Lets say you want to write a news article about the presidential candidates... and how they are viewed by economists.
Step 1 - Send a form email to hundreds of economists. Ask them who would be better for the economy.
Step 2 - Get 17 responses back. Act like that's all you wanted to get.
Step 3 - Write an article about how 9/17 selected Romney, and 3/17 selected Obama.
Step 4 - Give it a title "Economists RELUCTANTLY pick Romney
Step 5 - Get yelled at by your editor for yelling in the title, and breaking formatting rules.
Step 6 - Ensure that you don't qualify the claims of your study, cite names, or provide any other helpful data.
Step 7 - Publish: http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/30/news/ec … ?hpt=hp_t2
Let's not confuse journalists with pollsters.
The journalist is not looking for a representative sampling of economics with a margin of error of +/-3.
Getting 17 responses back is actually a pretty good response.
It might be helpful to the reader to know where these economists are.
I see one is from Brown and one is from Cal Lu. So are we to assume all the economists are economics INSTRUCTORS at UNIVERSITIES?
As to the the slant of the reporting.
The journalist in question could have left the story at 9/17 economists favor Romney and 3/17 favor Obama. He could have even said 3x more economists pick Romney than Obama. And that would be technically true, right?
Some news outlets would jump at being able to paint the story in such glowing light for Romney.
Until you read what the economists actually say to qualify their pick.
The real story here is the huge ambivalence.
A full 5 out of 17 refused to pick either one!
And those that did make selections caveated their picks pretty heavily.
There are sufficient citations for both sides of the story -- quotes from a couple who think Romney will be better and a couple who think a second Obama term might improve things.
For a roundup story like this, I think the reporter did a decent job of citing sources to represent what are basically the THREE sides of story.
You obviously disagree.
by Ralph Deeds4 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/19/opini … .html?_r=0"But Mr. Romney, it turns out, doesn’t have a plan; he’s just faking it. In saying that, I don’t mean that I disagree with his economic philosophy; I...
by Rod Martin Jr4 years ago
A recent YouTube News report by WXIX Fox19's Ben Swann reveals something you're not like to find out about on the evening news. Obama is ignoring a federal court order regarding his actions under the NDAA (National...
by Susan Reid4 years ago
Good for Soledad O'Brien!CNN anchor Soledad O'Brien debunked the pervasive right-wing media falsehood that President Obama "stole $700 billion" from Medicare. Right-wing media have repeatedly claimed that the...
by Marlene Bertrand4 years ago
Recently, I have been reading reports about how President Obama's birth certificate is a forgery. According to one reporter, the white house has a PDF version of the certificate that is publically available. I looked at...
by Susan Reid4 years ago
NJ Governor Chris Christie, who as recently as a week ago was a harsh critic of Obama's leadership has a new BFF: Barack Obama.He's been effusive (some believe TOO effusive) in his praise for the POTUS and his handling...
by Holle Abee5 years ago
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 … 24916.htmlMan, if that isn't the pot calling the kettle black! What about Obama's donors and bundlers? I really thought Obama was above something like this.
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.