jonnycomelately profile image 85

Why should a person of Muslim persuasion be less qualified to be President?


Surely it is the ability of a person to distance him/her self from any political/religious/commercial bias and to act in the best interests of the Nation as a whole that most befits a Leader. Similarly, a persons sexual orientation should have no bearing provided those non-biased conditions apply....without any backhanders for anyone.

sort by best latest

bradmasterOCcal profile image82

bradmasterOCcal says

12 months ago
 |  Comment
LoliHey profile image81

Lolita Monroe (LoliHey) says

12 months ago
 |  Comment
  • lovemychris profile image

    Leslie McCowen (lovemychris) 12 months ago

    You're not under Sharia, you're under Noahide. George Walker Bush, 1991. Public Law 102-14, 102 Congress.

tamarawilhite profile image87

Tamara Wilhite (tamarawilhite) says

11 months ago
 |  Comment
Ericdierker profile image82

Eric Dierker (Ericdierker) says

12 months ago
 |  Comment
  • jonnycomelately profile image

    Alan (jonnycomelately) 12 months ago

    I would hope that it is, Eric. But would a very biased Christian President limit my freedoms by virtue of my sexuality? Any better than under Sharia?


  • See all 2 comments
aguasilver profile image86

John Harper (aguasilver) says

12 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Austinstar profile image

    Austinstar 12 months ago

    Obama is a constitutional scholar and NOT a muslim. Why do you persist in believing these two lies?


  • See all 5 comments
working