Eric Holder's Proof

And The Sign Says...

I'm not sure how much more proof Eric Holder wants, or needs for that matter, that voter fraud is easily perpetrated in this nation. He has been on an Obama witch hunt of late against states that have mandatory voter laws that require an official photo ID. His ruse in doing so is the Voting Rights Act of 1964 which really belongs on the scrap heap of history rather than being used as a functional law. It is interesting that the incident you see here is real, it happened and the point that is being made to Holder is how easily this can be done and Holder himself is the subject. Of course Holder dismisses it as a stunt. I'm not sure how much more proof he can possibly want, stunt or not.

The DOJ is now claiming that the situation was "manufactured." It indeed was as most stings are, even when the DOJ does them. Here's their logic in a satement issued, "“It’s no coincidence that these so-called examples of rampant voter fraud consistently turn out to be manufactured ones.” Don't you just love it when this administration goes into the tailspin mode? In the real world you create a situation, such as the one in question, to prove how easily it can be done, and it was. That was the whole point and nothing but the point that was being made. Just how much more easy can it possibly get? The DOJ's response is utter nonsense.


Do You Have An Eric Holder? In Washington DC No Less!

This happened when Washington DC held it's Presidential Primary on April 3rd of 2012. It would seem that if the poll worker was anything but brain dead he would know that the young white man who walked up to his desk didn't even closely resemble Eric Holder who by now certainly has a bit of notoriety in our nation's Capitol.

So up he strolls into the precinct where Holder lives and presents himself as being Eric Holder. No ID required because if you are "on this list" you are who you say you are? It would seem to me that Holder would now get the message that anyone can just walk into his polling place and obtain his ballot or anyone else's for that matter. All you have to do is have a name and address and be breathing. And he dismisses this as a stunt. If I were the Attorney General of this nation I'd be doing more than that about what is shown on that video.

Fraud? What Fraud?

If you listened closely to what was said on the video, the young man stated that he'd feel much more comfortable if he was allowed to go out to his car and obtain his identification for verification purposes even though it wasn't required. The proof of the pudding was already had so there was no need to go further. He was offered Holder's ballot without any further questions. Of course there is no voter fraud in this nation Holder.

The young man then. evidently to emphasize to the poll worker who he was purporting to be jokingly said, "I’ll be back Faster than you can say Furious." Having written extensively about Operation Fast & Furious and Holder's involvement and stonewalling of the investigation I am perplexed. Even the Lame Stream Media has finally picked up on the story.

What O'Keefe is doing regarding voter fraud is called Project Vertias and this was Part IV of the operation and happened right in our nation's Capitol. Yes, right in that rat's nest that it has become. But according to Eric Holder voter fraud is not a problem in our nation and having and requiring valid voter identification laws on the books wouldn't do any good in solving the problem. Maybe we should require it and see Mr. Attorney General or are you so intent in seeing your boss re-elected that you will ignore the obvious. ACORN hasn't died, it has just changed its name to protect the guilty. Holder knows that, I know that and you probably do too.

Voting is sacred in this nation or at least it should be. It should be one US citizen, alive and kicking is equal to one vote. Why in the world would anyone want that to be any other way? Other than the obvious reason I might add.

So far Project Veritas has uncovered some rather inconvenient truths that Holder seems intent on ignoring. It uncovered the fact that dead people can vote in the state of New Hampshire. The good that came out of that discovery is that the state has now passed a voter identification law itself. Is Eric Holder objecting to that? Will he? Then they discovered that in Minnesota they could use names like Tim Tebow and Tom Brady to cast a ballot. Those are celebrity names that most people know on sight and have actual faces associated with them. Such was the case with the video above. What good became of that? Minnesota has now crafted a voter ID law that will incorporate it into the state's constitution and will be on the ballot for the voters to approve.

Of Course There Isn't A Problem...

