The Death of Patriotism

Source


WHY I'M WRITING THIS HUB

About a week ago, a fellow Hubber, jonnycomelately, asked a question--Can patriotism make you blind to shortcomings? I offered a comment, fine and good, but when I tried to make a second comment, the System said No!, but I was welcome to write a Hub about it

Please note that my academic background is in neither anthropology nor sociology. If you continue reading past about here, you'll be into my lay speculations about patriotism--where it probably came from, how it has been used to define and motivate populations, how its uniting purpose has bee used to divide and suppress, and how it now functions in our shrinking world .

If nothing else, I hope my perspective sparks some lively discussion.

ORIGINS OF PATRIOTISM

Patriotism probably began something like this--and cut me some slack on the "probably". No one can possibly provide documentation of the beginning of patriotism, so my speculation is at least as reasonable as the next guy's.

Millions of years ago, some little organism slithered out of the primeval ooze and started the long evolutionary journey that has culminated in our current social contracts. In the beginning, however, there could not have been any "contracts", or any "social" for that matter; rather, there would have been only individual organisms, struggling to survive. Gradually, the need to reproduce would have generated groupings of some kind, and we can speculate that individual survival gradually gave way to group survival--if the group was healthy, then by inclusion the individual stood a much better chance of survival, growth, even enhanced well-being. Over time, group survival depended on successful management of local resources. Food would have been primary. Natural growing grains, legumes, other vegetables, fruits, nuts and--later--animals that could be eaten, all of these food sources would have been sought, harvested, and followed as necessary for the good of the group.

In those long-ago eons, man was nomadic. It would take tens of thousands of years for two ideas to take root: 1) deliberately putting seeds into the ground, so that they would grow into gardens of food, and 2) catching and corralling animals so that they could be eaten at (relative) leisure.

BOTH of these strategies required fixed, stable locations to cultivate the plants and fatten the animals. Obviously, the success of these post-nomadic groups would have been predicated on their ability to locate sufficient sun, rivers and lakes,arable soil, precipitation, warmth etc.. We take these essentials of life for granted--imagine a time when you still had to discover what they were!

PATRIOTISM AS THE POSITIVE "GLUE" OF SOCIAL SUCCESS

Vague groups became somewhat less vaguely defined Bands, Bands became Tribes, Tribes became towns and towns became walled City States, the foundations for great nations. Troy, Athens, Sparta, Thebes, Rome--regardless of their historical time of glory--were all walled City States. Stones and mortar kept enemies out, but what dynamic kept citizens in , made them willing to fight literally to the death in defence of their State. This dedication of the individual to the ideals of a particular State was stunning in its totality and the ferocity of its expression. Spartan mothers were reputed to repeatedly pull their male infants away from the breast to engrain rage into their character, a rage that was channeled into the indomitable fighting machine that was the Spartan warrior. Socrates, faced with a choice between death and exile forever from Athens, chose death as preferable to exile. A few centuries later, the proudest declaration in the known world was "civis romanus sum"--I am a citizen of Rome--and banishment from the splendors of that great city and everything it stood for, was considered banishment from life itself.

Nations were built, became strong, and prospered in direct proportion to the degree of Patriotism leaders could inculcate into citizens, thinkers, legislators, warriors, and leaders. Patriotism, belief in the power of your nation not only to sustain you but to provide you with the values and inner strength to live a meaningful life--patriotism was that positive force that held the practical side of life together for thousands of years.

PATRIOTISM AS A FORCE OF HATE

Back in the day (love that dumb phrase! Means any time from last year to whenever), patriotism was generally used in positive ways. Athens is great because of our democracy and our navy. Sparta is great because we're the fiercest fighters on the block. Rome is a great nation because we rule the known world. These kinds of messages celebrate the greatness within--they do not denigrate the relative weakness or evil of OTHER nations or value systems. Such denigration was unnecessary, because the sense of positive greatness from within was sufficient unto itself.

This kind of patriotism changed most notably in about 1936 with the rise of the Third Reich. Hitler appealed to exactly the same kind of energy as positive patriotism to convince a sophisticated, educated, urbane society that the very fabric of their way of life would decay and fall if Germany did not suppress the Jews. The same patriotic energy that made Germans fiercely loyal to their country was now exploited to make them hate Jewsl Rather than fighting for the privilege of being members of their own nation, Germans were encouraged to hate others for being members of "theirs" (Hitler's propaganda was so successful, many Germans lost sight of the fact that hundreds of thousands of the hated Jews were German citizens!)

