War Made Easy narrated by Sean Penn with Norman Solomon Film Review
War Made Easy 70 minute video
War Made Easy
War Made Easy is a powerful documentary that explains and documents how and why the United States has repeatedly used war as an insturment of foreign policy and, with the complicity of the media, has used propaganda and outright lies to gain the support of a majority of the American people.
Here's a link to a trailer about this compelling movie:
MSNBC Picture Story on Events in Georgia
7-20-08 Bush's Iraq Fig Leaves Are Falling
Bill Moyers on Media Consolidation
Bill Moyers on Media Consolidation
War Made Easy and Collateral Murder in Iraq
- War Made Easy by Norman Solomon and Collateral Murder in Iraq Courtesy of Wikileaks
April 5, 2010 WikiLeaks released cockpit video footage from a U.S. helicopter gunship in Baghdad. The footage, which documented the killing of 12 people, was released in two versions: the full, original video and an edited video. Critics of WikiLeaks
Collateral Murder in Iraq
United States Institute of Peace Website
Stop the Iran War Resolution
Seymour Hersh on Bush and Iran The New Yorker June 8, 2008
Mearsheimer v. Foxman on Israel Lobby
Vince Bugliosi on Iraq War
George Galloway Testimony On Iraq Invasion Before the U.S. Senate
End of the World Scenario--VIDEO
George Bush's Lies About Iraq
Dwight Eisenhower's Warning About the Military Industrial Complex
Make Diplomacy, Not War by Nicholas Kristof
Op-Ed Columnist Make Diplomacy, Not War
Article Tools Sponsored By By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF Published: August 9, 2008
Iraq and Afghanistan are the messes getting attention today, but they are only symptoms of a much broader cancer in American foreign policy. Skip to next paragraph Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
A few glimpses of this larger affliction:
¶The United States has more musicians in its military bands than it has diplomats.
¶This year alone, the United States Army will add about 7,000 soldiers to its total; that's more people than in the entire American Foreign Service.
¶More than 1,000 American diplomatic positions are vacant because the Foreign Service is so short-staffed, but a myopic Congress is refusing to finance even modest new hiring. Some 1,100 could be hired for the cost of a single C-17 military cargo plane.
In short, the United States is hugely overinvesting in military tools and underinvesting in diplomatic tools. The result is a lopsided foreign policy that antagonizes the rest of the world and is ineffective in tackling many modern problems.
After all, you can't bomb global warming.
Incredibly, the most eloquent spokesman for more balance between "hard power" and "soft power" is Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Mr. Gates, who is superb in repairing the catastrophe left behind by Donald Rumsfeld, has given a series of astonishing speeches in which he calls for more resources for the State Department and aid agencies.
"One of the most important lessons of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is that military success is not sufficient to win," Mr. Gates said. He noted that the entire American diplomatic corps - about 6,500 people - is less than the staffing of a single aircraft carrier group, yet Congress isn't interested in paying for a larger Foreign Service.
"It simply does not have the built-in, domestic constituency of defense programs," Mr. Gates said. "As an example, the F-22 aircraft is produced by companies in 44 states; that's 88 senators."
With the Olympics unfolding in China now, the Navy and the Air Force are seizing upon China's rise as an excuse to grab tens of billions of dollars for the F-22, for an advanced destroyer, for new attack submarines. But we're failing to invest minuscule sums to build good will among Chinese.
For the price of one F-22, we could - for 25 years - operate American libraries in each Chinese province, pay for more Chinese-American exchanges, and hire more diplomats prepared to appear on Chinese television and explain in fluent Chinese what American policy is. And for the price of one M.R.E. lunch for one soldier, the State Department could make a few phone calls to push the Chinese leadership to respond to the Dalai Lama's olive branch a few days ago, helping to eliminate a long-term irritant in U.S.-China relations.
Then there's the Middle East. Dennis Ross, the longtime Middle East peace negotiator, says he has been frustrated "beyond belief" to see resources showered on the military while diplomacy has to fight for scraps. Mr. Ross argues that an investment of just $1 billion - financing job creation and other grass-roots programs in the West Bank - could significantly increase the prospect of an Israeli-Palestinian peace. But that money isn't forthcoming.
Our intuitive approach to fighting terrorists and insurgents is to blow things up. But one of the most cost-effective counterterrorism methods in countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan may be to build things up, like schooling and microfinance. Girls' education sometimes gets more bang for the buck than a missile.
A new study from the RAND Corporation examined how 648 terror groups around the world ended between 1968 and 2006. It found that by far the most common way for them to disappear was to be absorbed by the political process. The second most common way was to be defeated by police work. In contrast, in only 7 percent of cases did military force destroy the terrorist group.
"There is no battlefield solution to terrorism," the report declares. "Military force usually has the opposite effect from what is intended."
The next president should absorb that lesson and revalidate diplomacy as the primary tool of foreign policy - even if that means talking to ogres. Take Iran. Until recently, the American officials in charge of solving the Iranian problem were not even allowed to meet Iranians.
"We need to believe in the power of American diplomacy, and we should not believe a military conflict with Iran is inevitable," said Nicholas Burns, until recently the under secretary of state for political affairs and for three years the government's point person on Iran. "Our first impulse should be a serious and patient and persistent diplomatic effort. Too often in our national debate we focus on the military option and give short shrift to the diplomatic option."
So here's a first step: Let's agree that diplomats should be every bit as much of an American priority as musicians in military bands.
I invite you to comment on this column on my blog, www.nytimes.com/ontheground, and join me on Facebook at www.facebook.com/kristof.
Send the Marines--Tom Lehrer
We Will All Go Together When We Go--Tom Lehrer
Bob Dylan War Songs
More by this Author
Global Warming Update--2008-2011 This site is an aggregation of articles from reputable sources about scientific research 2008 to the present.
The best approach to improving motor vehicle fuel economy may be to apply a ehicle weight tax. This tax could be tapered in over a 5 to 10 year period with the effect of roughly equalizing the fuel cost per mile in the...
Staph Infections Patients who have sores that will not heal or that are filled with pus should see a doctor and ask to be tested for staph infection. They should not squeeze the sore or try to drain it--that can spread...