This Is Not A Problem To Holder. It Is Encouraged/

I have read numerous articles from across this nation about how it is expected that voter fraud will be even more of a problem this presidential election than it was during the last one. I encourage any informed citizen to become active in the process and volunteer to work the polls this coming election to ensure that a watchful eye is kept by those of us who value the process for what it needs to be - clean and free of fraud.

No more New Black Panther Party members with night sticks outside polling places who are given a free pass by the likes of Holder. That is called voter intimidation which is also against the laws of this nation. It's time for maybe the Attorney General of this nation to start upholding the laws on the books rather than breaking them and finding ways to circumvent the law to achieve his, and his bosses, agenda.

What say you?

As Always,

The Frog Prince

Remember In November!

More by this Author

  • "Ineptocracy" Is A Word
    18

    Ineptocracy is the new system of government that Obama-Biden ushered in. It is a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society...


Comments 36 comments

IntimatEvolution profile image

IntimatEvolution 4 years ago from Columbia, MO USA

Right on!


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

And here is what the DOJ has to say about the video!

"The Deparmtent of Justice on Monday attempted to play down video proof of how easy it is to vote fraudulently when a man working for James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas obtained Attorney General Eric Holder’s vote.

'About the only time we get concrete evidence of voter fraud is when someone pulls a stunt like this,' a DoJ spokesman told NBC’s First Read blog.

Holder and the department have consistently said there is no proof of widespread voter fraud, but the video, posted online by Breitbart is further embarrassment after Project Veritas successfully got dead people’s votes in New Hampshire and Minnesota."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/holder-vote-stunt...

When will the public refuse to put up with the lame excuses and lies this administration feeds us on a daily basis - if members of your family were this deceitful you would disown them, wouldn't you? THROW THE BUMS OUT IN NOVEMBER!


breakfastpop profile image

breakfastpop 4 years ago

Holder will not be upholding any laws that he and the president feel get in their way. Holder should have been let go a long time ago. The same is true of the president.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

tsadjatko - When will the public stop being spoon fed the news and rely on legitimate truth tellers? Probably never.

BPOP - Holder should never have been confirmed in the first place with his shady past.

The Frog


RealHousewife profile image

RealHousewife 4 years ago from St. Louis, MO

Hey Frog - I'm pretty sure I've heard of a lot of voter fraud in the past. I think people will keep doing it if they have a chance. I think it should be no problem to show my ID or birth cert at the polls. Not sure Obama would agree?

I can see November from my house! HAHA


ATT 4 years ago

Complain all you want..nothing will change,That,you can count on.


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

Complain? You miss the whole point - "complaining" is the only way to heighten awareness and get results - complaining does change things THAT IS A FACT and APATHY as expressed by your statement is why nothing changes. If anything people don't complain enough!!

I believe the democrats have been getting away with voter fraud for years and if what they say was true (and I doubt it because you have the fox guarding the hen house) "...that there is no proof of widespread voter fraud" it's only because they have been getting away with it and want to continue to get away with it and NO VOTER ID is how they get away with it. And who cares if it is widespread or not - any kind of voter fraud is an assault on our democracy (I mean republic) and a direct insult to all those military and civilians who have given life and limb to preserve our freedoms and our right to vote! So it is as bad as an act of treason to pursue the policy of no voter ID.


34th Bomb Group 4 years ago

We have three "cities" in my county.

During the '08 Election there was a vehicle carrying 5 women who "voted" in all three cities - using different names. We nabbed them before they could vote here and all we had to go on was a description of five shady women piling out of one car to go vote giggling the entire way.

Fortunately, when they piled out in my City it was obvious they didn't belong in this rural end of the County. They were sent on their way. They'll probably be more careful this year.


Jim Bryan profile image

Jim Bryan 4 years ago from Austin, TX

Just a couple of things:

1. No voter fraud occurred in this video. He never actually said he was Eric Holder, he just asked if they had someone by that name registered. He did not try to vote using a fraudulent ballot, and it would be impossible, given the video, to prove he ever intended to do so. If you think this is voter fraud, then let's put him trial.

