Did Ya Hear, "Women Just Don't Care..."

Talk About Some Pinocchio's!

Wowser! Stephanie Cutterocchio, Obama's Deputy Campaign Manager, hit one out of the lair's park the other day at the expense of her fellow women. You mean you didn't hear? Well you should have since it was one of the most outrageous things any Democrat has uttered as they continue to wage their "War on Women." She needs to be the poster girl for contraceptives and not anyone's spokesperson. She has now taken it upon herself to speak for the women of this nation and by extension, by being an extension of Obama, she is expressing his innermost thoughts and feelings. I just heard something similar to that last part spill from Jay Carney's lips so I will take it as gospel. Not really but I thought it sounded good.

With Team Obama it seems that the stupider they get the more lies seem to spill forth. I reckon that has to be the way it is when you're an empty suit not sitting in an empty chair "hoping" that you can convince your adoring sheeple that all those empty promises you made were just meant to make them feel warm and fuzzy as sheeple are wont to do. Here's a short audio clip where you can specifically hear her insult to this nation's women.

Her nose grows toward the end of this short chip...

Let me see here if I can catch her rationale her in a few clear, concise words. It seems that what Cutterocchio should have said was that the women of this nation aren't concerned with the train wreck that Obama has caused over the last four years, they really want to know what kind of fiscal mayhem Obama is going to cause during the next four years. Holy Bat Crap, Bat Woman! So why doesn't Obama comes out and lay it out for them rather than pussy foot around? He didn't pussy foot around back in 2008 telling us how he was going to heal the planet, make the oceans recede and cut the federal deficit in half during his first term. What he did say is that if he didn't do that within his first term his presidency would be a one term proposition. That ladies is where you were being misled and he wants you to take that same bait hook, line and sinker this time around.

But He's Only Responsbile For 10% Of The Deficit Increase? That Got Him 4 Pinocchios

Anyway, all this continual lying by Team Obama set Michelle Malkin off. If you aren't familiar with Michelle you might want to be. The woman has a tendency to call a spade a spade and a lying sack of crap just that. Kind of like me only of the female persuasion.

Cutterocchio was also involved in the outright lie that Mitt Romney was responsible for the death of Joe Soptic's wife when she died of cancer. The circumstances, timing and anything associated with the woman's death were so far remotely removed from Romney that the whole story was nothing but a Team Obama political smear and Cutterocchio ended up right in the middle of that pack of lies too. I thought Team Obama hit a new campaign low with that one but they just keep digging deeper and deeper with the liar's shovel. Pathological indeed my fellow Americans - pure outright lunatics.

So here you go with the video. Gosh and golly, I love my videos!

Here's Michelle...

One thing is evident to me and I'm not a woman. What does Cutterocchio think that women do on a daily basis, especially those out of work or stay at home Moms? That is another statistic that has increased since Obama took office. Many woman are the planners, run the household budgets, put gas in the cars, pay the bills, buy the groceries and the list goes on and on. Those same women have watched as their household budgets have been blown out of the water while the federal deficit has soared. The fact is that they can't print useless money the way the fed can, that they have to keep tightening that belt must be lost on the likes of Cutterocchio..

Actually there are two women I don't want Team Obama to fire because they are two of the best weapons the other side has. Those would be Stephanie (Cutterocchio) Cutter and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. Both of these two are the biggest liars on the political scene and both are so obvious when they do it. If there is a "War on Women" to be waged ladies, I suggest that these two are worthy targets. I find it incredible that Cutterocchio doesn't give women the credit that women are due. Of course they aren't worried about the last four years they have had to deal with and suffer through.

The average woman is worth her weight in gold. To denigrate their role in society and the family is over the cliff and pathetic.

But did ya hear? Pigs can fly now too..

"Book" It, "Tweet" It, "Pin " It, "Share It" With Your Followers. Time to keep the momentum going.

As Always,

The Frog Prince

Ladies! You Too Remember In November!

