Senator Harry Reid's Christmas Gift Giving With Our Money

First Senate Christmas Eve Vote in 114 Years

December 26, 2009

The big news in the past couple of days has been the Senate's now famous Christmas Eve vote to push forward the President's and Congressional Leadership's avowed ambition to impose European style socialism on the United States with their plan to socialize health care in this country despite the overwhelming opposition of the American people to their plan.

The President has made the imposition of the failed socialist health care model on the nation his prime objective for his first year in office and with that year approaching its end almost as fast as his free falling poll numbers, an air of despariation hangs over Washington.

Fearing that the sight of citizen opposition back home to this bad bill will change Senator's minds it became imperative that the legislation be passed before the Senators had a chance to meet and talk to the citizens who pay their salaries and whose interests the Senators are supposed to represent. Hence the Christmas Eve vote.

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada
Senator Harry Reid of Nevada | Source

No undertaking as massive as socializing one seventh of the world's largest economy can be done without some cost.

Here I am not talking about the trillions that the taxpayers will have to pay for this failed system but, rather the cost of buying the votes of 60 Democratic Senators (actually 58 Democratic Senators plus the Independent Senator Joe Liberman and Independent but, according to WikiPedia, self proclaimed Socialist, Bernie Sanders) needed to halt a fillibutster and cram the legislation through before Senators could go home and meet the angry citizens whose tax dollars pay them.

Of course Senate Marjority Leader Harry Reid was not concerned about a few extra billion to pass this trillion dollar monstrosity since the same taxpayers who will be stuck with the bill for Obama care also have to foot the bill to buy the votes to pass it.

Sort of like a bank robber sending the bank a bill for the gas needed to drive his get away car.

Sen Christopher Dodd of Connecticut  (Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Christopher_Dodd_official_portrait_2-cropped.jpg )
Sen Christopher Dodd of Connecticut (Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Christopher_Dodd_official_portrait_2-cropped.jpg )
Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana (Public Domain Photo Courtesy of WikiPedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mary_Landrieu_Senate_portrait.jpg )
Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana (Public Domain Photo Courtesy of WikiPedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mary_Landrieu_Senate_portrait.jpg )
Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska  (Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org ) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ben_Nelson_official_photo.jpg
Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska (Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org ) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ben_Nelson_official_photo.jpg
Senator Bill Nelson of Florida {Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bill_Nelson.jpg )
Senator Bill Nelson of Florida {Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bill_Nelson.jpg )
Senator Carl Levin of Michigan (Public Domain photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Carl_Levin_official_portrait.jpg  )
Senator Carl Levin of Michigan (Public Domain photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Carl_Levin_official_portrait.jpg )
Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont (Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bernie_Sanders.jpg  )
Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont (Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bernie_Sanders.jpg )
Senator Max Baucus of Montana (Public domain photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Max_S_Baucus.jpg )
Senator Max Baucus of Montana (Public domain photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Max_S_Baucus.jpg )
Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota (Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amy_Klobuchar.jpg )
Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota (Public Domain Photo courtesy of WikiPedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amy_Klobuchar.jpg )

What Some Senators Charge for a YES Vote on Obama Care

Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut - $100,000,000 for a university hospital in his state where he faces re-election

Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana - $300,000,000 to pay for Louisiana's share of the proposed Medicaid increases under the bill (i.e., the taxpayers of the other 49 states have to subsidize Louisiana's share of the trillions needed for Obama Care in addition to their own share of the trillions).

Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska - $100,000,000 to pay for Nebraska's anticipated Medicade increases under Obama Care - this appears to be just the first installment as Senator Nelson crafted this so that the taxpayers in the other 49 states will be paying this added cost in perpetuity or until the Democrat's socialist utopia goes broke and our nation's economy collapses like that of the socialist economy of the former Soviet Union.

Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Senator Carl Levin of Michigan - exemption for Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company - which, ironically, happens to be headquartered in Omaha, NEBRASKA - and Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance in MICHIGAN - from the proposed $10,000,000,000,000 (that is Billion) annual fee the bill proposes to impose on the insurance industry. Guess which corporate names will be at the top of the list of donors to these two Senators as they prepare to face angry electorates in the next election?

