The 2009 Copenhagen Climate Treaty
Alex Jones: Secret Copenhagen Documents Leaked 1/2
UPDATE 1/6/2010: World leaders [attending the Copenhagen Climate Meeting last month] failed to agree on a “tough – fair” and binding treaty to reduce global warming. While I believe in good earthly housekeeping, I also believe it must be accomplished globally through individual awareness and accountability. Obama did sign the treaty. However, for the treaty to be enforced all countries attending had to sign on the dotted line…Thankfully; the outcome of the meeting has left our country’s sovereignty and constitution intact; let’s keep it that way.
In the news today 11-26-09
President Obama is going to attend the UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen. He will commit to cutting emissions, over the next decade, to 17% below the 2005 levels. His figure amounts to 5.5% below the 1990 levels that most countries use as a reference point. Will he sign a treaty to this effect or verbally commit? Let us hope it be niether! Please take time to read this article and listen to the videos. Then, you will understand the importance of NOT SIGNING THEIR TREATY!
Just when you think, the sharks were driven back out to sea you find their lurking nearby. The sharks I am referring to is the UN, our congressional leaders, and the Copenhagen Climate Conference. In December, President Obama may travel to Denmark and attend this conference. He will also find that the conference includes a treaty, which will be presented to all in attendance. Their signature is optional; sign or do not sign. Let us hope our president does not sign. In my opinion, this treaty is unnecessary to a climate agenda. I agree that we all need to be mindful and take steps to protect our environment as a nation. I also feel that accountability belongs solely to “each individual nation” without the dictation of a treaty.
Mr. President you need to be aware that cloaked within the treaty is language, which will create a “world government”. In fact, this stipulation appears as the first of three positions. The second position will move the wealth from western countries to third world countries for restoration. This will be done under the guise of coyly, or “climate debt”. Their logic is that we have been burning the most CO2. In other words, we have been destroying the environment and they have not. The third position of this new group is enforcement, which is the most perilous position of all! They will structure enforcement through technological resources. Their power will rule as seen in paragraphs 36 and 38 of the treaty.
Paragraphs 36 and 38 of the treaty clearly foresee the creation of a new world ‘government’ with express powers of intercession in economic and environmental affairs of individual nations, and the heads of any elected government.
Article VI of the US Constitution is required to be read in concurrence with the Vienna Convention when relating to International Treaties. The Supreme Court has found that an international treaty prevails over the Constitution to the extent that there is a conflict."
Due to the devious wording, this treaty would nullify our constitution and government leaders! We would not be able to remove ourselves from this treaty nor could you Mr. President. In fact, you and the congress would become an ineffectual source of government. Therefore, my position is this, NO surrendering of our national sovereignty; NO agreement to shift our wealth to other countries; NO submissiveness to any world government or official.
This treaty Mr. President is UNACCEPTABLE to the people of the United States---the people you represent!