jump to last post 1-6 of 6 discussions (13 posts)

Should it be legal for the federal gov to purchase goods from foreign

  1. andrew savage profile image62
    andrew savageposted 4 years ago

    Should it be legal for the federal government to purchase goods produced outside of the United States? What are the reprecussions of the government purchasing goods from outside of the United States?

    1. psycheskinner profile image80
      psycheskinnerposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Of course.
      1) Some good are not even available in the US
      2) Even "US made" stuff is often partly made overseas
      3) They have a duty to spend our tax dollars frugally

      Buying local is sometimes a good idea, but not always.

  2. profile image0
    JaxsonRaineposted 4 years ago

    Of course! Why not?

    Trade is good.

    1. andrew savage profile image62
      andrew savageposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Is it good if it is your money that is going directly overseas via a government agency instead of the traditional private enterprise?
      Should the government be required to procure the capital goods necessary to be self-sufficient? If we were in debt would it be unwise to purchase goods from outside of our own homeland when we have bills to pay?

  3. profile image0
    JaxsonRaineposted 4 years ago

    Comparative advantage.

    Consider Country 1 and Country 2.

    In Country 1, a worker with machinery can produce 6 shoes an hour or 6 shirts an hour.
    In Country 2, a worker without machinery can produce 2 shoes an hour or 3 shirts an hour.

    Now, with two hours of work, each country can produce the following:

    Country 1 - 6 shoes, 6 shirts
    Country 2 - 2 shoes, 3 shirts

    Total = 8 shoes, 9 shirts.

    But, if they know about comparative advantage and are willing to trade, then they can produce the following:

    Country 1 - 9 shoes, 3 shirts (1.5 hours shoes 0.5 hours shirts)
    Country 2 - 0 shoes, 6 shirts (2 hours shirts)

    Total = 9 shoes, 9 shirts

    Working together, they can create more wealth with their time, then they can trade. Country 2 can trade shirts for shoes, and country 1 can trade shoes for shirts, and both can end up with more than they could have made on their own.

    1. maxoxam41 profile image78
      maxoxam41posted 4 years ago in reply to this

      It is an idealistic view. Realism would imply that westerners sought for natural resources and agricultural produce in counterparty they sold their manufactured goods. However the game has always been rigged by westerners exploiting to their benefits Africa's, South America's and Asia's commodities. In doing so, the West got richer and the South got poorer or "in development". Is it without counting on the legislations favoring their interests. Davos privileges superpowers.

      1. profile image0
        JaxsonRaineposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        In reality, people are better off when they trade. Why would you ever trade for something that is worth less than what you are trading away?

        The parts of the world that the West trades with are better off than if we didn't trade with them.

    2. andrew savage profile image62
      andrew savageposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      I understand why private industries partake in exporting their jobs overseas, but why would taxpayers in need of jobs that provide a live-able wage tolerate paying into an open system that progressively loses money?
      If our government only purchased goods from its homeland would we not save money in the long run? Many government officials advocate buying locally and thinking globally, but how can anyone take them seriously when it is currently legal for federal agencies to purchase supplies from other nations, let alone nations that the USA is in proxy-wars with?

  4. maxoxam41 profile image78
    maxoxam41posted 4 years ago

    Trading seems to be an obligation. A new trend is building though, with the BRIC, the ALBA formations... countries trade in a fairer fashion. Let us remember Chavez who instigated this movement of fairness from the shackles of the west. They use another currency to free themselves from the dollar domination.
    However it is an interesting question knowing that during a crisis shouldn't we privilege our economy versus a foreign one? Shouldn't we encourage local production versus international? Shouldn't the government penalize through heavy taxation any offshore production arriving in our households in their final destination with an insane profit margin? Shouldn't the government be independent from the pressure of lobbying? To those questions, I answer positively yes.

    1. andrew savage profile image62
      andrew savageposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      I agree. Perhaps the problem is that American culture is losing the desire to work. Granted that many people with college degrees do want to work and are working, it is becoming a problem for those without college degrees as blue color jobs are almost all but gone, save the building construction industry, resulting in a competition for simple jobs in convenience and retail. Is there anything useful that Americans can learn from the initiative measures of Chavez?

  5. profile image0
    JaxsonRaineposted 4 years ago

    Only if you want to hurt the country.

    1. andrew savage profile image62
      andrew savageposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Currently it is legal for federal agencies to purchase from nearly any other nation. Currently, most of the supplies the Department of Veterans' Affairs purchases are made in China.

  6. Springboard profile image79
    Springboardposted 4 years ago

    I certainly think that it should be a strong consideration by the federal government to purchase goods from mostly American suppliers. Anyone who has followed me for any length of time knows I am not a protectionist, but I am also not a huge fan of globalization in the sense that I think that American manufacturing has not benefited by globalization, but rather has taken a back seat. This has put many Americans out of work, and I think has been a large contributing factor in stagnant wages, and widening of the gap between the rich and the poor.

    Ultimately I think the full extent of capitalism should reign. It is survival of the fittest. It is about stiff and strong competition. And when it comes to the federal government, for the sake of tax payers I do think the dollars have to be looked at when comparing ANY purchase made by the federal government.

    I do not agree that buying foreign made good by the federal government should be illegal. I do think that strong efforts should be made to buy as many goods and services from American companies producing in America as is possible to do.

 
working