Special Elections | Is There a Better Way?
February 12, 2015, Oakley
What Kind of Government Do We Have?
Here in the United States, we have a system of government known commonly and colloquially as a democracy. That is not quite precisely true; it is actually a republic.
Under a republic, there are sub-types. We live in a Constitutional federal (federation) presidential republic. That’s a bit of a mouthful, so it’s easier to just say a democracy, even if that is not quite accurate. We should shorten it to republic, instead, but the term democracy is of such long standing use, that is unlikely to happen.
When our government was first formed, after the 1787 Constitutional Convention, a woman approached Benjamin Franklin, and inquired, “Well, what do we have? A republic or a monarchy?” His swift reply was, “A republic, if you can keep it.”
Of course, the key to ‘keeping it’ is active participation in the voting process. As we see almost daily in the news, this process has become quite subverted by big money interests, but that’s a whole different article.
The Election Process
As most educated citizens are aware, elections are held a couple of times a year to select representatives for various government offices and decide upon any issues.
Every four years, the election includes whom to choose as our next president, along with the other officials whose terms may be up or who have retired, and any issues (propositions) that may appear.
Some states have term limits on their state government representatives, who may not serve more than two terms in a given office.
This system has been serving well enough for the last two-hundred-odd years. However, there are some problems.
What is a Special Election?
A special election is held under a few circumstances:
- An elected official has retired, resigned or died
- An elected official has run for, and won, a seat in a different official capacity before his original term has expired
- An elected official has been removed from office for illegal activity
- Some special proposition considered to be of urgent timing is to be voted upon (note that nothing is so urgent it cannot wait for the next regular election cycle!)
Now, these elections are very expensive. Why? Because all of the same protocols and services must be provided the same as they would be for a regular primary or general election.
Currently, in the county in which I live, there is to be a special election in March, to fill just such a vacancy as described above in item number two.
There are five people running for a single seat. It is the only thing on the ballot.
How Much Does a Special Election Cost?
The short answer: a lot.
According to our county elections office, this particular election is expected to end up costing seven hundred fifty thousand dollars!
That’s for one special election. They have another scheduled for May! This will cost a total, then, of a million and a half dollars!
That’s for just two special elections in a single county in the state.
How many times is this scenario repeated in various counties all over the state, and in every state? It’s a huge waste of money.
As a taxpayer, these costs come out of your pocket!
How Elections Waste Money
They already waste a good deal of money anyway with this, even on regular elections, by sending the sample ballots and other informational pamphlets under separate cover. Sometimes as many as three separate mailings are sent!
Fortunately, with only a single seat up for grabs, that particular bit of waste is eliminated, but not so for regular general and primary elections.
The actual voting ballot, for absentee voters, is also sent separately.
Why Such High Costs?
First of all, the agency holding the election must pay all the poll workers, of whom four are required at each precinct. Then, they must in many cases, pay space rental for the day for those polling places.
Next, there is the cost in paper and printing of all the ballots for each and every registered voter in the area concerned. Add to this the postage for first-class mailing of said materials.
(Our county elections department somehow manages to get their postage under a non-profit organization status--I'm not sure how or why--regardless: in the end it is a cost the taxpayers pay.)
Then, there is the cost of mailing out all the absentee ballots for those who are so registered.
Finally after the election, all of the same costs of tallying the votes and determining the outcome are the same as for a regular election.
As a taxpayer, all of these costs come out of your pocket!
What is the Solution? Is There One?
I believe there is. There would need to be some minor changes to laws regarding running for office, and how to replace sudden and unexpected departure from office for any of the reasons listed above. In short, the entire concept and practice of special elections needs to go away.
Here are my own ideas on how to accomplish this goal:
- Disallow elected officials from running for a different office before their current term expires
- Re-set the terms of all elected offices of any type, from city all the way through federal, so that the expiry dates coincide with regularly scheduled primary or general elections (to effectively prevent the above from being an issue)
- Disallow retirement prior to the expiry of the current term of office (unless for serious health reasons)
- Fill sudden, unexpected vacancies by temporary appointment by consensus of the ranking body of the jurisdiction affected (mayor; board of supervisors; governor, etc)
- No special election may be held to decide any issue, proposition, tax bill or other item; such things are not so urgent that they cannot wait for the next regular election
Yes, there would be some immediate effects, in that some officials would have their normal terms shortened, others lengthened by a few months, in order to sync up with the regular elections. It should not make a big difference in the scheme of things as a whole.
It takes a great deal of work and effort to force things to be as complicated as they have become.
Can it be Done?
This solution subscribes to the “KISS” principle. (Keep It Simple, Stupid; for those unfamiliar with the acronym.)
Some people like to take the outlook of “It isn’t that easy.” Well, yes, it is just that easy. It takes a great deal of work and effort to force things to be as complicated as they have become.
Even if taking these measures would require a vote, it could still be easily placed on a regular election ballot, and I’m pretty certain it would pass.
People get fed up with having their time and money wasted. These suggestions would save both.
There is a saying of “I can’t means I won’t.” This can also apply collectively to legislative bodies who might try to say this “can’t” be done. It can, and it should.
Thank you for reading.
Cast Your Vote!
Do you agree with the ideas presented here?See results without voting
© 2015 Liz Elias
More by this Author
An exploration of the recent trend of police shooting first and asking questions later--too late.
In America, we supposedly have freedom of speech. It is in our constitution. However, it is becoming more and more only a perception of freedom, as our liberties are daily being compromised under the guise of...
Plumber's snakes: how to use them for clearing simple clogs. Save yourself the cost of a plumber's visit. D.I.Y. household maintenance and repairs.