More by this Author

  • "Ineptocracy" Is A Word
    18

    Ineptocracy is the new system of government that Obama-Biden ushered in. It is a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society...


Comments 57 comments

Lynn S. Murphy 4 years ago

Ok - whatever issues that were out there in cyberspace have cleared up for me. Those 2 women are living on same planet were Nancy Pelosi is. You are correct in saying that women are more aware of what's happening than they give them credit for, and I'm hoping for an uprising in November.


Wayne Brown profile image

Wayne Brown 4 years ago from Texas

I believe on the basis of what I have experienced that women care very much but may be more prone to actions than words. Women listen and form opinions but do not necessarily share as much of it as we men might. I believe the Dems might just be surprised how poor they do with the fairer sex in the November election. Sure, there are going to be some who are just like "the angry black male"....they quit listening, watching, and paying attention long ago and now they only want to run their mouth and verbalize their anger in the hope that everyone will join them. If they listen to themselves, they quickly realize why that line is dang short behind them. Good write, Frog! ~WB


TexasLadyJuanita profile image

TexasLadyJuanita 4 years ago from Kemah, TX

Regardless of what is polite, women do talk politics (and religion). In the workplace it was my experience that the larger the corporation, the women were more educated and discussed politics more. In the smaller business, women were more likely to discuss their family, and that did not usually include how politics affected family. The states I worked in over the years: Texas (home), California, Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, and Florida. That is a nice mix of Americana. I think that the women in the larger corporations were not only more educated, but more confident in expressing their views to others. In looking back, the women in smaller businesses were overall, happier people and maybe that is because they didn't worry about politics so much. No matter the size of the business, women were more likely to be conservative than liberal by about 80%. How do I know these things? I am just one of those lucky people who people talk to . . . or . . . sitting in the bosses office talking to her is a good excuse for not working? LOL In retrospect, I do wonder.


breakfastpop profile image

breakfastpop 4 years ago

Cutter is absolutely vicious, just the way team Obama likes it. I can't think of anything more insulting than her stupid statements. She is the force behind every lying ad.


Faith Reaper profile image

Faith Reaper 4 years ago from southern USA

WHAT??????? LOL, but NOT REALLY. How absurd to say the least. I cannot even believe such words are coming out of the mouth of a woman!!!! Did her brain fall out of her skull?

Thanks My Frog Prince. Voted Way UP In His Love, Faith Reaper


Ghost32 4 years ago

Last time I checked, my wife was still a woman--and she seems to care what happens. In fact, she cares what happens in the next 6 weeks aka Election Day on Nov. 6.

Plus, in the next 15 days or so she should be getting her early ballot and will be helping to DECIDE what's going to happen in the next 4 years....


Stu 4 years ago

Cutter has taken things to a new low. She's basically saying "who cares if we screwed up for four years, all that matters is the future." This is nonsense, because past damage makes the future all the more difficult. In the aftermath of the damage caused to freedom, American security, and our economic system by GWB and Greenspan, Obama had a golden opportunity to show real statesmanship and begin reversing the damage. Instead he copied the damage, and added steroids to it with Bernanke's help. To the Patriot Act were added the detention provisions of the 2012 NDAA, to the escapades in Iraq (which created a radical Shiite state) were added US involvement in Arab Springs that created yet more allies for Iran, and the Federal Reserve's printing press and dangerous ultra-low interest rate policy were revved up. For all of Obama's "blame-game" against George Bush, he certainly seems to be coying alot of his mistakes. Who is Obama going to blame for the crisis he "inherits" if he wins in November - Calvin Coolidge? Ronald Reagan? Barry Goldwater?


Pamela99 profile image

Pamela99 4 years ago from United States

I couldn't get on Hubpages this morning at all, then was gone much of the day. I am glad to have found this hub. Cutter is a liar. I have read some hubs by women here on Hubpages and they are so out of touch from listening to these lies it is scary. Many seem to think abortion is the biggest issue of the election, like a president can just step into the office and overturn Roe vs Wade. I can't believe the ignorance that I read and see on TV. This administration is a disgrace.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

Pamela - HP was hit with something this morning though they didn't tell me what it was. I'm like you and had to go to work. Some of us have to do that because other people want to keep their hands in ou pockets. If there is a "War on Women" the Democartic Party is the one waging it on our fairer sex.

