In 2011 total unfunded (above balanced) federal spending was 1.316 trillion dollars, military spending was 1.415 trillion dollars. We should not even be talking about cutting health programs that save lives or reducing the wages of teachers, firemen and policemen before looking at how to reduce military spending (which by the way the Ryan budget would increase significantly) and that Romney's budget would increase even more.
Don't worry, Josak.
They'll find a way to justify increased military spending.
Already building up to it...
If the American people fall for it again we are even dumber than I thought.
They are even using the exact same excuse, I am always saying that people who don't know their history are doomed to repeat it but it's been less than 10 years, you would think people would remember what happened last time conservatives assured us a middle eastern country had WMD's and invaded it on that basis.
With only one letter difference, can you blame people for not knowing or caring if there's a difference?
Especially when there are billions of dollars being spent to whip them up into another Islamophobic froth?
At the same time luring them into a false promise of prosperity...
Once R/R remove those pesky regulations and give corporations more tax breaks the only logical conclusion is that the corporations will jump to hire/rehire American workers.
Your saying is apt. Here's another one: "We get the government we deserve."
not a fan of Eisenhower but this make sense
“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron.”
Wait just a second here, PDH.
Wasn't Eisenhower a general?
And a president?
And a Republican?
Who served the U.S. during a period of relative peace and prosperity?
How come the Rs never quote this guy?
Nevermind. We know why. The R party of the 1950s no longer exists.
by Grace Marguerite Williams2 years ago
Obama administration? Why? Why not?
by Holle Abee5 years ago
Why?? And yes, I know most conservatives support this, but I do not. How many weapons and soldiers do we really need to protect ourselves? Aren't the rest just "overkill"? The left screamed about Bush's...
by Edwin Clark6 months ago
Instead of giving US corporations bailout/loans the government should give each of its citizens $1,000,000 to spend on anything they want within the United States.According to the US Census there are 305 million...
by Mom Kat4 years ago
Alright, so I have a question & I would appreciate not being attacked. With the debates and election coming up, as usual, one of the big topics is the national deficit.My question is this: Who do we owe that...
by kerryg6 years ago
Alan Grayson is one heckuva BAMF. I doubt this will get passed, but it's a fascinating idea.Grayson's speech:Mr. Speaker. Today I introduce H.R.5353: the "War Is Making You Poor Act." The "War Is Making...
by GNelson4 years ago
The following is from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute:1,630 Billion - Total estimated military spending in 2011 698 Billion - Total estimated U.S. military spending in 2011...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.