Senator Bill Nelson of Florida - unlike senior citizens in the other 49 states, the senior citizens of Florida will be exempt from the proposed cuts in the popular Medicare Advantage program.

Senator Bernie Sanders, socialist of Vermont - at 2.2% increase in Federal payments (read TAX DOLLARS from citizens of the other 49 states) to Vermont's Medicade program - worth about $600,000,000 over ten years.

Senator Max Baucus of Montana - special services for miners in Montana exposed to asbestos - taxpayers of other 49 states will pay for this and any who were exposed to asbestos outside of Montana will probably have to seek and pay out of pocket for care abroad as so called cost cutting provisions in the bill will restrict access to medical care for those without political clout.

And the List goes on.

On the Road to Kleptocracy

While the legislative agenda of the President and Democratic Congress fits the classic definition of big government socialism, a more apt description of the  political philosophy of the rank and file Democrats in the Senate would be Kleptocracy (government run by and for thieves)

Their Eliteism and Arrogance Knows No Limits

In addition to treating the U.S. Treasury as their personal campaign coffers, these elitist Senators further exhibit their distain for the American people with their chavilier dismissal of the need to read legislation before voting on it, by their refusing to face and listen to consistutants in town hall meetings and by their justifications of this massive vote buying.

According to Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, this buying of votes with taxpayer dollars is justified since, according to her, People fight for their own states. That's the nature of a democracy,

Then there is Senator Harry Reid's aide, Jim Manley's view of legislative democracy, This is just part of the normal legislative process. Spoken like a true kleptocrat who really believes that the taxpayers' hard earned money is available for legislators to do with as they please.

Forget What You Learned in High School Civics

This is not what I recall from civics class in high school about how the legislative process worked.

Of course, any time you have two or more people working together there will be a need for compromise and some trading of favors. However, this is not a simple I'll vote for your bill if you promise to vote for my bill, but rather a case of hiding their trades inside a single massive bill which is then rushed through passage before anyone can read it.

The bill that was just passed was secretly crafted by Senator Reid and a few others and put forward in place of two or three others being considered.

Then, according to the Wall Street Journal, some 450 amendments were added with only about 20 debated. The 450 amendments were more than likely the taxpayer funded purchases of votes most of which, at the time of the Christmas Eve vote, were known only to Senator Reid and the Senator whose vote he had brought.

This sleazy method of passing legislation is no surprise to those of us who have taken the time to follow politics and/or whos jobs have required us to actually read the mind-numbing regulations and laws that Congress and the bureaucracy routinely dump on us.

It is, however, a surpise to citizens who have relied on the left leaning main stream media for political news and information.

Times are Changing

However, thanks to the Internet, talk radio and cable news, the American people can now view all the gory details of the lawmaking process in Washington.

And, as polls show, the taxpaying citizens of this nation becoming increasingly angry and disillusioned as a result.

Polls show Americans views of Congress and the President to be at an all time low and falling while fully thirty-nine percent of us have replied that we no longer believe that the government does any good at all.

The Internet and Other Information Sources Will Make It Difficult for the Left to Dupe the American People

Also, in addition to providing an outlet for people to express their dissatisfaction with the current political situation, groups, such as the TEA Party Movement (TEA = Taxed Enough Already), are educating people about politics and the Constitiution which our politicians and mainstream media have chosen to ignore.

Senator Reid succeeded in ramming this bill through the Senate and he and Speaker Polosi will probably be able to get the final bill passed and sent to the President in time for him to claim that he accomplished something in his first year as President.

Despite the overwhelming opposition to this bill, the President and his hard left supporters in Congress expect that, once passed, people will forget their opposition and accept it as a fact accompli thereby giving the left the feeling of having achieved their nearly century long quest to set America firmly on the road to socialism.

This, however, is unlikely to happen. In years past, when the mainstream, left leaning media enjoyed near monopoly control over political information, leftist politicians could rely on this media to convince nearly everyone that big government was not only good and necessary but also enjoyed the overwhelming support of the American people.