The Frog


marcoujor profile image

marcoujor 4 years ago from Jeffersonville PA

I may be an old, conservative lady but I sure do hate when chicks speak for me. I shall go ahead and keep worrying about the past, present and the future....amd I'm probably not alone by a long shot.

Glad HP is straightened out...I sure never thought of the potential timing...

Voted UP & UI...{this almost blew my socks off, thank goodness for flip flops...}


34th Bomb Group profile image

34th Bomb Group 4 years ago from Western New York State

Liar, liar, pants on fire.

What a load of shameless, shameful lying crap.

Thanks FP.

(These a-holes will now blame Kennedy for the Libya Lies.)


Alastar Packer profile image

Alastar Packer 4 years ago from North Carolina

American women not concerned with the last 4 years? That's some assumption from Cutter..whats -hr-name. Anyway, your retort is unfortunately all too true, Frog. You know how I feel about women's contributions to their homes and country, yesterday, today and tomorrow.


Pat Potts 4 years ago

Michelle Malkin said it best. Stephanie is a shameless lying liar.

She absolutely doesn't speak for me and all the other women friends I have.

voted up


drbj profile image

drbj 4 years ago from south Florida

Whenever I listen to either Cutter or Wasserman- Schultz on television, I wonder if they are secretly on Mitt's payroll. They are both such dunderheads they have to be losing votes for BO.


Naomi's Banner 4 years ago

Here we go once again and our own kind trying to make us walk instead of ride the bus. Are you kidding me. I don't know what trip thief on but women nowadays multi task and are very informed and any intelligent women with any self respect at all will not buy this fancy packaged malarkey! I know how I'm voting in November and no lieing ignorant excuse for a politician will convince me to change my mind. I lift up our country in prayer continually now praying that many will come out of the fog filled heads and see this political deception before its too late.


bravewarrior profile image

bravewarrior 4 years ago from Central Florida

I'd like to know which women were polled. No one asked me!! Probably because Nobama wouldn't like what this woman has to say!!


teaches12345 profile image

teaches12345 4 years ago

I am chuckling at your reference "they are two of the best weapons the other side has"... You have something there! November is around the corner.


Pollyannalana profile image

Pollyannalana 4 years ago from US

I am glad you mentioned that women are worse off and the day that man gets another term I expect all hell to break loose. He will not pretend to love us any longer! He did fool me once but I am no idiot. Since I can see and hear he has not had me fooled, how does he fool so many others? It is like a possession! I cannot understand it.


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

Funny article Froggy. In a globalized society the American dream of 20 percent down and a fixed mortgage for a strong middle class is over.

Obama was not responsible for this. Capitalists were.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

bgamal - And what do your observations have to do with the subject of this article? Most people won't make the connection so clue us in to your brilliance.

The Frog


TexasLadyJuanita profile image

TexasLadyJuanita 4 years ago from Kemah, TX

bgmall, It was the government and their politicians need to destroy America that blackmailed the financial institutions into giving loans to people who could not afford them. If the financial institutions did not play along, they were threatened with constant audits, expect to be turned down for any growth, etc. Ask any banker who has been around at least thirty years.


TexasLadyJuanita profile image

TexasLadyJuanita 4 years ago from Kemah, TX

I changed my comment and it didn't take :( anyway what I had added was this: It was the liberals and ghetto pimps who promoted this problem. They used American citizens to destroy capitalism. This hurt the upward mobility of the working poor to reach the middle class by creating discontent in the poor class when they could not pay their mortgages. It set back the mentality of working ourselves into a better life, the American Dream, into an entitlement mentality.


