NO. Clinton wins, the liberal authoritarians have four more years to continue to demand their right to silence everyone they disagree with, shut down all organizations contrary to them in the name of creating unity (only by silencing dissent), criminalizing contrary opinions and punishing opinion holders. And to quote Dr. Peterson, when people cannot speak, you leave them only violence. And that's BAD.
Suppose Trump wins. First, he's not the anti-Christ, despite the DNC and mainstream media portraying him and many other conservative leaders as such. Yes there would be liberal violence at his victory, but there is already liberal violence from hate mobs trying to destroy people's lives online and offline for expressing non-PC opinions to attacking people physically for wearing Trump gear. The difference is that unlike the polar bear hunting games where black on white assaults are ignored but the only white on black assault gets the DoJ involved or college liberal mobs attacking people trying to see a conservative speaker, the power of the state would no longer be behind the liberal bullies.
Look at the video of liberals beating up a black homeless woman who supports Trump because Trump favors the poor American versus the immigrants who show up and get welfare/jobs. The people beating a homeless black woman, #Hillbullies, said "you spew hate, you get hate". When someone says we can physically attack you because we hate your words and your words equal violence, they have justified any and all evil actions in the name of THEIR ideology. And that does not allow for peace unless these liberal bullies either give it up or are fought against, and only the first unlikely option leads to peace.