS ROOM AND DOWN THOSE STAIRS. YOU WILL NOT FIND IT, BECAUSE DARLIE NEVER TOOK IT TO THAT EXTENT TO PROTECT DARIN. SHE WAS BULLIED INTO SAYING DARIN WASNT THE ONE, BUT SHE NEVER USED THOSE WORDS.

I HAVE FOUND PROOF OF DARINS GUITLT, AND I AM NOT ASHAMED TO SAY IT. THEY ARE COVERING FOR DARIN, I AM HAVE MY SPECTULATIONS AS TO WHY. THAT MIGHT NOT BE PROOF BUT ITS REASONABLE DOUBT THAT MULDER NEVER BROUGHT TO TRIAL.

I do agree with you that Darin knows more than he is saying and that Darin may have been involved in this crime.

TRUST ME, HE IS MORE THAN INVOLVED. HE CONVINCED DARLIE THAT HE WASNT THE INTRUDER, BUT HER DESCRIPTION OF THE INTRUDER SHE GAVE RIGHT AFTER POLICE ARRIVED WAS MORE THAN ENOUGH TO PROVE TO ME HE DID IT. THE POLICE SCREWED UP, AND EVERYONE COVERED UP FOR THEM.

NABORS STILL WORKS FOR THAT POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND HE IS STILL STICKING TO HIS LIES.

Where my opinion differs from yours is that I firmly believe that Darlie was also involved in this crime. Many of the reasons for that were listed by Shaun Edmonds. My primary reason is that if this were done for insurance money Darlie would be as dead as Devon and Damon with deep stab wounds, not a quarter inch slash.

Additionally, it's been pretty well established that Darlie herself told Mulder that he was not allowed to pursue Darin. It was one of the reasons darlie fired her original two court appointed attorneys, because they wanted to go after Darin. And she wouldn't allow it.

I KNOW THAT, BUT DARLIE KEE WAS BEHIND ALL OF THAT. SHE KNEW DARIN WAS INVOLVED AND SHE COVERED FOR HIM. SHE IS STILL COVERING FOR HIM. THERE IS SOMETHING SICKENING ABOUT THAT WOMAN. SHE DOESNT HAVE NORMAL FEELINGS TOWARDS DARIN. THAT IS OBVIOUS. DARLIE HAS HER DOUBTS NOW THAT DARLIE KEE AND DARIN AREN''T RIGHT THERE TO FEED HER THE INFORMATION THEY WANT TO HER TO HEAR.

DARLIE IS NOT GOING TO GET A NEW TRIAL UNLESS SHE GETS OFF HER ASS AND DOES HER OWN RESEARCH. DARLIE KEE CONTROLLED THE DNA TESTING, AND SHE DELIBRATELY LEFT OUT ANY TESTING THAT PROVED DARINS GUILT. THAT IS ONE OF THE REASONS DARLIE LOST HER FINANCIAL SUPPORT. SHE WILL NEVER GET OUT SO LONG AS SHE DEFENDS A BABY KILLER.

Darlie has repeatedly, even to this day, stated that the Intruder was absolutely, positively NOT Darin.

READ HER DESCRIPTION OF THE INTRUDER, IT MATCHES DARIN EXATLY. LISTEN TO THE 911 CALL. DARLIE WAS NOT AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIRS WHEN DARIN APPEARED. HE WAITED UNTIL SHE WAS OUT OF THAT AREA AND OUT OF SIGHT BEFORE HE APPEARED.

I DONT MEAN TO IGNORENT HERE, BUT I HAVE RESEARCHED THIS CASE FOR MANY YEARS. DARLIE DIDNT SEE DARIN COME OUT OF THAT ROOM.

GO TO 15 SECONDS INTO THAT CALL. ACCORDING TO DARIN HE CAME DOWN THE STAIRS AND HE PUSHED DARLIE ASIDE AND HE RAN RIGHT OVER TO DEVON.

THEN EXPLAIN TO ME WHY SHE GOES AND GETS THAT PHONE AND SECONDS LATER SHE IS HEARD TELLING DARIN TO HURRY. DARIN JUST APPEARED THE SECOND SHE WAS OUT OF SIGHT. IF THEY HAD CHECKED OUT DARINS STORY THEY WOULD HAVE KNOWN IMMEDIATLELY THAT HE LIED ABOUT EVERYTHING.

THE REASON I DONT BELIEVE DARLIE WAS INVOLVED IS BECAUSE DARIN WOULDNT HAVE GONE THROUGH ALL THAT TROUBLE TO TRY AND CONVINCE DARLIE THAT IT WAS NOT HIM WHO KILLED THOSE BOYS. IF DARLIE WAS IN ON DARINS PLAN THEN WE NEVER WOULD HAVE FOUND EVIDENCE OF DARIN TRYING TO COVER UP.

So if you truly believe Darin did it, you must also believe that Darlie is either lying or purposely covering up for him.

I HAVE HAD DOUBTS, THE ONE QUESTTION THAT KEPT COMING UP WITH ME WAS WHY DIDNT ANYONE ASK DAMON WHO DID THAT TO HIM. NOT ONE PERSON, DARLIE, WADDELL, WALLING,THE MEDICS, NO BODY. DARLIE WASNT CONCERNED WITH THE INTRUDER THAT 911 CALL PROVED THAT TO ME. IT WAS DARIN, DURING THOSE 5 MINUTES AND 44 SECONDS ALL DARIN TALKED ABOUT WAS THAT INTRUDER, YET HE NEVER LOOKED FOR HIM, HE NEVER ASKED DAMON WHO DID THAT TO HIM. HE DIDNT EVEN TOUCH OR GO NEAR HIS LIVING SON. HE STAYED THE ENTIRE TIME WITH THE SON HE KNEW AND ADMITTED WAS DEAD WHEN HE FIRST GOT TO HIM.

DARIN USED DEVONS DEAD BODY TO DECIEVE DARLIE THEN TO DECIEVE AND SHOCK OFFICER WADDELL. I KNOW HE IS GUILTY AND I AM GOING TO PROVE IT.


profile image

kezy1996 7 days ago

Jackie: Well it didn't take Bryan St John to try and milk his son crime. Apparently he is out there blaming welfare or social services for allowing his son to be around the 2 year old boy. He is already trying to get paid out for legal fee's. WOW


profile image

kezzy1996 7 days ago

Polly: Sorry Polly, its hard to find anything new on this case. Nobody seems to care that a innocent mother was set up and the killer is free to live his life. There is mounds of evidence right there on the internet to prove Darlies innocence, but it takes a lot of time combing through it. I have been coming here hoping to learn new things, but people have been so beat down by Bryan and his clan that they found better things to research.

This might be new. I believe that Darin turned on Darlie and that's the reason they tried so desperately to hide the evidence against Darin. I guess the state of Texas is ok with letting a child killer go free.

Darin bragged about the money is going to make off the movie deals about this story. Guess Texas is ok with that might bring tourist to that state, kinda like the way they slaughtered Aileen Wornos. They made blood money off her, while pulling the plug.


profile image

kezy1996 7 days ago

This was the article where Bryan comments on his own sons involvement. Makes me sick, he doesn't even know if his son is guilty and he is out there publicly putting thoughts in the minds everyone.

The incarcerated St. John’s father, Bryan St. John, has said his son should not have been in contact with the 2-year-old due to the case.

“The Children Services worker knew he was in the house when he shouldn’t have been in the house,” Bryan St. John said. “I would like to see that Children Services worker held accountable for this as well as anything that, if the evidence shows my son did this, he needs to be held accountable as well.”

Martin said she allowed St. John and two siblings to stay in her residence “because their mom just got kicked out” and “they didn’t have nowhere to go.”

The Dayton Daily News asked Dayton police for an interview regarding the investigation. No response was obtained.

The deceased child’s 19-year-old father, Darryl Ferguson, is serving the first year of an 11-year voluntary manslaughter sentence at a state correctional institution in Noble County for the 2014 beating death of Ryan Adams.


profile image

kezy1996 7 days ago

Jackie: I wanted to further comment on Darlie Kee's strange protectiveness towards Darin. It is far more than strange. I believe Darlie Kee had more than just friendly feelings towards Darin when she worked with him at the restaurant. She introduced her 15 year old daughter to this man. That isn't just inappropriate, but it was just plain sick. Darin didn't just manipulate Darlie Kee, he also got to Darlies sister. He was seen publicly making out with her after Darlie's conviction. Darin didn't move in with his family during or after the conviction of Darlie. Darin made sure he stayed as close as possible to Darlie Kee, he moved in with her. Here is man that was in the home while the family was attacked, claiming to be asleep the entire time. Through investigation Darlie Kee was told that there was over whelming evidence to prove Darins guilt, I personally spent years looking through this, and it is absolutely true. I have found evidence that proves Darins guilt. There was more than enough grounds to take Darin in and they have done nothing. Knowing all this evidence was there to prove Darins guilt, Darlie Kee allowed that man to move into her home.

She didn't even bother to look into Darin. That convinced me without doubt that her feelings towards Darin were never as a son in law. I have seen no evidence of Darlie Kee ever trying to help Darlie.

The only thing she has done is rob the public for funding. I have called Cooper many times and this lawyer that has been paid to help Darlie doesn't even answer his phone half the time. He isn't even willing to look at new evidence.

I believe Darlie kee has instructed Cooper to focus on the intruder theory and nothing else. This also proves to me she is fully aware of Darins guilt.

Basia admitted that she knew the owner of that black car that Darin had been talking about before and after the crime. Basia said she was to scared to go to the police about the black car. That convinced me even more of her involvement in that crime. She says she believes Darin helped stage, but I know she knows he played a much bigger part in that crime.


profile image

kezy1996 8 days ago

Jackie: Bryan St Johns son was arrested for killing a 2 year old boy on valentines day. Bryan for years slandered Darlie kee for her parenting and basically contributed that to why Darlie may have killed her kids. Now Bryans son is charged with murdering a 2 year old boy. I was pointing out in that Basia tape he did where he was pushing his child away while he was smoking talking murder, and swearing on the tape in front of his child. He was on youtube making the tape for over an hour and at the end of the tape he tells Basia he has to go feed his kid, but in the meantime he spent over an hour pushing that child away. Bryans kids have been exposed to everything, a child shouldn't be exposed to cig smoke first of all, but he kept his children in the room when he went into detail of the murders and slandering Darlie and her mother and whoever else. Bryan admitted he was reported for child abuse, he has threatened many people on the internet. Now we get to have a look at how Bryan raised his son to become a killer, if he is convicted.

Not only that Bryans first words about this case regarding his son, weren't defending him, saying innocent until proven guilty, Bryans first words were if he did then he should pay the price. What the hell kind of parent says that when your child hasn't even gone to trial.

Bryan is going to try and use this to make money and exploit it.

Not only that, Darlie kee reaches out and she tells Bryan she is sorry. WTF, after everything Bryan has done to that family, Darlie kee again back stabs her own daughter to reach out to Bryan. There is some serious crap going on here. I wanted to puke when I heard that.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 8 days ago from The Beautiful South Author

I really hate that about Kee but there are some mothers out there not like most of us are used to. I never saw what she saw in hi in the first place to want her daughter to meet. He is not nor never was good looking to me. Good thing the kids looked like her.

What murder case are you speaking of? I would be interested to look at it.


profile image

kezy1996 8 days ago

Jackie: There is so many things that Darlie mother could have been doing for her daughter, but since the money stopped rolling in and the interviews stopped. Darlie has had little or no support at all.


profile image

kezy1996 8 days ago

Jackie: I should have stayed away from Bryan years ago. The more I listened to his mouth the more repulsed I became. He wont make this about that baby, he will make it all about him. At least he will be leaving Darlie alone for awhile.