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

I will respond Frog. It is easy. All this other stuff is fluff. Ultimately the reason that there is an attack on women is because libertarian thought teaches that only property owners should vote. The Republicans don't want the libertarians to be in charge but they borrow all the time from libertarian thought. Peter Schiff says that only property owners should vote.

Add to this the fact that the libertarians rooted for the capitalists to deregulate, and look at the financial mess we have due to this deregulation.


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

Texas Lady, you said:

"It was the government and their politicians need to destroy America that blackmailed the financial institutions into giving loans to people who could not afford them. If the financial institutions did not play along, they were threatened with constant audits, expect to be turned down for any growth, etc. Ask any banker who has been around at least thirty years."

Truth is, that was a lie that was floated by the bankers. Private, not government, mortgage backed securities drove the liar loans, option arms and pay option arms. This came from the UK before subprime was an issue here. Yes, there was about 24 percent of the subprime loans that were CRA related, but over 70 percent of the subprime loans were originated by private shadow banks funded by hedge funds that now hate the Volcker Rule.

I bet if you talked to Neal Cavuto in private, he would tell you that focusing on the CRA was essentially a diversion by the bankers, and by Fox News, who benefit from the bankers greatly.

I wrote an article at Business Insider. I do that for free and have no skin in that game. But hopefully Frog will let me post it, showing that liar loans were being done before 2000 in the UK and those were imported to the US by the bankster cabal, centered in the Square Mile of London: http://www.businessinsider.com/smoking-gun-liar-lo...

Liar loans were known as self certified loans in the UK. But they were encouraged by the biggest lender in the land, RBS.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

bgamall - Your answer is total rubbish. If you actually actually believe such rubbish then I put you in class all by yourself in most cases. This is the United States and we are a capitastist nation and in more than all probabality will remain so. Your answer was a non-answer and again off topic. You seem to be a self-hate mode. Get a grip on yourself.

The UK huh? That explains a lot about your mentality.

The Frog


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

Frog said: "bgamall - Your answer is total rubbish. If you actually actually believe such rubbish then I put you in class all by yourself in most cases. This is the United States and we are a capitastist nation and in more than all probabality will remain so."

I have no issue with free enterprise, capitalism. But the scam of toxic loans when banks USED TO HAVE UNDERWRITERS, was not capitalism. It was a scam. The banks refused to use their underwriters when securitization of loans took place, because they didn't have to own the loans. They pawned them off. You must understand that underwriters were used to make sure people didn't buy too much house. That was always the responsibility of the banks, until they got greedy. It was planned in Basel 2 and it was applied to the US and Spain having been tested in the UK.

Women, and the so called "dependent", were victims of these loans. The bankers tried to blame hispanics for the housing bubble. They tried to blame government. They tried to blame everyone but themselves, and apparently they got away with it. The TBTF bankers are liars and scum and people hate them for good reason.


TexasLadyJuanita profile image

TexasLadyJuanita 4 years ago from Kemah, TX

I saw what happened in Houston first hand. Talked to bankers first hand. Saw employees buying houses first hand. It was reported at the time, but no one cared, because they didn't understand. Frog Prince I am sorry I answered this person. I wonder how much of his experience is first hand. It doesn't matter now anyway. It cannot be undone.


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

Texas Lady, I don't care who you talked to. Look at the following chart. Notice that in mid 2003, the real bubble took off without mortgages being originated in the public pool at all. You can talk to people, listen to their stories, but the stats don't lie. Most toxic mortgages by far were privately originated mortgages. Fox News lies and you may have been in an area where the private mortgages did not dominate, but that was likely a fluke. Here is the chart in my article at BI. It comes from the Fed. Read it. By the way, the Fed allowed the toxic mortgages so I hold them accountable with the banks they serve: http://www.businessinsider.com/you-can-hate-fed-be...

