SEXYLADYDEE profile image 78

Do you support a universal ban on military & assault "like" weapons for non military individuals?


Do you believe that only the military needs assault "type" guns? And that "non military" personal use gun purchases should have access to bullet clips with a maximum of 10 bullets?

sort by best latest

peoplepower73 profile image87

Mike Russo (peoplepower73) says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
CR Rookwood profile image91

Pamela Hutson (CR Rookwood) says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Mitch Alan profile image

    Mitch Alan 4 years ago

    Your "nuclear" comment is completely false. Arms are defined as firearms and "bear" means to carry on one's person.


  • See all 8 comments
ChristinS profile image94

Christin Sander (ChristinS) says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • SEXYLADYDEE profile image

    SEXYLADYDEE 4 years ago

    Well said. The ban refers to only those types of weapons not guns in general. Dee

pagesvoice profile image84

Dennis L. Page (pagesvoice) says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • SEXYLADYDEE profile image

    SEXYLADYDEE 4 years ago

    Thanks. My Gma used to say sense wasn't common. We have to separate the politically motivated jargon that says this is a step towards changing the constitution. It isn't. Dee

LauraD093 profile image82

Laura Tykarski (LauraD093) says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
Mitch Alan profile image86

Mitch Alan says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • AlexDrinkH2O profile image

    AlexDrinkH2O 4 years ago

    Outstanding answer - couldn't have said it better!

Prakash Dighe profile image81

Prakash Dighe says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • SEXYLADYDEE profile image

    SEXYLADYDEE 4 years ago

    Thank you very much for your input. Dee

daskittlez69 profile image79

daskittlez69 says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • collegedad profile image

    collegedad 4 years ago

    daskittlez69, I dare say that many of the same people who are pushing gun legislation are the same people who push to eliminate the death penalty.


  • See all 2 comments
Credence2 profile image85

Credence2 says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • SEXYLADYDEE profile image

    SEXYLADYDEE 4 years ago

    Thank you for your constructive input. Dee

60

Wilbart26 says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
collegedad profile image85

collegedad says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • SEXYLADYDEE profile image

    SEXYLADYDEE 4 years ago

    We agree to disagree. This is an open forum and ideas from both sides are welcome. Equating the banning of one type of weapon with civil rights seems like a stretch to me but you are entitled to your opinion and I/ We respect that. Dee

redwhiskeypete profile image83

redwhiskeypete says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • peoplepower73 profile image

    Mike Russo (peoplepower73) 4 years ago

    You know it's like porn. It's hard to define, but you know it when you see it. Especially when it is being fired!


  • See all 3 comments
Admiral Murrah profile image84

Admiral Murrah says

3 years ago
 |  Comment
starme77 profile image86

starme77 says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
AlexDrinkH2O profile image86

AlexDrinkH2O says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • SEXYLADYDEE profile image

    SEXYLADYDEE 4 years ago

    Would it be better to do nothing when senseless violence is increasing? How is excluding one category of weapons taking anything away from any reasonable collector or owner?


  • See all 3 comments
0

Old Empresario says

4 years ago
 |  Comment
  • peoplepower73 profile image

    Mike Russo (peoplepower73) 4 years ago

    How many times do we have to say this. Your weapons are not going to be confiscated. They are just not going to make any new military style weapons available to the public. The law has to be passed by both the senate and the house.


  • See all 5 comments
bman3725 profile image59

bman3725 says

3 years ago
 |  Comment

3 answers hidden due to negative feedback. Show

working