He is apparently friends with Darlie kee now. I have no idea how Kee can be so sickening. This man called her every name under the sun, he completely trashed her daughter in every way imaginable and now Bryan and Kee are apparently friends. So horribly pathetic.

There are still people focusing on trying to get help for Darlie, I really hope we can at least try and get her a new trial. Another child murderer in the news is not going to help her case at all.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 8 days ago from The Beautiful South Author

He does seem very hostile (though it has been awhile since I have listened to him). I found him to have an unnatural hate for Darlie but then there have been others online like that too that seems to go beyond understanding. Many have their opinions based on the trash the cops dug up on her which is exactly why they did that. It worked on that jury for sure.


profile image

kezzy1996 8 days ago

I know this isn't the blog for St. John, but I have argued and posted regarding Bryan St. Johns threats to peoples lives all over the internet. I have pointed out the horrible treatment his kids have been subjected to on his video'. Thousands watched those video's and they just turned the other cheat. Bryan is smoke cigs and talking murder while his young child is patting him on the shoulder asking to be fed. What is Bryan doing in that video besides slandering Darlie Routier, he is pushing his kid aside continuing on with his video. If this type of abuse goes on camera, imagine what his household must be like what he isn't on camera


profile image

kezy1996 9 days ago

Jackie: Darlie kee has always known about Darins guilt, and she has always chosen to defend him over her own daughter. The problem with Darlie is she trusted Darin and her mother, so between the two of them, Darlie only heard what they wanted her to hear. Darlie kee and Darin walked out of court arm in arm in one interview. I wanted to puke. If you read the posts about this case, there is only a very few that defend Darin outright, and I am pretty sure that Darin and or Darlie kee, and Darins familys is behind all of them. Anyone not familiar with this case that just comes by to have a peak, instantly know Darin was more than involved. Even that crap about Glen, that came from Darin, and Darlie played right into it. He knew she would beak off and that's exactly what she did.

Personally, I think Darin went behind Darlies back after the police screwed up the crime scene and screwed up their prime suspect Darin by allowing him to destroy evidence and handle the crime scene. I think he made a deal with the state as part of the whole cover up. That is the only thing can could explain why Darin is not on death row today.

He used Darlie to give him an alibi, and then he used Basia, her mother and himself to destroy in her in court.

The jury never heard what a horrible creep that guy really was. Darlie deserves to have a new trial, and the jury deserves the right to hear the truth about Darin.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 9 days ago from The Beautiful South Author

No reason to delete, I want any information I can get ad wow this does say a lot. Even if she was fed up with him we can imagine how after she was charged with murdering her boys she would get so dependent on Darin being all she has and I am sure if guilty himself he would have taken every advantage of that to make her look more guilty. I wonder if he even somehow managed to put doubts in Darlie Kee's mind.


profile image

lindaf3 9 days ago from Amsterdam, The Netherlands

kezzy please check your message on Fb!


profile image

kezy1996 9 days ago

Jackie: Darin didn't want that last kid, Darlie was terrified to tell him she was pregnant, so much so she contemplated getting rid of it. I don't know if its ok to say this but you can delete, but he didn't just give her a venereal disease it was herpies, and according to ones around her there is no cure for that. He apparently cheated on her with an old girl friend. I don't care what anyone says, Darin screams guilt. I know for a fact Darlie didn't see darin come out of his room. That 911 call proves Darin didn't appear in that hallway until after Darlie went into the kitchen. If the police and her lawyer would have checked that 911 call and checked his statements they would have known he was lying and they would checked Darlie more carefully for drugs and tried to find out more about her strange behavior and memory loss. They fixated on her and let the killer go free.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 10 days ago from The Beautiful South Author

I didn't know about the affair. No one can say there is not reasonable doubt!


profile image

kezzy1996 12 days ago

lindaf3: do you know if its true about Darin cheating on Darlie and giving her a sexually transmitted disease? I don't get how he could have never been a suspect, even now why aren't they looking into this. Darlie deserves a new trial. A jury needs to hear all the details, not just the crap about Darlie.

That lawyer went out of his way to make sure he protected Darin. There was very objections that Darlies defence made. I don't see how they can execute her when there is so many unanswered questions.


profile image

kezzy1996 12 days ago

lindaf3: Did you watch that video I told you about? Isn't against the law for an adult to smoke in front of children? It should be against the law for them to carry on a conversation about murder. Talk about child abuse, to busy slandering people on the internet to take care of his kids, very sad. He has no room to be putting anyone down that's for sure.


profile image

kezy1996 13 days ago

Jackie: You know something else that is very interesting. Mulder was very deliberate in his questioning in court on the 911 call. He made sure he avoided any parts of that call that might have implicated Darin.

He never asked the big question, did you see him come out of his room. He knew that when Darlie said hurry 15 seconds into that 911 call she was talking to Darin. That proved he was not there before she went and got that phone. Its obvious to me he coached her on the way to the police station on the 8 th.


profile image

kezy1996 13 days ago

Jackie: Yes I agree, I don't believe Darlie knew he did it, and don't believe she would have ever covered for him. There are to many things that lead away from that theory.

Darin definitely didn't show up until Darlie was out of sight, if they were in on it together, that wouldn't have mattered. I believe Darlie did cover and back him when he said he was in his room, but I checked and she has never come right out and said she saw him come out of his room. She defended and believed him, but not to the extent that she used those exact words.

I am sure Darlie has had a lot of time to put the pieces together and there is a lot to sort through, but after Darin stopped going there and controlling what she was hearing and seeing, Darlie learned a lot of things about Darin. That is why now she believes he might have been involved.

I cant get past that black car. Its to much of a coincidence First his employees mother sees it that and points it out to Darlie, then Darin claims he saw it when he came home. The neighbor said she saw it out and went over to find out what was going on, and the sped away, then Basia and her mother saw the car speeding away at 6 pm. I believe that car was there for Darin or because of Darin.

If that person was innocent and didn't have anything to hide, then why not come forward. It was Darin that pushed the robbery/sexual assault theory not Darlie. Most of all I do not believe that girl would have ever done that to those boys or to herself.

Darlie can help herself right now if she goes through those transcripts and realizes that Darin was not there when he claimed to be. I already know she didn't see him come down those stairs or even out of his room, She would have left a blood puddle there and there is no evidence of that.

The only way I would ever believe that Darin didn't do this is if Darlie told me in her own words that there was no way for him to have fooled her. I already know she cant do that because she has already admitted it was possible and she has doubts about him.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 13 days ago from The Beautiful South Author

Kezzy, I think Darin very well could have gotten Darlie to say certain things to cover for him but just to protect him not because she thought he was guilty. I will never believe she thought he killed the boys and covered for him and of course he visited her faithfully and plead his undying love for years to her in prison while he was making money on the whole act he was putting on.


profile image

kezzy1996 13 days ago

Jackie: When you look at the questioning that Mulder did regarding the 911 call, he deliberately went right past all the parts of that 911 call that made Darin look guilty.

Mulder skipped right past the part where Darin was harassing Darlie about missing items. He doesn't mention anything about her getting mad at Darin for insisting it was a robbery.

If this was a set up done by Darlie why would she have left her jewellery right there in the open. Wouldn't she have gotten rid of it?

That intruder she talks about didn't run out the quickest exit, he was headed right over to Darlies jewellery. This crime was interrupted. I am very sure of that. This entire 911 call screams guilt for Darin, and Mulder deliberately avoided any questions at all that pointed to Darin as being that intruder. No wonder the jury found her guilty.


profile image

kezzy1996 13 days ago

Jackie: That is very odd, I have gone through everything and there is nothing to indicate to me that there was an intruder.

There is something that is bothering about Darlies statement in court.

She starts to go through the details of what happened and when she gets to the part where she is explaining about going to get the phone, she says that Darin went over to Devon at that time, but she isn't telling the truth

When you listen to the 911 call. Darlie is clearly telling Darin to hurry, that means Darin had just arrived, he wasn't there before she got the phone. So why would she be covering for him? She had know there was something very suspicious about that wouldn't she?


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 2 weeks ago from The Beautiful South Author

It is pretty odd an intruder would not bring their own weapon but then isn't it true one of the boy's blood was not found on that knife?


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

One thing I am sure of, Darlie didn't inflict those neck injuries herself. She was laying down when she was cut. The person that cut her was standing above her and she facing the back of he couch. We did test that theory out. I have no idea why Mulder didn't put the prosecutions theory to the test.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

I had taken some information from the trial and gave it too a crime writer. I wanted to know if my theory or the evidence that I uncovered was prove of guilt. It was quite a long letter, but I am hoping to hear back soon. I will let you know what the results are either way. We are either on the right track or way off base. Drake has been through so much already. I am not hoping to be right in my assumptions. He has lost his mom for the past 20 years, but on the other hand he deserves to know the truth and Damon and Devon have to have justice no matter the outcome of the case.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie: you are so right about that. Mulder only had that case for three months before it went to trial. You know the lawyer is screwing up when he is working a capital case and you have the judge falling sleep all the time. Mulder had no business taking on that case. He admitted to making two major mistakes, one was putting Darlie on the stand, and the other was not putting a stop to the silly string tape. In my eyes he made a lot more than just two mistakes.

Darlie wasn't likable, they hated her with every fiber. She went into that trial believing that she was never going to be convicted. When you look at the prosecutions evidence and theory its a complete joke. Darlie was angry and cocky. She honestly believed innocent people do not go to jail. But on the other you have to look at Casey Anthony, I followed that case from start to finish, it took me a long time to get over that verdict.

All I know is have said for years on end, if they continued with that intruder theory, Darlie may as well just give up. There wasn't evidence of an intruder 20 years ago, and there hasn't been any evidence since. Her appeals were completely wasted on that theory. In my opinion there is only one decision that a jury has to vote on, and that's whether or not Darlie was a victim or willing participant. Myself, the evidence shows me she was railroaded. I do not believe she had a reason to kill those kids, and she never would have agreed to have herself chopped up that way.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 2 weeks ago from The Beautiful South Author

I honestly think the prosecution just turned the jury against Darlie cause she was young and pretty and had gone to bars and she acted ditsy and played right into their impression and Mulder should have stopped all that since it had nothing to do with nothing. It does not a murderer make. Then the silly string on top of that and people today still hate her for that. You cannot get them to listen to anything because of that!


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie: To be honest with you, I think they just rushed to judgement with Darlie and I don't believe anyone has really investigated Darin until these past few years. I know by the postings that majority of the public are convinced he was involved, if not even responsible. But a person has devote years of their time researching things. In Darins case he has thrown in so much chaos a person gets so frustrated trying to sort through it they give up. A couple of us just took it on a spare hobby, before we knew it we were working on more and more everyday. The more we looked the more convinced we were of his guilt

Not to put Texas down, but I did read a survey on Texas rating the education of each state. California has the highest amount of low educated people, Texas rates at 49 percent. That is based on just getting high school diploma. I believe that it the reason for so many wrong conviction in that state. Those people are expected to learn and figure out the science in forensics in a matter of days or weeks, when it takes the experts years to learn what they learn. So when they are fed a cock n bull story about forensic science or evidence to do with DNA they don't bother to research what it is or what it means. They rely on the prosecution and lawyers to be honest. We all know that doesn't happen very often.