2. There are more than one Eric Holders in the DC area. Your claim that the election staffer should have been able tell which Eric Holder was before him is an impossible expectation.

3. The "Voter Fraud" debate concerning individual voters is ridiculous. There are many safegaurds in place to prevent it and there is no evidence that it isn't prosecuted when found [except for the this cycle, where Republican operatives (O'Keefe, et al) have perpetrated it].

Regardless, IF the above *is* voter fraud (as you suggest), and you therefore have photographic evidence of voter fraud being comitted by a Republican and you have no photographic evidence of a single Democrat comitting voter fraud, how did you come to the conclusion that Democrats are the one's committing voter fraud, despite the evidence before your own eyes?


Old Poolman profile image

Old Poolman 4 years ago from Rural Arizona

There will always be those who refuse to admit that voter fraud is alive and well. The simple act of requiring picture ID to vote would put this issue to rest but is being fought all the way by our own government. Fighting this ID requirement would lead you to believe there are those who don't want voter fraud stopped for obvious reasons.


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

Absolutely Poolman! You can't participate in the economy without a photo ID so why should you be able to vote without one?


WillStarr profile image

WillStarr 4 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

There's only one reason to resist voter ID...fraud!


Stu 4 years ago

This problem is going to get worse and worse. More and more states are moving to electronic balotting, and there will be no way to ensure that voters are eligible, using their real identities, or that the votes are being counted accurately. I don't know if the story is true, but I read recently that Obama is considering outsourcing some of the 11/2 vote counting to a Spanish company that counts George Soros as one of its investors.

The fraud is beinning to impact the GOP too. Reports are that states with non-binding GOP caucuses are seeing trolls being chosen as delegates at the precinct level. Once a troll moves up the ladder to the county or state caucus, he can change his vote. So, for example, someone could say they are a Ron Paul delegate, and at the precinct level must support Paul, even in states with non-binding caucuses. But, if this delegate moves up the chain, as long as the state's caucuses are non-binding, he can switch his vote to another primary candidate. In effect, states with non-binding caucuses allow delegates to negate the impact of the popular primary vote. Your vote at the polls could mean almost nothing in these states. The crooked delegates in effect decide for you who the state will support at the national convention.


Ms Dee profile image

Ms Dee 4 years ago from Texas, USA

With all this kind of stuff going on and our laws not being upheld and followed, it is easy to feel like giving up on voting. I sure hope voters will not become discouraged a come out in large numbers on voting day. Great hub, Voted Up!


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

You know the Democraps shouldn't be so dedicated to allowing voters fraud by voting without an ID when there are high tech methods of cheating - Programmer Under Oath In Open Court Admits Computers Rig Elections - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qshi4QOnlmA


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

Jim Bryan - So I'll address your non-points. There was indeed no voter fraud because the young man refused to take the Eric Holder ballot the assistant poll taker was going to hand him. Get it? Did you really watch and listen to the video closely. If not, I suggest that you do.

The people went to Eric Holder's precinct with his address. Obviously you are out in left field again. The ballot they were handing him was Eric Holder Jr's - the AG of the US of A. Get your thinking straight. They did.

Voter fraud was proven in the Senate race in Minnesota where Al Franken was declared the winner. Whoops! You are wrong again.

I think other user's answered your last observations. It doesn't matter one bit to me what party is guilty of what. You see Jim, I'm a registered Independent. I can assure you though that not too many Republicans associated themselves with ACORN.

Stu - What you heard about Spain and Soros is true. It never helps the situation when the SEIU are the ones maintaining and servicing the voting machines like happened in 2010 out in Nevada. We saw what the results were there.

The Frog


b. Malin profile image

b. Malin 4 years ago

What is Wrong in having Voter ID. We need an ID for just about EVERYTHING else we do. I guess that would keep things LEGAL...God for Bid. We all got a Laugh out of the Eric Holder Incident...But it's also SCARY!


