bethperry profile image 89

Are U.S. taxpayers unnecessarily burdened by the cost of Presidential vacations?


Even as the U.S. government has put sequester budget cuts in place that affect the general public, the Obama family is going on a multi-nation vacation this month. The projected end cost to taxpayers for this trip is between 60-100 million dollars. Is this an extravagance on the part of ANY first family? And if so, what legal changes would you suggest enacted to stop Presidential vacation excesses from occurring in the future?

sort by best latest

jdw7979 profile image78

John David (jdw7979) says

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Gareth Pritchard profile image

    Gareth Pritchard 3 years ago

    Yes people do need to fix this along with the rest of the world and big government. It's the same in the UK, ever expanding governments, tin pot politicians who are supposed to work for us not against us. Plus the cost of European Government for UK.

ParadigmEnacted profile image81

ParadigmEnacted says

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Gareth Pritchard profile image

    Gareth Pritchard 3 years ago

    Yes but you will still have to pay for the army and all those undercover things that swarm around him to protect him and his family because he is one of, if not the, most hated men in the world with targets all over him and his family. Sad but true.


  • See all 3 comments
thegecko profile image85

Warren Samu (thegecko) says

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • bethperry profile image

    bethperry 3 years ago

    Nope. I wish it was.


  • See all 2 comments
Lisa HW profile image82

Lisa HW says

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • ParadigmEnacted profile image

    ParadigmEnacted 3 years ago

    Making small exceptions and concessions here and there is how problems become amplified. The president needs time away just as you and I do, but have any of your jobs paid for your vacation as something separate from a salary?


  • See all 3 comments

1 answer hidden due to negative feedback. Show

working