Josak profile image 60

What's your opinion on dueling? Could it still be used to settle international disputes without war?


There was a time when an honorable duel was acceptable in America (it still is many places around the world) President Andrew Jackson is said to have been in dozens of duels to the death and to have been wounded so many times that he "rattled like a bag of marbles" from the shot still inside him. Could dueling still serve a purpose in America? Saddam Hussein challenged George Bush to a duel with swords to avoid the Iraqi war, to be held on neutral soil, Bush refused, would such a duel be a better solution than the ensuing war that killed up to a million people, most of the innocents?

sort by best latest

FatFreddysCat profile image94

Keith Abt (FatFreddysCat) says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Sheepsquatch profile image

    Sheepsquatch 4 years ago

    Excellent idea. May be a few flaws in the application of the process, but definitely doable.


  • See all 3 comments
d.william profile image85

d.william says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Josak profile image

    Josak 4 years ago

    Yeah well we already do depend on such idiots apparently considering the war happened.

JohnGreasyGamer profile image91

John Roberts (JohnGreasyGamer) says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
ackman1465 profile image60

ackman1465 says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
Sheepsquatch profile image75

Sheepsquatch says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Josak profile image

    Josak 4 years ago

    I don't think everyone would be happy but hat are most people going to do? this certainly worked in past times particularly in classical Greek History.

swordsbane profile image60

William Grant (swordsbane) says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Josak profile image

    Josak 4 years ago

    No it would not be that severe, for example in the Saddam vs Bush one the deal was something along the lines of America would not invade if Saddam won and Iraq would open to full inspection for weapons if Bush won.

working