Two Justice Systems in the USA: One for Police, One for Citizens

Michael Bell
Michael Bell

There have been a series of really sad incidents involving mostly blacks at the hands of police. This has stirred the media and others to state that there are two justice systems in America: one for blacks and others and one for whites. The reality is more of one for police and one for everyone else. The use of the grand jury, while historical, is a means to be non-transparent about misconduct of police officers who conduct grievous actions against citizens. Granted, each situation IS unique and has its own details, but when a police officer uses excessive force or kills a suspect and the the grand jury method is used to protect the officer under the cloak of justice, it is NOT justice. It is a scam.

Having a police department investigate its own police wrongs is inherently a bad idea. It is bound to have built in bias in favor of the officer even if it is obvious the officer acted out of scope. Look no further than Eric Garner. The video the grand jury saw, called by a prosecutor to look at the evidence, shows one officer using a choke hold that officers no longer were allowed to use. While it was not an unlawful act, it was against police policy. Even as Eric screamed that he could not breath, the officer continued. Eric died from this action despite having other health issues. The coroner ruled it as a homicide. The only person liable for it was that police officer.

Yet, in a grand jury that was comprised of 40% minority (non-white), it was decided the officer did no wrong, no crime happened. Most attorney's indicate that there was the minimum required to prosecute the officer in a trial, which is all a grand jury decides. Whether the evidence would convict him is another matter, but most suspect that at least a conviction of involuntary manslaughter (reckless and wanton disregard resulting in death) would occur after a trial.

The grand jury is a secret, non-public look at the evidence presented only by the prosecutor. While the D.A. used it to determine if a case can be won or not, they have discretion of what the grand jury sees and this can easily manipulate any jury. If the prosecutor really does not want to take an officer to trial, the D.A. can cherry pick what evidence the grand jury sees. Thus, the grand jury can be "steered" into an unjust decision not to indict an officer. This is the justice system for the police who use excessive force during an arrest. If the D.A. does not want to prosecute and officer, all they have to do is use the grand jury system, present limited evidence that exonerate an officer. The grand jury system can be manipulated since there is no opposing counsel or even judge present! Since it is secret, not open to the public, just where is the justice for the victim injured or dead?

Of course, justice may still be served when the federal investigation occurs in both the Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases, although, the bar is higher to prosecute. In the Garner case, because there is a video of the whole tragic event, the decision of the Grand Jury on Statton Island, NY., is inherently biased and shows how the system cries out for a special prosecutor outside of the police force to conduct the investigation and file charges. Here, a local prosecutor with ties to the police department presented evidence to steer the grand jury to a "no indictment". Statton Island has a long history of being pro-police and is mostly white. Many of the residents are tied to police and the grand jury history of that area show that the grand jury seldom indicts a police officer.

Let's not forget why police were attracted to Eric in the first place- selling loose cigarettes with no taxes. This an infraction, usually dealt with a ticket and fine. Of course, Eric had been arrested 30 times for the same offense, but is this really what police should be wasting time on? His death is wrongful and I am sure the family will seek millions in a civil suit.

The grand jury used in the Michael Brown case was far different. The whole sequence of events pointed to MB's attitude and behavior even before the encounter with Wilson, with MB stealing from a store. There was no video of the actual event, of the 30 witnesses, 50% of them disagreed among themselves of what happened.

Then, there is the Michael Bell case of 10 years ago, where a white college student was shot in the head after being stopped. Michael had pulled up into his driveway to comply with the stop. The video shows the cop simply walked to the car and as the victim was getting out of his car, the cop simply grabbed him and pulled him outside of the camera range of the police dash cam. You can hear shouting. Why he was stopped is conjecture. Michael was to have testified in court against the same officer for a previous incident between the same actors. Obviously, this colors the whole event. Was the officer in trial planning to "silence" the accuser? Worse, the trial was the very next day in 2004. This case still is unresolved as it goes to higher courts. Michael was executed at point blank range according to forensics. Police say he resisted arrested as 3-4 officers claimed. Yet, the audio of that night paints a different picture. The police seemed to have planned the apprehension for non-traffic reasons. The sworn testimony of each officer directly opposed irrefutable forensic evidence provided by the medical examiner. Still, no fault according to internal investigations.

