Political Corruption + Campaign Contributions = Partners in Crime

It's the way Government and Business is done

How We Can Change the System

The US Congress recently passed a new law stating that, starting immediately, there is no cap on the amount of campaign contributions politicians can legally accept from corporate sponsors such as oil, pharmaceutical, car, power, unions, organized crime & chemical companies etc. etc. just to name a few or from the private sector (individuals).

In other words, they can take as much money legally from whom ever they want but at what cost to us, is the question we all have to ask ourselves.

I don't think it comes to any surprise for most of us who acknowledge that politicians have secretly received huge, illegal cash donations towards their political campaigns since the beginning of Government only now, these companies can benefit even more from income tax deductions in the form of receipts so they can now do it legally and in my opinion, there lies the seed for even greater political corruption. Nothing has really changed. Now it's just "legal".

Once these giant, multinational corporations pay out hundreds of millions of dollars to get their favorite puppet into power, those puppets now have to pay back those corporate or private donations in the form of favors.

Exclusive Government contracts, new laws, re-zoning, etc. etc. etc.. It could be a million different scenarios to return the favor but all designed for one reason. To gain profit or power for the donating party.

That's how the world of Government and big business works, "payoffs" whether we like it or not.

Accepting this fact as a way of life makes me ask the question, Who does our appointed political leaders have their best interest really in? despite what they say in all their bullshit campaign promises?

The people who elected them into power to serve and protect our way of life or the corporations who pay their campaign bills and luxurious living expenses. The answer is obvious when we look at the news every day.

So how do we, as the people, change how the system works?

We have the power to make it happen by forcing politicians to do what we elect them for, but how do we do it? How do we take the power away from major corporations and put it back into the control of the voting, tax paying public and what is in their best interest. Not motivated by greed or corruption but for a higher quality of life for all of us.

What about this idea.

Lets say we force Congress/Parliament to pass a new law stating that accepting any form of corporate or private campaign donations is now illegal, no matter what size the amount or what office the politician is running for.

They can only run their campaign on a certain budget that is given to them out of tax payers dollars and each candidate running for the same office has access to the same, equal amounts of campaign funds.

Now wait, hear me out before you criticize the idea

I know what you are going to say. That means more taxes for me to pay but does it really? Lets examine this more closely.

They are already spending billions of dollars in tax payers money anyway to run these ridiculously over priced campaigns so let's say we put a limit (cap) on it and every politician has to run their own campaign based on the exact, same amount of money as their opposition party.

It would at least create an even playing field for all the candidates and force them to be more creative in their promotional and marketing campaigns.To actually work for their money. What a concept.

Now I'm not saying politicians do not work hard to get into office. It's probably the hardest they will ever work for the rest of their political careers but once they are elected in there, a couple of years in office and they are pensioned off for life. Sweet deal, right!

To insure they are staying within their budget and not accepting those under the table bribes anymore, what do you say that we have each political party's campaign books examined by their running opponents accounting team to make sure they are not accepting any illegal payoffs. Just the books, nothing else. We wouldn't want one creative party stealing promotional ideas from the other to gain in the race now would we, or would we? It might be kind of fun watching them tear each other apart.

How many of these expensive, televised smears campaigns do they waste millions on, that have absolutely nothing to do with the issues and are only designed to destroy their opponent's credibility like two kids arguing in a sand box.


Do you think they would be wasting that money on these "my daddy can beat up your daddy hate campaigns", if they were on a limited budget. I don't think so.

We also wouldn't want to hire any outside accounting firms to monitor all the receipts and record each party's campaign spending habits because those companies can be paid off to cook the books so each party only answers to their opponents book keepers and public scrutiny.

They would be watching each others campaign spending like a hawk to make sure they are not buying any more prime time TV spots than their budget dictates.

They would also be the only ones in the campaign race with no hidden agenda by forcing them to answer to the other parties book keeping practices. Interesting concept don't you think?.

Let's take it a step or two further

Not only would that cut millions off the cost of the elections by eliminating massive over spending but it would also give those less known politicians, who don't have the financial support to run a huge campaign but might be great leaders, have a fair and equal shot at getting into office plus, they wouldn't be forced to pay back those "favors" to the groups or individuals orchestrating everything from behind the scenes.

The corporations and politicians know full well that major companies can hand the Oval Office over to whoever they favor in the political race with all their money and power backing them up but they can also take it away with the same resources, forcing every politician into corruption if they accept those political bribes that put a strangle hold on them by using their never ending cash cow to force their will on every part of our society using their bought and paid for politicians as their puppets.

Every corrupt organization always puts a front man on display for the media and public eye to take all the heat while they are closing deals behind closed doors.