In Darlies case there was only one crucial mistake made in my eyes and that was trusting Mulder. Darin and Darlie kee convinced Darlie they didn't have a case and when Darlie was asked not to implicate Darin she had no idea she signing her own death warrant.

Its time now for an honest judge to step up and realize that Darlie is a victim in all of this. She had no idea what conflict of interest even meant. She couldn't have known the damage it would cause her case by trusting Mulder. There was no defense there for her.

The fact that a jury could believe the prosecutions theory on the sock just proved how little those people knew about the case. They a choice to make, either Darlie or a stranger, and Mulder never made the slightest effort to prove the intruder theory. The jury went with the only choice they had. Mulder should be ashamed of himself and retire if he hasn't already. Then he should hire a high profile lawyer and pay for it out of his own pocket.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 2 weeks ago from The Beautiful South Author

I think she was drugged too which would answer much of how she acted. As soon as I read that theory I bought it! It is talked about in this book and if you get the chance to read this is is very good. Things talked about you would not read about anywhere else and the notion of a white truck that had been spotted, not the black car and of course if it were the truck Darin would be pushing the black car theory.

These two guys could have well been in on this. One was really disturbed about stabbing these little kids. He is dead but there is still one living as of the time of the book anyway. Why is no one talking to him?


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie: I believe Darlie was drugged. She had all the symptoms. I thought it very strange that the attack had happened so quickly after she had gone to bed. The drug takes about 30 minutes to take affect. Within the first 2 hours a person can be in an almost coma like state where they don't remember anything. After that they slowly start to come back. One of things that convinced she was drugged was because Darlie never cried in pain once in those entire 6 minutes. She even mentioned paid. She bring up feeling dizzy and weak. Those are side effects with that drug. But the big one for me was her normal blood pressure. These drugs lower your blood pressure. Why weren't they suspicious when Darlie's blood pressure was normal. Here they had a woman who had supposedly stabbed two children, ran around a large home staging the crime scene, ran down the alley to plant evidence and they are claiming that her blood pressure being normal was not a sign of drugs. She was on diet pills but that is not one of the side effects of that drug.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley: There is no possible way that Darlies mother couldn't have known about all this information. If she didn't know back then she sure as hell knows now and she still choses to turn her back on all this evidence and stand behind Darin instead of helping her daughter. Darlie's mother never continued to try and fight to have the evidence against Darin brought into trial. She has wasted time and money on DNA testing that she knows will never prove the intruder theory. That was a dead issue from the start. The odds of an intruder doing that crime is virtually impossible. I am going to look into finding out if any person have ask the courts to finish the DNA testing that was started by the court appointed lawyers. The prosecution and Darlies lawyer deliberately with held information that would have changed the verdict. That I am certain of. Mulder not only chose not to bring in Darins jeans but his underwear that also had blood on it was seen by the jury either. Mulder knew there wasn't just two suspects he knew Darin was a very strong suspect. He chose to let Darin off the hook, just so he could take Darlies case.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley you know what else is very curious to me. Darin said he was down stairs already when Darlie ran to get the phone. But in other statements he said he was already with Devon when he saw Darlie with the phone.

If you go to the 911 call. You can clearly hear Darlie pull the phone away from her mouth, to talk to someone else. Darlie says 'hurry' 15 seconds into that 911 call. That proves without a doubt that Darin had not yet reached Devon. That proves that Darin waited until Darlie was out of site in the kitchen before he emerged. I believe he came from that dining room right beside the landing of those stairs. Darlie wouldn't have had a clue where he came from at that time, but if Darin appeared when he said he did, why didn't we hear that dog bark until 3 minutes and 30 seconds into the call. That masterbedroom door was shut, and it stayed shut with that dog in that room right up until the 3 minutes and 30 seconds into the call.

Not only Darin lied in his police statement when he said he went back up stairs to put pants on at that time, but he didn't. So does the man of the house hear glass break and his wife scream frantically stop to put pants on and then close the bedroom door behind him. He said nothing of that. So if Darin was in bed and asleep, how is it possible for him to have been dressed when he ran down the stairs in a frantic rush as he claimed. The evidence is all there, it always had been, but nobody bothered to check out Darins story. We already know Mulder didn't investigate Darin and anyone had, this information would have been discovered long before the trial.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 2 weeks ago from The Beautiful South Author

Kezzy, my guess is that Texas does not want to have to pay Darlie millions of dollars as they have had to other wrongfully convicted and they know it will show how out of their way they went to frame her. Apparently they really did not like Darlie for some reason and maybe Darin played his hand in that for as you say he had so much to be looked at that didn't add up, why were they so off looking closer at him.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley: This case baffles me. There is a group out there for sure that intervene every time someone comes forward with evidence against Darin. They have gone to great lengths to make sure that evidence against Darin stays hidden. I was told by someone today that there is a lot of cover up that goes on in these trials. That is the only thing makes sense here.

When I went through that 911 call, and I learned that Darin had lied about Darlie seeing him come out of his room it set me off again. The over whelming evidence that those two court appointed lawyers found against Darin convinced me 100 percent of his guilt.

Even if they dont grant Darlie a new trial they need to go after Darin with everything they have. Darin never touched Damon, he didn't go anywhere near that boy so Darin has no way to explain away any blood from that boy at all. The 911 call also proves he didn't touch Damon, I just dont understand how Darlies mother can be aware of this evidence and still tale Darins side. All these years instead of wasting time on the intruder theory they should have been submitting evidence about Darin. Darlies mother refuses to talk about it. I read an article that stated Darin made over 250,000 off of Darlies bad fate. I quess he stuck around long enough to get paid out, when the money stopped coming in for the interviews and statements he decided to move on. I hope they put a stop to him making a profit off such a tragic story


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 2 weeks ago from The Beautiful South Author

It does seem a fact everyone has Darin's back doesn't it? I could never believe they did not suspect first the one who was to benefit!


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

There are many out there who believe I am obsessed over Darins guilt.

If that is true and I am wrong about Darlie seeing Darin come out of his room and come down those stairs, I would appreciate it some would take the time to prove to me that Darlie ever admitted, documented or testified to the fact that she saw Darin come out of his room and down those stairs.

This is the key to Darlies innocence. If I am right, which I am, and Darlie didn't actually see Darin come out of his room that changes everything. The trial was based on the fact that it was proven that there was only two suspects according to the prosecution.

I have proven through theory that this is not true. There is and always was three suspects, Darlie, the intruder and Darin.

It was never proven nor confirmed that Darin was in his room during the attack. Nobody had proven to me that it was impossible for Darin to have murdered his children. But I on the other hand have proven it was possible, probably and with premeditated intent.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Seconds pass again and Darlie is now over with Devon, that is when she screams out that Devon is dead. Devon never moved from where he was attacked. Devon was already dead when Darin got to him, yet Darin stayed with Devon for 3 minutes and 18 seconds while Damon was laying just a few feet away fighting for his life.

When Darin finally got up and left Devons side, it was to go upstairs before the police arrived. It was not to go over and help Damon or Darlie. I have not heard Darlie say the words that she saw Darin come out of his room and down those stairs.

At thirty seconds or so Darlie is over at Devons body. Darlie is describing the cpr that Darin is doing on Devon in detail. So how is it possible that 4 minutes later Darin is back at Devons body after Waddell arrives to be doing that exact same cpr on him. Darin would have had to step right past his living son Damon to go back over to his son Devon, who he knew for a fact died 4 minutes earlier.

Then it was even after that Darin runs over to karens claiming to need help, he already knew Devon had been dead for 5 minutes. He also knew that the medics were with Darlie and Damon before he ran over to karens. Karen also gave this same story.

We now know by the 911 call that Darlie never saw Darin come out of his room. We also know that when Darin went over to karens he knew help had arrived for his boys. This only led me to be more suspicious that Darin was putting on a show in front of Waddell and then another in front of Karen.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

This is what my issue is with this case. The only reason Darin was not treated as a suspect was because Darlie backed Darin up when he told her he came out of his room.

I read Darlies testimony. If Darlie didnt see which room Darin emerged from then that proves he was and should have been the major susect in this case.

Mulder didnt research this case, and didnt put Darins testimony to the test. If he had investigated Darin he would have known that Darlie didnt and couldnt have been there when Darin got to the hallway.

Darlie wouldnt have been saying to Darin hurry, Darin would have already been with Devon and she would not have been saying hurry. Hurry meant Darin was in motion at that time just heading over to Devon. To further confirm this there is no conversation between Darlie and Darin prior to that 15 seconds into the 911 call.

Seconds pass again and Darlie is now over with Devon, that is when she screams out that Devon is dead. Devon never moved from where he was attacked. Devon was already dead when Darin got to him, yet Darin stayed with Devon for 3 minutes and 18 seconds while Damon was laying just a few feet away fighting for his life.

When Darin finally got up and left Devons side, it was to go upstairs before the police arrived. It was not to go over and help Damon or Darlie.

There is absolutely no way in hell that Darlie could have seen Darin come out of his room or down those stairs.

No matter how many times Darin has changed his story, he can not change what we all heard on that 911 call.

If Mulder really was representing Darlie and not protecting Darin then he would have known before the trial that Darlie didn't see Darin come out of his room. He should have proven to the jury right then that Darin was a strong suspect and he didn't have a witness that saw him come out of his room. Darin cant change what was said on that 911 call.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Bryan/Sclemmons: Again you have chosen to slander and lie about me. I gave opportunity for Sclemmons to show the proof of Darlies 8 statements and has claimed she wrote and lied. Instead they attack my personality Pathetic. Bryan may have been called all sorts of names because of who he is but those insults do not come from one person.

You have cluttered this blog and article with lies and childish nonsense.

I am obsessed with case. When I learned of all the evidence against Darin I became even more obsessed. Worried about me mentally, give me a break. There is mother in jail that may not have murdered her children, there is son who was very sick and he hasn't touched his mother I 20 years. I have a son, and I couldn't even begin to imagine not being able to touch him. Yes, obsessed is exactly what I am. I am going to make sure everyone knows everything I have uncovered about Darin. BASED ON FACTS AND TRUTH. You have called me a liar, but you have failed to show me any proof of that. I do appreciate healthy conflict, I know I have a lot to learn still about this case, but your comments have nothing to do with case. I have asked you to leave me alone. I have stopped going on Sclemmons site because of his lies about Darlie and the sickening conversations on that blog.

AGAIN I ASK YOU TO PLEASE LEAVE ME ALONE. IF POLLY OR ANY OTHER PERSON DOESNT LIKE MY POSTS THATS FINE, I RESPECT THAT, BUT ITS NOT UP TO YOU TO COME ONTO THESE OTHER SITES TO SLANDER ME OR MAKE LIES ABOUT ME.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley: It is a fact that Darlie Kee has stuck by Darin. I have no idea why she has chosen not to look at the evidence. I know in Darlie's last interview she stated that did believe that Darin was involved. She was turning that direction just because of certain facts that Darin had lied to her about.

One fact that I am sure about is Darlie didn't see Darin come out of his room as he claimed. I also know that Darlie did not push past Darlie as he claimed.

If you listen to that 911 call you can clearly hear Darlie say to Darin hurry. That is the first time she talks or there is any sign that he was even there. He waited until Darlie went to the kitchen, and he ran out just as she was returning to the boys.

