Whilst more and more of the UK electorate believe they should have a vote on whether the UK should leave the EU it seems US politicians think its a bad thing, why.
Even a former UK chancillor has now said the unthinkable and concluded that he thought the UK would do better outside of the European union.
I wanna check this out more when I have time.
I already don't understand the purpose of the EU really.
Is it mostly monetary? Or is it societal and political?
The main underlying purpose of the European Union was to bring peace to the region and reduce the risk of nationalism raising again. Under the first beginnings of the European coal and steel community and then the European economic community it increased it political powers and started to expand.
Under the Maastricht treaty the member states became the European Union which seeks to centralise political power and trade.
After almost 60 yrs of exsistance some point to its success in stoping war within Europe, others however are more inclined to believe the union had now become a petty dictatorship that used its power to hold sway over nations and their economies without proper mandate from the electorate of those countries.
US politicians, as all politicians do, love statism, and love statism everywhere they can. The expansion of state worldwide is mutually beneficial to the US and the EU. The more countries that belong to the bureaucracy, the less dissent there is to the bureaucratic/imperialist empire.
They cannot also be seen as hypocritical: they cannot support the independence of one country whilst quelling all suggestions of nullification and secession of the states in the US.
by Justin Earick2 years ago
While a 28th Amendment stating that corporations are not people and money is not speech would be ideal - how about compulsory voting? What if we used the carrot approach - say increasing tax-credits for voting in...
by My Esoteric3 months ago
In both the Federalist Papers AND the Constitutional Convention, it is extremely clear the distaste most of those involved in creating today's America had for democracy, which they saw as mob rule which allows...
by GA Anderson12 months ago
Should a Congressman Only Stand For Moral and Sensible Actions... that benefit all U.S. citizens?Or should they stand for the desired actions of their electors?I think it is the latter.If they cannot, in good...
by Simon Cook4 years ago
I am not a Democrat or Republican - thought I'd say that up front.Why are the Republicans debating the Health Care bill again? I know they are against it and will repeal it. I know they've voted on it before - isn't it...
by chigoiyke6 years ago
....soonest it will be; why did they kick out the British PM - what's his name again? Gordon Brown. I have been following the British election with some amount of attention but I still don't get why a serving PM is...
by Writer Fox18 months ago
Hillary Clinton is too old to be president of the U.S.Hillary would be 69 years old if she assumes office in 2017, which would tie her with Ronald Reagan for being the oldest US president ever elected. (You...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.