Today the Internet, talk radio and cable TV news provide an abundance of information, on all sides of a topic, thereby giving people access to a full range of unfiltered information on which to make up their minds about current political issues. People now days not only have access information and opposing views on political topics but they also have the opportunity to see how many others share their views.

Selected Senate & House Members Have One More Chance To Add Additional Taxpayer Paid Goodies to the Bill

Even before Senator Reid's Christmas Eve vote, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina had called upon the Attorney General of Alabama to investigate going to court to challenge the Constitutionality of Senator Nelson's scheme to make taxpayers in the other 49 states pay for Nebraska's added Medicade costs under the bill.

Since then Attorney Generals in another half dozen or more states have also begun investigating challenging the Constitutionality of some of the known provisions in the Senate version of the bill. And this isn't the final bill, let alone the law in its final form.

The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 7 states: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

The House of Representatives has already passed its version of its trillion dollar health care industry take over bill and what was passed on Christmas Eve 2009 was Senator Reid's view of how this should be accomplished. Now selected members of the House and Senate will meet to decide how the two versions will be merged into one bill.

Since this merging process will include no only more vote buying but other little goodies secretly inserted during late night sessions attended by select members of the House or Senate meeting on the merger or by their unknown and unelected aides.

It is not uncommon to discover, after a bill like this has been passed, all kinds of hidden extras that no one admits to adding or even claiming to know who added them. Just another example of the low quality of people running our government.

There is a far greater possibility that a monkey, let loose on a word processor, could produce a piece of legislation that Congress would pass without reading than the odds that such a monkey could end up typing a line from Shakespeare.

Opposition to Obama Care Will Probably Increase Rather than Decrease When It Becomes Law

Contrary to what the President and the Democratic leadership in Congress believe, opposition to this bill will intensify rather than vanish with its passage.

First of all, the hard core socialist wing of the Democratic Party, which is the base to which the President and Congressional leadership owe their positions, are unhappy with this bill because it is too moderate. On the other side, the vast majority of American people are opposed to this bill because it is too radical and neither group will not be happy if it is passed.

The TEA Party Movement is not only alive and well but can be expected to gain even more momentum with the passage of this bill.

While there is still no real central leadership of the movement, its influence is being felt at the local level with the Republican Party leaders at this level being out maneuvered as local TEA Party groups throw their support behind small government conservatives seeking the Republican nonination for Congress.

Constitutional and especially Tenth Amendment (The Tenth Amendment to the Bill of Rights which reads The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.) groups initiating lawsuits against parts or all of the final bill on Constitutional and other grounds.

My guess is that the President and Democratic leadership in Congress will, despite the overwhelming opposition, force enough Democrats in both houses of Congress to pass this piece of bad legislation.

According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, even the President and Democratic Congressional leadership know that this will result in the loss of a number of seats in Congress and they have been offering jobs in the Administration to vulnerable Democrats in Congress if their vote on Obama Care causes them to lose in the 2010 election.

Obama Care Could Be Repealed by a New Congress in 2011

With Obama Care tied up in the courts and the election only ten months away little, if anything, will be done to get the program set up and people enrolled. If, as expected, conservative, small government Republican candidates running on a platform opposing Obama Care succeed in winning enough seats in Congress they could then simply repeal this law.

© 2009 Chuck Nugent

More by this Author


Comments 18 comments

susanlang profile image

susanlang 6 years ago

Come on you and me, lets go to Washington DC, grab a bus load of people and tell them we want change, that's change back in our wallets! I'm ready, you ready? ;)


breakfastpop profile image

breakfastpop 6 years ago

Excellent and disturbing hub. If we don't throw this socialist train off its tracks we will wake up in a nation that we can no longer recognize.


Consultanttech profile image

Consultanttech 6 years ago

Eyes wide shut, still alot of work to be done. The excuse of.... enjoy the fruits of our labor and see the expansion throughout our neighborhoods. Where the selected priviledge decides our future regardless the circumstances that surrounds their last 15 current events, for your local citizen. Thank you, just learning the system.