Darlie went anywhere near the landing on those stairs. Just as the lawyers and Richard Burr stated, had the police investigated Darin and listen to the 911 call and really looked at the evidence they would have known that Darin had been coaching Darlie on what he claimed happened that morning. But the most important fact here they would have known Darin didn't have an alibi in Darlie. That would have made him prime suspect. He had all the motives, and now we know he had no alibi and all the opportunities to do that crime.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

I have not posted lies about anyone regarding this case or any other. I viewed the case and told my theory of how it was very possible for Darin to have killed those boys. I have repeatedly asked anyone who felt I was lying about something I have posted then point it out specifically.

Sclemmons had told me and everyone that he has seen 8 or more statements that Darlie has written where she lied on all those statements.

I HAVE YET TO SEE AND FACTS OR TRUTH FROM BRYAN OR SCLEMMONS. If you are going to call someone out and try to make them look the fool, then do right the right thing and put your proof out there.

SHOW EVERYONE WHAT I HAVE LIED ABOUT, DONT JUST SAY I HAVE LIED. SICKENING PATHETIC PEOPLE.

As far as Bryan goes, Darlie kee has full intentions of suing you for your lies and slander. When voice my opinion about that woman its based on facts not lies just to stop the funding.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 2 weeks ago from The Beautiful South Author

No you are wrong on this Jez. The cops secretly filmed this graveyard scene and only put out the party part not the crying which you can search and find easy enough online (it may even be in this article, not sure) but two cops I believe it was took the 5th over this and the lawyer just let this great opportunity pass him by.

I was not aware Darlie was turning against Darin. I guess he feels safe now from her and whatever she might say. Especially it looks as though he has Darlie Kee on his side according to Kezy.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley: I totally agree with you. When I first looked at this case many years ago, I was directed to Darin intentionally. It was just one thing after another. The failed poly tests, the rude sickening comments, the continuous lies. The more I looked into him the more convinced I was of his guilt, and yes the bad vibes. What is so upsetting is people are thinking, but few say it. I think that's because of Drake. My heart goes out to that boy, it really does, but he was robbed of his mother in the worst possible way. That boy has lived such a hard life and I believe Darin is the reason he hasn't had his mother.

I do believe that Darlie was punished because she wanted out of that marriage. If you look back at what Darin was dealing with that night, it would make any sane man snap. Not making excuses here, but giving a reasonable explanation as to why he might have snapped.

I do agree with your opinion. I think a lot of research went into your comments. I hope for Darlie and Drake the truth finally gets told and she is released.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 2 weeks ago from The Beautiful South Author

Jez- You sure have that wrong. The whole thing is on video which the cops had no right to do and they plead the 5th but did that lawyer use that for his client? Of course not.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley: You are a very smart little lady. No he didn't implicate Darin. Even though he was on the defensive about what the other lawyers accused him of, he still went ahead with that trial and kept all that evidence away from the jury.

They all knew that if the jury didn't hear the evidence against Darin, Darlie would be convicted. All of them including Darlies mother chose to go ahead and hire Mulder knowing full well what his real intentions were.

They want facts, well got to the transcripts and read the statements by between Darin and Mulder. Darin is asked about the glass table he claimed fell on Devon. He gave his speech and instead of proving Darin was a liar, Mulder tried to get Darin to change his statement about the glass table falling on his son. Mulder didn't implicate Darin in the crime, but what he did do was try to help Darin cover up lies during his testimony. That is a fact, and its right there for everyone to read. This comment about facts is directed to Heather


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

It amazes me to see other people who have made hub accounts coming on to this site knocking down the writer. They put this site down for using such words and screwed up and botched. Claiming none of us are detectives and we sat back watching video's and posting the information.

First of all, the police did screw up. The main detective Patterson admitted he held that file, but he never took any personal hand written notes. He didn't even read the file until just before he testified. He also stated that he didnt even remember Darlie telling him about a struggle in the kitchen. He didnt even take notes when he interviewed Darin. He never separated Darin from Darlie, in fact none of the police separated him from anything, not even the house. Darin was the only other adult in that home and he should have been immediately separated from Darlie and made to give a statement. That didnt happen. One of the most important pieces of evidence, the nightgown, was clearly mishandled. It wasn't even put into secure evidence, it was bagged wet with other items and first ended up at the fire hall where it was picked up later.

They didnt even bother to check out Darins story to see if he was in his room, if they had looked into they would have seen Darlie was never at the foot of those stairs as he claimed. They would have known he didnt come out of his room when he claimed. All Darins lies would have been exposed within minutes had the police checked.

Look at the cap. It took the police 14 days to go back and get that black cap. The house had already been turned back to Darin by the time they went back for the cap. These are just a few of the screw ups in this case.

Cron was there just to look at the scene, but he decided to even move and touch the evidence. He lifted the vacuum cleaner and he pressed his body up against the table. Then he lied to forensics officers by telling them there was no blood in the garage. There was blood found right there on Darins runners. He then made up an excuse by accusing someone of planting the blood there later. Don't see how that was possible when they claimed to have secured that crime scene.

They also didnt explain how Darin got back into that house to look over the evidence. yes, not to go see Devon, but Darin admitted he went back into that house just to view the evidence. If that isn't suspicious I don't know what the hell is.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley: Did you know most people that read into Darlies case don't even know about the other part of the funeral service/birthday party. To this day I have only heard about it, but never saw it. I did post that it was out there and the Darlie haters called me a liar. Unless they see it up front and personal they accuse anyone who brings new evidence to the table liars. I can see why its been so difficult to get the truth out there for people to see. Its nice that you have brought up many hidden or hard to find facts.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

lindaf3: I guess we are not the only ones being stalked and harassed here on hub. Check out some of the other posts. He is at it with someone else now. Anyone with any garbage on their record is going to be slandered and bullied. I guess some hub posters don't get it until it too late.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: You know another thing that upsets me. Darlies mother is aware that there was and is evidence to prove Darins guilt, rather than properly investigate that avenue, she has chosen to waste the publics money and all the dna testing on the intruder theory. She knows there was no intruder, and she is willing to let her own daughter rot in jail rather than let an proper investigation clear Darin. She knows once that can of worms is open it proves Darlie didn't kill her children, but she also knows that proves she lied and protected the killer for the past 20 years. All I am saying is if Darin didn't kill those kids then let the legal system go through the evidence and clear him once and for all. They deceived the public and the jury by hiring Mulder and allowing him to keep that evidence away from the jury. They knew they were all warned before the trial. IF THEY KEPT THAT EVIDENCE AGAINST DARIN AWAY FROM THE JURY DARLIE WOULD GO TO DEATH ROW. Darlie kee, Darin, Darins family everyone of them knew Darlies only hope was to show the jury all the evidence. They chose to protect Darin.

I ask you this. If Darin was innocent then wouldn't he have done anything to save his wife? Why did he cut off his hair and change his appearance so he didn't resemble the intruder. Why didn't Darin let the insurance do the investigation so he could collect on a policy that was in good standing.

Darin was behind on all of his bills, yet the one thing he made sure to keep the payments on was that life insurance policy, you don't find that odd at all?


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: There was no intruder. For twenty years there has never been one shred of evidence to prove an intruder. The fact that you would even bring that up shocks.

First of all this was a well lit home.

Darlie and her two boys were asleep I plain view.

The tv was on and it could be seen through the windows

Dispite Darin trying to convince the officer that they took and ran nothing was taken.

The house wasn't just lit up on the inside it was lit up outside by fountain

In order for the intruder to have left that home he had to leave through the back because Gorsuch just got home he would have seen an intruder.

The intruder would have had to know there was an exit through the kitchen

He would have known where not to walk to trigger the light in the back yard, the same light that stays on for 17 minutes after it lights up.

There was no sign of the gate being opened, why would an intruder take the time to close the back gate.

There was nothing taken and no attempt of a robbery.

Darin is the only one who noticed and brought up Darlies missing panties or a so called attempted rape.

There was no break in and the door were locked. There was still dust on the ledge of that screen.

Darin said he locked all the doors.

There was no sign of any cars in that neighbor around that time except for the one the police checked.

Darin kept bringing up to neighbors about this strange black car stalking his house, but will notice nobody ever came forward to explain why they were there. I suspect that's because it was set up by Darin as part of his premeditation for the crime. If you were innocent and you knew your car was seen around a crime scene wouldn't you come forward?

No sign no evidence to prove the intruder.

It wasn't a strangers sock in the alley it was Darins.

I can name on one hand how many strangers have ever gone into a home and just randomly killed children for no reason. The doctors said this was a rage crime. The only one who would have had that kind of rage that night was Darin.

Darlie told Darin that night she wanted to separate.

His car was broke down, his boat was broke down, he was behind on the mortgage, credit cards, taxes, he was losing his business, he just found out a very expensive important piece of equipment broke down he didn't have the money to fix it. He applied for a 5000 dollar loan and got turned down. He promised Darlie she would be going on the trip planned for the 14th and he didn't have the money to go. Darin said he planned that robbery to take place when he was gone, but he knew he didn't have the money to even take that trip.

Up to that night they had company in their home, either a family member or the kids had friends. It was this night that it just so happen that the home was clear for the first time of outsiders spending the night. Only two people were aware of that, Darlie and Darin. The boys had a sleep over just the night before. I looked at the intruder theory. Believe me I wanted it to be an intruder but all the evidence just kept bringing me back to Darin


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Kezy1996- "They didn't convict Darlie based on the same methods or reasons I am accusing Darin."

You are refusing to consider an assailant from outside the home, taking every minor inconsistency and turning into what you have decided is a lie and turning every prior bad act he may or may not have engaged in into some twisted logic that those bad acts prove he murdered his children.

Does planning a robbery in the house his children live in make him a bad father? Yes. Does it prove he'd murder his children? Absolutely not. Same goes for drug use. As for him "forcing" Mulder to hide evidence? I have no doubt in my mind Mulder was highly ineffective assisting in Darlie's defense but his piss poor representation of Darlie goes far beyond any protection he MAY have offered Darin. To quote him "I decided not to call Labor or Epstein to the stand because I didn't think they had anything to bring to the party." He was so arrogant it never even dawned on him he actually needed to defend her and you can't blame those actions on Darin.

"Darin never touched Damon so how the hell do explain Damons blood spatter on Darins jeans. HE NEVER WENT NEAR THAT BOY HE NEVER TOUCHED HIM OR EVEN TRIED TO HELP HIM"

A) These are the exact same false accusations that were made against Darlie that were made solely to make her look like an evil mother.

B) Darin's jeans weren't tested.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

They didn't convict Darlie based on the same methods or reasons I am accusing Darin.

Did Darlie set up a robbery on her home.

Did she stand to collect over 500,000 in life insurance

Did she lie about cpr on Devon

Did she fake trying to save Damon

Did she go around to neighbors or anyone else complaining how the boys interfered with her naked time with Darin

Did she make up lies about standing at the bottom of the stairs while Darin came out of her room

Did she lie and refuse to give Damon help

You are wrong. I am not judging Darin under the same shadow Darlie was judged.

Darlie didn't try to frame Darin did she?

She didn't premeditate this crime did she?

She didn't back stab Darins employee to make sure they testified against Darin?

She didn't ask Jovell to show up at the crime scene right after the murders to bring up a strange car did she?

I am basing my opinion of Darins guilt based on fact and evidence. Darin had far more evidence proving he killed those children, but the jury never got to see that evidence because Darin and Darlie kee kept that from the jury and the courts.