If you need help with the chart, let me know. Without this chart, which is also in my ebook, Ponzi Housing Scheme 21st Century, you cannot understand the money flow with regard to originated mortgages and private mortgages guaranteed by bogus AAA bonds.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

bgamall - " I don't care who you talked to." You're about at the end of any discussion here. I'd rather talk to the horse than look at any chart. I think you lie and are a delusional sort who has a conspirator hiding around every corner. Did a banker run off with your girl? You obviously have some axe to grind with the banking industry. If you do this is not the place to grind it.

This article is NOT about the banking industry and won't be. Write your own Hub about it. This is about Cutterocchio and what the Obama administration is doing, Stay on topic and that is my last warning. You trolls who have an issue axe to grind don't amuse me at all.

The Frog


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

Fair enough. You mentioned that it was stated that Obama was only responsible for 10 percent of the budget deficit. This is a chart that is commonly known to the business community. It shows that without the Bush wars and housing bubble, there would have been no deficit: http://rackjite.com/deficit-chart-shows-gop-at-fau...

Now, I don't blame Bush alone for the housing bubble because it was set up by both Republicans and Democrats. However, it was allowed to happen under the Bush watch. The wars for oil, and that is a whole other subject where I have substantial proof, were massively costly.

Women do care about the economy, Frog. It is just that they know Romney cannot do much more than Obama, and may even do what he has always done, outsourced jobs. And women have other issues, like Planned Parenthood, that they want protected, and they know Romney at least talks about getting rid of it. They know that Romney has spoken in derisive terms about family issues and about people who rely on government.

Tell you what Froggy, the people that rely most on our government are the military, bankers and the 1 percent. Women view that as being unjust, and rightly so. We spend more money on our military than pretty much all the other countries in the world combined. Women don't like that as a general rule. They would rather see money spent on our sorry roads, airports, bridges, etc.

Big projects are never funded by bankers. The government funded the Hoover Dam, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and on and on. The Army Corps of Engineers have funded countless lakes, which bring prosperity, and yet bankers would never do so. Even Las Vegas was funded by the mob because bankers had no vision of the place.

All we have now is money being funneled to the wealthy to buy up the American dream. The 1 percent are buying up all the real estate. If congress acted, then we would have a different kind of spending, on the real economy. But Mitch McConnell said he wanted Obama to be a one term president and he blocked all efforts to do more for the real economy.

And Obama has kept gas prices down. He has threatened to release the oil reserves and that has undone the speculators. Yet gas prices are high because we have too few refineries, they say. I think that is where big oil controls the supply, even though we are inundated with oil.

Someone needs to fix that yet we hear no one of either party talking about new refineries.

Women want their rights. They don't trust Romney, who has flipped so much they don't know what his real story is. That is why he is being crushed at the polls at this point.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

You still don't want to get on topic and stay there. Next off topic comment and the economy. Try tomorrow's Hub. It will be.

The fact is that 47% of the working people pay no income tax but use the same services, more really, than those of us who do. I call them sponges myself because I don't have to be polite.

CYA

The Frog


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

"You still don't want to get on topic and stay there." You wrote that women plan the budgets, put gas in the cars and pay the bills. I don't understand where I got off topic based on that statement on this hub.

Also, women want rights. The whole theme of this hub is making fun of those who would claim to speak for the women of this nation about contraceptives. I made the claim that women want these rights. I don't understand how that is off topic, Frog.

I made the case that women should and do care about the economy. I thought we were in agreement there.


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

Frog, I wanted to comment on your statement if I could. You said:

"The fact is that 47% of the working people pay no income tax but use the same services, more really, than those of us who do. I call them sponges myself because I don't have to be polite."

I just wanted to break down the 47 percent:

1/4th of them are social security recipients. Ronald Reagan didn't want them to pay tax.

A large percentage are working poor who get credit for child care and child deductions. America throws the poor who raise children a bone. You say that is sponging. I don't.

Some are disabled. I bet you know some military folks who are disabled who rely on the government, and some may not pay taxes. Are they sponges?

And most of these 47 percent pay all sorts of taxes, and private taxes. They pay too much at the pump since the wealthy drive up the price of gasoline. They pay sales tax, and that is a tax for local government.

