sort by best latest
My Esoteric says
Very true! We have to keep watchers on the watchers. It's a shame but it's a necessary "evil". Dee
It certainly was a short cover-up; 7 days after the atk, the WH was testifying to Congress that it was a terrorist attack. I think the answer to your question about the response was contained in the report from the investigation into the matter.
Except for the fact that the President was trying to sell a different story to the public in his UN Speech two weeks after the incident. I guess their either intentionally misleading the public or incompetent
You and I must have heard two different speeches. The one I heard had Obama speaking briefly about the attack in Benghazi, but he focused most of his time on the broader subject of peace in the Middle East and tolerence between religions.
This was TWO weeks after the incident...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfiUQASpVdc Why mention it if you're not blaming it on this obsure filmaker. More misleading of the American people. He needs to get his story straight.
- See all 4 commentsHide extra comments
Wayne Brown says
I must point out that at the time the dipomats died, their was no cover-up going on.
Is it a coverup? Is is possible that human beings misjudged the situation and a horrible mess including death occurred? And is it possible we have our hands in too many pots to keep an accurate & appropriate watch over them all? Dee
- See all 2 commentsHide extra comments
Old Empresario says
That brings a different but very interesting spin on this topic. The problem with most conspiracy theories involving govt activities is they are difficult to fact check. Not making them any less true. Thanks for your input. Dee