Like this local police force, it embodies a "Home Rule" ethic. That is, the same police force and officers investigate their own. The use of the grand jury can be used in this manner.

It is time for real justice by an impartial outside entity.

More by this Author


Comments 7 comments

maxoxam41 profile image

maxoxam41 2 years ago from USA

I fully agree.


perrya profile image

perrya 2 years ago Author

We finally agree!


maxoxam41 profile image

maxoxam41 2 years ago from USA

I am a humane being.


Rayne123 24 months ago

Hello how are you. This may be a long reply so hope its ok.

What a great hub, I could have not said it better myself. I was going to write my thoughts on this whole situation but you more or less said it all. So thank you for that.

You wrote it with thought and research of both sides/cases.

I myself agree that all police will stick together no matter what is said or isn't. Just like doctors and lawyers, and I think it is time to change the world and allow people to use the gift of authority the way it is meant to be used. I believe that any gift is given from above and any misuse of this gift will be consequenced as we see happening in front of very eyes.

The problem is too many people have been getting away with their corrupt or unacceptable behaviour as many people feared authority, no one at one time would even think about taking a stand over authority.

I believe things happen for a reason and the way I look at it, this was supposed to happen, I believe the Good Lord controls the world and uses people to change what is wrong or not going according to Gods law.

I myself do not understand juries, never did. I would like to be a fly on the wall when jurors are brought in. You have to wonder sometime if they are paid.

Anyway if Darren Wilson was however indicted I believe that it would state the end and things would not change with the police force. I am not saying that I am glad these people died in the situation at all, however I do believe that this may just change the world or if not the world, at the very least the police force.

Some people do not believe it will do any good, but I do, since I believe there is a reason for it, then I must believe that it is to change authority.

I not only see this happening as a racial problem I see this happening all over the world. Police get so caught up with this control of power they think they have the right to do what they want and not worry about ever getting caught. The most they get is a leave of absence with pay (which also needs to be changed). This kind of authority ruins it for the good ones that actually care about the world/humans/animals and want to send messages of hope and faith.

I do not agree with the violence however as people are only going against others that totally agree with them. Its like good turning evil. Protests can happen peacefully and as a matter of fact, peace is what will bring about the change.

You mention Rodney King, he is a good example of things not changing and here we are decades later trying to change that very same thing. However there is more of us than them and I believe if we unite together we can make a change.

The protests may not be enough however we need to sign a petition around the world that body cameras , tracking systems and NO PAY (when they are suspended) to be brought into action immediately. This is to be instilled for every police officer in the world, no matter the city, country or town.

Authority is now being tested, they are not getting away with corrupt/unacceptable behaviour, it comes out in the open now. Media and the internet make that much more possible these days. Now we are also allowed to use any recording in any unacceptable behaviour. We see it happening with priests, ministers, churches, celebrities,(Bill Cosby to name a few) people in power that thought they would never be brought down because of their status.

There is also the very high case of OJ simpson who laughed his way out of the court room, but look at him now. Had he been indicted he might have been out by now, but he stepped in his own grave and now he is not laughing. The consequence for the crime always comes to surface somehow.

As we see people all over the world are now making a stand and I believe that they are lashing out not only at one certain case, it is a way to lash out at the world and any problem they may have encountered without blame. However we need to show peace together or this change will not happen.

Anyway sorry for the long reply. Your hub was very inspirational and I hope you do get a lot of views and replies. I do hope that everyone feels the same way.

Many blessings

Laurie


perrya profile image

perrya 24 months ago Author

Thanks for your thoughts...keep reading!


Mary Neal profile image

Mary Neal 22 months ago from Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Your title tells a truth that is dangerous for national security in the USA: "Two Justice Systems in the USA: One for Police, One for Citizens." We should demand an immediate end to this government's hypocrisy that allows police to use lethal force to boost their egos without fear of reprisal. Secrecy and cover-ups should not be used to hide their crimes. NYCLU and Legal Aid are in NY Supreme Court today because they filed suit to open the Pantaleo grand jury transcript (Pantaleo killed Eric Garner in a choke hold and was not indicted). See information at "Democracy Cannot Breathe in Secret Courts," my hub at http://hubpages.com/politics/Democracy-Cannot-Brea...


perrya profile image

perrya 22 months ago Author

Thanks Mary, agreed.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working