DEFINED BORDERS ESSENTIAL TO EXPLOIT PATRIOTISM

Hitler was a madman; unfortunately for the rest of the world and, ultimately, for the German people, he was a brilliant madman. He knew the fierce pride and historical identification individual Germans felt for their country and its traditions. After its defeat at the end of WW I, Germany had to cede certain of its territories to neighbors, and the loss of those lands cut bitterly into the German national psyche. Hitler used that deeply engrained patriotism of his own people as the foundation for his specious argument that war was necessary to recover lands essential for German life--Lebensraum. The word literally means "space to live in", and the argument had a profound appeal because the German people's national identity was so strongly fused with the land itself. This physical argument, mixed with the psychological argument against the Jews, was then seasoned by the passion of patriotism, producing a toxic stew which just about brought the world to its knees.


REDEFINING PATRIOTISM

Speaking to an audience of 450,000 in West Berlin in the summer of 1963, US President John F. Kennedy said, "Ich bin ein Berliner!" ('I am a citizen of Berlin")--declaring not only US solidarity with West Berliners, but the solidarity of all citizens of the free world with the citizens of that City. The phrase became instantly iconic for the growing millions who looked on traditional patriotism as an isolationist concept that worked against hundreds of millions of needy people.whom the accident of birth had placed in impoverished countries. At about the same time, Marshall McLuhan published The Making of Typographic Man (1962) and Understanding Media (1064), introducing the concept/phrase "the global village"--the "communications" equivalent to Kennedy's declaration of global social and political "unity". McLuhan realized that television and the internet were creating a new sense of community, of responsibility by those who had freedom and the good life for people who were suffering and had little possibility of socio-political relief from their own countries.

This was new. This was simultaneously exciting and hugely problematic. It is all very well in this New Age of borderless humanity to look on oneself as a citizen of the world, but that is NOT really true for any one of us--legally we are Canadians or Americans, Latvians or Fijians or Icelanders or Russians. No one has a passport from The World, . How are we to reconcile our new expanded consciousness with our love of country? If a military force from an impoverished country showed up on Canada's shores and invaded with cannons, guns, and other weapons of destruction...............would I defend my country? Damn right I would! And with all the ferocity I could muster, I might add.

But with the expanded consciousness, new global thinking, and new sense of possible action I have inherited from the visionaries of the 1960s, I would be seeking a quick solution, i would want to learn everything I could about why this country had invaded, I would want to minimize casualties on both sides, and I would want to put in place long-term solutions to ensure the reason for this country's invasion was put to rest.

ANSWERING THE QUESTION THAT STARTED THIS HUB

We began this brief enquiry with jonnycomelately's question---"can patriotism make you blind to shortcomings?" So where are we now? I think we've demonstrated that patriotism is still alive and well, but patriotism now manifests itself as a sense of pride, tempered with a broader humanity that has room for compassion and empathy for the plight of others. But there is a measure now, based entirely on what I'll call a "sliding scale of direct threat". When the threat is extremely high, my "old school" patriotism, the knee-jerk-I'll-stomp-all -over-you school of patriotism, will be very high. I will be completely blind to any suggestion of "shortcomings" to my patriotic responses, whatever they may be. As the threat recedes, my willingness to become more aware, more problem-solving, will increase. Eventually, I will be as interested in the other guy's point of view and needs as i will be in my own.

This last is my answer to the question. Our sense and understanding of the strengths, dangers, and limitations of patriotism have been hard-earned through history, but I actually think we've learned a thing or two. We can love our countries and defend them like rabid dogs when circumstances demand, but we can also put on the brakes and reason our way to calmer waters when circumstances permit.

That apparently simple ability to put such a distinction into effect, is demonstration that occasionally we actually DO learn from History. Goof grief..................

Comments 13 comments

Mhatter99 profile image

Mhatter99 3 years ago from San Francisco

Though I use to hang out with a very patriotic crowd, I sense you are right. But this was predicted of societies by Aristotle.


diogenes 3 years ago

Hi Clark. Some hub! Deserves "Hub of the Week." Didn't someone say patriotism was the ast refuge of rogues? Maybe I dreamed that.

