Is It a Cut, an Increase -- Or What?

The Root of All Evil?

An increase or a cut is truly in the eye of the beholder.
An increase or a cut is truly in the eye of the beholder.

'A Billion Here, a Billion There' ...

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen, R-Ill.  'A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money.'
U.S. Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen, R-Ill. 'A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money.'

Democrats talk of draconian cuts in the budget. Republicans, aghast, say that what the Democrats characterize as "cuts" are really increases, albeit smaller increases.

Who's telling the truth?

In my opinion, they're both telling the truth -- but from different perspectives. It's a matter of judgment.

It's like two people witnessing the same event, but coming away with totally different conclusions.

Differing Views

For instance, if two people see a passerby give a homeless person a half-dollar for a cup of coffee each may come away with an entirely different view. One might see that as a kindly act designed to relieve the plight of someone who's down on his luck; the other may see it not as a kindly act but rather as a disservice to the individual who likely would use the half-dollar to buy alcohol or support his drug habit.

No one can say with certainty that one position is right and the other is wrong, but one can certainly express a strong personal opinion one way or the other.

It's all in how you look at it. It's the same with budget cuts.

Keeping Perspective

Sometimes when you spend a great deal of time and energy looking at details or at peripheral matters, you can lose perspective.

I think this was what the late Sen. Everett Dirksen was getting at when he said (paraphrasing): A billion here and a billion there and pretty soon you're talking about a lot of money.

It's easier to understand why politicians have trouble figuring out when a cut is a cut, and when a cut is not a cut, when you get away from the big items like Medicaid and Welfare and take a look at the issue from a personal viewpoint.

Suppose you were employed for many years by a corporate giant who started you at a moderate salary but gave you a 10 percent pay increase every year. After four or five years of increases -- all things being equal -- you might begin to think of them as "normal."

After you've celebrated 10 or 15 years with the company -- and every year, like clockwork, you were given a 10 percent increase -- you may have concluded that the company values you an employee and the increases were based on your productivity, value and loyalty to the company.

A Pay Increase Or a Pay Cut?

But, when you arrived at work today, the company said the increases this year would be five percent, not 10 percent.

No doubt some people, like the Republicans in Congress, would celebrate their good fortune in receiving the five percent "increase." After all, casting aside such things as inflation and a growing need to provide for retirement, your pay check will indeed show an increase.

Others, however, might see the unusual omission of the normal increase as a cut in pay, especially if they were counting on the income to meet their current -- and probably higher -- ongoing expenses.

Whether it's an increase or a cut is truly in the eye of the beholder.

Finding Common Ground

Sincere and honest people often will disagree on important issues; that's expected. But it's not the difference of opinion that's important.

What is important is that each side make every effort to reach common ground, try to understand the other side of the issue, and not to let partisan politics keep anyone from working for the overall good of the country.

I wrote this column as a "My View" for The Hour newspaper of Norwalk, Conn., on Feb. 17, 1996. I now write my views on a wide variety of topics on HubPages. To view my HubPages Profile Click Here

Are the Wealthy in the United States Paying Their Fair Share of Taxes?

See results without voting

Comments 9 comments

compu-smart profile image

compu-smart 8 years ago from London UK

As you say everyone sees things differently and i totally agree that reaching a common ground is a perfect and only way of really settling all disputes from political, military as well as to family differences.


MrMarmalade profile image

MrMarmalade 8 years ago from Sydney

I learnt many years ago there were three way the world of you look at you.

1. the Way you see yourself.

2. The way your family look at you.

3. The way the rest of the world see you.

I guess none of three aspects will see you in the same light.

Thank you


William F. Torpey profile image

William F. Torpey 8 years ago from South Valley Stream, N.Y. Author

Very true, MrMarmalade. But it surely is most important how you see yourself. If you're not happy with the way you see yourself, how can anyone else think well of you?


Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds 8 years ago

A budget increase that is less than the increase in the Consumer Price Increase or in the cost of providing the service or benefit is a de facto cut, in my opinion.


William F. Torpey profile image

William F. Torpey 8 years ago from South Valley Stream, N.Y. Author

That's why the question is so troublesome, Ralph. Everybody uses a different yardstick. Or should I say some use apples, some use oranges.


IĆ°unn 8 years ago

what ralph said.


Bob 8 years ago

Bill ... Good column.


Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds 5 years ago

This continues to be topical and timely.


William F. Torpey profile image

William F. Torpey 5 years ago from South Valley Stream, N.Y. Author

Thanks for commenting, Ralph. Yes, the controversy over "tax cuts" continues unabated.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    More by this Author


    Click to Rate This Article
    working