What people think non-interventionists are saying: "Don't intervene in Syria because we are selfish hate the Syrian people"
What they are actually saying: "Adding more violence to an already violent and ambiguous situation is not going to assist in the larger aim of peace in the region"
Can we continue with the debate from there instead of 4th-grade level argumentation?
Top 10 unproven claims for war against Syria.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-j- … 70763.html
In a display of supreme wit, the Curmudgeon would speculate that perhaps Mr. Kucinich was not invited to join Mr. Kerry in the closed-to-the-public "classified briefings" that seem to have persuaded some other lawmakers. Or perhaps they were really persuaded by being invited into the "Club."
But to answer at a 4th grade level - shouldn't it all boil down to the question of why the U.S. should be the only nation contemplating taking action - even if Assad did do it?
My opinion is that whether he did or did not do it is irrelevant to our, (U.S.), decision to get involved. Shouldn't the real determinant be national security implications?
The very fact that only a punitive strike is planned - seems to prove to me that we should not do it. Do we really want to be the world's "spanker?"
I believe you have answered your question. It lies in the field of morality; people are being hurt, and as we are the most moral people in the world it is up to us to enforce those morals. Human rights (as defined and practiced in the US) must be upheld worldwide, by force as necessary, and hang what other countries think or want. The good of the US is irrelevant.
And yes, we are the worlds disciplinarian, and have been for many years.
Rather sad, isn't it? How we ever got to that position (we are the most righteous in the world) I'll never know.
Well yes, if violence is to be justified at all, it has to be justified as an act of self-defense. What war is in this scenario is finding out that a neighbour is hitting his wife, and then bombarding the house with grenades.
10 Chemical Weapons Attacks Washington Doesn't Want You to Talk About
Washington doesn't merely lack the legal authority for a military intervention in Syria. It lacks the moral authority. We're talking about a government with a history of using chemical weapons against innocent people far more prolific and deadly than the mere accusations Assad faces from a trigger-happy Western military-industrial complex, bent on stifling further investigation before striking.
http://www.policymic.com/articles/62023 … talk-about
Syrians are killing Syrians, so we should kill Syrians to save the Syrians from Syrians?
Tear gas is a chemical weapon of war? The A bomb is, too? And aerial bombardments of Fallujah left thousands of tons of depleted Uranium that has caused 50% of new births to be deformed?
Where do people get such ideas is beyond me.
by LhouvieBlue5 years ago
It is very serious situation and Syria is facing a chaos world where in more Syrians are dying each day passed.UN Security Council made an urgent meeting towards this event and how they can help the people of the...
by RanaKm2 months ago
I have a very bad luck in my life.... I do believe in the existence of luck but not in my life ....Unfortunately, I hope I'm the only one because I don't want others to experience the same things that I have been/am...
by Credence210 months ago
I found this article from the Denver Post. I am always distressed when my native Colorado struggles to shuck off the husk of the last vestiges of reaction in the attempt to become ever more and more blue. That damnable...
by GA Anderson3 years ago
Or...Here we go again - same old same oldOr...The more things change, the more they stay the sameObama and Biden were castrating Bush for talking about moving against Iran - Biden even talked impeachment.But here they...
by Judy Specht11 months ago
We are being told the refugees being relocated to Europe are widows and orphans.I want to be compassionate. So I imagined myself in the position of a Syrian widow. Would I want to be taken away from my home...
by Susan Reid4 years ago
I can only surmise he's setting us up for a super duper vetting job by the Romney campaign on whoever they're going to announce as his VEEP.But seriously.Why is Dick Cheney getting airtime in 2012 talking about the...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.