jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (50 posts)

Hey guys! We may be having two more wars!

  1. Barefootfae profile image59
    Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago

    How they gonna get paid for hmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

    1. profile image0
      Justsilvieposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Why not just charge it like Bush did!

      1. Barefootfae profile image59
        Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        They can do that with a straight face and look you in the eye?
        After years and years and years and years of hearing how Bush was supposed to have done that?

        1. profile image0
          Brenda Durhamposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          haha
          anything the great wise Obama does is not only okay, but brilliant! roll
            dontcha know??!   He does all those things, yes, with a straight face.   But I have noticed that he quite often does NOT look ya in the eye.  Very telling.    Hillary Clinton does the same thing, only better (the avoidance of eye contact).   Wonder which one learned it from  the other.........

        2. PrettyPanther profile image83
          PrettyPantherposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          Who are "they"?

          1. Barefootfae profile image59
            Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            Anyone who ranted about military actions previous to this administration but will allow anything to happen in this one without a peep.

            1. PrettyPanther profile image83
              PrettyPantherposted 4 years ago in reply to this

              And who would that be?  I have yet to hear anyone I know who opposed the invasion of Iraq say that they currently support the invasion of any other country.  So, who?

              1. Barefootfae profile image59
                Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                Who opposed Iraq?
                Where are they now?

                1. PrettyPanther profile image83
                  PrettyPantherposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                  You're the one who brought it up, so you tell me.

                  1. Barefootfae profile image59
                    Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                    I love it.
                    Got amnesia do you kitty kat?

                    Iraq happens and it's wars not paid for.
                    There has already been someone on this thread try to shift the conversation around to Romney.
                    I am talking about why was it a big deal for George Bush to get into action......and theoretically not pay for it....but we now have this administration sabre rattling towards Iran and Syria and I have not seen one LETTER in opposition from any journalists or politicians on the same side of the aisle who scram about the cost every time you money budgets or money and get them with a hundred yards of a microphone..
                    Now please stop insulting my intelligence by pretending you have never seen or heard or maybe even participated in such activities.

                2. junkseller profile image87
                  junksellerposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                  156 members of Congress voted against Iraq in 2002 (23 Senators and 133 Representatives). Of those 156 members, there were 147 Democrats, 7 Republicans, and 2 Independents. Those 147 Democrats tend to be progressives (as in the farthest to the left). They for the most part, like Progressive citizens, oppose war period. They opposed Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, as well as all the drones flying over half of the world, and they will oppose wars with Iran, Syria, or anybody else, absent an extremely good reason.

                  You seem to be accusing people of flip-flopping, though, without any actual flip-flopping identified it's a bit of a hollow claim. And considering it is people over on the right who don't seem to oppose war for ANY reason I don't know why you're complaining about the side that does at least have some opposition.

        3. profile image0
          Justsilvieposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          I was being facetious! I am against any war, since it brings us nothing but our kids home in body bags and debts and the treat against us is minute. I know they are flinging around the words, but you can't blame this one on Obama. He is trying to tone down Israel who is biting at the bit, to start a war. Brings to mind the old saying "lose lips sink ships"!

          And Bush did do it!

          1. Barefootfae profile image59
            Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            Oh well I was aware you can't blame Obama.
            Why would anyone try and do that?

            As for Israel what do you do when the little guy with the WalMart jacket in Iran says he is going to vaporize you once they get their nuke?

            1. profile image0
              Justsilvieposted 4 years ago in reply to this

              You keep doing what you are doing! You use diplomacy and sanctions. And you let them keep talking because eventually their own people will drag them down, because I really don't think people as smart and educated as Iranians do not realize an attack would probably mean the Ancient land of Persia would wind up being a glass bowl.

              1. Barefootfae profile image59
                Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                They tried a couple years ago and what happened?

                1. profile image0
                  Justsilvieposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                  who tried what?

                  1. profile image60
                    retief2000posted 4 years ago in reply to this

                    A revolt among the Iranian people was violently put down by the Revolutionary Guard and the Iranian government.  It was in some of the papers.

      2. profile image85
        Education Answerposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Why not print it, like Obama does?

      3. profile image60
        retief2000posted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Really?  GWB is the sole culprit? Congress has authorized and re-authorized funding for the Iraq and Afghan wars since 2001 but they bare no responsibility, even when the Democrats held the reins? Even while Obama has been POTUS?  Even while all other aspects of government has run up 5 times the debt of the Bush years?  Really? 

        Aren't we supposed to be enjoying the vast sums of money freed up by the end of the Iraq war?  Isn't that how we are to pay for the new green economy?  Isn't that what Obama has promised?  Really, GWB is the villain here.

        A war with Iran is inevitable and not because Mitt Romney, whoever he is, wants it.  War with Iran will come for two reasons. One, the squandered opportunity that was Iran's brief "green" revolution in 2009/10, a genuine people's revolt that Obama ignored.  Two, the direction mapped out by the Iranian government since 1979.

        1. Barefootfae profile image59
          Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          I agree and you have explained better than I can what this thread is about.

    2. Josak profile image61
      Josakposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      So this is a thread blaming the Obama administration for two wars that he has actually not started yet...

      You guys are very funny.

      1. Barefootfae profile image59
        Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Actually it's not blaming...
        It's trying to see how many will allow him to do it without raising so much as a tiny finger against it.
        Which will be most of them. Indoctrination.

        1. Cody Hodge5 profile image61
          Cody Hodge5posted 4 years ago in reply to this

          It depends, are we going to declare "mission accomplished" seven years before the war actually ends?

  2. Barefootfae profile image59
    Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago

    The places I'm hearing are Iran and Syria.

    1. Uninvited Writer profile image82
      Uninvited Writerposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      I haven't heard anything. I do know that many, many politicians on the right want to go to war with Iran. Romney certainly seemed to want to.

      1. Barefootfae profile image59
        Barefootfaeposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        But it wouldn't be Romney doing it.
        How we gonna pay for it?

        1. profile image60
          whoisitposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          They will find a way to blame Bush and the lapdogs will believe it.

          1. profile image85
            Education Answerposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            whoisit,

            Could this be a war for oil?  That's what Bush was blamed for, among countless other things. . .  How is the intelligence?  Is Obama lying about our intelligence?  Isn't that what liberals accuse Bush of doing?

  3. profile image0
    Justsilvieposted 4 years ago

    And why are these forums full of Trolls? Half the people on here have never written a hub... don't you all have friends or anyone else to play with?

 
working