You call them sponges and then plead with people at your home page not to jump on you for your beliefs. How can you believe this stuff, and not expect people to criticize you Frog?

Did you know that Romney could be in the 47 percent but won't let all his taxes be known? He pays way too little tax. And that is sponging, Frog.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

Listen and listen closely. In this nation women have rights. They are basically the same rights as all other citizens. The topic here is some bimbo named Stephanie Cutter who evidently believes, and has voiced that belief, that women don't concern themselves with what they have had to endure, just like the rest of us have had to, with Obama's fialed economic policies.

Understand English? I am very fluent in it and write where most people can identify the subject of my Hubs. You have failed to do so. You want to bring your Grand Bank Conspiracy theory into this article. It isn't there. As I told you it appears from your answers that you have an axe to grind with the banking community. This isn't the place.

You obviously don't understand English son. I specifically said "income taxes." Everyone else also pay all those other taxes. You really that dense?

Let me also add that I deleted your comment on my Socialism Hub because I don't allow self-promotion on any article I write. I suggest you learn the rules of blogging since many of them seem to escape you.

The Frog


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

You said: "Let me also add that I deleted your comment on my Socialism Hub because I don't allow self-promotion on any article I write. I suggest you learn the rules of blogging since many of them seem to escape you."

Frog, generally, self promotion relates to giving a link to a personal website. I purposely did not do so. I am sorry you deleted the post.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

bgamall - You used the word "generally" and I generally, as the author of my own writings, set the rules of conduct on my Hubs. I have that prerogative whether you like it or not. If anyone here has any interest in anything you have written, which I find doubtful, they can click on your icon and go to your home page. I don't allow self-promotion period, subtle or not I don't give a rat's butt how it is done. I recognize it when I see it. Understand?

The Frog


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

Hey Frog, do you get a government pension? People accuse those of us who get government pensions of being sponges, you know. Something to think about before you go putting down others. It is simple, the sponges are the wealthy, not people like you and me. Both political parties are guilty of allowing the richest to sponge. I don't think your pension for military service is sponging. But there are many right wingers who think it is sponging. Just FYI.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

bgamall - I call a spade a spade and an idiot an idiot. Now I suggest you travel on to where you make sense to others. It isn't here. I'm not a right winger, left winger. I am a Tea Party conservative who believes in adherence to the US Constitution. In closing, the document mentions that the primary role of the "limited" federal government is the defense of this nation. Every citizen should contribute to that cause via the federal income tax which pays for that defense. Now wise up and move on. Spend some time reading exaqctly what the US Constitution says. It might help you think straight.

The Frog


bgamall profile image

bgamall 4 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada

He Frog, I engaged you in the political forum for calling me an idiot.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

And who is supposed to care? You tagged yourself and maybe aren't bright enough to see it. I have no idea which.


Wayne Brown profile image

Wayne Brown 4 years ago from Texas

That should be a rousing discussion...hope you can ignore the distraction, Frogman! LOL! ~WB


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

Wayne - Some of these folks need some cheese to go with their whine. My being a member of the TPM really set the lefty off. Compound that by the fact that I defended his ability to continue to run his gums for 23 years and it is highly unlikely I'll be distracted by blabber.

So take a trip over here to see the tantrum:

http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/104207

The Frog


poetvix profile image

poetvix 4 years ago from Gone from Texas but still in the south. Surrounded by God's country.

It will be a cold day in the most southerly place when that woman speaks for me. "Woman don't care about the last four years." Really? I care. She is beyond insulting. And I wouldn't believe a word any of them said about what they plan for the next four. It's not like the told the truth last time around. Keep at it, Sir Frog! You just get better and better.

@ Bgmail you wrote to Sir Frog - “Also, women want rights. The whole theme of this hub is making fun of those who would claim to speak for the women of this nation about contraceptives. I made the claim that women want these rights. I don't understand how that is off topic, Frog.”