Jim Bryan profile image

Jim Bryan 4 years ago from Austin, TX

Your article addresses only voter fraud by impersonation. I limited my comments to refer only to impersonation. Its not really proper to begin citing other types of fraud once you have framed the limits of the subject in the HUB.

Do you think that the voting staffer knew which Eric Holder in DC lives at a particular address? That's an unreasonable expection.

Insofar as your political affilliations: you're main evidence is from Project Veritas. It's headed by a felony-convicted Republican party operative. Since you are, in fact, spreading propaganda supporting one party's platform, put out by a party operative, I assumed you supported that party. I apologize if I was mistaken.

Project Veritas members (including the person in the video) are being investigated by the D.C. Elections Board (who, rather than Eric Holder, actually has jurisdiction) to determine if a violation occurred.

In New Hampshire, the State Atty Gen and a Federal Prosecutor are also investigating this group. If found to be guilty of Voter Fraud in NH, it's 5 years per instance. Since he's already on probation, he'd be guilty of violating the terms and end up in prison.

Yes, Fraud exists. Project Veritas may have done it in this case. If so, let's prosecute them, but that's not Eric Holder's job, regardless, especially since they targeted him specifically. Primary voter fraud is generally investigated/prosecuted by the States, not the DoJ. The NH instance is an exception, if they can prove that they travelled across state lines, and may end up as a RICO charge. If Eric Holder got peronally involved in a case against PV, it would be a conflict of interest, and an abuse of power.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

Jim Bryan - I called you on your not really listening to the video. Your comments displayed your selective listening. Now you are displaying selective reading. I referenced more than an isolated instance. Go back up and read carefully. I don't have time, nor will I make it, to respond to selectivity. That is a liberal attribute I prefer not to exercise, now or ever.

This is about another instance of how easy voter fraud can be. I have written a few articles about this subject. Browse through my library and try reading a few.

They deliberately targeted Holder because of his stance concerning this issue and the treatment of the individual states attempting to tell the states what they can, or cannot do, regarding voter ID laws.

Holder is dirty and always has been. I know his history. Do you? He should never have been confirmed in the first place. Holder abuses his power continuously. He's like his boss - a sleazy Chicago politician.

Your use of a legal argument is preposterous and laughable to say the least. After PV did their work there both NH and Minnesota set about changing their ID laws. Gee, I wonder why...

The Frog


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

Frog, why waste your breath on guys like this - their own statements say way more about them than anything they are talking about! :-D


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

tsadjatko - Sometimes they might actually learn something, not often but sometimes. It does require that the blinders be removed though.

TFP


Alastar Packer profile image

Alastar Packer 4 years ago from North Carolina

Hmmm, Boss Tweed redux. Thanks for the breakdown Frog. Any thoughts on the electronic voting machines.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

Alastar - I'm a paper ballot advocate myself. It is too easy to tamper with the machines as we witnessed in Nevada in 2010 when people were getting a straight Democratic ticket spit out rather than the way they actually voted.

It just presents too many problems. When I worked the polls during the 2010 elections we had a problem with getting any results out of one of the machines. It caused a bit of ruckus because the person running the precinct that day didn't know what to do or who to call.

I called the right people who ended up talking the idiot through the process. The second video I posted about what is going on down in Florida regarding voter fraud should be an eye opener to anyone who wants clean elections. That was a good investigatory piece of how it is being done and it is happening across this nation.

But according to Holder it isn't a problem?

The Frog


drbj profile image

drbj 4 years ago from south Florida

In Florida, I am required to produce a photo ID before I am allowed to vote. I welcome that. But such a law in every state does not sit well with Obummy and Holder. They will do their utmost to keep that from happening in order to ensure our leader's re-election. Thanks, Jim, for that revealing but not surprising Project Veritas video.


Wesman Todd Shaw profile image

Wesman Todd Shaw 4 years ago from Kaufman, Texas

HOLY $HIT !!! Is that some kind of....what the hell was that woman thinking with the "I only got to vote once" thing?