Darin never touched Damon so how the hell do explain Damons blood spatter on Darins jeans. HE NEVER WENT NEAR THAT BOY HE NEVER TOUCHED HIM OR EVEN TRIED TO HELP HIM


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Kezzy1996- "THEY DIDNT GIVE DARLIE THE SAME COURTESY, NOT AT ALL. THEY MADE DIFFERENT RULES FOR HER THAN THEY DID FOR DARIN. "

Which is one of the reasons I refuse to engage in the same sort of narrow minded thinking that already resulted in one innocent person being sent to death row. I will show them BOTH the same courtesy any crime victim should be shown.

"THEY ACCUSED HER OF MURDER BECASUE OF THE NIGHTGOWN, BUT THE SAME EVIDENCE WAS SHOWN WITH DARINS PANTS AND THEY EXCUSED THAT AWAY."

That's not correct. She was accused of murder based entirely on the assertions of Cron who stated he knew within twenty minutes of entering the house that there was no intruder and they needed to start looking at "the mother." It's called tunnel vision and it snowballed from there. Once he decided at 5:30 a.m. that same morning that Darlie did it no one ever bothered to look for evidence other than that which would confirm his theory.

And what evidence was included in the warrant for her arrest? A blond hair, implied to be Darlie's, with root attached that Linch claimed could only have happened if it was forcibly removed from her head as she was crawling through the screen; same screen being cut from the inside; Darlie having no cuts on her feet even though she walked through the kitchen where there was broken glass; and Parchman's assertion that the wound on Darlie's neck was "a good two inches or a medical mile" from causing any serious harm.

As it turned the hair wasn't her's, the screen was cut from the outside, her feet also had no dirt, grass or other abrasions from running down the alley and Parchman was clearly just wrong. One item of evidence that was conspicuously absent was the sock. The prosecution never brought it up during her bail hearing because they couldn't explain it in a way that implicated Darlie (and still haven't to this day).

Obviously the prosecution saw that their case was falling apart when all their evidence from the bail hearing started unraveling. Greg Davis was never going to admit he jumped the gun by accused a crime victim of murdering her children. THAT'S when Darlie's shirt came into play.

The prosecution hired Tom Bevel in late August/early September to come up with blood spatter evidence to support their theory of the crime. Bevel identified 19 individual blood spatters on Darlie's shirt. And no, I'm no misspeaking. 19 blood spatter stains. 5 were spatters that included blood from the boys and Darlie. The other 14 blood spatters were only from Darlie meaning:

A) none of the stains he identified were spatter at all or

B) 14 of the stains were spatter from when she was being attacked.

These facts were ignored by the prosecution because they were too heavily invested in Darlie being the perpetrator. Why? Because Cron said so and the only evidence they looked for was anything that would implicate her.

Cron did say at least one thing of interest. In these types of cases there needs to be a dual investigation, meaning you investigate people within the home as well as outside the home. Patterson testified the only people he interview in this case prior to arresting Darlie was Darlie and Darin. Inexplicably he nor Frosch never questioned or looked into anybody outside the home. I'm not going to engage in the same idiocy of refusing to consider an assailant from outside the home.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: I want to make something very clear to you. I have not assumed that Darin has lied. I researched this case for years. When I say Darin lied its because he LIED.

Darin lied when he said he didn't help Damon because he had no pulse.

He lied when he said he didn't meet Waddell in the front yard.

He lied when he said he didn't know Darlie was cut

He lied when he said Darlie was at the bottom of the stairs when he came down

He lied when he said he pushed past Darlie at the bottom of the stairs.

He lied when he said he handed Drake to Darlie

He lied when he said he took Darlie to the porch

I can go on but I think you got the drift.

What you aren't answering is how does a father set up a robbery on his home when he has a wife and three children living under that roof?

How does a father leave cocaine laying around his house for his children to get into?

How does

How does a husband go to his wifes lawyer to force him to keep evidence out of her trial that could prove her innocene?

Those my friend are the questions you should be asking


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley: I don't know if you have noticed or not but Bryan has not been on your site for a long time. I have quit posting on many sites due to the constant life threats and stalking. Its either the multi profile harassment or the constant threats of other sorts. He starts out by accusing of multi profiles, then he accusing the viewers of being the same person, this guy has followed and stalked and threatened every single person and site to the point they don't post any longer. As you will notice he keeps track of the amount of activity on each site. When he doesn't like the numbers he constantly stalks the people who are inquiring about the case or trying to find the truth. I really hope you put a stop to this. This isn't about his ratings, he is trying to destroy any site that has any activity at all. If someone gets along he deliberately causes problems with either threats or lies. I would like to stay on the site you have some great info and points but I cant take the threats and stalking any longer


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: I am sorry but I can over look some things Darin may have done that night but not all of them. Every single thing he did was so evil and calculating. There is no way you can believe Darlie is innocent and at the same time believe Darin didn't murder his children. NO WAY


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint:Kezzy1996-

One thing that you seem to be honing in on is the variations between the accounts being given. You're assuming any variations indicate someone, in this case Darin, is lying. It is a known fact that people involved in high stress situations don't always remember things accurately be it things they heard, saw or in what order they may have happened.

I HAVE FACTORED THAT IN WITH DARIN TRUST ME I HAVE. IF IT WASNT FOR THE ALL THE OTHER FACTORS IN THIS CASE I MIGHT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GIVE HIM THE BENIFIT OF THE DOUBT. A FATHER A HUSBAND DOENST HAVE THE COMMEN SENSE TO ORGANIZE AND MAKE UP LIES LIKE DARIN DID. THEY DONT HAVE THE SENSE TO GO AND CLEAN THEMSELVES UP WHILE THERE FAMILY IS DEAD AND DYING

Victims of crimes (Darlie and Darin both) would have an even higher probability of not having a clear and accurate memory of the events given that one was attacked and the other woke up to find both of his children had been attacked along with their mother (his wife).

THEY DIDNT GIVE DARLIE THE SAME COURTESY, NOT AT ALL. THEY MADE DIFFERENT RULES FOR HER THAN THEY DID FOR DARIN. THEY ACCUSED HER OF MURDER BECASUE OF THE NIGHTGOWN, BUT THE SAME EVIDENCE WAS SHOWN WITH DARINS PANTS AND THEY EXCUSED THAT AWAY.

Three examples of faulty memory of people involved in crimes (responders, witnesses and victims):

First was an experiment done in a park where the witnesses to a crime were asked what they remembered after seeing a mugging (staged mugging). All the witnesses had accounts that varied from the actual events. None of the witnesses remembered the events in order matching as other witnesses remembered (variations on the actions of mugger and victim in any particular order). Further variations in memory were what the mugger and victim wore. One witness actually thought the victim of the crime was the perpetrator and that a knife was involved.

Second example was a study done on the memory of cops after being involved in/witnessing a crime. Two cops were questioned after a crime where the officers shot at suspects. Both cops told versions that were similar to each other but the versions varied when describing the exact sequence of events (mind you neither was lying). One officer even stated that the suspect(s) were throwing beer cans at them when the shooting happened. What the cop thought were beer cans were actually bullet casings from his own gun flying back at him.

The third example was a home invasion where three people (a man and two women) were attacked by an intruder. The man was killed. Both women told claimed to have been awake and fighting the intruder face-to-face. Neither woman could describe anything about the intruder (clothing, height or race). When asked if it could have been a specific neighbor (both had seen the man before as he lived next door) they both said no, it wasn't him. The man's bloody footprint was found at the scene and he later confessed.

None of the above are liars nor were they being deceptive or trying to hide anything. Their memory was inconsistent and inaccurate due to the level of stress they were under during the crimes. I do not fault Darlie for her inability to remember exactly what happened and I think Darin should be shown the same courtesy.

I AM NOT A DOCTOR, BUT I HAVE ENOUGH SENSE TO KNOW THAT A PERSON IN SHOCK DOES NOT HAVE THE COMMON SENSE TO REMEMER DETAILS THE WAY DARIN DID. THEY DONT HAVE THE COMMON SENSE TO WASH OFF EVIDENCE.

DARIN KNEW WHO BROKE WHAT. HE KNEW WHO WAS STANDING WHERE. FOR CHRISTS SAKES. DARIN WENT BACK INTO HIS OWN HOME KNOWING HIS SON WAS LAYING DEAD ON THE FLOOR AND HIS ONLY CONCERN WAS TO LOOK OVER THE EVDIENCE.

YOU ARE EXPECTING ME TO OVER LOOK TO MANY EVIL ACTS THAT MAN DID IN ONE NIGHT.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: Before I even read your comment I want to say thanks for at least reading my posts. This is a very emotional case for me. I get defensive even though I have no personal interest here. So I am going to read your comments and try to be decent and civil as hard as that is for me to do.


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Kezzy1996-

One thing that you seem to be honing in on is the variations between the accounts being given. You're assuming any variations indicate someone, in this case Darin, is lying. It is a known fact that people involved in high stress situations don't always remember things accurately be it things they heard, saw or in what order they may have happened. Victims of crimes (Darlie and Darin both) would have an even higher probability of not having a clear and accurate memory of the events given that one was attacked and the other woke up to find both of his children had been attacked along with their mother (his wife).

Three examples of faulty memory of people involved in crimes (responders, witnesses and victims):

First was an experiment done in a park where the witnesses to a crime were asked what they remembered after seeing a mugging (staged mugging). All the witnesses had accounts that varied from the actual events. None of the witnesses remembered the events in order matching as other witnesses remembered (variations on the actions of mugger and victim in any particular order). Further variations in memory were what the mugger and victim wore. One witness actually thought the victim of the crime was the perpetrator and that a knife was involved.

Second example was a study done on the memory of cops after being involved in/witnessing a crime. Two cops were questioned after a crime where the officers shot at suspects. Both cops told versions that were similar to each other but the versions varied when describing the exact sequence of events (mind you neither was lying). One officer even stated that the suspect(s) were throwing beer cans at them when the shooting happened. What the cop thought were beer cans were actually bullet casings from his own gun flying back at him.

The third example was a home invasion where three people (a man and two women) were attacked by an intruder. The man was killed. Both women told claimed to have been awake and fighting the intruder face-to-face. Neither woman could describe anything about the intruder (clothing, height or race). When asked if it could have been a specific neighbor (both had seen the man before as he lived next door) they both said no, it wasn't him. The man's bloody footprint was found at the scene and he later confessed.

None of the above are liars nor were they being deceptive or trying to hide anything. Their memory was inconsistent and inaccurate due to the level of stress they were under during the crimes. I do not fault Darlie for her inability to remember exactly what happened and I think Darin should be shown the same courtesy.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

I would like to open this question to anyone.

I would like to know what kind of a father goes around looking for a stranger anyone to come to his home to rob him when he has a wife and three young children there?

What kind of husband fires the his wife's lawyers knowing they spent thousands of hours and dollars proving her innocence.

What kind of father and husband decides to protect himself over his own wife when he learns that the evidence that is going to be brought to trial is evidence that could get his wife off of death row and prove her innocence. Darin and Darlies mother fired these two court appointed lawyers after they learned they had evidence against Darin that would prove she was innocent, but prove Darin was guilty.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Bryan St John: Let me tell you some thing else you *(*&*Y(*Y, the money Darlie kee has been raising and collecting hasn't been going towards helping her daughter. As soon as the money stopped coming in that useless woman disappeared. Any mother who could defend her son in law over the innocence of her own child is more than sick to me. I am not afraid to speak my mind. When a mother knows a man has molested her own child, her daughter, and she stays with that man lost my respect long long ago. Don't ever threaten me with Darlie Kee. You are the one she is after and is suing not me.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: I get one strange thing being done, but when you look at all of it together it paints a full picture.

Darin knew when he hired Mulder to represent Darlie that certain evidence had to be shown to the jury to make sure Darlie didn't go to death row.