That's the game and if you don't play by the rules set forth by the real power running our world, Corporations, you are not in the game, period. They can crush you as fast as they can make you so politicians learn to play hardball at a very early age no matter how pure their intentions were at the beginning of their political career.

Corporations are the true Puppet Masters in this world, not Government.

It never ceases to amuse me when you hear of some politician coming into your area, donating millions of dollars for a major sporting facility, school or new road construction, just before election time and in reality, we are thanking them for giving us back our own money that we pay in taxes.

That's how brainwashed we've all become. You have leaders whom have never ran a business before in their lives, spending our tax money like they own it and we let it happen. Then we beg for crumbs like a dog lying under the dinner table.

I guarantee you that the politicians who scream the loudest about making campaign contributions illegal are the ones that are the most corrupt and they are the ones we want out of power. They will show themselves because of the pressure put on them from their corporate masters to crush the idea.

The political leaders that support the idea should be the ones we want in power. Also, we can force the corrupt ones to get on board with the idea by threatening them out of office in the next election, unless they are part of the utterly useless and extremely expensive Senate. Either way, they will be exposed and that is the beginning of their demise in the political arena.

It has already shown itself in the history books. How many politicians have you seen found guilty of corruption but amazingly were now receiving huge paying jobs in the same corporations that supported them financially in their campaign race.

If you want more proof, find out were most of the former Bush administration is now working. I'll tell you where. The same oil companies, pharmaceutical companies, car companies, chemical companies, power companies, unions, universities and law firms that supported them financially in the campaign race. The only difference between those individuals and ones still in power is that they were stupid enough to get caught.

We have the power to make changes but we have to do it as a collective body or they will divide and conquer all of us.

Corporations are running this world and it all begins with those multimillion dollar campaign contributions and bribes filtering down through every government office and department in every country on our planet, which is how they are controlling us all, but if we don't do something to change the system as a united front representing the people and for the people, they will continue to destroy us and the planet.

I'm not saying this is a simply fix and it runs a lot deeper than this suggestion but it's a start and we have to start somewhere.

Even if everyone in America picked just one oil company and boycotted all their gas stations for one month, do you think that would make a difference in their bottom line at months end and force them to sit up and take notice. I know it would but we just won't stand together but in reality, That is were our true power lies.

We can force Government and corporations to their knees if we can just get our act together instead of complaining about the system and doing nothing to change it.

Knowing all this, I think we really have to ask ourselves,

Who's fault is it really then anyway? Governments? Corporations? or Ours for letting it happen?

Breaking News! Last night on the Canadian National News, it was reported that Canadians are now living longer. 81 years for men and 83 years for woman. Good news Right!

In the same broadcast, the scene was shifted to an Interview with the newly elected Premier of the province of Nova Scotia, stating that if people live longer, then it is going to be an extra burden on our health care system which means they are going to have to raise taxes again.

Now get this: This is the same recently elected majority NDP Government that were just investigated by the Auditor General and all it's members, including the Premier, Darrell Dexter himself and found guilty of filing false tax receipts for reimbursement on things like video games, generators for their home, 61 inch flat screen TV's for their office, $2500.00 digital cameras, 11 computers for their families etc. etc. etc.

It was even discovered in the investigation that many members submitted the same receipts up to 10 times and got paid for all 10 claims. The list goes on and on but two years later, the investigation is still on going and no charges have yet to be laid. Are they above the law? I believe fraud is still a criminal act in this country, isn't it?

Plus they can also pay anyone that helps them win in their political campaign (Campaign assistance), in cash and they do not have to show any records of the transactions or claim any income tax on that money, plus the recipient does not get a T4 slip (Income Tax Record) for receiving all that cash. Unreported, tax free money. Isn't income tax evasion a crime in this country too?

Having that majority Government also allows them to hold private meetings, behind closed doors with their members only, deciding how their party spends tax payers dollars and they do not have to report those spending procedures to the public or to other party members, even though it is the public's money . They are free to do whatever they want, spend whatever they want and answer to no one but themselves.

Government are the real gangsters in this country. They control the drugs, liquor, gambling, construction and every other money making industry out there but because they say they are the government spending tax dollars, those are legal operations but do not have to answer to anyone to where all that extra cash goes.

The only projects they invest tax dollars into are business ventures that are going to keep the cash coming in but not for the citizens that are literally starving to death in one of the richest countries in the world. If you don't believe that one, just take a hard look at our social programs for the millions of people unemployed and living below the poverty level in Canada.

If you listen to the world media about how Canada survived the global recession you would actually believe all that bullshit but ask the person struggling to keep their home, pay the bills and feed their family while being over taxed to death, that question and you'll get to the truth to what's really going on.