You’re not a woman. I am. So, I’m going to tell you just what we women think about this line of male horse manure. Mind you, I said women, not idealist, leftist, Kool-aid sipping little girls looking for a man to be their daddy. Women’s rights does not have anything to do with contraception, as you well know as evidenced by your earlier comment when you state, “Ultimately the reason that there is an attack on women is because libertarian thought teaches that only property owners should vote. The Republicans don't want the libertarians to be in charge but they borrow all the time from libertarian thought. Peter Schiff says that only property owners should vote.” You are aware that “property” plays into this issue but really dance around the truth.

The truth is women’s rights has to do with the fact that women were property for thousands of years in a very literal sense. We were treated no different than any other animal when it came to being sold, traded, beaten, raped, married off, what have you and there was not a damn thing we could do about it.

I don’t give a rat’s ass about some cheap pills or a three hundred dollar medical procedure should I be the kind of person who would use it, which I am not. I care very much about my right to remain a free human being on the face of this planet which the current administration endangers daily. Their giving away of 120 billion dollars of OUR tax dollars (you know half of it came from us girls) to the Muslim Brotherhood endangers that! Every female in our nation should snap to that right now. Women suffered and died for thousands of years so whiny, little, spoiled, diva wanta be’s can stand up now and cry about free birth control. A real woman is not about to sell out her gender or her children for a few cheap pills.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

poetvix - Not being a woman myself you are able to address the flaws in bgamalls illogical rationale. Great words of wisdom from a woman who I also know as a patriot.

The Frog


WillStarr profile image

WillStarr 4 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

Sadly, Stephanie Cutter is probably right...at least for leftist women and government-dependent women. They will ignore Obama's failures because he promises a leftist Utopia for women. As one female pundit put it, they see Obama/government as both their daddy and their husband.

As long as we allow government to tax Peter to support Pauline, Pauline will vote for the Democrats. That's why government largess is so wrong...it uses your money to buy votes for your opponent.


Wayne Brown profile image

Wayne Brown 4 years ago from Texas

I think Will makes a solid point and that is the crowd this stuff plays to...the rest of us are simply angered by it and brush it away as yet another pack of lies. High school girls are now being offered the morning-after pill without consultation of their parents as an effective birth control method and yet one more safety net insuring that young folks will engage in sexual relations. We need to wake up and see what we are doing in our education system to entice young minds to be irresponsible at an early age. This welfare state which Obama is creating is one bad trip and the women supporting it will ultimately suffer for their ignorance. ~WB


WillStarr profile image

WillStarr 4 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

Romney's supposed 'War on women' is based on his objections to the sort of income redistribution that supplies 'free' birth control for the likes of Sandra Fluke.

Now they don't call it free birth control, of course. They call it 'access' to birth control, as if women who don't get government funded birth control can't legally pay for it themselves.

But make no mistake about it...the demonizing of Romney and the appeal to women are the reasons that the worst president in memory, who has failed in just about everything and cannot run on his record, is absurdly in the lead. I am stunned that American voters have become so dumbed-down that they will vote in a man whose main claim to fame is free phones and birth control.

God help us all if he wins four more dismal years.


Old Poolman profile image

Old Poolman 4 years ago from Rural Arizona

I keep asking myself why I should be forced to pay for the birth control for others, and I just can't come up with a good answer. I asked this question once on another hub. The answer "It is cheaper to provide birth control than it is to support illegitimate children for their entire childhood. " Perhaps this makes sense to some, but there is also Total Abstinence which is a guaranteed form of birth control.

If women make up 50% of the population, I am being taxed for something that benefits only half of the population.

If we are to pay for birth control, why don't we also provide free toilet tissue. Everyone I know uses that, or at least I think they do.