Maybe I'm just way in the dark...I didn't realize or hadn't much considered how corrupt the voting booths were, but then again I'm beyond able to be surprised any more at how corrupt American politics is.


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

drbj - The flaw in Florida is that illegal aliens can get a driver's license without proof of citizenship. Check out the second video closely.

Wesman - Corrupt is using a mild word. The place is a rat's nest of professional, career pick pockets. We need to start sweeping the garbage out more often.

The Frog


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

Be careful you two Wesman and Frog - you'll be labeled with waging a war on women!


The Frog Prince profile image

The Frog Prince 4 years ago from Arlington, TX Author

tsadjatko - Me? When it comes to women I'd rather make love, not war! Different subject altogether. LMBO.

TFP


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

For those who mistakenly think voter fraud is not a problem they should watch the Fox special Stealing Your Vote

Election fraud stories are getting some coverage, but it is the tip of the iceberg. Millions of illegal voters are casting votes and changing the outcomes of elections across America. SURPRISE, SURPRISE!...Fraud was responsible for getting Barack Obama on the ballot in Indiana in 2008.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedd...

Did illegal voting elect Minnesota Senator Al Franken (WHO BECAME THE 60TH VOTE IN THE SENATE GIVING DEMS A FILIBUSTER PROOF MAJORITY WHICH CHANGED HISTORY)?

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/18/inside-look-h...


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

the Fox special Stealing Your Vote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03helhoBVMk


Old Poolman profile image

Old Poolman 4 years ago from Rural Arizona

And yet we have those who refuse to admit voter fraud exists, or that the problem is so small it is of little or no concern. That is an interesting video and pretty conclusive proof. We even have people getting convicted after admitting voter fraud, yet many refuse to believe it can happen.


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

Yeah, those you are referring to come in two groups - the second group is the gullible, misinformed "masses" who simply parrot the propaganda of the first group because it is what they want to believe. The first group is the hard core, liberal agenda driven LIARS who create the propaganda they use to deceive everyone as to their true intentions. The second group wouldn't know a fact if they investigated it themselves and the first group's mission is to hide or distort the facts. That is the world we have to live with.


Onusonus profile image

Onusonus 4 years ago from washington

Eric Holder should be thrown in jail. Calling people racist is just a liberal diversion to take our focus off of his fast and furious fiasco.


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

An investigative report from a media watchdog group reveals that the left is involved in a systematic strategy to undermine the ability of election officials to effectively manage elections and prevent voter fraud.

As previously reported on OneNewsNow, Accuracy in Media (AIM) has published a report that exposes the history, current tactics, and implications of left-wing voter fraud and intimidation. "The Left's National Vote Fraud Strategy Exposed" (http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-lefts-nation... reveals a "deliberate, premeditated, comprehensive plan to win the 2012 presidential election at all costs."

James Simpson was commissioned by AIM to author the special report. He says vote fraud is widespread and typically occurs in areas where the enticers can get away with it -- places like inner-cities where few people care to venture.

"They do whatever they want, and what they want to do is stuff the ballots," he explains.

Simpson alleges another tactic involves flooding polling places with fraudulent voter registrations, as the controversial group ACORN has done in past elections.

"They created chaos in the local electoral offices by swamping them with huge numbers of registrations," he reports. "And, of course, when they're so overwhelmed with all that, it's kind of hard to keep track of who of these registrants is a legitimate real voter and who isn't."

According to Simpson, two Democrats recently caught in a vote fraud scandal told police that "voter fraud is an accepted way of winning elections."


Old Poolman profile image

Old Poolman 4 years ago from Rural Arizona

When one of the most powerful fox's in the world is in charge of the hen house, what else could we expect? It is like we the citizens are powerless to fix any of this corruption. Even faced with the facts of officials who have recently been prosecuted for voter fraud, many still refuse to admit that voter fraud exists. This is all very frustrating.


tsadjatko profile image

tsadjatko 4 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

So the left says there is no evidence of voter fraud! I guess liberals don't count buying votes!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trVpHB0XAkI

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working