The Government simply tells all media sources that if they do not report what they are told to report, they will lose their broadcasting license and they are out of business.

Thank God for the Internet. At least there you know you can find the truth somewhere out there if you dig deep enough.

To finish, I suggest that one of you Internet Marketing Guru's, hopefully reading this Hub, should start an online petition demanding Congress (US) & Parliament (Canada) to make private and corporate campaign donations illegal and then sit back and watch some political blood vessels explode.

They will go nuts because you are trying to take away their gravy train. I would love to see how all that unfolds. Please send the petition to me. I'll be the first to sign it.

Thanks for your time



More by this Author


Comments 5 comments

Whats Up 6 years ago

CEO of AmeriChoice Health Bolts.

John J. Kirchner - Director, Operations

John Kirchner joined Healthfirst in May 2010 with over 25 years experience in health care management. Mr. Kirchner’s background includes responsibility for health plan P&L, strategic planning and operations, and government and regulatory affairs. Mr. Kirchner will be responsible for supporting all aspects of NJ health plan operations.

Prior to joining Healthfirst, Mr. Kirchner held a variety of positions at AmeriChoice of New Jersey serving as President from 2007 through 2009. Mr. Kirchner also held Government Relations positions for Home Life Financial Assurance Corporation and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey and served as Legislative Liaison for the New Jersey State Department of Health. Prior to beginning his career in health care, Mr. Kirchner served on the staff of US Senator Bill Bradley.

Mr. Kirchner received his BS Degree in Business Management from Stonehill College, Northeaston, MA.


BayBayz profile image

BayBayz 6 years ago from Nova Scotia, Canada Author

Great research Honest Fraud. I love it. Send me more.


HONEST FRAUD 6 years ago

Beatrice Wilkinson Welters is President Obama's nominee for ambassador to Trinidad and Tobago. No surprise, her husband Anthony Welters, is an executive with UnitedHealthGroup which brought in $200,000-$500,000 in campaign donation for the election and another $100,000 for the Obama crowning inaugural. Beatrice Welters donated $4,600 to the Obama campaign in each of the years 2007 and 2008. Her husband, Anthony donated $4,600 in 2008. The Welters' two sons were also $4,600-donors: Bryant, reportedly 19 years old today, donated $4,600 in the second quarter of each of the years 2007 and 2008, when he was an unemployed student, and Andrew, reportedly 17 years old today, an unemployed student, donated $4,600 in the second quarter of 2008.

http://maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com/2009/11/beatri...

BACKGROUND*

Anthony Welters has been President of Public and Senior Markets Group at UnitedHealth Group Inc. since September 2007. Mr. Welters has been Executive Vice President of UnitedHealth Group Inc., since December, 2006. He serves as Chief Executive Officer of AmeriChoice Health Services, Inc. He served as Head of Public & Social Markets Group of UnitedHealth Group since August 2007. Mr. Welters co-founded AmeriChoice Corporation (AmeriChoice) in 1989 and served as its Chief ... Executive Officer and President from 1989 to December 2006. He served a number of senior positions in the federal government and in private industry. He served as an Attorney for the securities and exchange commission and an Executive Assistant of U.S. Senator Jacob Javits. Mr. Welters served as Director of Federal Affairs and as Assistant Vice President of corporate development of AMTRAK. He served as an Associate Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Mr. Welters serves as Chairman of the Board of Morehouse School of Medicine Inc. Mr. Welters served as Chairman of AmeriChoice Corporation from 1989 to September 2002. He serves as Vice Chairman of New York University, Morehouse School of Medicine the NYU Hospitals Center and the Library of Congress. He serves as Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Morehouse School of Medicine in Atlanta. He serves as Trustee of Morehouse School Of Medicine Inc., The. Mr. Welters has been a Director of Qwest Communications International Inc., since July 25, 2006, CR Bard Inc. (formerly known as Bard C R Inc.) since February 1999, West Pharmaceutical Services Inc., since March, 1997 and AmeriChoice Corporation since 1989. He serves as Director of Horatio Alger Association, The Congressional Black Caucus foundation Inc., The An-bryce Foundation and the Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts. Mr. Welters serves as Council Member of the National Museum of African American History and Culture. He serves as Trustee of the Healthcare leadership Council, New York University Law School and Medical Center and the National board of the Smithsonian Institution and is a Member of the Young presidents' organization. He is a recipient of the Horatio Alger Award in recognition of his achievements and contributions to society and serves on the board of that charitable organization. Mr. Welters holds a JD from New York University of Law and a BA from Manhattanville College. He is admitted to the bars of New York and DC.