Darin and Darlies mother were warned ahead of time. If Mulder doesn't show the jury all the evidence including the evidence against Darin. Darlie will lose her case and go to death row. Darin didn't care. He never took out any stops when Mulder went to trial and protected him instead of defending Darlie.

You tell me what the hell kind of husband back stabs his own wife when she is fighting for her life. If Darin wasn't guilty then he didn't have anything to worry about when the jury was shown the evidence against him. Darin didn't even tell the courts about his planned robbery. He didn't try to lesson the damage to Darlie when he closed the doors on his business.

Darin knew that his employee knew of his robbery plans. He also knew how evil and vindictive this woman was. Instead of trying to prevent this woman from testifying against his wife, Darin closed the doors on his business knowing this woman was going to be out for revenge. He also knew that she was too scared to tell the police about his planned robbery. So instead of this employee getting part of Darins business she was now unemployed. He knew she was going to go to court and testify against Darlie, he counted on that .

You don't take out over 500,000 dollars of life insurance against your family right before an attack without the full intention of trying to collect.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: explain this to me then.

Darin was asked by police, why didn't you help Darlie or your son Damon.

This is Darins response.

First Darin said he didn't help Damon because he had not pulse when he stopped to check on him just before he went upstairs. FIRST OF ALL THE REASON YOU GIVE SOMEONE CPR IS TO GET THEM BREATHING. DARIN KNEW DARLIE HAD JUST BEEN TALKING TO DAMON SECONDS EARLIER. PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME HOW YOU PUT YOUR PRIORITIES OF GOING UPSTAIRS AHEAD OF HELPING YOUR DYING CHILD. YOU KNOW HE LIED ABOUT THE REASON HE WENT UPSTAIRS. NOT ONLY THAT HE SAW HIS SON DRAKE RIGHT THERE IN THE CRIB AND HE TURNED AND LEFT THE ROOM RIGHT AFTER HE CLAIMED SOMEONE MOVED HIS WALLET. WHAT THE HELL.

HE THEN LIED ABOUT POLICE COMING IN THE DOOR JUST AS HE WENT UP THOSE STAIRS. IT WAS ALL LIES TO COVER UP WHAT HE DID.

HE RAN OUT OF THAT HOUSE NOT ONCE BUT TWICE LEAVING HIS DYING FAMILY BEHIND. THIS ISNT A MAN IN SHOCK OR UNDER STRESS. PEOPLE IN SHOCK DONT HAVE THE COMMON SENSE TO GO OVER TO THE NEIBORS AND WASH OFF EVIDENCE WHEN THEIR FAMILY IS DEAD AND DYING.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

I see your point, but I also didn't come to this conclusion without first comparing witness testimony.

Can you show me one thing that Darin did during that entire time that was beneficial or in any way an attempt to save his family.

You have to take into consideration all the factors here. Darin admitted that he knew Devon was already dead when he went over to karens. Right?

Darin lied about when he went to karens. He is telling the police and everyone he went over there before Waddell entered that home. ITS A LIE, he knew it was a lie. Darin knew that he had done that cpr on Devon after he already admitted that he knew Devon was dead. No matter how you try and swing this he knew when he took Devons dead body infront of officer Waddell he knew he was dead for over 4 minutes. He tried to cover that up.

This isn't a theory of mine. Its facts based on witness testimony. How can you say I am making this up when it didn't come from me it came from Karen and Gorsuch. The only one who lied here was Darin.


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Kezzy1996- "I am sorry but I do not believe for one second Darlie killed those boys."

Nor do I. However I don't find it all that productive to accuse another innocent person of murder with the same tactics that already put one innocent person on death row.


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Kezzy1996- "I DONT BELIEVE KAREN WAS CONFUSED, I BELIEVE SHE FIGURED OUT EXACTLY WHAT DARIN HAD BEEN DOING...

SHE WASNT AWARE THEY WERE IN THE HOME ALREADY, THAT IS WHY SHE TOLD THE OFFICER SHE WAS A NURSE. BUT DARIN DEFINATELY KNEW. READ DARINS OTHER STATEMETNS. DARIN ADMITS AND SAYS I KNEW DEVON WAS DEAD BEFORE I WENT OVER TO KARENS. HE KNEW DEVON WAS ALREADY DEAD WHEN HE RAN OUT THAT FRONT DOOR AND MET WADDELL, THIS PROVES DARIN KNEW THAT CPR HE DID ON DEVON IN FRONT OF WADDELL WAS A COMPLETE FAKE."

You are making so many assumptions and then using those assumptions in an attempt to prove Darin is guilty it's unreal. Have you ever considered this "fake CPR" you keep talking about wasn't anything other than a father trying to do everything he could to help his dying or dead son? Nope, you just keep insisting it was fake (assumption) because it backs up your theory.

If we go by your reasoning that Darin must have been performing fake CPR because he already knew Devon was dead then the paramedic and doctors who tended to Damon also engaged in fake CPR on him as well because according to Kolbye he watched "as the light went out of his (Damon's) eyes." Since this clearly means the boy had died at that point all the CPR he did after that moment must have been fake because, as he said, the boy was dead at that point.

For those who may or may not be aware, CPR is performed on a person who is not breathing on their own and/or has no heartbeat (AKA dead). The reason why CPR is done is to attempt to revive an otherwise dead person and/or provide rescue breathing for an otherwise dead person until advanced medical treatment can be administered. It is also very much discouraged to perform CPR on a person who is still breathing on their own (as Damon was).

Please stop claiming Darin's CPR efforts were fake just because Devon was dead. That's the whole reason you do CPR on a person.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

SinSaint: Another thing I would like to tell you is Darlie has never been in trouble with the law. She didn't know about conflict of interest or the permanent damage it would do to her case if she defended Darin. I do believe Darlie believed that Darin was in his room. I can also see how she couldn't accuse him if she wasn't there to see if he came out of his room or not. She was in the kitchen when Darin emerged into that hallway. The dining room is right next to the landing of those stairs, there is no way Darlie could have known he came from that dining room

Did you know Darin did an interview where he told the reporters that he appeared and him and Darlie sat down and gazed lovingly into each others eyes before they even called the police. He then says after this long stare into each others eyes he told Darlie to call 911. The sickening things this man has said and done have absolutely shocked and repulsed me. There are people out there who have bare faced lied and claimed Darlie has written at least 8 statements where she has lied and contradicted herself. When I demanded to that proof they resorted to threats and reporting me to the hub sight.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: please forgive me for coming across to aggressive. It really means a lot to me that you put my accusations to the test. I have tried for years to sort through this and I believe I have all the proof I need to show what Darin did that night. I don't hate anyone. The worst crime in the world is a crime against a child, next to that is when an innocent mother is robbed of the affections of her child due to a wrong conviction. I am sorry but I do not believe for one second Darlie killed those boys. There is no motive and never was. They ask why she is still in jail. I will tell you why. Darlie has been alone in this fight. She trusted her family when she should have sought help from strangers. I know her mother knows the truth about Darin and she still chose him over her own flesh and blood. Maybe its the fact that this mother introduced her 15 year old daughter to her boss, or maybe its the fact that she stayed married to a man she knew molested Darlie as a child, what ever the reason is I have very little respect for that woman. She helped to cover up and hide evidence that proved Darins guilt and that repulses more than words can ever say.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

Darin was doing that fake cpr on Devon in front of Darlie for the first three minutes. At about 3 minutes and 18 seconds Darin gets up because he either saw or heard Waddells car pull up. Its at that time he runs upstairs. Nobody knows why Darin went upstairs because nobody made him answer to his lie he told in his statement. We know it wasn't to put pants on. He did run from his room right out the front door. That is when Gorsuch saw and heard Darin yelling, he was yelling someone stabbed my wife and kids.

Gorsuch couldn't see The front door of the Routier home. His house is in the cultisac to the left of that house, so he saw the fountain and Darlin run around from behind it. That is when he saw Darin run up to Waddell.

This is where Darins lie begins. He denies being the person who met Waddell out front. Darin is saying that person wasn't him, he is trying to convince everyone that he ran over to karens at that time, but we know he is lying, not just because of Waddells statement, but also by Gorsuchs, Gorsuch said he saw Darin and Waddell go back into that house. The 911 call also confirms this Darin is heard trying to convince Waddell the intruder took and he ran. Darin knew the cpr he did on Devon in front of Waddell was a complete lie and fake, He knew for a fact that Devon had already been dead for over 4 minutes. Go to the 911 call. Darlie screams out at 39 seconds into the call oh,my God Devon is dead, and he was dead, he never moved from that spot. Darin has 7 years cpr training. He n ever lost control that day, his mind was spinning to try and cover everything. What Darin didn't plan on was Gorsuch seeing everything from his window. If it hadn't been for Gorsuch Darin might have gotten away with that fake cpr in front of Waddell.

There is not one single thing that Darin did that entire time to try and help or save any living member or his family. If I missed something then I would sure appreciate someone bringing that evidence to my attention


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Kezzy1996- "At this same time Gorsuch also said he saw and heard the second car coming over the hill. That was Walling, Walling is the officer who went through the garage with Waddell. He is also the officer who cleared the medics to come into the home. It was after that when Darin ran over to karens. Darins police statement was not honest. He knew that he didn't go to karens when he claimed. He also knows that he was that intruder that Waddell ran into when he first arrived. This was a story Darin made up to try and convince everyone Waddell let the intruder get away."

Explain something to me. If Darin wasn't outside when Waddell arrived because he was trying to go get Karen to help why was he outside?


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

I think you are overlooking a lot of facts. Let's break it down. At around 3:30 minutes into the 911 call Waddell arrived at the scene. Darin was either already outside going to get Karen when Waddell arrived or did so soon after.

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED, DARIN WAS DOING THE CPR ON DEVON, HE EITHER SEEN OR HEARD WADDELL PULL UP, FOR WHAT EVER REASON DARIN WAS DESPERATE TO GET UPSTAIRS BEFORE THE POLICE ENTERED THE HOME.

IN HIS POLICE STATEMENT HE LIED AND SAID HE WENT UP THERE TO PUT PANTS ON, BUT WE ALREADY KNOW HE HAD PANTS ON ALREADY, THAT WAS CLEARED UP WHEN HE TESTIFIED IN COURT. DARIN DID GO INTO HIS ROOM THATS WHEN THE DOG BARKED.

DARIN THEN RAN DOWN THE STAIRS JUST AS HE CLAIMED AND HE RAN OUT THE FRONT DOOR, BUT IN HIS STATEMENT DARIN LIED AGAIN. POLICE AND MEDICS WERE NOT COMING IN THE FRONT DOOR AS HE CLAIMED AND HE DIDNT RUN OVER TO KARENS AS HE CLAIMED, HE RAN RIGHT INTO WADDELL AND WITNESSES SAW THIS. THE 911 CALL PROVES HE CAME INTO THAT HOUSE HE WENT OVER TO DEVONS DEAD BODY, HE KNEW FOR A FACT DEVON DIED 4 MINUTES EARLIER. HE HAD ALREADY ABANDONED THE CPR ON HIM TO GO UPSTAIRS. NOW HE IS PRETENDING IN FRONT OF WADDELL TO BE DESPERATELY TRYING TO SAVE HIS SON. ITS ALL AN ACT ITS A COMPLETE LIE. WADDELL DIDNT KNOW DARIN HAD ALREADY SPENT THE FIRST THREE MINUTES WITH DEVON TO AVOID HELPING DARLIE AND DAMON. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY OF LOOKING AT THIS, DARIN KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS DOING.

