This isn't a combative thread. I'm actually just looking for some opinions on the issue.
Do you believe the United States is a true free market (however you choose to define the term)? If so, why? If not, why not?
In a free market economy businesses fail and rebuild as needed by supply and demand. Nothing is too big to fail in the free market. Sometimes things just need to end. It is a silly company that continues to make something nobody wants or uses. Like black and white television. It's time ended a long time ago..
When the government subsidizes any kind of business you eliminate the freedom of the economy. You give an unfair advantage to whomever the government is subsidizing. Businesses cannot compete with subsidized businesses no matter how well run and efficient. I love how government deregulates businesses by changing the regulations- Usually they deregulate by giving more regulations, and less ability to function. It is amazing how adding rules is supposed to convince us we have fewer rules.
The idea of a true free market economy in the U.S. has been fantasy for almost a century. Early 20th century introduces the Progressive Era, working against child labor, graft, monopolies etc. Books like "the Jungle" and other startling revelations made it necessary for the J.P. Morgans, Rockefellers and Goulds to be reined in. As Tireless says, subsidies, the involvement of the government to promote goods and services for specific purpose giving advantages in the tax code to some over others is just one example of how this economy is anything but 'free market'. There is no such thing as a simple lemonade stand, anymore.
The idea of a 'free market' laissez faire approach to the economy is less than desirable. A avaricious few will make certain that all the chips are in their corner at the expense of the public at large.
Absolutely not. The free market is a situation where all voluntary economic transactions are allowed to take place unfettered. Where do we begin with the United States economy?
Principally, the Federal Reserve claims a violent monopoly of money, and in turn, counterfeiting; its quantitative easing has debased the dollar to something like 2% of its original value, relieving the citizenry of purchasing power. 'Federal Reserve Notes' were once tradable for hard Gold, but this is no longer possible. It is also illegal to use competing currencies. This cannot be considered 'free'.
Other government monopolies include: the roads, education, health, the police, and the military. Voluntary economic transactions in these sectors are at least limited if not prohibited. This cannot be considered 'free'.
Legislation of transactions are too numerous to count - hundreds of thousands of new laws are added to the books each year. The average citizen will unintentionally break at least 3 laws every single day. This cannot be considered 'free'.
Corporate socialism is rife. Subsidies to favoured corporations in the medical, food and financial sectors create inequalities and monopolies. Bailouts incentivise poor economic decisions by offering resources confiscated from the public to large corporations who fail. This cannot be considered 'free'.
Prohibition criminalises non-violent transactions, whether it be drugs, prostitution or gambling, overcrowding prisons (another monopoly, come to think of it). This cannot be considered 'free'.
So, the United States cannot be said to have a 'free market' in any sense. The US is a 'mixed economy', a mix of violent monopoly and diminishing voluntary transactions, and to put it harshly (perhaps more accurately): fascist.
Do you think there has ever been a true free market on the scale of an entire nation?
No such thing as a true free market. and especially this country where regulations are enacted frequently to stifle true free trade.
by Mike Russo2 years ago
During Obama's state of the union speech, he stated that he wants the minimum wage raised and is going to raise it for federal employees. He implied this will create jobs. The republican party countered...
by Ralph Deeds3 years ago
Economists Agree: Solutions Are ElusiveBy EDUARDO PORTERPublished: April 23, 2013 "Last week the International Monetary Fund hosted a conference of some of the world’s top macroeconomists to...
by Don W6 years ago
Would a free market have prevented this from happening?I'm guessing the libertarian argument would be that the failings of state regulation was a contributing factor. Those failings stemming from the fact that the...
by Sooner283 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/world … odayspaperhttp://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/23/world … wanted=allEmployees work in dangerous conditions, are paid a pittance of a wage, and don't even have the...
by James Smith3 years ago
This is partially a joke - everyone thinks Jesus agrees with them. A question to consider though: although Jesus advocated compassion, charity and liberty, he did not advocate the use of violence to achieve any end,...
by Gary Anderson4 years ago
Hey Even, Mises said big business was not evil. To be fair, he did not live to see the TBTF banks, but I am waiting for his libertarian followers duped by this stuff to say the TBTF banks ARE evil. Say it Evan!Here is...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.