Obamacare Gains More Healthcare Coverage and Ohio Still Sues

Source

"You must have all your teeth pulled immediately."

The Tri-State area that meets at Cincinnati, Ohio has experienced some healthcare insurance coverage problems since the Affordable Care Act took effect. By March 2015, some of these problems subsided, though not all of them (see Update below).

Residents of Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio were pleased when governors accepted the option of expanding Medicaid coverage to more of their states' residents under an insurance carrier that is available to higher-level income recipients as well. However, as these newly covered individuals, Medicaid and otherwise, soon learned, coverage for costs was not what it seemed that it would be.

In response to questions about sketchy coverage and vague explanations about what is covered and what is not covered, some healthcare providers rushed patients during 4th QTR 2014 (insurance carrier could be changed beginning in November) into using as many benefits as possible for services that were actually covered.

In a stunning response from a dental provider to an associate of mine, the dentist advised him to have all teeth pulled, because root canals, caps, and bridges needed for a few teeth would not be a covered expense. Cleanings for natural teeth were not covered, either. Extractions and one set of dentures every two years would be covered.

UPDATE: The Medicaid Extension that Governor Kasich OK'd for Ohio seems to be working well in 2015. I have received calls and messages from a number of people who state that more health and medical services are covered in 2015 than in 2014. May this continue. Some individuals are still angry that their taxes pay for healthcare for those who do not or cannot work; but I was angry that it did not seem to cover anything. Taxes need to accomplish something real.

Tri-State Area in Question

A markerCincinnati, Ohio -
Cincinnati, OH, USA
[get directions]

Source

Pilot Study of a Dozen Insured People

A quick interview with a dozen women between ages 50 - 64 insured under the ACA by the insurance carrier that covers both Medicaid and other insurance participants in Ohio revealed negative surprises among all of those interviewed. The problems occurred in the areas of Dental and Vision Care.

Concerns Reported with Dental Coverage

  • Member handbooks state that dental exams and cleanings should be done twice a year. However, only two exams and one set of X-rays are covered each year. The exam entails looking into the mouth and checking teeth, gums, cheeks, tongue, etc.
  • Of the dozen people reporting, they received anywhere from 3 bite-wings to a full set of X-rays of all teeth at a cost of $23 to $58 to the insurance carrier, with no out-of-pocket cost or co-pay. Just before gaining insurance, one woman paid $225 for the same complete mouthful of X-rays she received that were now billed to the insurance carrier for only $58. The discrepancy is unexplained.
  • Root canals are covered for the front teeth (incisors) only. Other teeth that could be saved with root canal therapy are sometimes pulled instead, because of the high out-of-pocket cost for these root canals.
  • Crowns or caps and bridges are not covered, but full dentures (upper or lower or both) are covered biennially.

Source

Looking for More

Concerns Reported with Vision Coverage

  • Handbooks state that the insured is entitled to an eye exam and one pair of glasses every two years from ages 21 to 59 and every year at ages 60 and older. WalMart Vision Center locally reported that they accept the insurance carrier in question, but accept it only for a basic eye examination, not including astigmatism. Currently, the basic exam costs $58 and the patient must pay $2 as a co-pay. The insurance covers eyeglass frames, but WalMart will not accept the insurance for the frames, only for the basic eye exam.
  • Eyeglass lenses are not covered at all by the insurance.
  • Among WalMart and several other providers, no-line bifocal lenses begin at a cost of over $100 per lens. This is cost-prohibitive for many people and some older folks fall when they wear lined bifocals, because of the resultant distortions.
  • One option is to go to the City Health Department Vision Clinic by appointment, receive a covered eye examination, and receive a voucher good for one free complete set of eyeglasses at specific opticians' offices. The Vision Clinic is crowded and appointments may be made only by phone during two hours on Friday mornings.
  • Another option is to trust a company like America's Best Eyeglass Warehouse, which offers a free eye exam (normal cost = $45) and purchase two pairs of no-line bifocals for a little over $200. Two pairs of single-vision eyeglasses run about $100 for the two pair.

It would be interesting and more accurate to interview many additional adults in the Tri-States mentioned to learn whether the problems reported are far reaching or only local.

County Near Cincinnati Sues US Government

A markerWarren County, Ohio -
Warren County, OH, USA
[get directions]

Fastest growing county in the state and a part of the Ohio Space Corridor.

State of Ohio and Fastest Growing County Sue the Federal Government

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine sued the Obama Administration in US District Court o January 27, 2015, alleging that the ACA includes an unconstitutional tax on state and local government income resulting from other taxes. It appears to be a tax on a tax.