Bieberella profile image

Bieberella 6 years ago from Pennsylvania

What's funny is I can't get health care, because my Cobra ran out from getting laid off, and it's extremely costly to get the kind of coverage that covers pre-existing -- not that I have much of that, but a little.

Anyhow, I've been scammed a couple of times, and still I have no health care.

I'm a Republican!

I don't want social health care anymore than the smart people in this world. However, I do want to be able to have the freedom to independently and still get good coverage.

Congress needs to tackle that, rather than a free-for-all at the expense of the middle class.


shazz01109 profile image

shazz01109 6 years ago from Western Massachusetts

This is a great hub! Thanks for the info. I'm glad I found this hub.


The Rising Glory profile image

The Rising Glory 6 years ago from California

I think we are on the horizon of some drastic change. Unfortunately I think things will become more unstable before they settle down


C.J. Wright 6 years ago

Nice work. I thought of writing about this myself. No point now, you just about covered it all! Very informative and complete.


Chuck profile image

Chuck 6 years ago from Tucson, Arizona Author

Pamela99 - Thanks for your comments.

I checked the Hub you wrote on this topic when Senator Reid was quietly cutting deals at 1:00 am and it is very good and worth reading - here is a link to it so others can see it:

http://hubpages.com/politics/Dirty-Tricks-to-Pass-...

Your Hub on Seniors being hurt by the Medicare cuts that accompany this bill is another great one and here is a link to it: http://hubpages.com/hub/Healthcare-Bill-Hurts-Seni...


Pamela99 profile image

Pamela99 6 years ago from United States

Very good hub. I am certainly interested in the fact that what they've done may be unconstitutional. I wrote a hub when these sweetheart deals were first being announced, but you have put together a lot more good information. Keep it up!


Chuck profile image

Chuck 6 years ago from Tucson, Arizona Author

Paradise7 - thank you for your comments.

As to the British National Health System it is probably alright for healthy people,like me, who only have to seek medical help occasionally for minor illnesses.

However, its passage years ago led to an ongoing exodus of doctors from England with America being the destination of choice for many. This naturally led to a shortage of health care workers (socialism always leads to shortages) which led to the long (months or years in duration) waiting lines or ques as they call them on the other side of the pond, as well as the use, in an effort to keep costs under control, of outdated equipment, medicines and procedures.

According to Mark Steyn, a writer and Canadian expat living in the U.S., Florida is home to numerous British doctors and New Hampshire the home to many Canadian doctors.

If I were more of a cynic, I would probably be a big supporter of socialized medicine in other nations given that we Americans are the beneficiaries of these systems. However, my humanitarian instincts make me want to see all people having access to good medical care which is why I favor a free market approach which has always resulted in making goods and services both more abundant and less expensive.

As to socialism, I never implied that it was a crime. I am not opposed to it per se. There are many instances where it is an ideal model for living - monasteries, communes and other group living arrangements where people happily and VOLUNTARILY choose this lifestyle.

In fact, as I frequently point out to my economics students, my home, like most homes the world over, is a perfect example of socialism. Most households, mine included, operate on the Marxian principle of "from each according to their means and to each according to needs".

When our children were young, I earned the money and spent most of it on the children who contributed nothing financially toward the family's support. Two of our children are grown and have moved out and the other two have jobs and are in school, however, my wife and I continue to provide over half of their support while they, despite their jobs, make no direct financial contribution to us (I do insist that they pay a very nominal amount to me which is then put into their IRA accounts - this is to force them to start saving, and I have also required them from the time they got their licenses to pay the added insurance as an incentive to drive carefully). Further, while I make more than twice as much as my wife all monies go into joint accounts which both of us use. So socialism can be good and I can honestly call myself a socialist in this sense.

My problem is with socialism imposed by force with people having no choice but to allow the government to take the fruits of their labor or go to prison. My other problem with government socialism is that when it is imposed upon a nation as a whole there are so many people involved that the community link doesn't exist with the result that most people are strangers to each other, and the normal incentives to help ones you know, as a result of living and working with them, are missing as are the normal group pressures to do one's part.