Funom Makama 3 profile image

Funom Makama 3 4 years ago from Europe

Fantastic hub and practically an engaging one. It is nice I came here. Hoping to read more of this.


tom hellert profile image

tom hellert 4 years ago from home

Frog Frog Frog, you got trcked by ganimal he used the oldest trick in the book on you ye olde Bgaitith and switchith... You start talking about Littlr pinochocutter and because bganimal couldnt make a salient arguement- he switched to bank bail out bad loans etc- caused originally by Clinton and the dums incongress giving loans to folks who coulnt pay for them what that has to do with Cuckinoccio....typical bait n switch...

TH


Cassie Smith profile image

Cassie Smith 4 years ago from U.S.

The Democrats exposed...AGAIN! The Dems really think women can't do anything or even think for themselves which is why they are so eager to have a democratic gov't make the decisions for them. Another great hub, Frog!


Stu 4 years ago

Bgamall,

You are correct that Bush (and Greenspan) were very profligate. But two wrongs don't make a right. Obama is the biggest spender in US history. He's increased the official debt 60% in less than four years in office; it took 230 years to build up the $10 trillion of official federal debt he inherited, and in less than four years he added $6 trillion to it.

You are quite correct that the Bush Administration bears alot of blame for the housing bubble and burst, largely a result of Greenspan's "zero interest rate" policy. But Bernanke is following exactly the same policy. And what about the Carter era CRA that forced banks and mortgage insurers to make and insure bum loans to people who weren't creditworthy? This fed the housing collapse too.

You consider the MURDER of innocent babies OK? Did you know that federal law prohibits federal funding of abortion, but the feds do it anyway? Over 50 million babies have been killed since the Roe v. Wade decision. We need a federal Life at Conception Act to end the slaughter.

Federal government's biggest cost is not the military or the bankers; the single biggest federal expense is entitlement spending, and to top it off, federal entitlements are not even legal due to the absence of any applicable enumerated power in the Constitution. All entitlements are Constitutionally optional functions of the states.

You are correct that the government has in fact funded many large commercial projects. But again, under what enumerated Constitutional power? Read Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution. Federal powers are strcitly limited to about a dozen items, all of which have a material nexus to international affairs (signing treaties, operating the military, establishing maritime law, etc.). Purely domestic law is the sole function of the states and the municipalities, yet the federal government has illegally usurped almost all of these powers.

I agree with you that money being funneled to special interests from the taxpayer is atrocious, as were the 2008-2009 bailouts. But look who's doing it - Obama, NOT GWB.

Obama has kept gas prices low? I just filled up, and it cost $60. Obama is gutting our chance for energy independence and lower energy prices by refusing to issue lease sales and drilling permits. It's his way of pandering to the "greenies" for votes and campaign money. He cares more about being reelected than solving the nation's problems.

Nobody with any brains trusts Romney. He's a lying flip-flopper. But he's not being crushed at the polls. Even the biased liberal polls have him running a dead heat with Obama on the popular vote. And most important, he's not a socialist like Obama. He's a milquetoast moderate, sort of the lesser of two evils.


bravewarrior profile image

bravewarrior 4 years ago from Central Florida

Frog, I'm surprised you even approved bgamall's comments. He doesn't live here, he's not a woman and he doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground!


Ghost32 4 years ago

Thanks, Stu. bgamall had so much fluff on here, I think it put me to sleep--at any rate, I missed the bit about Obama keeping gas prices low till you tagged it.

What Obama HAS done for gas prices is require me to use my card twice to fill up the gas cans I use to supply the generators we use for heavy electrical draw appliances. The pump cuts the fill off at $75, which used to be plenty--but not now.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

bravewarrior - I actually tolerated bgamall a lot longer than I should have and normally do with users who troll articles trying to exercise their personal agendas.

I have another one over here right now.

http://hubpages.com/politics/Its-Still-The-Economy...

The Frog


bravewarrior profile image

bravewarrior 4 years ago from Central Florida

It seems there has been a run of nasty people commenting all over HP lately. Maybe if we start hitting the 'deny' button, they'll take their nastiness elsewhere!


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

bravewarrior - In cyberspace they are known as trolls. They cruise along looking for places to drop their left wing horse turds.

TFP

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working