jump to last post 1-5 of 5 discussions (23 posts)

SNL's violent Jesus clip

  1. Onusonus profile image85
    Onusonusposted 4 years ago

    Last year the president went to the UN and apologized to all the Muslim countries for a crappy anti- Mohammed video saying, "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”-BHO
    To my knowledge the producer of that film is still in jail. So where is the media uproar for this? When will the president apologize to Christians, denounce the creators of SNL, and throw them in jail?
    http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/nbc-skit-has … s-rampage/

    1. Josak profile image59
      Josakposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      "It's so unfair that Muslims get more attention than my faith"
      Fixed it for you.
      Yes insults against Islam are more important because Islam is a growing faith still dominated by hardliners and thus have real world impacts, Christianity is a dying faith more and more dominated by moderates and thus jokes at their expense have little real world impact.

    2. profile image0
      Brenda Durhamposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Obama?  Actually defend Christianity?
      I'll believe that when I see it.
      Probably when pigs fly.

      Yeah that skit is horrible.

      1. MelissaBarrett profile image60
        MelissaBarrettposted 4 years ago in reply to this
        1. profile image0
          Brenda Durhamposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          lol
          Pigs haven't flown yet.
          Despite rumors to the contrary.

      2. Onusonus profile image85
        Onusonusposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        What are you talking about? He defends Christianity all the time! lol
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RWHdQBMgb4

        1. profile image0
          Brenda Durhamposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          Yup.  wink
          I've seen probably all of those instances where he offends, not defends,  Christianity.
          He's a stubborn fool;  those are his two strongest assets.

          1. Onusonus profile image85
            Onusonusposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            Did I say defend? Oops...

  2. Onusonus profile image85
    Onusonusposted 4 years ago

    Dang, Jesus gets swept under the rug again.

  3. PrettyPanther profile image85
    PrettyPantherposted 4 years ago

    You forgot the rest of the quote:

    "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.  But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.”

    Also, the man is in jail for unrelated charges having nothing to do with making the video.

    "The man, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who is also known as Mark Basseley Youssef, a name he legally adopted in 2002, appeared in Federal District Court here and pleaded guilty to four charges of violating a probation sentence imposed on him in 2010 after a bank fraud conviction. Each of his guilty pleas, worked out with prosecutors in advance, was related to his maintenance of the two identities."
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/ma … .html?_r=0

    Now, on to the next fake outrage.

    1. PhoenixV profile image80
      PhoenixVposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Turned out it was just a bunch of disinformation propagated by the White House to cover up the truth behind Benghazi.  So there is no credibility there, one way or the other.

    2. Onusonus profile image85
      Onusonusposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Outrage is for liberals. Conservatives simply point out the raging hypocrisy that is constantly on display by liberals in office.

      1. Zelkiiro profile image83
        Zelkiiroposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        It's a pretty nice view up there on Bullshit Mountain, eh?

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfCBurnHCh8

        1. Onusonus profile image85
          Onusonusposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          He has some interesting ideas. Here's a little tidbit about the facts of life made just for economically inept folks like Stewart.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCXcU91QIGM

  4. profile image61
    whoisitposted 4 years ago

    Do people still watch this irrelevant show?

  5. psycheskinner profile image79
    psycheskinnerposted 4 years ago

    Feel free to threaten riots if that is how you want to get that kind of attention. 

    Otherwise you could just realize that freedom of speech includes offensive speech, and the president only gets involved when it is a matter of pressing national interest.

    1. profile image61
      whoisitposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      So its ok to use racial slurs?

      1. psycheskinner profile image79
        psycheskinnerposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        We are not talking about what is "okay".  We are talking about what is legal.  And yes it is.  Have you listened to the radio recently?

        You don't have to like it, but the President doesn't need to apologize for it either.

        1. profile image61
          whoisitposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          Two different stances on two different threads.

          1. psycheskinner profile image79
            psycheskinnerposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            Incorrect. Failure to comprehend. Once I realized the use of the slurs was not associated with a threat, I saw there was not hate crime.  And indeed, that he had not been charged with one.

            1. profile image61
              whoisitposted 4 years ago in reply to this

              Not at all correct.

              You
              "If you use a pile of racial slurs and then say "I want to choke you to death" to a woman standing right in front of you on the sidewalk... well. It sounds both hatey and crimey to me."

              1. psycheskinner profile image79
                psycheskinnerposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                If he had done that (which he hadn't) it would be a crime because he threatened to kill someone for being black.

                Just saying black people are [bad thing] is not a crime, it's just ignorance.  Ignorance is legal.

                1. profile image61
                  whoisitposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                  Apparently not in New York where he could be charged with a crime for using offensive language.

 
working