The result is the need for an outside force to run the system and these always end up being self-appointed elites who insist on special treatment for themselves.

One only has to read George Orwell's classic, "Animal Farm" where the pigs, who were the self appointed leaders, operated on the principle that "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squealer_(Animal_Farm... )

If you remember news reports (at least on Fox as I doubt reporters from other networks thought it appropriate to ask) during the debates over the so called "Public Option" none of the members of the House or Senate who were asked if they would elect this great option for themselves and their families, all either said no or declined to answer. To paraphrase Orwell "All citizens are equal, but liberal politicians are more equal than regular citizens".

The beauty of free enterprise is that individuals can freely organize and operate on socialist principles but under mandatory, government run socialism the opposite is not true, as operating a free market within such as system is illegal (and in the former Soviet Union the penalty for this crime was execution).

As to your fear of a return to the McCarthy era, remember that this was a period of bitter partisan political infighting in Washington and much of what we know of that era was reported by a rather partisan press. Also, while many of the Senator's tactics were certainly not appropriate, the opening of SOVIET ARCHIVES has shown that many of those accused by the Senator, such as Alger Hiss, were in fact Soviet agents.

When I refer to "socialism" in the Hub I am referring to a proposal that fits the economic definition of socialism which is government control (through excessive regulation) or outright ownership of the factors of production in the economy. This is not the traditional American way and, because it is unpopular with the majority, politicians favoring this system like to disguise it as simple liberalism (which itself is a 19th century term for a free market model which has been taken over and re-defined into something else, but that is another story). I have to respect, while totally disagreeing with, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont because he campaigns and freely admits that he is pushing a socialist agenda. The others in Congress and the Administration aren't quiet as honest.

Thanks again for your comments.

Chuck


scourtney profile image

scourtney 6 years ago

Excellent and well written article. Bookmarked of course.


Paradise7 profile image

Paradise7 6 years ago from Upstate New York

Chuck, I appreciate your point of view even though I differ with you in many respects. The National Health system in England seems to work a lot better than the mess we have here in America. The people in office are trying to fix it and it's a totally uphill battle no matter what they do. The choices are just not good, and they have to do something soon.

Using the word "socialist" like it's a crime or something to be socialist, liberal, whatever. I hope these ideas and this attitude on the part of many Americans doesn't mean we're headed towards a return to the McCarthy era.


Pastor_Walt profile image

Pastor_Walt 6 years ago from Jefferson City, Tennessee

Well written and to the point. The socialist train is rolling, and the nation is stalled on its tracks. Lord, help us. Elections have meaning!


johnwindbell profile image

johnwindbell 6 years ago from - the land of beards and buggies

Thanks chuck, wonder how many people would vote for Ron Paul if they could do it over again? Don't blame me, I did. One side has been fighting against the other for so long, they are now the same. We are doomed people, or should I say 'sheeple.'


Smireles profile image

Smireles 6 years ago from Texas

Thanks for putting this information together in one place for research. The American people are getting tired of this arrogance and disregard for the wishes of the people. Good hub.


Darlene Sabella profile image

Darlene Sabella 6 years ago from Hello, my name is Toast and Jam, I live in the forest with my dog named Sam ...

Unbelivable, this is crazy. I saw this coming at us, I'm glad I'm to old to care, but how about our children, and the generations to follow. This is a scam, Obama must think he is Hitler and can convince everyone to follow him off the cliff. Thanks for a great article.


eovery profile image

eovery 6 years ago from MIddle of the Boondocks of Iowa

Sounds like politics as usual. Cheat, thievery, and lies.

Keep on hubbing!


bobmnu profile image

bobmnu 6 years ago from Cumberland

The TEA Parties I have attended all have talked about following the Constitution and listening to the people. You are right the people are fed up with politicians who think they can do what ever they want. These people talk of being men/women of principals yet will sell out their principals for a few a few votes.

You wrote another great page. What will happen with the next big piece of legislation? Senators lining up with their hands out for our money and not caring about what the bill is about.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working