FEDERAL JUDGE SAYS IF THEY DID NOT PROMISE OR SIGN ANYTHING, KICKBACKS ARE OK??? WHICH IS NOT TRUE BY THE WAY.

Turning next to relators’ claims based on alleged violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, the court concluded relators failed to allege “that United Health certified compliance with the Anti-Kickback Act, nor did they allege that such compliance was relevant to the Government's funding decisions.” The court then declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over relators’ state law claims and refused to grant relators leave to amend.

MEDICARE FRAUD, MEDICADE FRAUD, AND KICKBACKS AND BRIBES BUSINESS AS USUAL,INSIDER INFORMATION GIVEN. 9B BS ONE THING BUT WHAT ABOUT YOUR "HANDS OFF POLICY" BY THE DOJ AND CMS AND HHS, AND WHY NO INVESTAGATIONS OR AUDITS TO CONFIRM OR HELP? "SELF DISCLOSURE BY CARRIER ANOTHER JOKE".

WHAT ABOUT "TAXPAYERS TO PREVENT AND STOP AND PREVENT FRAUD FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICADE" WHAT ABOUT WILLIS AND WILKINS BEING FIRED FOR NOT WANTING TO BREAK THE HEALTH FRAUD LAWS?

NJ CEPA CLAIM NOW ON FILE.....FALSE CLAIM UNDER APPEAL AND FILED..... WHERE WAS ANY HELP FROM THESE DEPARTMENTS?

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed May 13 a qui tam action alleging violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) by United Health Group and its subsidiaries. According to the court, the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under the FCA. Relator Charles Wilkins began employment with United Health Group and its subsidiary AmeriChoice in October 2007 as a sales representative. Relator Darryl Willis began employment with United Health Group and AmeriChoice in 2007 as the general manager for Medicare/Medicaid marketing and sales.

In their qui tam complaint, relators allege 11 violations of Medicare and Medicaid regulations. The United States declined to intervene in the case and the relators filed an amended complaint that stated one federal count—violation of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)-(3)—and nine state law counts. United Health moved to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), arguing relators failed to plead the elements of a "false certification" claim, they failed to plead any anti-kickback violations, and failed to adequately plead a conspiracy. Relators alleged that because United Health entered into a contract expressly certifying that it agreed with all "terms and conditions of payment," they made a false claim when they submitted claims despite any one of the 11 purported regulatory violations alleged in the amended complaint. Rejecting relators' express false certification claim, the court found “[not once in the Amended Complaint have Relators identified even a single claim for payment to the Government.”The court also held relators’ implied false certification claim failed. According to the court, relators argued that because United Health agreed to comply with all CMS regulations when it contracted to become a prescription drug plan sponsor, and because at times it was in violation of some regulations, it therefore committed fraud each time it submitted a claim for payment. The court found such a theory of liability overly broad. “If Relators' theory were correct, the FCA would become a federal tort fountain, flowing claims for every trivial violation of Medicare/Medicaid regulations,” the court said. Relators next argued that under the recently enacted Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (FERA) a relator need only show whether compliance with regulations would have a tendency to influence the government's payment decision. While that argument is true, the court reasoned, “Relators must still show a claim . . . and [t]hey have not done so.” Turning next to relators’ claims based on alleged violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, the court concluded relators failed to allege “that United Health certified compliance with the Anti-Kickback Act, nor did they allege that such compliance was relevant to the Government's funding decisions.” The court then declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over relators’ state law claims and refused to grant relators leave to amend.

United States ex rel. Wilkins v. United Health Grp. Inc., No. 08-3425 (D.N.J. May 13, 2010).

FCA claim alleging aggressive marketing tactics by health plan provider dismissed

Publication: Health Law Week

Date: Friday, June 4 2010

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed a qui tam action brought by two former employees of healthcare plan providers alleging violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) arising from excessively aggressive marketing methods. United Health Group Inc., a provider of access to healthcare services, had as its subsidiaries AmeriChoice and AmeriChoice of New Jersey, which each offered Medicare Advantage plans. Charles Wilkins and Darryl Willis (the r


BayBayz profile image

BayBayz 6 years ago from Nova Scotia, Canada Author

Right on bud. people think political corruption only goes on in third world countries but as we both know, our Governments are just as corrupt, just better at hiding it


robsanbo 6 years ago

I have been saying this for years. Every time I bring it up to someone, they look at me with a blank stare as if they dont even get what I am saying. I don't think people realy relize that it is legal for corporations to give money to politicians. The first time I read that in a government text book I couldn't belive what I was reading. We'll no wonder everyting is so corrupted I thought.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working