He can also be heard yelling for Karen on the 911 tape.

NO HE CAN NOT. THAT WAS DARLIE YELLING, SHE OPENED THE FRONT DOOR AND YELLED OUT FOR HER.

Per testimony from Koschak he arrived on the scene after both Waddell and Walling arrived but did not immediately enter the house. He waited until one of the officers told him the house was secured and he could enter. His estimate was that he waited 60 to 90 seconds before entering.

IT WAS WALLING WHO WENT TO TELL THE MEDICS THE HOUSE WAS CLEAR. HE DIDNT RUN OVER TO THE MEDIC VAN HE WALKED. THEN HE TOOK HIS TIME GOING OVER TO THE DRIVERS SIDE OF THE VAN AND TOLD THEM TO CALL FOR MORE HELP.

THEN THOSE MEDICS ADMITTED THEY GOT OUT OF THE VAN AFTER THEY WERE TOLD THE HOUSE WAS CLEARED AND WALKED TO THAT HOME NOT RAN. THERE WAS NO RUSH FROM ANY ASSISTANCE THAT CAME TO THAT HOME THAT NIGHT. THEY ALL KNEW THERE WAS STABBINGS OF THREE PEOPLE IN THAT HOME AND THEY WALKED TO THAT HOUSE.

At the point Darin was asking Karen for help it may well have seemed odd to her because when she first sees the house paramedics are already there.

KAREN DIDNT KNOW THAT UNTIL SHE ACTUALLY ENTERED THE HOUSE ALONE. THAT IS WHEN SHE REALIZED EVERYONE HAD ALREADY BEEN TENDED TO, THATS WHEN SHE COMMENTED THAT IT WAS VERY ODD TO HER THAT DARIN WAS ACTING THIS WAY WHEN HE ALREADY KNEW THEY WERE THERE.

READ THE STATEMENTS OF THE MEDICS DARIN WAS IN THAT HOME WHEN THEY CAME IN. THEY SAID DARIN WAS BLOCKING THEIR PATH TO GET HELP TO DAMON. IT WAS AFTER THAT DARIN RAN OVER TO KARENS AND PUT ON THIS BIG SHOW ACTING LIKE HE WAS TRYING TO GET HELP. HE WAS BLOCKING THE MEDICS FROM GETTING TO HIS SON,. HE LIED AND SAID HE DIDNT STOP AND HELP DAMON BEFORE HE RAN UPSTAIRS BECAUSE HE HAD NO PULSE. THAT WAS A COMPLETE LIE, DAMON LIVED FOR SIX MINUTES, HE WAS ALIVE MOVING LOOKING AROUND THE ROOM WHEN WADDELL WALKED IN AND DARIN DELIBRATELY STEPPED RIGHT PAST THAT BOY TO PUT THAT SHOW ON INFRONT OF WADDELL. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THAT WAS. HE ALREADY DID ALL THOSE DRAMATICS INFRONT OF DARLIE EARLIER.

What you are ignoring in your quest to view all this as suspicious behavior on Darin's part is all the different times things were happening in very close proximity to each other and what each person knew (or didn't know) at the moment they were making these observations. For example, Karen thought it was odd because paramedics were already at the house but her observations do not account for when the paramedics arrived (which could have been seconds before Darin started banging on her door).

I DONT BELIEVE KAREN WAS CONFUSED, I BELIEVE SHE FIGURED OUT EXACTLY WHAT DARIN HAD BEEN DOING.

Or whether Darin knew that the paramedics wouldn't enter the house to help his children but Karen wasn't aware of that.

SHE WASNT AWARE THEY WERE IN THE HOME ALREADY, THAT IS WHY SHE TOLD THE OFFICER SHE WAS A NURSE. BUT DARIN DEFINATELY KNEW. READ DARINS OTHER STATEMETNS. DARIN ADMITS AND SAYS I KNEW DEVON WAS DEAD BEFORE I WENT OVER TO KARENS. HE KNEW DEVON WAS ALREADY DEAD WHEN HE RAN OUT THAT FRONT DOOR AND MET WADDELL, THIS PROVES DARIN KNEW THAT CPR HE DID ON DEVON IN FRONT OF WADDELL WAS A COMPLETE FAKE.

WADDELL HIMSELF SAID HE DIDNT UNDERSTAND WHY DARIN DID THAT. THEY ALL KNEW WHAT A MONSTROUS THNING DARIN DID AND NOBODY WANTED TO OPENLY SAY IT. WELL I AM SAYING IT. I READ THE STATEMENTS AND I COMPARED THE TESTIMONY OF EACH OF THOSE WITNESSES AND IT ALL SCREAMS WHAT WE ALL KNOW BUT COULDNT BRING OUR SELVES TO SAY.


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Kezzy1996- "I know that dog was barking."

And this is the problem. You don't KNOW the dog was barking because you weren't there. You're making a lot of assumptions about things because you've already decided Darin did it and you want your assumptions to lend credence to your preconceived belief. Might I remind you that's the exact type of thinking that led to an innocent woman being on death row for this crime.


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Kezzy1996- "You know what is so shocking about this. Karen said when Darin went over to her place he was yelling and acting very excited, telling her he needed help. She said she thought Darins behavior was very strange because medics and police were already there with Darlie and the boys. This had all been an act that Darin put on in front of her to get sympathy and attention."

I think you are overlooking a lot of facts. Let's break it down. At around 3:30 minutes into the 911 call Waddell arrived at the scene. Darin was either already outside going to get Karen when Waddell arrived or did so soon after. He can also be heard yelling for Karen on the 911 tape. Per testimony from Koschak he arrived on the scene after both Waddell and Walling arrived but did not immediately enter the house. He waited until one of the officers told him the house was secured and he could enter. His estimate was that he waited 60 to 90 seconds before entering.

At the point Darin was asking Karen for help it may well have seemed odd to her because when she first sees the house paramedics are already there. What you are ignoring in your quest to view all this as suspicious behavior on Darin's part is all the different times things were happening in very close proximity to each other and what each person knew (or didn't know) at the moment they were making these observations. For example, Karen thought it was odd because paramedics were already at the house but her observations do not account for when the paramedics arrived (which could have been seconds before Darin started banging on her door). Or whether Darin knew that the paramedics wouldn't enter the house to help his children but Karen wasn't aware of that.

Lastly, even if the paramedics were there AND actively helping the children at that very moment him asking Karen to come help isn't suspicious in the slightest. If my children were in dire need of medical help I'd be begging everyone I could think of for help because you can never have too many medically trained people trying to help save your family at that point.

Let's say Darin didn't ask Karen for help. People would view that in just as much a suspicious light because... why wouldn't Darin have ran to the nurse across the street and asked her for help while they were waiting for the paramedics to arrive/enter the house? You're faulting him for asking for more help? People would just as easily fault him if he hadn't asked Karen for help.


profile image

kezzy1996 2 weeks ago

The biggest issue with this case is all the hidden evidence. Most people don't have the time to compare all the witness testimony. A person cant get to the truth without reading and crossing one witness testimony with another. The only reason a few of us managed to figure out what Darin had done was because we read through several witness statements and compared them to each other. When we came across Karens testimony and compared it to Gorsuch and Waddell, it was then that we realized Darin had been lying about these things. Then we tried to sort out why he lied. It was all to try and cover up this fake cpr that he did on his son Devon. Darin knew for a fact Devon had been dead for over 4 minutes when he came back into the house with Waddell.

First Darin tried to lie and say he didn't come in with Waddell he said he ran out and went to Karens. I compared Karens and Gorsuchs statements and they both confirmed that Darin didn't go over to karens until after police and medics already entered the home. Darin was trying to cover up the fact that when he did that cpr on Devon it was all for show to deceive that officer. Darin didn't realize that Gorsuch was awake and he saw everything from his bedroom window. He saw Darin run from behind that fountain.

Gorsuchs house is just to the left of the Routier home. Gorsuchs bedroom faces the corner of the house where the fountain is. He cant see the front door from his house so he did not know if Darin came running out the front door or not. He just knows that Waddell was the first officer to arrive and Darin met him out front.

At this same time Gorsuch also said he saw and heard the second car coming over the hill. That was Walling, Walling is the officer who went through the garage with Waddell. He is also the officer who cleared the medics to come into the home. It was after that when Darin ran over to karens. Darins police statement was not honest. He knew that he didn't go to karens when he claimed. He also knows that he was that intruder that Waddell ran into when he first arrived. This was a story Darin made up to try and convince everyone Waddell let the intruder get away.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: It isn't just the dog that proved to me Darin did not come out of his room. The biggest reason he was over looked as a major suspect is because Darin convinced Darlie to not only say that she saw him come out of his room, but she backed him up all the way. Read her testimony. The second Darlie mentioned that she might have doubts about Darin she is shut right down and they moved on and changed the subject.

If you look at that blood evidence it will prove to you without any doubt at all that Darlie was not anywhere near those stairs to scream for Darin. Darin lied when he said Darlie was at the bottom of the stairs when he came down. He even said he pushed past her to get to his son. Lies. Look at the blood map evidence. There is no blood puddle at all anywhere near those stairs. The 911 call proves Darin didn't appear until Darlie was out of site. The second Darlie went to the kitchen Darin ran out. Within seconds Darlie is walking back, 15 seconds into the call Darlie is heard saying hurry. She is telling Darin to go over to Devon. She was not anywhere near those stairs when he appeared. His alibi was a complete lie.

Darin knew Darlie had memory loss that is why he was able to fill in the memory blanks with his lies. He lied to Darlie when he told her it was him who took her to the porch. DARIN WAS NOT IN THE HOME AT THAT TIME. HE RAN OVER TO KARENS AND HE WAS NOT ALLOWED AT THAT TIME TO ENTER THE HOUSE. THE OFFICER STATED THIS AND SO DID THE NEIGHBOR. DARIN AGAIN IS LYING TO TRY AND COVER UP FOR HIMSELF


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

I know dogs are not creatures, it was a figure of speech. I have a Pom, she is 15 years old. These dogs have certain charactoristics that are common in that breed of dog. I know for a fact that these dogs hear sounds that I heard very very far away. I also know that for 15 years my dog had barked whenever a vehicle even pulls up to the house no matter if it is a family member or not. These dogs will scream right up until the second they see what or who makes that sound

I know for a fact that this dog of Darlies stayed up stairs, he was too little to come down on his own. I also know this dog had a loud bark and he barked at everything, even family members.

I also know for a fact that dog would have been screaming frantically even with the slightest movement of Darlie walking downstairs.

First of all, there is no way Darin could have been wakened by the sound of that wine glass breaking in the kitchen. This is a 3600 square foot home, he is at the other end on a totally different floor. Not only that he claimed he was asleep at the time. I know that dog was barking.

This is what my point is. Darin said he came out of his room and went down stairs. That door remained closed with that dog locked in that room right up until he went upstairs as Waddell pulled up to the home. We didn't hear the dog bark before that time because he had to be locked up. That's why I know for a fact Darin didn't come out of his room when he claimed. We would have heard that dog bark at 15 seconds into that 911 call.


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Kezzy1996- "03:30 The dog is heard barking for the first time. This is when one of the doors to a room"

You know what else happened right around 03:30 minutes into the 911 call happened? Officer Waddell entered the house. Up until that point no stranger making a concerted effort to be quiet was in the home. I too own dogs and they are not creatures I'd rely heavily on based on their bark/non-bark behavior.

