dadibobs profile image 60

Should a convicted rapist be castrated?


Two arguments exist regarding this question. For castration is as a punishment, but also to remove the ability to repeat the act. Against castration is based along the idea that rape is a crime of anger and frustration, meaning this would inevitably lead to more violent attacks on women. What do you guys think?

sort by best latest

Seeker7 profile image93

Helen Murphy Howell (Seeker7) says

5 years ago
 |  Comment
  • anujaa 3 years ago

    seeker7... u r right my friend,,there are a lot of innocent men in jail who have commited rape.there are many cases of making consensual sex without knowing her real age.if chemical castration to rape accused then same for false rape accusertoo.

tamarawilhite profile image86

Tamara Wilhite (tamarawilhite) says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
Bretsuki profile image85

William Elliott (Bretsuki) says

5 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Hopewithin 4 years ago

    1. That's true, but DNA evidence is never wrong.

    2. Who cares if it is sexually motivated or by power? Rape is rape, there is only one way they can prevent it in the future and that's by castration.

    3. If rapist is free, he will likely rape again


  • See all 2 comments
duffsmom profile image61

P. Thorpe Christiansen (duffsmom) says

5 years ago
 |  Comment
  • anujaa 3 years ago

    chemical castration also for false rape accuser

Ana Teixeira profile image60

Ana Teixeira says

5 years ago
 |  Comment
WinglessGuardian6 profile image61

WinglessGuardian6 says

5 years ago
 |  Comment
0

Old Empresario says

5 years ago
 |  Comment
working