Saudi Arabia is Buying America

Such hypocrisy in foreign policy
Such hypocrisy in foreign policy

Saudi Arabia has a problem that they created. In December, 2015, they outlawed any crops that are used for livestock feed, like alfalfa. It was kind of an odd decision for them because they have 170,000 cows to feed from their parched dry land. Alfalfa and wheat, like other crops, uses enormous amounts of water, something not found in SA. It was part of the government’s crackdown on water usage where agriculture accounts for 90% of water consumption there.

To solve the problem, the Saudi firm, Almarai, has bought 14,000 acres in California’s Palo Verde valley that has first rights to the water from the Colorado River. It also purchased more land near Vicksburg, AZ., making it an economic force in the region. In essence, SA is securing its food supply to its people, while the West uses the Saudi oil to fuel their needs. Both the UAE and SA account for 10% of all hay sales for export. The UAE has its own grain exporter company in Bakersfield, CA., and grows alfalfa on some 7,500 acres in various places in the state and Arizona.

In 2014, the Saudis paid $47.5 million for 9000 acres in La Paz Country, Arizona to grow alfalfa because the area is exempt from water use restrictions that Phoenix, Tucson and others, must follow to protect the state’s aquifers. In January, 2016, the Saudis paid $31.5 million for 1800 acres in Palo Verde. Some locals are not happy about the intrusion of foreign countries buying up land in the USA, especially those who have or still do support radical Islam secretly. Saudi Arabia was one and many still feel the government tacitly still promotes its extreme version of Islam in the Middle East. Thus, the Saudi company has recently tried to appease opposition by buying more hay from local farmers and building a new hay production plant in Imperial Valley, CA.

Why is America so easily sold to foreign countries when they do no reciprocate? Does America own any of the Saudi oil fields they developed?

More by this Author


Comments 3 comments

lions44 profile image

lions44 8 months ago from Auburn, WA

I"m torn on this one. They should have the right to own land but not the resources on the land, particularly water. We need the Saudis to remain in power. Their oil is not the necessity anymore, but their suppression of the Wahabis is what we require. Granted, they fostered their growth. Now we all live with that monster. If overseas investing helps maintain their power, I'm okay with that. The alternative to them is much worse.


perrya profile image

perrya 8 months ago Author

I think the smart thing would be say only US Citizens can buy and own land in the USA, foreigners can lease tracts of land for farms or enterprise only. Many countries have similar things like that.


lions44 profile image

lions44 8 months ago from Auburn, WA

I guess there is the big difference between private residence ownership and commercial interests. If a rich American wants to buy a castle in Switzerland to live in part of the year, he can own outright. But he wants to buy a tract in Mexico to develop minerals/oil/gas, he can only lease it. And vice versa. Good point.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working