I'm burned out with HP, mate: have no inspiration to contribute and little to even read, although i usually read your work and a couple of others, like Willstar and Austinstar, etc. But all ends, doan it/ I am psychologically drained and can't shit! I need some good sex, but that's also a pipe dream without a pipe.

I'm OK, Mexico soon and that brings me round a bit. It's a bitch watching the sap dry ain't it?

All the best

Bob


moonfroth profile image

moonfroth 3 years ago from Rural BC (Canada) & N of Puerto Vallarta (Mexico) Author

Bob--

I'm down on Hp too. Delete a lot of nonsense. But keep those spirits up! And everything else too. Mex. will take care of the latter!

Clark


lilyfly profile image

lilyfly 3 years ago from Wasilla, Alaska

Dear moon... I left you a poem, and get only the feeling that you actually do not want to critique my poems for me, as you stated in your letter. Well, that's O.K., because I am busy fighting for my right to live a free life, perhaps that is the best type of Patriotism, fighting for freedom for all the constituants of a particular area, or nation, regardless of creed, color, religion or sex, the type of Patriotism spoken of by John Adams, written about by Thomas Jefferson, and fought for by George Washington. lily


AudreyHowitt profile image

AudreyHowitt 3 years ago from California

So interesting--perhaps in your closing paragraphs--I might (if I were the one making the argument) amend to state that it is the perceived level of threat--that dictates where on that knee-jerk continuum we fall at the moment. I say that only because I know so many radical 2nd Amendment "believers" who react in much the same knee-jerk way --but the threat to their caches of armaments is more perceived than actual--and they make this argument almost exclusively under the guise of patriotism--my 2 cents


moonfroth 3 years ago

My dear Lillian--I do not have the FAINTEST idea what you're talking about. I love your work, as I have said over and over and over. I never said, in a letter or otherwise, that I didn't want to critique your poetry. You have seriously misunderstood something or other--or I wasn't clear about something or other. Please send me a private note with details so we can sort this out.


moonfroth profile image

moonfroth 3 years ago from Rural BC (Canada) & N of Puerto Vallarta (Mexico) Author

Thanks Audrey. and of course I agree. I would add that very paranoid people look on their PERCEPTIONS of threat as absolute reality, which makes them doubly dangerous. I suppose the old classic "Dr. Strangelove" has some of the most iconic characters in the grips of this phenomenon!


AudreyHowitt profile image

AudreyHowitt 3 years ago from California

I think you are correct!


ImKarn23 profile image

ImKarn23 3 years ago

Excellent! Loved this Moon! Patriotism IS a double -edged sword and yes - while it is still 'alive' - it is also KILLING us in many ways! I won't begin to list them, but zealots of any nature are dangerous to society as a whole - even when they portend to support that same society - ala patriotism as an example..

or the NRA...

or Politicians..

or religions..

or Wall street..or or or ..

DAMN! Said i would list 'em..

voting/sharing

(quite the little 'misunderstanding' up there, moon...wow!) lol


suziecat7 profile image

suziecat7 3 years ago from Asheville, NC

Moonfroth - great Hub. Everyone has their own idea of what being a patriot is. Like ImKarn23 said, it is a double-edged sword.


lilyfly profile image

lilyfly 3 years ago from Wasilla, Alaska

Hello Dear! No, the rumors of my death were highly exaggerated! I hope this note finds you well, and your family! I am in California, moved yesterday, and my computer broke about three months ago, so... I just never got e-mail access to anything.... so, I thank you for all your kind comments and caring, your abject admirerer... love lily


lilyfly profile image

lilyfly 2 years ago from Wasilla, Alaska

Umm, going thru Canada, tried to e-mail you many times, umm I see my other posts. God, how ridiculous I am. I see people are reading you! Good!!!! love, lil


moonfroth profile image

moonfroth 2 years ago from Rural BC (Canada) & N of Puerto Vallarta (Mexico) Author

lILY m'dear--TRYing to email me? What's the problem?

moonfroth@gmail.com. Let's hear from you!

love

Clark

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working