If you can’t do the time do the crime in Florida
How in the world did it happen you ask? This young woman lied for 31 straight days as to the whereabouts of her child, invented fictitious people, invented fictitious jobs, drove a car around with the stench of death in the trunk and got a tattoo during the period while her child was missing translating into a Beautiful Life, competed in “hot body contest” during that same period of time and finally buried her child wrapped in a plastic bag and bound with duct tape in a wooded area less than a half-mile from the house she and Caylee lived with her parents.
Surly if there could not be a consensus of 12 logical thinking adults as to the degree of guilt this so called mother should be subjected to then there would have to be at least one logical thinking adult that would not capitulate to the liberal based arguments of Jose Bias and Hang the Jury! My lord how much proof did they need? No there was no definitive DNA or an admission of quilt by Casey Anthony but there have been other circumstantial cases before where the perpetrator did not just walk free; remember Scott Peterson?
The only insight we have thus far is from a taped conversation from one of the 4 alternates who stated the prosecution didn’t answer the question how did Calee die nor did they produce a motive and as a side note we wondered what was George hiding? I can’t believe the illogic of that statement yet then again it goes to explain society in general these days. I will attempt to draw a parallel between the lack of logic exercised in the jury deliberation to the lack of logic exercised in the electorate in general these days.
First I am a creature firmly entrenched in deductive reasoning; a deductive argument is valid if the conclusion does follow necessarily from the premises, i.e., if the conclusion must be true provided that the premises are true. A deductive argument is sound if it is valid and its premises are true. Deductive arguments are valid or invalid, sound or unsound, but are never false nor true. Deductive reasoning is a method of gaining knowledge. An example of a deductive argument: (A) all men are mortal and (B) Socrates is a man then (C) therefore Socrates is Mortal!
So now let’s examine the juror’s premise using deductive reasoning; remember he said the prosecution failed to show how Calie died. Remember the deteriorated skull of little Calee was found with deteriorated duck tape over the mouth and nose; that’s (A). It was proven that Casey Anthony researched Chloroform on the home computer despite the attempts of her mother Cindy to take the rap for her; that’s (B). Casey had a new boyfriend who didn’t want children in his life; that (C). Casey got a new tattoo translating into a beautiful life during the time little Caylee was dead wrapped in a plastic bag with duck tape over her mouth and nose; that’s (D). Casey was out partying like a free person without the responsibility of a child during the time little Caylee was dead wrapped in a plastic bag with duck tape over her mouth and nose; that’s (E). How much more deductive reasoning do you need; little Caylee was obviously killed by someone and the logical one was Casey Anthony!
Stupid statement number 2 from the juror; the prosecution failed to produce a motive. What trail was this dope watching; failed to produce a motive; their entire case was riddled with motive. The same deductive reasoning points enumerated above are applicable in the explanation of motive and add these additional points. Casey Anthony was the only one with a motive; that’s (F). Casey’s lies were numerous and insurmountable people with nothing to hide don’t make up lies, they only make up lies in order to hide the truth; that’s (G). Finally what mother on the face of this earth would wait 31 days to report her child missing unless she had the motive to try and invent a story to cover up her guilt and/or allow more time for the body of evidence to decompose; that’s (H). I don’t know what more motive you need!
Finally what the hell did this liberal dope mean by “we wondered what was George hiding”? Sure it appears old George may have had an affair but there was absolutely no proof what so ever he was guilty of abusing Casey; just the accusation of the lying littler slut’s Sleaze Bag Attorney which only came up as a Plan B to further confuse this already confused jury.
So now you are asking how you draw the parallel between this jury and the current American public. Well this jury obviously was devoid of any common sense. When old Jose asked them to consider Casey’s Fantasy Friends as an explanation for her behavior, any logical conservative thinking person would have debunked that for the pile of BS it was. Casey’s imaginary friends were nothing more than a cute way of attempting to explain away Casey’s lies which have been enumerated above. This verdict parallels this society’s refusal to hold individuals responsible for their behavior. First and foremost look for a way to exonerate inexcusable behavior and in this case they chose to or were led to hide the inexcusable behavior behind that pie in the sky phrase reasonable doubt!
No this same society that excused Bill Clinton’s inexcusable behavior because the private proclivities of politicians are none of our business; this same society allowed O. J. Simpson to walk free after brutally murdering two people; this same society allowed Barrack Hussein Obama to waltz into the White House without asking one single probing question as to who exactly is he.
Now this same society has hidden behind Reasonable Doubt and allowed this murderer to walk free after chloroforming her two year old child; duck taping her mouth; throwing her away like trash in a swamp in hopes the evidence would decompose; partying for 31 days while little Caylee lay dead; get a tattoo expressing her relief at finally being free of all responsibility and this jury of 12 dopes couldn’t connect the dots. Hell Pee Wee Herman could have connected these dots!