sort by best latest
wba108, I remember hearing about that, too. And I find it hard to believe the fairytale and the timing for its storytellers were coincidence.
the only person that voted for war is already out of office.
the only person currently responsible for the continuation is still in office.
the current person lied about Benghazi and 4,320 other acts
lies are lies, no matter how you spin them.....
Well said, PerrySpark.
So why didn't we impeach Bush? Kucinich tried, you know. R's not interested. but NOW they sure are...what's the diff?
I think anyone who voted for Obama or Bush or the vast majority of current legislators has voted for war.
For our purposes, lies are lies when you can prove them, and no one is even remotely close to doing so, no matter how you spin it.
lovemychris, I think Bush should have been impeached. But right now there is another man in office, and it is with what has occurred under his watch that our immediate concerns lie with.
Bulloney. After what Bush got away with, any and all future presidents have immunity, just like he did. After what Bush pulled, and how we were treated who spoke out: people have some nerve now even mentioning Obama! U dont get special treatment.
- See all 6 commentsHide extra comments
Leslie McCowen says
lovemychris, we should be respectful of all those that die under the watch of careless and callous leaders.
yes, there were no lies spread about the previous bombings, so now that you know the difference, will it make any?
Nobody asked! Nobody would even consider that Bush has something to do w it! I'm asking, What's the difference now? Why accuse Obama from the start? Oh,and Bush lied plenty.PULENTY.
- See all 3 commentsHide extra comments