But assuming we do rely on that behavior Domain's bark/non-bark could just as easily point to an intruder with reason to stay as quiet as possible. While dogs do have very keen hearing factors such as age and other louder noises can affect a dog's ability to hear things. If the dog was sleeping upstairs, in a room with the door shut and a TV on (possibly upstairs and definitely downstairs) all these things could contribute to the dog not hearing someone enter downstairs.

At the point Darlie begins to yell and Darin goes downstairs the dog still has no reason to bark as the voices it hears are it's masters voices. The point when the dog begins to bark is the exact same time that Waddell enters the house. Between his voice and the noise from his radio is when the dog begins to bark; not because the door had been shut until then but because that was the first time the dog heard a stranger in the house.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Sinsaint: I know that I appear to be picking on Darin most of the time, but all the evidence seems to point to him. His statements don't add up and his lies just point to him trying to take suspicion away from himself to point it at Darlie. No matter what I do to try and find something good or honest about Darin I cant. That police statement convinced me without a shadow of doubt that Darin was guilty. When I read the evidence against Darin that was deliberately kept from the jury by not only Darlies lawyer but by the prosecution too it turned my stomach. The police allowed Darin to go back into that home and study that crime scene. Darins own words. I went back into my house to look over the evidence. Did you know when Darin went back into that home that his son Devon was left on the floor in that house as evidenced. Darin never went near or even mentioned his son. Darin went right to the evidence. He looked over the knife and then went to the garage where he heard the officers talking about the screen. Darin knew right then that they were looking at somone in the home and not an intruder. That is when Darin made sure he got to Darlie before anyone else dd. Darin started filling in the blanks for Darlie starting with the lie about him getting Drake and handing him to her. The lies carried on an on. Those lies he told Darlie were all to try and make Darin look as though he had been trying to save his family.

If you just look at one thing Darin did that suspicious you could over look it, but it was all the things one after the other.

Three times at least, Darin went past Darlie and Damon and offered no assistance.

Darin ran out of his bedroom leaving his 7 month old baby alone in the crib after he said his wallet had been moved.

He runs out the door leaving his dying and wounded family behind.

He runs into Waddell outside delaying him from getting to Darlie and the boys.

The only time Darin even attempted to be getting any help for his family was when he went to karens, and we already know that was just an act he put on to get sympathy.

There is not one single bit of evidence to prove or show Darin made any attempt at all to ever try and help the surviving victims.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

You know what is so shocking about this. Karen said when Darin went over to her place he was yelling and acting very excited, telling her he needed help. She said she thought Darins behavior was very strange because medics and police were already there with Darlie and the boys. This had all been an act that Darin put on in front of her to get sympathy and attention.

See Darin lied about when he went over to karens. In his police statement he claims he went over to karens before Waddell entered the house, that was a complete lie and karens testimony proved that. Darin knew that he screwed up when he did that fake cpr on Devon after Waddell entered the house, so Darin tried to confuse everything by trying to make it look as though he was desperately trying to get help for his family.

What Waddell and Karen didn't know about Darin was he refused any assistance to Darlie or Damon that entire time. He was desperate to get help for them, he was desperate to try and stall help getting to them so they would bleed out. That is what the evidence and witness testimony proved to me. Karen was a friend of the family, she wouldn't have made that up. The 911 call and the medics testimony also proves this.


profile image

Sinsaint 2 weeks ago

Lindaf3- "I know, i found it odd that he left.. for karens.. that made no sense! Didnt he say that he handed the baby to Darlie at the porch?? That never happened, Bryan Kosnack, the paramedic never mentioned that, he worked on Darlie all the time."

Karen is/was a nurse. He was trying to get medical help for his children which absolutely does make sense. And whether Koschak never mentioned Darin bringing Drake to Darlie isn't proof it never happened. It's only proof that no one ASKED Koschak if anyone brought Drake to Darlie.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

I would like to make it clear to everyone that my postings here are based on my findings and my opinions. I do believe that Darin is guilty and Darlie was railroaded, I am not making a statement that Darin is guilty, I am only saying what I believe my findings have proven to me personally.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley: I agree with you. There are some questions regarding Darlies guilt, but when you factor in what the jury didn't hear about evidence it still makes me wonder why people still have doubt. I am totally amazed about this case. I thought I knew a lot about it, but the information in this blog is so informative. It really helps to be able to cut through a lot of the pages of transcripts to see the facts. You have made some very valid points here.

What shocks me the most is the public and the jury didn't get to hear the evidence of Darins guilt, now that I have seen a lot of it, this explains a lot of things to me as to why the jury may have voted against Darlie. I do not believe for one second that at jury would have ever convicted Darlie if they knew even a fraction of the evidence against Darin.

I know some people turned against him when they read some of his sickening comments he made regarding Darlie and the boys, but I know if they really looked at this case, Darlie would get a new trial at the very least. I do know Davis has always suspected Darin, and I have no idea why he has never gone after him. This to me is the worst crime in the world, even if it has been twenty years, those boys deserve justice. Both sides of this family have had their personal selfish reasons why they stayed involved in this case, but neither Darins or Darlies family has stayed involved for the right reason. I believe Darlies family has stuck with it for the financial gain and to continue to protect Darin, and Darins family has stayed involved to try and keep the public from finding out the truth about Darins involvement, using that word lightly. I hope someday Darin will be brought to justice and he will be forced to answer for what he has done.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

There is some other things I would like to point out about Darlies nightgown. That nightgown was cut off of Darlie by the medics. It was then thrown to the floor and picked up and bagged while it was still wet. This nightgown was also bagged with other items. It was put into secure evidence it was then taken to the number 2 fire hall where it was later picked up by another officer. That nightgown never should have been allowed into evidence and Darlies lawyer made no attempt to have it thrown out.

This was a capital case and Darlies lawyer only had this case for three months. He was so desperate to get this case that he did agree with Darlie kee and Darin not to implicate him in this crime. Mulders line of questioning proves his lack of knowledge of this case.

He claims he didn't dispute the silly string tape because he didn't know the damage it was going to do. He also admitted he made a mistake putting Darlie on the stand. That girl was angry and had never been in trouble with the law before. She went on the stand angry and with a lot of attitude. The jury misunderstood this for her being cold and cocky. It was up to Darlies lawyer to know the huge mistake he made, it wasn't up to Darlie to know those things. The courts blamed Darlie for not recognizing conflict of interest. How was Darlie to know any of this.


Jackie Lynnley profile image

Jackie Lynnley 2 weeks ago from The Beautiful South Author

I can see why some people will always suspect Darlie but I can never understand why at the same time they cannot have reasonable doubt and see it could more easily been Darin.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Darlie was attacked while she was laying down. Her lawyer never even bothered to put the prosecution to the test. Mulder only had that case for three months. The forensic experts that had gathered all the evidence against Darin were never called to testify. That was Mulders decision. He claimed that those experts had nothing to bring to his defense, but they did. They found hair belonging to Darin on the murder weapon, they found fibers from Darins runners on that sock. They also found blood evidence on Darins jeans that proved he was right there when those boys were stabbed.

I have absolute proof Darin was not in his room when that family was stabbed. I also have proof that Darlie didn't and couldn't have seen Darin come out of his room as he claimed. The only reason that those experts and that evidence was not brought into Darlies trial is because Mulder had made a deal with Darin not to implicate him in the crime.

I have spent years reading those transcripts. I have read all the testimony, there is not one single piece of evidenced in those transcripts that ever prove Mulder even tried to bring reasonable doubt to that jury.

Mulder was warned by the lawyers, If you do not bring this evidence to trial and show it to the jury Darlie will lose her case. Mulder lied to the courts about what his plans were. He didn't just keep evidence away from the jury, Mulder even tried to get Darin to change his testimony when he knew Darin had lied about the table falling on Devon.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Shaun Edmonds: It wasn't a coincidence that Darlie was on the couch. That is the problem with this case. Darin and Darlies mother kept evidence away from the jury. Darlie had been sleeping on the sofa for over a week. and the boys often slept with their mother. This was perfect timing for Darin. Darlie told Darin that night she wanted to separate from him and he waited for the perfect time and that night just happen to work out for him


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

yes that's what I found very strange. Darlie was saying all this stuff about Darin, how he handed Drake to her and how Darin helped her to the porch and how Darin went up and got Drake. I was blown away. I had to back track to see if I had read the other statements right, that's when I learned it was Darins words not Darlies. Darin tried to take the credit for rescuing his son and taking Darlie to the porch, but a couple of lies Darin wasn't able to coach Darlie on was his lie about noticing her missing panties. Darlie and the medics both said it was Darin who brought up her missing panties. Darin made up the lie about helping Darlie on the stretcher to try and explain away how he knew Darlies panties were missing when nobody else knew. Darin didn't help put her on that stretcher so that proved to me it was Darin who removed them. Another lie Darin told was when he told the two investigators that Darlie told him to catch the man who killed her boys. Darlie didn't say that to Darin, she said it to Karen. Darin was help back by the police. The only one allowed to go near the house was Karen. Darin lied about that also just to try and make up excuses as to why he acted so desperate at karens. Darin knew the medics were with his son and Darlie, he was just putting on a show in front of Karen. She knew that and even commented on it and nobody bother to pay attention. Darin wasn't in shock, he was cunning and calculating the entire time. Nobody bothered to pay any attention to how dishonest and cunning he really was. A person has to go through thousands of pages of transcripts to fully understand how deceiving and evil Darin really was.


profile image

lindaf3 2 weeks ago from Amsterdam, The Netherlands

To Kezy: I know, i found it odd that he left.. for karens.. that made no sense! Didnt he say that he handed the baby to Darlie at the porch?? That never happened, Bryan Kosnack, the paramedic never mentioned that, he worked on Darlie all the time.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

lindaf3: Did you find in the transcripts where Darin had been coaching Darlie on what to say. In karens transcript she says Darin went over to her house yelling he needed help. She said she didn't understand why he was acting that way or why he was asking for her help. The medics and police were already tending to everyone when she got there. She said Damon was already in the van and Darlie was on the porch. Darin didn't just put on a false act in front of Karen. He also told Darlie that he went and got Drake and handed her the baby. He also told Darlie he took her out to the porch. It was all lies to make himself look like he was trying to help his family, but he was covering up for the fake cpr he did in front of Waddell. Darin is trying to get everyone to believe that he was at karens when waddell entered the home, but the 911 call proves Darin was there trying to convince Waddell the intruder took and he ran. That whole scene that Darin did was all fake, all of it in front of Waddell and Darlie and Karen, everyone. It was all lies to cover up what he had done. Darin knew Darlie had lost a lot of her memory of events that night that's why it was so important for him to get to her first in recovery and to drive her to write her statement, he coached her with his details knowing she had memory loss. That's why she said Darin handed Drake to her, its because that was Darins lie to make himself look like he cared. How the hell did the police miss all that. Why didn't Karen speak up about what Darin did. She had to know it was all fake.


profile image

kezy1996 2 weeks ago

Jackie Lynnley: If Darin wasn't involved in the crime then how did his hair get on that murder weapon. And how does explain the blood spatter on his jeans that proves he was right there when the boys were stabbed. This proves for a fact that Darin was not covering up for Darlie. Darlies lawyer wrote a letter to courts claiming the other court lawyers who were fired were wrong about him making a deal with Darin not to implicate him, but all the evidence proves that the state and Darlies lawyer kept information from the jury that could have changed the verdict of her case. How is it possible that Darin was never charged, or that Darlie never got a new trial? Why isn't someone going after Darin now?


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working