DeWine is joined in the suit by Warren County leadership, the Ohio Department of Administrative Services, Bowling Green State University in Bowling Green, Ohio near Toledo; Youngstown State University; Shawnee State University (newest state-supported university in the state); and the University of Akron.

The list above covers Northern Ohio and Southwestern Ohio, which is a major piece of the Ohio Space Corridor. These areas are also the only sections of the state that have passenger railroad service. Upon his first election, Governor Kasich returned to the Federal Government $400,000,000 that was meant for bringing passenger rail service back to the rest of Ohio. In January 2015, Ohio showed a $1,500,000,000 surplus in the state budget.

The Space Corridor's Warren County is the fastest growing county in the state for business and population, according to the US Census Bureau and County Chambers of Commerce. As such, the county is important to the USA Government- and Privatized Space Programs. Even so, the county is suing the national government. Will the lawsuit buzz spill over into negative effects on our space programs?

What will become of the 1.5 Billion Dollar Surplus?
What will become of the 1.5 Billion Dollar Surplus? | Source

Tax on a Tax Program Defined

Uncertainty exists about the lawsuit's potential for winning. The plaintiffs' problem is with the ACA's Transitional Reinsurance Program.

The program levies fees against some employers - which ones, I do not know - that offer self-insured group plans. I do know that it includes state and local governments, like Warren County, some cities and towns, and certain Bureaus of Workers' Compensation.

Mr. DeWine, et.al. say that this is a tax on a tax. Democratic leaders say the levy is a fee and not a tax and that the lawsuit is a distraction from the good aspects of ACA.

It seems that the aspects of Dental and Vision Coverage under the Medicaid carrier (that insures other people as well) need to be improved. Taxpayers are paying for the Medicaid insurance that is received at no cost by others, and the dental and vision benefits are far from good, even for the non-Medicaid premium payers. Taxpayers are paying much and the insured persons seem to be receiving little.

Reference: cincinnati.com/story/news/courts/2015/01/26/ohio-warren-co-sues-feds-over-obamacare-fees/22354337/ Retrieved January 27, 2015.

Youth Health Insurance

Are you happy with your healthcare coverage since the passage of the Affordable Care Act?

  • Very happy.
  • Happy, but would like some additional coverage without premium rate increases.
  • Somewhat unhappy
  • Miserable
See results without voting
Lunar Prospector, ready to mine the moon for minerals and H3.
Lunar Prospector, ready to mine the moon for minerals and H3.

© 2015 Patty Inglish

More by this Author


Comments 8 comments

CatherineGiordano profile image

CatherineGiordano 20 months ago from Orlando Florida

I'm happy I have Medicare. There should be a medicare- for-all plan as one of the choices. The cost would be deducted from your paycheck or added to your tax bill. The same subsidies would apply. It sounds like the problem is with the insurance companies and not the ACA.


Patty Inglish, MS profile image

Patty Inglish, MS 20 months ago from North America Author

Yes, some of the insurance companies seem to be not very good.


KoffeeKlatch Gals profile image

KoffeeKlatch Gals 20 months ago from Sunny Florida

I am amazed at how different this plan is than the one originally planned. Not only does it cost us more but offers less. I have yet to see a clear explanation of what it really entails.


Patty Inglish, MS profile image

Patty Inglish, MS 20 months ago from North America Author

A friend of mine who works pays for the same policy that is given to Medicaid recipients and it is the exact same coverage, although it was supposed to be one of larger coverage ( a higher level of insurance). Too many surprises! She is switching to another insurance provider.


peachpurple profile image

peachpurple 20 months ago from Home Sweet Home

Nowonder i see lots of negative comments on obmacare


Patty Inglish, MS profile image

Patty Inglish, MS 20 months ago from North America Author

I see negative comments too, but some of my friends are happy with it. They don't have Medicaid, though. Their premiums went up in January, however.


PegCole17 profile image

PegCole17 19 months ago from Dallas, Texas

Our state did not elect to expand Medicaid coverage so we do not qualify to get insurance under the Affordable Care Act. If we had, the premiums were going to be $1600 per month for the two of us with a $5000 annual deductible. What I wonder is how is that considered affordable to most people? Certainly not to us with my husband laid off and unemployed at the moment. Under the proposed Right to Refuse act ..."Congress shall make no law that imposes a tax on a failure to purchase goods or services".


Patty Inglish, MS profile image

Patty Inglish, MS 19 months ago from North America Author

@PegCole17 - That is incredible and absurd for government reps to think that that amount is affordable. This system is not working for everyone, that is certain. Changes are needed. OMG, many people do not even earn $1600/month.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working